OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Amazon Fire HD 8 12th Gen (2GB + 64GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£140RAM capacity:2 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:8 inchesChipset:MediaTek MT8169A

Amazon Fire HD 8 12th Gen (2GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications, 20 expert and video reviews and 1 best-of list to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.9/10

Overall score

Score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components

35%

5.8

Technical score

30%

5.8

List score

25%

5.8

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 6.9, the mark of a weaker model in this category

▼Worse than 89% of tablets
7.1

Value for money

Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

9.8

Price

▼Worse than 78%
5.8

Technical score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 60% of models
Score components

22%

5.8

Performance

20%

5.1

Display

16%

4.9

Camera

14%

5.9

Battery

12%

5.9

Connectivity

8%

8.1

Software

5%

7.0

Design

3%

6.0

Audio

▼Worse than 60%
5.8

Reviews score

Reviews score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 72% of models

5.8

Mark 7.6 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.3

Average grade

20%

8.4

Popularity

Grades by review (20)
15 reviews: 13 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▼Worse than 72%
5.8

List score

List score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (1)
List score: in 1 of 139 lists (1%)
★Better than 90%
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £140
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
2GB + 64GB2GB + 32GB

What reviewers say about the Amazon Fire HD 8 12th Gen (2GB + 64GB)

Based on 15 · 5

Reviewers like battery life, Alexa integration, expandable storage and streaming, but criticise sluggish performance, limited apps and a glare-prone screen.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Amazon Fire HD 8 12th Gen (2GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 60% of models
Score components:

22%

5.8

Performance

20%

5.1

Display

16%

4.9

Camera

14%

5.9

Battery

12%

5.9

Connectivity

8%

8.1

Software

5%

7.0

Design

3%

6.0

Audio

5.8
Reviews score
5.8
List score
5.8
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

9.8

Price

7.1
RAM capacity
2 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 2 GB of RAM, which is less than 61.3% of tablets and equal to 15.5% of tablets.
Process node
12 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 12 nm process, which is smaller than 53.2% of tablets and equal to 13.9% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 64 GB of internal storage, which is more than 39.1% of tablets and equal to 17% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
MediaTek MT8169A
This tablet runs on MediaTek MT8169A, which is less advanced than 91% of tablets and equal to 0.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1280×800
This tablet has a 1280×800 screen, which is less sharp than 68.1% of tablets and equal to 21.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
189 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 189 ppi, which is lower than 66.5% of tablets and equal to 6.8% of tablets.
Display glass type
Aluminosilicate Glass
This tablet protects its screen with Aluminosilicate Glass, which is less durable than 58% of tablets and the same as 7% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
2 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 2 MP resolution, which is lower than 93.6% of tablets and equal to 5.6% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 2 MP resolution, which is lower than 53.8% of tablets and equal to 25.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0, which is wider than 57.4% of tablets and equal to 24.7% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
4,750 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 4,750 mAh battery capacity, which is smaller than 76.5% of tablets and equal to 0.4% of tablets.
Charging speed
15 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 15 W, which is slower than 52.1% of tablets and equal to 6.3% of tablets.
Battery life
13 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 13 hours, which is longer than that of 76.1% of tablets and equal to that of 4.9% of tablets.
mixed use
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 43.2% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
no
This tablet does not have built-in LTE. 42.9% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
?
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
Operating system
Fire OS 8
This tablet uses the Fire OS 8 operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 80.9%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 32.4% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
yes
This tablet supports on-device AI. 71.7% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
?
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
337 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 337 g, which is lighter than 85.3% of tablets and equal to 0.6% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 1, which is more than 0.2% of tablets and equal to 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.7% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.8% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

Amazon Fire HD 8 12th Gen (2GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • 3 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (13 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    mixed use
    13 hours vs 10 hours
  • 74 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (474 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    474 nits vs 400 nits
  • 31.2% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (337 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    337 g vs 490 g
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's front camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • More advanced memory type
    This tablet uses more advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • Includes on-device AI
    This tablet includes on-device AI, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets include on-device AI.
  • 46.2% faster GPU clock
    This tablet runs its GPU faster than the average tablet (950 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet runs its GPU at 650 MHz.
    950 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 85.7% cheaper
    Amazon Fire HD 8 12th Gen (2GB + 64GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£140 vs £260).
    £140 vs £260
  • More advanced memory type
    This tablet uses more advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 46.2% faster GPU clock
    This tablet runs its GPU faster than the average tablet (950 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet runs its GPU at 650 MHz.
    950 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 14.3% smaller process node
    This tablet has a smaller process node than the average tablet (12 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 74 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (474 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    474 nits vs 400 nits
  • 73 nits brighter screen
    This tablet is brighter than the average tablet (474 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    474 nits vs 401 nits
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's front camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's main camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 3 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (13 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    mixed use
    13 hours vs 10 hours
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This tablet has a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.2 vs 5).
    5.2 vs 5
  • Includes on-device AI
    This tablet includes on-device AI, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets include on-device AI.
  • 31.2% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (337 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    337 g vs 490 g
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.5% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 37.96 mm narrower
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (137.3 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    137.34 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • 26.6% lower list score
    List score
    5.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (1)
    List score: in 1 of 139 lists (1%)
    5.8 vs 7.9
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • 6 MP lower rear resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (2 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    2 MP vs 8 MP
  • 3 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • Worse main-camera video
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 2 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • 28% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (4,750 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    4,750 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • 26.6% lower list score
    List score
    5.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (1)
    List score: in 1 of 139 lists (1%)
    5.8 vs 7.9
  • 17.1% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models

    5.8

    Mark 7.6 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.3

    Average grade

    20%

    8.4

    Popularity

    Grades by review (20)
    15 reviews: 13 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.8 vs 7.0
  • 6.7% worse value for money
    Amazon Fire HD 8 12th Gen (2GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (7.08 vs 7.6).
    7.08 vs 7.55
  • 2 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (6 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    6 vs 8
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not support big.LITTLE architecture, while the average tablet does. 51.7% of tablets support big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 2 fewer GPU execution units
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (2 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    2 vs 4
  • 2.1 inches smaller screen
    This tablet has a smaller screen than the average tablet (8 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    8 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Less sharp display
    This tablet has a less sharp screen than the average tablet (1280×800 vs 1920×1200).
    1,280×800 vs 1,920×1,200
  • 14.5% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (189 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    189 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Less durable glass
    This tablet has less durable glass than the average tablet (Aluminosilicate Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). The average tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass.
    Aluminosilicate Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • Less vivid contrast
    This tablet has less contrast than the average tablet (1000:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,000:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 6 MP lower rear resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (2 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    2 MP vs 8 MP
  • 3 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • Worse main-camera video
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • No tap-to-focus
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, while the average tablet does. 83% of tablets support touch autofocus.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not support manual white balance, while the average tablet does. 51.5% of tablets support manual white balance.
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.6% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not support panorama mode, while the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets support panorama mode.
  • No backside-illuminated sensor
    This tablet does not have a BSI sensor, while the average tablet does. 52.6% of tablets have a BSI sensor.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, while the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets support timelapse video.
  • 28% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (4,750 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    4,750 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • 16.7% slower charging
    This tablet charges slower than the average tablet (15 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    15 W vs 18 W
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56.4% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Fire OS 8 vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Fire OS 8 vs Android
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 53% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No offline voice recognition
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.4% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • 1.6 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (9.6 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    9.6 mm vs 8 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
20/11/2023
Full-week test · Budget tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 8 is not excellent at anything, but it handles streaming, Prime content and video calls well enough on a tight budget.
8.0
cordbusters.co.uk
✓ explicit
04/12/2022
Hands-on review · Media tablet
Verdict
The Fire HD 8 is a cheap, light tablet for video, reading and light games, but missing Google apps and outdoor glare hold it back.
7.0
androidpolice.com
✓ explicit
01/11/2022
Hands-on review · Budget tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 8 is only a slight upgrade on the 2020 model, but it handles streaming, reading and casual games such as Stardew Valley well enough.
6.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
19/10/2022
Review · Streaming tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 8 is a bare-minimum streaming tablet, best for Prime members, kids or a cheap portable TV, but slowness and missing Google apps limit it.
6.0
techadvisor.com
✓ explicit
20/10/2022
Review · Value tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 8 suits Prime subscribers who won't miss Google apps, and it works well as a kids' tablet, but its cameras and performance are weak.
8.0
t3.com
✓ explicit
08/04/2025
Months-long test · Budget tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 8 is one of the most affordable tablets and suits travel and kids well, but it is limited beyond streaming and basic games.
7.0
telegraph.co.uk
✓ explicit
07/10/2025
Long-term test · Budget tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 8 is excellent value for streaming and casual games, though its average screen and slow apps hold it back.
7.0
reviewed.com
≈ estimated
18/11/2022
Hands-on test · Budget tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 8 suits Amazon Prime users who want Amazon's services, but without Google services it disappoints as an all-round tablet.
fastcompany.com
19/10/2022
Not graded yet
4.8
computerbild.de
✓ explicit
13/07/2023
Lab test · Budget tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 8 is a bargain for light browsing and streaming, but its dated screen and slow performance make the Fire HD 8 Plus a better buy.
6.8
lesalexiens.fr
✓ explicit
14/11/2022
Hands-on test · Entry-level tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 8 is a cheap tablet with long battery life and microSD expansion, but its mirror-like, fingerprint-prone screen and 2GB of RAM hold it back.
8.0
zdnet.fr
≈ estimated
18/11/2022
Two-week test · Budget tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 8 suits Amazon Prime members who want a cheap tablet for streaming and Alexa, but it is a poor pick without Prime.
8.0
notebookcheck.biz
✓ explicit
15/01/2023
Benchmark test · Budget tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 8 (2022) is a clear step up on the 2020 model, but still trails the iPad mini 6 by a wide margin in its tests.
7.0
tomshw.it
✓ explicit
14/11/2022
Hands-on review · Entertainment tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 8 (2022) is a budget tablet for streaming and Amazon services, but its slow performance and weak screen hold it back.
6.0
global.techradar.com
✓ explicit
16/11/2022
Hands-on test · Streaming tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 8 (2022) is a basic video streaming tablet for Amazon users, but its slow performance, weak screen and higher price hold it back.
8.0
notebookcheck.nl
✓ explicit
15/01/2023
Benchmark review · Budget tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 8 is faster than its 2020 predecessor, but it trails the iPad Mini 6 and Huawei MatePad T10S in demanding 3D graphics tests.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Amazon Fire HD 8 12th Gen (2GB + 64GB)

  • Affordable price and excellent overall value
  • Long-lasting battery life, frequently cited at over 13 hours
  • Portable and lightweight design, making it easy to carry
  • Durable build quality that feels solid for the price
  • Convenient hands-free Alexa support
  • Decent stereo speakers for media consumption
  • Features a 3.5mm headphone jack and expandable storage up to 1TB

What customers don't like about Amazon Fire HD 8 12th Gen (2GB + 64GB)

  • Lack of native Google Play Store access limits app variety
  • Sluggish and underpowered performance for multitasking or heavy gaming
  • Slow charging speeds, often taking up to 5 hours with the included 5W adapter
  • Middling screen resolution (1280x800) with significant glare issues outdoors
  • Poor camera quality on both front and rear sensors
  • Lockscreen advertisements present on cheaper 'With Ads' versions

Verdict

The Amazon Fire HD 8 12th Gen (2022) is a compact 8-inch tablet featuring a 1280 x 800 (189 ppi) HD display and a hexa-core 2.0 GHz processor that offers a 30% speed increase over its predecessor. This specific configuration includes 2GB of RAM and 64GB of internal storage, which is expandable up to 1TB via a microSD card slot. Its primary strengths are an impressive battery life of up to 13 hours, a durable design with strengthened glass, and seamless integration with Alexa for hands-free voice control. However, notable drawbacks include its restriction to the Amazon Appstore (losing out on native Google Play apps), relatively slow 5W charging that takes about 5 hours for a full cycle, and underpowered performance that can feel sluggish during intensive gaming or multitasking.

Compare Amazon Fire HD 8 12th Gen (2GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Amazon Fire HD 8 12th Gen (2GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found