OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Alldocube X (4GB + 64GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£190RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:10.5 inchesChipset:MediaTek MT8176

Alldocube X (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 13 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Alldocube X (4GB + 64GB)
7.1/10

Overall score

Score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components

35%

6.2

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

7.9

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 6.9, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–²Better than 55% of tablets
7.8

Value for money

Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Score components

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

9.5

Price

â–²Better than 64%
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 53% of models
Score components

22%

5.5

Performance

20%

6.6

Display

16%

7.4

Camera

14%

4.4

Battery

12%

7.2

Connectivity

8%

6.4

Software

5%

5.7

Design

3%

6.5

Audio

â–²Better than 53%
7.9

Reviews score

Reviews score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 52% of models

80%

7.8

Average grade

20%

8.0

Popularity

Grades by review (13)
7 reviews: 5 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 6 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 52%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • alldocube-x-4gb-64gb
  • alldocube-x-4gb-64gb
  • alldocube-x-4gb-64gb
  • alldocube-x-4gb-64gb
  • alldocube-x-4gb-64gb
  • alldocube-x-4gb-64gb
  • alldocube-x-4gb-64gb
  • alldocube-x-4gb-64gb
  • alldocube-x-4gb-64gb
alldocube-x-4gb-64gb
alldocube-x-4gb-64gb
alldocube-x-4gb-64gb
alldocube-x-4gb-64gb
alldocube-x-4gb-64gb
alldocube-x-4gb-64gb
alldocube-x-4gb-64gb
alldocube-x-4gb-64gb
alldocube-x-4gb-64gb
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Alldocube X (4GB + 64GB)

Based on 7 · 7

Reviewers praise the sharp display and solid build, but complain about sluggish performance, inaccurate colours and weak battery life.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Alldocube X (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 53% of models
Score components:

22%

5.5

Performance

20%

6.6

Display

16%

7.4

Camera

14%

4.4

Battery

12%

7.2

Connectivity

8%

6.4

Software

5%

5.7

Design

3%

6.5

Audio

6.2
Reviews score
7.9
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Score components:

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

9.5

Price

7.8
RAM capacity
4 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 4 GB of RAM, which is more than 47.2% of tablets and equal to 17.8% of tablets.
Process node
28 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 28 nm process, which is larger than 65.1% of tablets and equal to 17.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 64 GB of internal storage, which is more than 39.1% of tablets and equal to 17% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
MediaTek MT8176
This tablet runs on MediaTek MT8176, which is less advanced than 90.8% of tablets and equal to 0.1% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
2560×1600
This tablet has a 2560×1600 screen, which is sharper than 77.5% of tablets and equal to 10% of tablets.
Refresh rate
?
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
This tablet uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 92.5% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
288 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 288 ppi, which is higher than 88.7% of tablets and equal to 0.4% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
?
Front camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 8 MP resolution, which is higher than 69.6% of tablets and equal to 19.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
?
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
8,000 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 8,000 mAh battery capacity, which is larger than 70.2% of tablets and equal to 4% of tablets.
Charging speed
18 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 18 W, which is faster than 48% of tablets and equal to 12.3% of tablets.
Battery life
5.5 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 5.5 hours, which is shorter than that of 95% of tablets and equal to that of 0.5% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 43.2% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
yes
This tablet has built-in LTE. 57.1% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
?
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 47.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
no
This tablet does not support direct OS updates. 79.8% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
496 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 496 g, which is heavier than 51.7% of tablets and equal to 0.3% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
no
This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory. 84.3% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 1, which is more than 0.2% of tablets and equal to 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
?
FM radio
yes
This tablet includes an FM radio. 81.1% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

Alldocube X (4GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • Better display type
    This tablet features a better display type than the average tablet (OLED/AMOLED vs IPS LCD). The average tablet uses IPS LCD display technology.
    OLED/AMOLED vs IPS LCD
  • More vivid contrast
    This tablet has more contrast than the average tablet (1,000,000:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,000,000:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 30.3% sharper screen detail
    This tablet has sharper screen detail than the average tablet (288 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    288 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Sharper display
    This tablet has a sharper screen than the average tablet (2560×1600 vs 1920×1200).
    2,560×1,600 vs 1,920×1,200
  • Wider color gamut
    This tablet supports a wider color gamut than the average tablet (DCI-P3 vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    100% DCI-P3 coverage reported.
    DCI-P3 vs sRGB
  • 3 MP higher front resolution
    This tablet has a higher-resolution front camera than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • Supports PDAF
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28% of tablets support PDAF.
  • 12.9% higher review score
    Reviews score
    7.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 52% of models

    80%

    7.8

    Average grade

    20%

    8.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (13)
    7 reviews: 5 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 6 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    7.9 vs 7.0
  • 5% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.1 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Better display type
    This tablet features a better display type than the average tablet (OLED/AMOLED vs IPS LCD). The average tablet uses IPS LCD display technology.
    OLED/AMOLED vs IPS LCD
  • More vivid contrast
    This tablet has more contrast than the average tablet (1,000,000:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,000,000:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 30.3% sharper screen detail
    This tablet has sharper screen detail than the average tablet (288 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    288 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Sharper display
    This tablet has a sharper screen than the average tablet (2560×1600 vs 1920×1200).
    2,560×1,600 vs 1,920×1,200
  • Wider color gamut
    This tablet supports a wider color gamut than the average tablet (DCI-P3 vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    100% DCI-P3 coverage reported.
    DCI-P3 vs sRGB
  • Supports HDR10
    This tablet supports HDR10, while the average tablet does not. 21.7% of tablets support HDR10.
  • 0.4 inches larger screen
    This tablet has a larger screen than the average tablet (10.5 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    10.5 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 3 MP higher front resolution
    This tablet has a higher-resolution front camera than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Supports PDAF
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28% of tablets support PDAF.
  • 21.2% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a larger battery capacity than the average tablet (8,000 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    8,000 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • Fingerprint unlocking
    This tablet supports fingerprint unlocking, while the average tablet does not. 16% of tablets offer this.
    Side-mounted fingerprint scanner.
  • 1.1 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (6.9 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    6.9 mm vs 8 mm
  • Supports LDAC
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.3% of tablets support LDAC.
  • 4.5 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (5.5 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    5.5 hours vs 10 hours
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This tablet has a narrower front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.8 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's front camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.8 vs f/2.2
  • 101 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (300 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    300 nits vs 401 nits
  • No direct OS updates
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, while the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets offer this.
  • 100 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (300 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    300 nits vs 400 nits
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not support manual exposure, while the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets support manual exposure.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not support manual white balance, while the average tablet does. 51.5% of tablets support manual white balance.
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (6 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    6 vs 8
  • 2x larger process node
    This tablet has a larger process node than the average tablet (28 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    28 nm vs 14 nm
  • 933 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (933 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    933 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (PowerVR GX6250 vs Mali-G51).
    PowerVR GX6250 vs Mali-G51
  • 2 fewer GPU execution units
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (2 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    2 vs 4
  • 14.1% less memory bandwidth
    This tablet has less memory bandwidth than the average tablet (12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 101 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (300 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    300 nits vs 401 nits
  • 100 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (300 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    300 nits vs 400 nits
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This tablet has a narrower front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.8 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's front camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.8 vs f/2.2
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not support manual exposure, while the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets support manual exposure.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not support manual white balance, while the average tablet does. 51.5% of tablets support manual white balance.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, while the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets support timelapse video.
  • 4.5 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (5.5 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    5.5 hours vs 10 hours
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56.4% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No direct OS updates
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, while the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No camera and mic privacy
    This tablet does not support camera and mic privacy, while the average tablet does. 56.6% of tablets offer this.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 53% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, while the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No offline voice recognition
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.4% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • No keyboard accessory
    This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory, the average tablet does. 84.2% of tablets support a keyboard accessory.
  • 68.38 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (243.7 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    243.68 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 43.68 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (243.7 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200 mm tall.
    243.68 mm vs 200 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Zi Reviews Tech
≈ estimated
23/01/2022
Hands-on review · gaming, keyboard and pen tests
Verdict
Alldocube X is recommended for gaming if nothing better fits the price, despite keyboard and pen flaws.
8.0
TechTablets
≈ estimated
14/01/2019
Hands-on review · screen, audio, battery and gaming tests
Verdict
Alldocube X has a premium screen, but it suits only buyers who accept weak battery life and no full-quality Netflix.
8.0
KLGadgetTV
≈ estimated
04/05/2022
Hands-on review · productivity, gaming, battery and accessories
Verdict
Alldocube X is a good budget tablet for media and work, better suited to productivity than gaming.
9.0
gizmochina
≈ estimated
03/02/2022
Hands-on review · gaming, video, battery and daily use
Verdict
Alldocube X offers strong gaming and everyday performance, with a distinctive design that stands out.
8.0
gizmochina
≈ estimated
10/05/2019
Hands-on review · display, build and performance tests
Verdict
Alldocube X is a solid tablet for the price, with a great display but no GPS or cellular.
8.0
Neowin
≈ estimated
27/02/2019
Unboxing · first impressions
Verdict
Alldocube X feels great in hand with an excellent display at a fair price, though it is not the most powerful.
Not graded
Not graded
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
notebookcheck.net
✓ explicit
13/01/2019
Lab test · AMOLED display
Verdict
The Alldocube X is a compact tablet with the Galaxy Tab S4's AMOLED panel, but dim peak brightness and weak cameras hold it back.
6.0
china-gadgets.de
≈ estimated
21/03/2019
Full test · Budget AMOLED tablet
Verdict
The Alldocube X is a well-built 10.5-inch tablet with a sharp AMOLED screen, but its slow wake-up and weak cameras hold it back.
6.0
chip.de
≈ estimated
11/03/2019
Hands-on test · Display focus
Verdict
The Alldocube X is a solid tablet whose 10.5-inch AMOLED screen and fingerprint reader suit buyers who can live with slow performance and weak battery life.
7.6
mobiflip.de
✓ explicit
22/04/2019
Hands-on test · Media tablet
Verdict
The Alldocube X is a media tablet whose AMOLED screen and clean Android suit films and series, but it stutters in demanding games and streams only in SD.
8.0
notebookcheck.biz
✓ explicit
14/01/2019
Lab test · Display and benchmarks
Verdict
The Alldocube X is a fast AMOLED tablet with near-perfect contrast, but its lab colour accuracy is the weakest of the group and it flickers when dimmed.
8.0
notebookcheck.org
✓ explicit
15/01/2019
Lab test · Budget AMOLED tablet
Verdict
The Alldocube X's sharp AMOLED screen makes it look worth more than it is, though its colours and brightness fall short.
8.0
notebookcheck.nl
✓ explicit
17/01/2019
Lab test · Display and benchmarks
Verdict
The Alldocube X is a fast-responding AMOLED tablet with strong contrast, but its colours are the weakest of those tested and its screen flickers at low brightness.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Alldocube X (4GB + 64GB)

  • High-quality 10.5-inch Super AMOLED display (Samsung-made) with 2K resolution
  • Excellent value for money compared to mainstream OLED tablets
  • Premium slim design with a solid all-metal unibody build
  • Includes a 3.5mm headphone jack and MicroSD card expansion
  • Features a side-mounted fingerprint scanner
  • Stock Android experience with minimal bloatware

What customers don't like about Alldocube X (4GB + 64GB)

  • Underwhelming battery life (approx. 5-7.5 hours depending on brightness)
  • Outdated and underpowered MediaTek processor (SoC) for heavy gaming
  • Poor camera quality for both front and rear sensors
  • Likely to remain on an older Android version due to poor manufacturer software support
  • Speakers are somewhat tinny and lack bass
  • Charging speed is relatively slow for its battery size
  • Lacks Widevine L1 support, limiting Netflix/Amazon Prime to standard definition

Verdict

The Alldocube X is a multimedia-focused tablet featuring a standout 10.5-inch Samsung Super AMOLED display with a 2K resolution (2560 x 1600) and HDR support. It is powered by a MediaTek MT8176 hexa-core processor paired with 4GB of RAM and 64GB of expandable internal storage, all encased in a slim 6.9mm metal unibody. Key pros include its vibrant, high-contrast screen that rivals premium devices, a dedicated AKM Hi-Fi audio chip for enhanced sound, a built-in fingerprint scanner for security, and a large 8000mAh battery with quick charging. However, some users have noted cons such as underwhelming battery life under heavy use, mediocre 8MP camera performance in low light, and occasional lag during high-end gaming or fast web scrolling.

Compare Alldocube X (4GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Alldocube X (4GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found