Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Asus ZenPad 7.0 Z370CG (1GB + 8GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£140RAM capacity:1 GBInternal storage:8 GBScreen size:7 inchesChipset:Intel Atom x3-C3230

Asus ZenPad 7.0 Z370CG (1GB + 8GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 13 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Asus ZenPad 7.0 Z370CG (1GB + 8GB)
5.9/10

Overall score

Score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

35%

4.9

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

4.9

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 6.9, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 91% of tablets
7.0

Value for money

Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

9.8

Price

â–¼Worse than 83%
4.9

Technical score

Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

22%

5.0

Performance

20%

4.2

Display

16%

6.3

Camera

14%

2.8

Battery

12%

5.9

Connectivity

8%

5.2

Software

5%

6.1

Design

3%

3.9

Audio

â–¼Worse than 92%
4.9

Reviews score

Reviews score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

4.9

Mark 7.6 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.4

Average grade

20%

8.0

Popularity

Grades by review (13)
8 reviews: 0 with a printed score, 8 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 93%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • asus-zenpad-7-0-z370cg-1gb-8gb
asus-zenpad-7-0-z370cg-1gb-8gb
Where to buy
    N/A~ £140
Other versions:
1GB + 8GB2GB + 16GB

What reviewers say about the Asus ZenPad 7.0 Z370CG (1GB + 8GB)

Based on 8 · 5

Reviewers praise the design and software, split on size, sound and battery, and agree gaming and the camera disappoint.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Asus ZenPad 7.0 Z370CG (1GB + 8GB)

Technical score
Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

22%

5.0

Performance

20%

4.2

Display

16%

6.3

Camera

14%

2.8

Battery

12%

5.9

Connectivity

8%

5.2

Software

5%

6.1

Design

3%

3.9

Audio

4.9
Reviews score
4.9
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

9.8

Price

7.0
RAM capacity
1 GB
This tablet has 1 GB of RAM, which is less than 78% of tablets and equal to 19.1% of tablets.
Process node
28 nm
This tablet is built on a 28 nm process, which is larger than 65.1% of tablets and equal to 17.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
8 GB
This tablet has 8 GB of internal storage, which is less than 93.6% of tablets and equal to 4.8% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
Intel Atom x3-C3230
This tablet runs on Intel Atom x3-C3230, which is less advanced than 76.3% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1280×800
This tablet has a 1280×800 screen, which is less sharp than 68.1% of tablets and equal to 21.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
216 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 216 ppi, which is lower than 52% of tablets and equal to 3.7% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
This tablet protects its screen with Corning Gorilla Glass, which is more durable than 45.4% of tablets and the same as 32.8% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
?
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 2 MP resolution, which is lower than 53.8% of tablets and equal to 25.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0, which is wider than 57.4% of tablets and equal to 24.7% of tablets.
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
3,450 mAh
This tablet has 3,450 mAh battery capacity, which is smaller than 93.5% of tablets and equal to 0.6% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
This tablet charges at 10 W, which is slower than 60.9% of tablets and equal to 33.3% of tablets.
Battery life
8 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 8 hours, which is shorter than that of 72.2% of tablets and equal to that of 11.9% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 56.9% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
no
This tablet does not have built-in LTE. 42.9% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 47.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
no
This tablet does not support direct OS updates. 79.8% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
272 g
This tablet weighs 272 g, which is lighter than 97.4% of tablets and equal to 0.3% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
no
This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory. 84.3% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
1
This tablet has a microphone array of 1, which is more than 0.2% of tablets and equal to 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
1
This tablet includes 1 speakers, which is fewer than in 90.3% of tablets and equal to the number in 9.6% of tablets.
FM radio
yes
This tablet includes an FM radio. 81.1% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

Asus ZenPad 7.0 Z370CG (1GB + 8GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • 44.5% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (272 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    272 g vs 490 g
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's front camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's main camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 495 Hz higher PWM dimming frequency
    This tablet has a higher PWM dimming frequency than the average tablet (495 Hz vs 0 Hz). The average tablet has PWM dimming frequency of 0 Hz.
    Below 45% brightness only.
    495 Hz vs 0 Hz
  • Supports slow-motion video
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, while the average tablet does not. 37.3% of tablets support slow-motion recording.
  • 64.4 mm narrower
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (110.9 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    110.9 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Intel Atom x3-C3230 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Intel Atom x3-C3230 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 85.7% cheaper
    Asus ZenPad 7.0 Z370CG (1GB + 8GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£140 vs £260).
    £140 vs £260
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Intel Atom x3-C3230 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Intel Atom x3-C3230 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 495 Hz higher PWM dimming frequency
    This tablet has a higher PWM dimming frequency than the average tablet (495 Hz vs 0 Hz). The average tablet has PWM dimming frequency of 0 Hz.
    Below 45% brightness only.
    495 Hz vs 0 Hz
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's front camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's main camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Supports slow-motion video
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, while the average tablet does not. 37.3% of tablets support slow-motion recording.
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • 44.5% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (272 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    272 g vs 490 g
  • 64.4 mm narrower
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (110.9 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    110.9 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 30.0% lower review score
    Reviews score
    4.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    4.9

    Mark 7.6 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.4

    Average grade

    20%

    8.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (13)
    8 reviews: 0 with a printed score, 8 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    4.9 vs 7.0
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (Mali-450 MP4 vs Mali-G51).
    Mali-450 MP4 vs Mali-G51
  • 47.7% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (3,450 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    3,450 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 30.0% lower review score
    Reviews score
    4.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    4.9

    Mark 7.6 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.4

    Average grade

    20%

    8.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (13)
    8 reviews: 0 with a printed score, 8 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    4.9 vs 7.0
  • 7.3% worse value for money
    Asus ZenPad 7.0 Z370CG (1GB + 8GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (7.04 vs 7.6).
    7.04 vs 7.55
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (Mali-450 MP4 vs Mali-G51).
    Mali-450 MP4 vs Mali-G51
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 87.5% less internal storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (8 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    8 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2x larger process node
    This tablet has a larger process node than the average tablet (28 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    28 nm vs 14 nm
  • 71.8% less memory bandwidth
    This tablet has less memory bandwidth than the average tablet (4.2 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    4.2 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not support big.LITTLE architecture, while the average tablet does. 51.7% of tablets support big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 4 years older
    This tablet was released earlier than the average tablet (2015 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    August 2015
    2015 vs 2019
  • 3.1 inches smaller screen
    This tablet has a smaller screen than the average tablet (7 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    7 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 100 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (300 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    300 nits vs 400 nits
  • Less sharp display
    This tablet has a less sharp screen than the average tablet (1280×800 vs 1920×1200).
    1,280×800 vs 1,920×1,200
  • 51 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (350 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    350 nits vs 401 nits
  • 50% slower touch response
    This tablet samples touch more slowly than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet samples touch at 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 3 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • Worse main-camera video
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not support manual white balance, while the average tablet does. 51.5% of tablets support manual white balance.
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.6% of tablets support burst mode.
  • 47.7% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (3,450 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    3,450 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 2 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    8 hours vs 10 hours
  • 44.4% slower charging
    This tablet charges slower than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet has an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5).
    4 vs 5
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56.4% of tablets support face recognition.
  • No Ethernet support
    This tablet does not have Ethernet support, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets support Ethernet.
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No direct OS updates
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, while the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61.4% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera and mic privacy
    This tablet does not support camera and mic privacy, while the average tablet does. 56.6% of tablets offer this.
  • No multi-user mode
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average of independent expert reviews and videos, graded by us; missing reviews count as 7/10.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how independent test sites and video reviewers rate the product in real use.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Asus ZenPad 7.0 Z370CG
    the average tablet
    Asus ZenPad 7.0 Z370CG (1GB + 8GB) does not support multi-user mode, while the average tablet does. 73.8% of tablets offer this.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 53% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy
    This tablet does not support location privacy, while the average tablet does. 76.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, while the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No keyboard accessory
    This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory, the average tablet does. 84.2% of tablets support a keyboard accessory.
  • 0.7 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (8.7 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    8.7 mm vs 8 mm
  • 1 fewer speakers
    This tablet has less speakers than the average tablet (1 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    1 vs 2

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Tech Rebel
≈ estimated
06/01/2016
Hands-on review · audio cover, speaker, gaming and camera tests
Verdict
Asus ZenPad 7.0 Z370CG is strong for loud entertainment, but gaming, the camera and its bulky feel hold it back.
8.0
Intellect Digest
≈ estimated
08/12/2015
Hands-on review · display, audio, camera and gaming tests
Verdict
Asus ZenPad 7.0 Z370CG is a good compact media tablet, but it is not suited to heavy gaming.
7.0
Techniqued
≈ estimated
19/10/2015
Hands-on review · battery, camera and performance tests
Verdict
Asus ZenPad 7.0 Z370CG is a decent all-round tablet for calls, but its battery life is weak and the camera is average.
6.0
AndroidPure
≈ estimated
09/10/2015
Gaming test · Asphalt 8 performance and heat
Verdict
Asus ZenPad 7.0 Z370CG gets smoother in games after a warm-up, but performance and heat leave room for improvement.
7.0
YugaTech
≈ estimated
19/08/2015
Full review · performance, camera and display tests
Verdict
Asus ZenPad 7.0 Z370CG is decent for media and casual use, but its dim screen and camera glitches hold it back.
8.0
Techniqued
≈ estimated
09/10/2015
Unboxing and first look · build, interface and camera modes
Verdict
Asus ZenPad 7.0 Z370CG looks premium and compact, with the performance review still to come.
Hands-on video, no verdict

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

5.0
digit.in
≈ estimated
01/08/2023
Full review · Budget tablet
Verdict
The ASUS ZenPad 7.0 suits basic reading and email with voice calls, but its weak performance rules out gaming and heavy use.
7.0
technave.com
≈ estimated
06/10/2015
Full review · Modular tablet
Verdict
The ASUS ZenPad 7.0 is a flexible 7-inch tablet whose swappable Audio Cover and Power Case add surround sound and battery life, but its performance is weak.
8.0
hitchwriter.wordpress.com
≈ estimated
08/01/2016
Blog review · Media tablet
Verdict
The ASUS ZenPad 7.0 is a good budget media tablet, with a sharp screen and a detachable speaker cover that makes films and music sound fuller.
8.0
mygreedybackpack.com
≈ estimated
07/01/2016
First impressions · Everyday tablet
Verdict
The ASUS ZenPad 7.0 is a comfortable 7-inch tablet with good sound, and its detachable speaker clutch adds battery life for all-day use.
7.0
unbox.ph
≈ estimated
21/08/2015
Daily use review · Media tablet
Verdict
The ASUS ZenPad 7.0 is a slim, comfortable media tablet for reading and video, but it cannot handle demanding games.
8.0
gadgetmtech.com
≈ estimated
01/10/2015
Hands-on review · Customizable tablet
Verdict
The ASUS ZenPad 7.0 is an affordable, customizable tablet whose swappable covers suit mix-and-match fans, but its battery and smoothness fall short.
8.0
yugatech.com
≈ estimated
19/08/2015
Full review · Smooth 7-inch tablet
Verdict
The ASUS ZenPad 7.0 is a smooth, attractive 7-inch tablet for browsing and light gaming, but its dim screen and short battery are its weak points.
7.0
androidpure.com
≈ estimated
24/10/2015
Hands-on review · Everyday tablet
Verdict
The ASUS ZenPad 7.0 is a good everyday tablet for browsing and video, but it is not a good choice if you want a gaming tablet.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Asus ZenPad 7.0 Z370CG (1GB + 8GB)

  • Elegant 'clutch-style' design that is compact and easy to hold with one hand
  • Modular system with interchangeable backplates like the 5.1-channel Audio Cover
  • Good IPS display quality with strong viewing angles and vibrant colors using Tru2Life technology
  • Voice-calling support with a dedicated micro-SIM slot
  • Expandable storage via a microSD card slot up to 128GB

What customers don't like about Asus ZenPad 7.0 Z370CG (1GB + 8GB)

  • Underwhelming performance from the Intel Atom x3 processor, leading to lag and stuttering
  • Poor battery life that often fails to reach the advertised 8 hours, sometimes lasting only 3-5 hours under heavy use
  • Unsuitable for high-end gaming; struggles with titles like Asphalt 8 and Marvel Future Fight
  • Camera quality is average at best, with slow autofocus and grainy results in low light
  • No built-in LED flash for the rear camera
  • Significant amounts of pre-installed 'bloatware' that cannot be fully uninstalled

Verdict

The Asus Zenpad 7.0 Z370CG is an entry-level 7-inch tablet featuring a 1280x800 IPS display, powered by a 1.2GHz quad-core Intel Atom x3-C3230 processor with 1GB of RAM and 8GB of internal storage expandable up to 128GB via microSD. Notable characteristics include its unique semi-modular design with interchangeable back covers for accessories like the 'Audio Cover' (featuring 5.1 surround sound) or 'Power Case,' as well as 3G connectivity for voice calls. While it is praised for its premium clutch-inspired aesthetic, solid build quality, and decent 5MP rear camera, it suffers from significant performance lag during multitasking, weak battery life that often fails to meet the advertised 8 hours, and excessive pre-installed bloatware.

Compare Asus ZenPad 7.0 Z370CG (1GB + 8GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Asus ZenPad 7.0 Z370CG (1GB + 8GB) and other tablets

No results found