OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Asus Transformer Pad 300 4G (1GB + 16GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£440RAM capacity:1 GBInternal storage:16 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Nvidia Tegra 3

Asus Transformer Pad 300 4G (1GB + 16GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 21 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.6/10

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 64% of models
Score components

35%

5.2

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

8.1

Reviews score

10%

5.2

Sentiment score

▼Worse than 64% of tablets
7.1

Value for money

Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

8.2

Price

▼Worse than 78%
5.2

Technical score

Technical score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components

22%

4.5

Performance

20%

4.8

Display

16%

6.3

Camera

14%

4.2

Battery

12%

6.3

Connectivity

8%

6.0

Software

5%

4.9

Design

3%

6.9

Audio

▼Worse than 79%
8.1

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 68% of models

80%

8.0

Average grade

20%

8.4

Popularity

Grades by review (21)
18 reviews: 10 with a printed score, 8 estimated from the review. 3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▲Better than 68%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £440
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
1GB + 16GB1GB + 32GB

What reviewers say about the Asus Transformer Pad 300 4G (1GB + 16GB)

Based on 18 · 3

Reviewers praise smooth performance and handy ports and storage, but most are unhappy with the screen; the keyboard dock divides opinion.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Asus Transformer Pad 300 4G (1GB + 16GB)

Based on 39 owners sharing their experience in online comments

49%positive10%mixed41%negative

Owners praise its quick performance and useful dock, while software lag and difficult unlocking cause the most frustration.

What owners dislike

  • Owners say unlocking the bootloader often fails with errors, and the Asus unlock tool stopped working for some.10
  • Owners say the tablet lags in general use and browsing, even on Performance mode. One owner says it lags badly on stock software.4
  • Owners say the screen is hard to read in direct sunlight and is dimmer than some rivals. Some say it looks weaker than the 7-inch Tab 2 and the Infinity.3
  • Owners report the screen breaking after a drop, and some returned units with hardware faults. One owner says the case cracked from docking it to the keyboard.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Asus Transformer Pad 300 4G (1GB + 16GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components:

22%

4.5

Performance

20%

4.8

Display

16%

6.3

Camera

14%

4.2

Battery

12%

6.3

Connectivity

8%

6.0

Software

5%

4.9

Design

3%

6.9

Audio

5.2
Reviews score
8.1
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

8.2

Price

7.1
RAM capacity
1 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 1 GB of RAM, which is less than 78% of tablets and equal to 19.1% of tablets.
Process node
40 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 40 nm process, which is larger than 86.9% of tablets and equal to 8% of tablets.
Internal storage
16 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 16 GB of internal storage, which is less than 78.8% of tablets and equal to 14.8% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
Nvidia Tegra 3
This tablet runs on Nvidia Tegra 3, which is less advanced than 64.8% of tablets and equal to 2.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1280×800
This tablet has a 1280×800 screen, which is less sharp than 68.1% of tablets and equal to 21.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
149 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 149 ppi, which is lower than 86.8% of tablets and equal to 9.2% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass 2
This tablet protects its screen with Corning Gorilla Glass 2, which is more durable than 78.3% of tablets and the same as 1.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 8 MP resolution, which is higher than 36.4% of tablets and equal to 31.9% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
1.2 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 1.2 MP resolution, which is lower than 86.3% of tablets and equal to 4.8% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.2, which is wider than 30.1% of tablets and equal to 27.3% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
2,940 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 2,940 mAh battery capacity, which is smaller than 97.5% of tablets and equal to 0.2% of tablets.
Charging speed
18 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 18 W, which is faster than 48% of tablets and equal to 12.3% of tablets.
Battery life
9 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 9 hours, which is shorter than that of 62.7% of tablets and equal to that of 6.9% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 43.2% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
yes
This tablet has built-in LTE. 57.1% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 47.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
635 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 635 g, which is heavier than 81.9% of tablets and equal to 0.4% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 2, which is more than 55.1% of tablets and equal to 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
?
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

Asus Transformer Pad 300 4G (1GB + 16GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • More vivid contrast
    This tablet has more contrast than the average tablet (1504:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,504:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Supports manual ISO
    This tablet supports manual ISO, while the average tablet does not. 45.9% of tablets support manual ISO.
  • 15.7% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 68% of models

    80%

    8.0

    Average grade

    20%

    8.4

    Popularity

    Grades by review (21)
    18 reviews: 10 with a printed score, 8 estimated from the review. 3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.1 vs 7.0
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Nvidia Tegra 3 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Nvidia Tegra 3 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • 1 more microphones
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet's microphone count is 1.
    2 vs 1
  • 8 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (12 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    12 vs 4
  • 15.7% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 68% of models

    80%

    8.0

    Average grade

    20%

    8.4

    Popularity

    Grades by review (21)
    18 reviews: 10 with a printed score, 8 estimated from the review. 3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.1 vs 7.0
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Nvidia Tegra 3 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Nvidia Tegra 3 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 8 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (12 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    12 vs 4
  • More advanced memory type
    This tablet uses more advanced memory than the average tablet (DDR3 vs LPDDR3).
    DDR3 vs LPDDR3
  • More vivid contrast
    This tablet has more contrast than the average tablet (1504:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,504:1 vs 1,015:1
  • More durable glass
    This tablet has more durable glass than the average tablet (Corning Gorilla Glass 2 vs Corning Gorilla Glass). The average tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 2 vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • Supports manual ISO
    This tablet supports manual ISO, while the average tablet does not. 45.9% of tablets support manual ISO.
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
  • 1 more microphones
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet's microphone count is 1.
    2 vs 1
  • 3.8 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (1.2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    1.2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 55.5% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (2,940 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    2,940 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51).
    ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 2.86x larger process node
    This tablet has a larger process node than the average tablet (40 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    40 nm vs 14 nm
  • 30.7% lower sentiment score
    5.2 vs 7.5
  • 69.2% more expensive
    Asus Transformer Pad 300 4G (1GB + 16GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£440 vs £260).
    £440 vs £260
  • 6.4% worse value for money
    Asus Transformer Pad 300 4G (1GB + 16GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (7.09 vs 7.6).
    7.09 vs 7.55
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51).
    ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51
  • 2.86x larger process node
    This tablet has a larger process node than the average tablet (40 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    40 nm vs 14 nm
  • 35% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.3 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 75% less internal storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (16 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    16 GB vs 64 GB
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not support big.LITTLE architecture, while the average tablet does. 51.7% of tablets support big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 57% less memory bandwidth
    This tablet has less memory bandwidth than the average tablet (6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 7 years older
    This tablet was released earlier than the average tablet (2012 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    June 2012
    2012 vs 2019
  • 32.6% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Less sharp display
    This tablet has a less sharp screen than the average tablet (1280×800 vs 1920×1200).
    1,280×800 vs 1,920×1,200
  • 51 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (350 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    350 nits vs 401 nits
  • 50 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (350 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    350 nits vs 400 nits
  • 3.8 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (1.2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    1.2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not support manual white balance, while the average tablet does. 51.5% of tablets support manual white balance.
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.6% of tablets support burst mode.
  • 55.5% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (2,940 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    2,940 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • 1 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (9 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    9 hours vs 10 hours
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet has an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (3 vs 5).
    3 vs 5
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Fewer Wi-Fi bands
    This tablet supports fewer Wi-Fi bands than the average tablet (2.4GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz). The average tablet supports 2.4GHz/5GHz Wi-Fi bands.
    2.4GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61.4% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera and mic privacy
    This tablet does not support camera and mic privacy, while the average tablet does. 56.6% of tablets offer this.
  • No multi-user mode
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average of independent expert reviews and videos, graded by us; missing reviews count as 7/10.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how independent test sites and video reviewers rate the product in real use.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Asus Transformer Pad 300 4G
    the average tablet
    Asus Transformer Pad 300 4G (1GB + 16GB) does not support multi-user mode, while the average tablet does. 73.8% of tablets offer this.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 53% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy
    This tablet does not support location privacy, while the average tablet does. 76.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, while the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets offer this.
  • 29.6% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (635 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    635 g vs 490 g
  • 1.9 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (9.9 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    9.9 mm vs 8 mm
  • 87.7 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (263 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    263 mm vs 175.3 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Neowin
≈ estimated
10/06/2012
Hands-on review · performance, display, speaker and keyboard dock
Verdict
Asus Transformer Pad 300 4G is a great little media tablet, best bought with the keyboard dock, though it has some drawbacks.
8.0
PhoneArena
≈ estimated
30/04/2012
Hands-on review · battery, camera and performance tests
Verdict
Asus Transformer Pad 300 4G is a great choice if you don't need the Prime's better display, though low-light photos disappoint.
Overview video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
t3.com
✓ explicit
09/05/2012
Hands-on review · Keyboard dock tablet
Verdict
The Asus Transformer Pad TF300T is a fast Android tablet with a useful keyboard dock, though its screen and plastic build hold it back.
9.0
pocket-lint.com
✓ explicit
16/04/2013
Hands-on review · Travel tablet
Verdict
The Asus Transformer Pad TF300T is a light, vivid-screened tablet that suits long journeys, though it can't replace a laptop.
8.0
eurogamer.net
≈ estimated
28/06/2012
Benchmark test · Gaming tablet
Verdict
The Asus Transformer Pad TF300 is a powerful Tegra 3 gaming tablet with a plastic build, though its dimmer screen and camera hold it back.
8.0
uk.pcmag.com
≈ estimated
16/05/2014
Lab test · iPad alternative
Verdict
The Asus Transformer Pad TF300 is a solid iPad alternative with a fast chip and keyboard dock, but its screen is dimmer than the Prime's.
8.0
expertreviews.co.uk
✓ explicit
11/05/2012
Review · Keyboard dock hybrid
Verdict
The Asus Transformer Pad TF300T is a capable Transformer hybrid with long battery life, though its dim screen and top-heavy build hold it back.
7.0
avforums.com
✓ explicit
19/07/2012
Review · Tablet-laptop hybrid
Verdict
The Asus Transformer Pad TF300T is a smooth, capable tablet with a useful dock, though its dark screen and weak camera limit it.
7.7
cnet.com
✓ explicit
22/04/2012
Full review · Tegra 3 tablet
Verdict
The Asus Transformer Pad 300 matches the Transformer Prime's performance in a plastic, slightly heavier body that feels less sturdy.
8.0
theverge.com
✓ explicit
25/05/2012
Full review · Midrange Android tablet
Verdict
The Asus Transformer Pad 300 is a sturdy, nicely gripped Android tablet with good low-light photos, but its screen is unreadable outdoors.
7.0
laptopmag.com
✓ explicit
21/04/2012
Full review · Keyboard-dock tablet
Verdict
The Asus Transformer Pad 300 is a stylish, fast Android tablet with a keyboard option, but its screen is dimmer than the Transformer Prime's.
6.0
delimiter.com.au
≈ estimated
29/06/2012
Full review · Tablet with dock
Verdict
The Asus Transformer Pad 300 has a keyboard dock that beats most netbooks, but it sits between tablet and laptop without being the best at either.
9.0
hothardware.com
✓ explicit
24/04/2012
Performance review · Tegra 3 tablet
Verdict
The Asus Transformer Pad 300 is a very fast, good-sounding tablet that can stand in for a netbook for light work.
9.0
mobiletechreview.com
≈ estimated
02/05/2012
Editor review · Dock-equipped tablet
Verdict
The Asus Transformer Pad 300 is a good-value tablet whose optional dock brings a strong trackpad and keyboard, though its looks are not striking.
phonearena.com
30/04/2012
Not graded yet
8.0
pcwelt.de
≈ estimated
17/10/2012
Lab test · Keyboard dock tablet
Verdict
The Asus Transformer Pad 300 is a well-equipped tablet whose keyboard dock makes typing easy, but its screen is less sharp and bright than rivals.
9.0
notebookcheck.com
≈ estimated
14/06/2012
Full review · Netbook-style hybrid
Verdict
The Asus Transformer Pad 300 works well as a tablet-netbook hybrid, but its plastic body creaks when twisted and its cameras lack sharpness.
7.8
android-mt.ouest-france.fr
✓ explicit
10/02/2013
Review · Affordable hybrid tablet
Verdict
The Asus Transformer Pad TF300T is a powerful, good-value Transformer, though its plastic body and glare-prone screen show the lower cost.
9.0
maximejohnson.com
≈ estimated
22/04/2012
Hands-on test · Power and battery
Verdict
The Asus Transformer Pad TF300T is a fast, well-built Android tablet with a sturdy dock, but its dull screen is its main weakness.
9.0
xataka.com
≈ estimated
24/04/2012
Full review · Mid-range tablet
Verdict
The Asus Transformer Pad 300 is a smooth, long-lasting mid-range tablet for indoor use, but its 350-nit screen struggles in direct sunlight.
7.0
fwd.nl
✓ explicit
31/05/2012
Video review · Midrange tablet
Verdict
The Asus Transformer Pad 300 is a capable midrange tablet with good cameras and handy apps, but its flexible back and light leak hold it back.
tweakers.net
23/04/2012
Not graded yet

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Asus Transformer Pad 300 4G (1GB + 16GB)

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium rivals
  • Strong quad-core performance from the Nvidia Tegra 3 processor
  • Versatile keyboard dock that adds a second battery and full-size ports
  • Impressive total battery life (up to 15 hours) when docked
  • Good GPS and Wi-Fi reception due to the plastic casing
  • Decent 8MP rear camera performance in optimal lighting

What customers don't like about Asus Transformer Pad 300 4G (1GB + 16GB)

  • Plastic build feels less sturdy and 'cheaper' than metal alternatives
  • Display is relatively dim and difficult to use in direct sunlight
  • Single rear speaker is poorly placed and easily muffled by hands
  • Top-heavy design when docked can cause the device to tip backwards
  • Poor low-light camera performance and lack of an LED flash
  • Occasional software glitches, app freezes, or touchscreen lag

Verdict

The Asus Transformer Pad 300 4G is a versatile 10.1-inch tablet featuring a 1280 x 800 IPS display and powered by an NVIDIA Tegra 3 quad-core processor clocked at 1.2GHz. This specific configuration includes 1GB of DDR3 RAM and 16GB of internal storage, expandable via a microSD slot. Its standout features include a high-quality 8MP rear camera capable of 1080p video recording, 4G LTE connectivity for on-the-go data, and compatibility with an optional keyboard dock that extends battery life from 10 to 15 hours. Main pros are its smooth gaming performance, excellent battery endurance, and responsive touchscreen. However, notable cons include a plastic build that can feel slightly hollow or flex under pressure, a screen that is not bright enough for comfortable outdoor use in direct sunlight, and the lack of a rear camera flash.

Compare Asus Transformer Pad 300 4G (1GB + 16GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Asus Transformer Pad 300 4G (1GB + 16GB) and other tablets

No results found