OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Asus Transformer TF101 3G (1GB + 16GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£440RAM capacity:1 GBInternal storage:16 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Nvidia Tegra 2 T20

Asus Transformer TF101 3G (1GB + 16GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 27 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Asus Transformer TF101 3G (1GB + 16GB)
6.4/10

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

35%

4.7

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

8.1

Reviews score

10%

4.7

Sentiment score

▼Worse than 73% of tablets
6.9

Value for money

Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

8.2

Price

▼Worse than 87%
4.7

Technical score

Technical score
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

22%

3.7

Performance

20%

4.7

Display

16%

5.2

Camera

14%

4.4

Battery

12%

5.8

Connectivity

8%

5.1

Software

5%

4.5

Design

3%

4.8

Audio

▼Worse than 96%
8.1

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 68% of models

80%

8.0

Average grade

20%

8.7

Popularity

Grades by review (27)
21 reviews: 12 with a printed score, 9 estimated from the review. 6 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▲Better than 68%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • asus-transformer-tf101-16gb-1gb-16gb-3g
  • asus-transformer-tf101-16gb-1gb-16gb-3g
  • asus-transformer-tf101-16gb-1gb-16gb-3g
  • asus-transformer-tf101-16gb-1gb-16gb-3g
  • asus-transformer-tf101-16gb-1gb-16gb-3g
  • asus-transformer-tf101-16gb-1gb-16gb-3g
  • asus-transformer-tf101-16gb-1gb-16gb-3g
  • asus-transformer-tf101-16gb-1gb-16gb-3g
  • asus-transformer-tf101-16gb-1gb-16gb-3g
asus-transformer-tf101-16gb-1gb-16gb-3g
asus-transformer-tf101-16gb-1gb-16gb-3g
asus-transformer-tf101-16gb-1gb-16gb-3g
asus-transformer-tf101-16gb-1gb-16gb-3g
asus-transformer-tf101-16gb-1gb-16gb-3g
asus-transformer-tf101-16gb-1gb-16gb-3g
asus-transformer-tf101-16gb-1gb-16gb-3g
asus-transformer-tf101-16gb-1gb-16gb-3g
asus-transformer-tf101-16gb-1gb-16gb-3g
Where to buy
    N/A~ £440
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Asus Transformer TF101 3G (1GB + 16GB)

Based on 21 · 6

Reviewers praise the keyboard dock, battery life and ports, but find it heavy and criticise the camera and connectivity.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Asus Transformer TF101 3G (1GB + 16GB)

Based on 107 owners sharing their experience in online comments

48%positive7%mixed45%negative

Owners value its long life and recovery guides, while aging software and boot or power failures cause the most frustration.

What owners dislike

  • Flashing sometimes stops mid-partition or says Done with no change, and gives a blob-not-extracted error; one owner fixed it by fully unzipping EasyFlasher.12
  • After a flash, some tablets reboot repeatedly or hang on the Eee Pad or CyanogenMod spinning logo and never reach the home screen.10
  • Some tablets only charge when switched off, shut down randomly, or show a blinking red light and won't turn on.9
  • Windows 10 often blocks the APX driver over signature errors, so owners had to disable driver signing and manually pick the Naked Driver.9
  • Without Google support, owners cannot sign in to the app store, which shows a secure connection error, and older apps stop opening.5
  • Some owners receive mail but browsing reports connection problems, and others find Wi-Fi shows no signal at all.3
  • On some units the touchscreen suddenly stopped working; one owner found a USB mouse through OTG works as a workaround.3
  • Owners could not find the CM and Gapps files or the stock ROM under the names shown, so the process stopped.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Asus Transformer TF101 3G (1GB + 16GB)

Technical score
Technical score
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components:

22%

3.7

Performance

20%

4.7

Display

16%

5.2

Camera

14%

4.4

Battery

12%

5.8

Connectivity

8%

5.1

Software

5%

4.5

Design

3%

4.8

Audio

4.7
Reviews score
8.1
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components:

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

8.2

Price

6.9
RAM capacity
1 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 1 GB of RAM, which is less than 78% of tablets and equal to 19.1% of tablets.
Process node
40 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 40 nm process, which is larger than 86.9% of tablets and equal to 8% of tablets.
Internal storage
16 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 16 GB of internal storage, which is less than 78.8% of tablets and equal to 14.8% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
Nvidia Tegra 2 T20
This tablet runs on Nvidia Tegra 2 T20, which is less advanced than 70.5% of tablets and equal to 2.6% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1280×800
This tablet has a 1280×800 screen, which is less sharp than 68.1% of tablets and equal to 21.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
149 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 149 ppi, which is lower than 86.8% of tablets and equal to 9.2% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
This tablet protects its screen with Corning Gorilla Glass, which is more durable than 45.4% of tablets and the same as 32.8% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 5 MP resolution, which is lower than 63.7% of tablets and equal to 26% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
1.2 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 1.2 MP resolution, which is lower than 86.3% of tablets and equal to 4.8% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
?
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
3,300 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 3,300 mAh battery capacity, which is smaller than 94.6% of tablets and equal to 0.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
18 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 18 W, which is faster than 48% of tablets and equal to 12.3% of tablets.
Battery life
9.5 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 9.5 hours, which is shorter than that of 61.4% of tablets and equal to that of 1.2% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 43.2% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
no
This tablet does not have built-in LTE. 42.9% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 47.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
no
This tablet does not support direct OS updates. 79.8% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
680 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 680 g, which is heavier than 86.9% of tablets and equal to 0.4% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 1, which is more than 0.2% of tablets and equal to 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.8% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more

Asus Transformer TF101 3G (1GB + 16GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • Supports manual ISO
    This tablet supports manual ISO, while the average tablet does not. 45.9% of tablets support manual ISO.
  • 15.7% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 68% of models

    80%

    8.0

    Average grade

    20%

    8.7

    Popularity

    Grades by review (27)
    21 reviews: 12 with a printed score, 9 estimated from the review. 6 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.1 vs 7.0
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Nvidia Tegra 2 T20 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Nvidia Tegra 2 T20 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
    mini-HDMI port
  • 4 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (8 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    8 vs 4
  • 15.7% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 68% of models

    80%

    8.0

    Average grade

    20%

    8.7

    Popularity

    Grades by review (27)
    21 reviews: 12 with a printed score, 9 estimated from the review. 6 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.1 vs 7.0
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Nvidia Tegra 2 T20 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Nvidia Tegra 2 T20 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 4 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (8 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    8 vs 4
  • Supports manual ISO
    This tablet supports manual ISO, while the average tablet does not. 45.9% of tablets support manual ISO.
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
    mini-HDMI port
  • 6 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    2 vs 8
  • 3.8 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (1.2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    1.2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 50% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 50% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (3,300 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    3,300 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51).
    ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 37.3% lower sentiment score
    4.7 vs 7.5
  • 8.9% worse value for money
    Asus Transformer TF101 3G (1GB + 16GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.93 vs 7.6).
    6.93 vs 7.55
  • 69.2% more expensive
    Asus Transformer TF101 3G (1GB + 16GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£440 vs £260).
    £440 vs £260
  • 6 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    2 vs 8
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 50% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51).
    ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51
  • 2.86x larger process node
    This tablet has a larger process node than the average tablet (40 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    40 nm vs 14 nm
  • 1,199 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (667 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    667 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 75% less internal storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (16 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    16 GB vs 64 GB
  • 82.1% less memory bandwidth
    This tablet has less memory bandwidth than the average tablet (2.7 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    2.67 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not support big.LITTLE architecture, while the average tablet does. 51.7% of tablets support big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 53.8% slower GPU clock
    This tablet runs its GPU slower than the average tablet (300 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet runs its GPU at 650 MHz.
    300 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 8 years older
    This tablet was released earlier than the average tablet (2011 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    March 2011
    2011 vs 2019
  • More basic memory type
    This tablet uses less advanced memory than the average tablet (DDR2 vs LPDDR3).
    DDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • 32.6% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Less sharp display
    This tablet has a less sharp screen than the average tablet (1280×800 vs 1920×1200).
    1,280×800 vs 1,920×1,200
  • Less vivid contrast
    This tablet has less contrast than the average tablet (800:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    800:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 48 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (352 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    352 nits vs 400 nits
  • 1 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (400 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    400 nits vs 401 nits
  • 3.8 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (1.2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    1.2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • Worse main-camera video
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 3 MP lower rear resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not support manual exposure, while the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets support manual exposure.
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.8% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.6% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not support panorama mode, while the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets support panorama mode.
  • No backside-illuminated sensor
    This tablet does not have a BSI sensor, while the average tablet does. 52.6% of tablets have a BSI sensor.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, while the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets support timelapse video.
  • 50% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (3,300 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    3,300 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • 0.5 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (9.5 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    9.5 hours vs 10 hours
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet has an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (2.1 vs 5).
    2.1 vs 5
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Fewer Wi-Fi bands
    This tablet supports fewer Wi-Fi bands than the average tablet (2.4GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz). The average tablet supports 2.4GHz/5GHz Wi-Fi bands.
    2.4GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No direct OS updates
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, while the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61.4% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera and mic privacy
    This tablet does not support camera and mic privacy, while the average tablet does. 56.6% of tablets offer this.
  • No multi-user mode
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average of independent expert reviews and videos, graded by us; missing reviews count as 7/10.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how independent test sites and video reviewers rate the product in real use.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Asus Transformer TF101 3G
    the average tablet
    Asus Transformer TF101 3G (1GB + 16GB) does not support multi-user mode, while the average tablet does. 73.8% of tablets offer this.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 53% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy
    This tablet does not support location privacy, while the average tablet does. 76.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, while the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No offline voice recognition
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.4% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • 38.8% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (680 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    680 g vs 490 g
  • 4.98 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (13 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    12.98 mm vs 8 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0
RetroNetVideos
≈ estimated
05/07/2015
Custom ROM test · Android 5.1 running on the tablet
Verdict
Asus Transformer TF101 3G runs much better than stock, but old hardware still lags and freezes, so it is not a sole work device.
9.0
Test and Review
≈ estimated
02/03/2013
Hands-on review · build, display, camera and performance
Verdict
Asus Transformer TF101 3G is a very good tablet and a strong pick if you want something older but cheaper.
9.0
Futurelooks
✓ explicit
21/09/2011
Long-term test · battery, performance and keyboard dock
Verdict
Asus Transformer TF101 3G gets strong praise for performance, battery life and expandable storage, especially with the keyboard dock.
9.0
BASIC thinking
≈ estimated
05/05/2011
Hands-on review · battery life, browser and benchmark tests
Verdict
Asus Transformer TF101 3G is the best Android Honeycomb tablet on the market, especially with its keyboard dock.
8.0
UltrabookReview
≈ estimated
19/04/2011
Conclusion · performance, camera and software tests
Verdict
Asus Transformer TF101 3G has very good hardware and a strong dock, but the software still has laggy, slow moments.
Hands-on video, no verdict
Shop video
Hands-on video, no verdict
Not graded
Not graded
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
10/05/2011
Review · Android tablet with dock
Verdict
The Asus Eee Pad Transformer TF101 is a powerful tablet that doubles as a desk netbook, though its camera and onscreen keyboard are weak points.
8.0
theverge.com
✓ explicit
10/10/2011
Review · Honeycomb tablet with dock
Verdict
The Asus Eee Pad Transformer TF101 is a good-looking tablet with an excellent IPS screen and optional keyboard dock, but its plastic build and camera disappoint.
8.6
notebookcheck.net
✓ explicit
25/05/2011
Lab test · Tablet with dock
Verdict
The Asus Eee Pad Transformer TF101 is a quiet tablet with wide viewing angles, but its keyboard dock and office software still cannot replace a PC.
7.0
pcworld.com
✓ explicit
06/05/2011
Hands-on review · Tablet with dock
Verdict
The Asus Eee Pad Transformer TF101 works well on its own, and its optional keyboard dock adds SD, USB and an extra battery, though its plastic back flexes.
7.0
uk.pcmag.com
✓ explicit
03/02/2012
Review · Honeycomb tablet with dock
Verdict
The Asus Eee Pad Transformer TF101 is the most affordable Honeycomb tablet and strong at multitasking, though its predictive text and cluttered layout can frustrate.
8.0
whathifi.com
✓ explicit
20/07/2011
Lab test · Dock-equipped Android tablet
Verdict
The Asus Eee Pad Transformer is an affordable alternative to the iPad 2 for buyers who can live with occasional glitches, thanks to its dock and good screen.
6.0
tomshardware.com
≈ estimated
12/09/2011
Hands-on review · Tablet-notebook hybrid
Verdict
The Asus Eee Pad Transformer turns a tablet into a notebook with its keyboard dock, but its weak speakers and missing flash limit it.
9.0
mobiletechreview.com
≈ estimated
19/05/2011
Hands-on review · Budget Android tablet
Verdict
The Asus Eee Pad Transformer is a top-pick Honeycomb tablet for its price, with an excellent IPS screen, but it has no 3G and needs the dock for serious typing.
7.0
jrs-s.net
≈ estimated
15/08/2011
Hands-on test · Docked netbook use
Verdict
The Asus Transformer TF101 is a fast, long-lasting tablet to recommend without reservation, but its keyboard dock falls short as a netbook replacement.
8.0
digit.in
✓ explicit
01/08/2023
Full review · Tablet and netbook
Verdict
The Asus Eee Pad Transformer is a bright, slim tablet that doubles as a netbook, lasting about 8 hours of browsing alone but priced above rival Honeycomb tablets.
9.0
legitreviews.com
≈ estimated
27/09/2011
Full review · Wi-Fi tablet dock
Verdict
The Asus Eee Pad Transformer is a Wi-Fi tablet that becomes a netbook in seconds, giving more value than an iPad 2 once its keyboard dock is added.
7.2
computerbild.de
✓ explicit
18/07/2011
Lab test · Netbook-style tablet
Verdict
The Asus Eee Pad Transformer TF101 is an easy-to-use tablet with a sharp screen and long battery life, though videos sometimes stutter.
7.0
chip.de
≈ estimated
22/06/2011
Lab test · Hybrid tablet
Verdict
The Asus Eee Pad Transformer is a bright, well-built Android tablet that becomes a notebook with its dock, but it plays few video formats and has average battery life.
7.0
connect.de
≈ estimated
21/10/2011
Lab test · Keyboard dock tablet
Verdict
The Asus Eee Pad Transformer is a well-made tablet whose keyboard dock adds a second battery, but its screen struggles in strong sunlight.
8.6
android-user.de
✓ explicit
08/09/2011
Test · Keyboard dock and games
Verdict
The Asus Transformer TF101 suits game lovers and netbook shoppers, its dock stretching battery life to 16 hours, though arrow keys sit cramped.
10
bilanz.ch
✓ explicit
14/06/2011
Test · Keyboard dock concept
Verdict
The Asus Transformer TF101 is a well-built tablet whose keyboard dock feels like a real netbook, though it has no UMTS mobile data.
7.2
01net.com
✓ explicit
24/05/2011
Hands-on test · Tablet-netbook hybrid
Verdict
The Asus Eee Pad Transformer TF101 suits buyers who want a tablet that becomes a netbook, with good value and a sharp IPS screen but no 3G at launch.
7.0
xatakandroid.com
≈ estimated
15/06/2011
Long-term test · Android tablet with dock
Verdict
The Asus Eee Pad Transformer is currently the best Honeycomb tablet, lasting a full day on a charge, but web video lags and its connector limits accessories.
9.0
geeknetic.es
✓ explicit
22/06/2011
Full review · Tablet with keyboard dock
Verdict
The Asus Eee Pad Transformer is a sturdy tablet that becomes a small netbook with its dock, but Android 3 is short on tools for professional office, video and sound work.
9.0
muycomputer.com
≈ estimated
28/07/2011
Hands-on review · Dock-equipped tablet
Verdict
The Asus Eee Pad Transformer is a well-rounded Android tablet at an attractive price, with a bright screen and a dock that adds a keyboard and battery.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Asus Transformer TF101 3G (1GB + 16GB)

  • Innovative keyboard dock that turns the tablet into a netbook and extends battery life
  • High-quality 10.1-inch IPS display with excellent viewing angles and bright colors
  • Competitive and affordable pricing compared to peers like the iPad 2 and Motorola Xoom
  • Strong connectivity options including mini-HDMI, microSD, and USB ports on the dock
  • Solid, grippy build quality with a textured 'honeycomb' back for better handling
  • Speedy performance for the time due to the Nvidia Tegra 2 dual-core processor

What customers don't like about Asus Transformer TF101 3G (1GB + 16GB)

  • Early software instability with occasional OS crashes and random reboots
  • Poor camera performance characterized by grainy photos and choppy 720p video recording
  • Limited availability of tablet-optimized apps in the early Android Honeycomb era
  • Bulkier and heavier design, especially when the keyboard dock is attached
  • Unintuitive trackpad scrolling behavior and slight cursor lag when using a mouse
  • Lack of integrated USB ports on the tablet itself (only available via the dock)

Verdict

The ASUS Eee Pad Transformer TF101 3G is a versatile 10.1-inch tablet featuring a 1280 x 800 IPS display protected by scratch-resistant glass. It is powered by a dual-core 1GHz NVIDIA Tegra 2 processor paired with 1GB of RAM and 16GB of internal storage, expandable via a microSD slot. Its primary appeal is the optional QWERTY keyboard dock that transforms the device into a netbook while extending battery life from approximately 9.5 hours to 16 hours and adding two USB 2.0 ports. Main pros include its excellent wide-angle display, innovative modular design, and robust connectivity options like mini-HDMI. However, notable cons include occasional software instability on the early Android Honeycomb platform, choppy 720p video recording from the 5MP rear camera, and a slightly heavier build compared to some non-hybrid rivals.

Compare Asus Transformer TF101 3G (1GB + 16GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Asus Transformer TF101 3G (1GB + 16GB) and other tablets

No results found