OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Alcatel One Touch Pixi 7 WiFi (1GB + 4GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£70RAM capacity:0.5 GBInternal storage:4 GBScreen size:7 inchesChipset:MediaTek MT8117

Alcatel One Touch Pixi 7 WiFi (1GB + 4GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 3 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.4/10

Overall score

Score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

35%

4.6

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

4.6

Reviews score

10%

4.6

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 99% of tablets
6.8

Value for money

Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components

70%

5.4

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 91%
4.6

Technical score

Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components

22%

4.4

Performance

20%

4.9

Display

16%

4.6

Camera

14%

2.8

Battery

12%

5.5

Connectivity

8%

5.0

Software

5%

6.6

Design

3%

3.9

Audio

â–¼Worse than 98%
4.6

Reviews score

Reviews score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models

4.6

Mark 6.8 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

6.9

Average grade

20%

6.3

Popularity

Grades by review (3)
2 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. 1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 98%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £70
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Alcatel One Touch Pixi 7 WiFi (1GB + 4GB)

Based on 2 · 1

Reviewers agree the compact, lightweight size makes this tablet easy to carry and hold.
Praised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Alcatel One Touch Pixi 7 WiFi (1GB + 4GB)

Based on 79 owners sharing their experience in online comments

30%positive3%mixed67%negative

Owners praise its smooth gaming and staying power, but many report weak cameras, sluggish performance, and serious startup failures.

What owners dislike

  • Tablets get stuck on the Alcatel logo or shut off after the title screen, often after the battery fully drains or a factory reset.13
  • Owners say it is slow and lags, with some apps taking minutes to open and the tablet hanging when many apps run at once.7
  • Owners say the camera is poor, with photo and video quality weak, and one saying the camera only shows a dark image.7
  • Games like GTA San Andreas and Real Racing 3 freeze or shut down after a short while; Tomb Raider won't run.6
  • Screens crack after drops, or go black while touch still works; one owner saw square boxes around the screen after it shut off.6
  • About 3 GB of internal storage, nearly 2 GB taken by preinstalled apps, leaves little room, and Play Store can show storage errors.5
  • Pop-ups say Android, Settings or Google Play services has stopped, and owners report these errors returning even after restarting.5
  • Wi-Fi signal drops out, often after about five minutes of video, while phones and computers on the same network stay connected.4
  • Some owners get no sound at all, not even for videos or music, while others hear sound cut out during games.3
  • The charging port can break so the tablet won't charge, and some owners say the power button stopped working.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Alcatel One Touch Pixi 7 WiFi (1GB + 4GB)

Technical score
Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components:

22%

4.4

Performance

20%

4.9

Display

16%

4.6

Camera

14%

2.8

Battery

12%

5.5

Connectivity

8%

5.0

Software

5%

6.6

Design

3%

3.9

Audio

4.6
Reviews score
4.6
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components:

70%

5.4

Overall score

30%

10

Price

6.8
RAM capacity
0.5 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 0.5 GB of RAM, which is less than 97.1% of tablets and equal to 2.6% of tablets.
Process node
28 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 28 nm process, which is larger than 65.1% of tablets and equal to 17.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
4 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 4 GB of internal storage, which is less than 98.5% of tablets and equal to 1.2% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
MediaTek MT8117
This tablet runs on MediaTek MT8117, which is less advanced than 94.8% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1024×600
This tablet has a 1024×600 screen, which is less sharp than 92.8% of tablets and equal to 6.2% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
TFT LCD
This tablet uses a TFT LCD display type. 89.9% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
157 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 157 ppi, which is lower than 83.7% of tablets and equal to 0.4% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
0.3 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 0.3 MP resolution, which is lower than 99.7% of tablets and equal to 0.3% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
0.3 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 0.3 MP resolution, which is lower than 93% of tablets and equal to 7% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
?
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
Battery capacity
2,840 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 2,840 mAh battery capacity, which is smaller than 97.8% of tablets and equal to 0.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
5 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 5 W, which is slower than 96% of tablets and equal to 3.3% of tablets.
Battery life
8.2 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 8.2 hours, which is shorter than that of 71.8% of tablets and equal to that of 0.3% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 56.9% of tablets offer this.
Show more
LTE support
no
This tablet does not have built-in LTE. 42.9% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 47.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
no
This tablet does not support direct OS updates. 79.8% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
285 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 285 g, which is lighter than 96.5% of tablets and equal to 0.2% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 1, which is more than 0.2% of tablets and equal to 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
1
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 1 speakers, which is fewer than in 90.3% of tablets and equal to the number in 9.6% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more

Alcatel One Touch Pixi 7 WiFi (1GB + 4GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • 41.8% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (285 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    285 g vs 490 g
  • Supports slow-motion video
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, while the average tablet does not. 37.3% of tablets support slow-motion recording.
  • 66.3 mm narrower
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (109 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    109 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 3.71x cheaper
    Alcatel One Touch Pixi 7 WiFi (1GB + 4GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£70 vs £260).
    £70 vs £260
  • More advanced memory type
    This tablet uses more advanced memory than the average tablet (DDR3 vs LPDDR3).
    DDR3 vs LPDDR3
  • 3.71x cheaper
    Alcatel One Touch Pixi 7 WiFi (1GB + 4GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£70 vs £260).
    £70 vs £260
  • More advanced memory type
    This tablet uses more advanced memory than the average tablet (DDR3 vs LPDDR3).
    DDR3 vs LPDDR3
  • Supports slow-motion video
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, while the average tablet does not. 37.3% of tablets support slow-motion recording.
  • 41.8% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (285 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    285 g vs 490 g
  • 66.3 mm narrower
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (109 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    109 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 4.7 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (0.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    0.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • 6 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    2 vs 8
  • 34.3% lower review score
    Reviews score
    4.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models

    4.6

    Mark 6.8 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    6.9

    Average grade

    20%

    6.3

    Popularity

    Grades by review (3)
    2 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. 1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    4.6 vs 7.0
  • 3.5 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (0.5 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    0.5 GB vs 4 GB
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • 7.7 MP lower rear resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (0.3 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    0.3 MP vs 8 MP
  • 57% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (2,840 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    2,840 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • 34.3% lower review score
    Reviews score
    4.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models

    4.6

    Mark 6.8 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    6.9

    Average grade

    20%

    6.3

    Popularity

    Grades by review (3)
    2 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. 1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    4.6 vs 7.0
  • 38.7% lower sentiment score
    4.6 vs 7.5
  • 10.9% worse value for money
    Alcatel One Touch Pixi 7 WiFi (1GB + 4GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.81 vs 7.6).
    6.81 vs 7.55
  • 6 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    2 vs 8
  • 3.5 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (0.5 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    0.5 GB vs 4 GB
  • 40% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 93.8% less internal storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (4 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    4 GB vs 64 GB
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (PowerVR SGX544 vs Mali-G51).
    PowerVR SGX544 vs Mali-G51
  • 2x larger process node
    This tablet has a larger process node than the average tablet (28 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    28 nm vs 14 nm
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not support big.LITTLE architecture, while the average tablet does. 51.7% of tablets support big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 64.4% less memory bandwidth
    This tablet has less memory bandwidth than the average tablet (5.3 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    5.3 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 5 years older
    This tablet was released earlier than the average tablet (2014 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    July 2014
    2014 vs 2019
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • Less sharp display
    This tablet has a less sharp screen than the average tablet (1024×600 vs 1920×1200).
    1,024×600 vs 1,920×1,200
  • 3.1 inches smaller screen
    This tablet has a smaller screen than the average tablet (7 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    7 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 29% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (157 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    157 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 4.7 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (0.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    0.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • 7.7 MP lower rear resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (0.3 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    0.3 MP vs 8 MP
  • Worse main-camera video
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (480x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    480x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No tap-to-focus
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, while the average tablet does. 83% of tablets support touch autofocus.
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not support manual exposure, while the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets support manual exposure.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not support manual white balance, while the average tablet does. 51.5% of tablets support manual white balance.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, while the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets support timelapse video.
  • 57% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (2,840 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    2,840 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 72.2% slower charging
    This tablet charges slower than the average tablet (5 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    5 W vs 18 W
  • 1.8 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8.2 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    8.2 hours vs 10 hours
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet has an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5).
    4 vs 5
  • Fewer Wi-Fi bands
    This tablet supports fewer Wi-Fi bands than the average tablet (2.4GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz). The average tablet supports 2.4GHz/5GHz Wi-Fi bands.
    2.4GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56.4% of tablets support face recognition.
  • No Ethernet support
    This tablet does not have Ethernet support, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets support Ethernet.
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No direct OS updates
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, while the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61.4% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera and mic privacy
    This tablet does not support camera and mic privacy, while the average tablet does. 56.6% of tablets offer this.
  • No multi-user mode
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average of independent expert reviews and videos, graded by us; missing reviews count as 7/10.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how independent test sites and video reviewers rate the product in real use.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Alcatel One Touch Pixi 7 WiFi
    the average tablet
    Alcatel One Touch Pixi 7 WiFi (1GB + 4GB) does not support multi-user mode, while the average tablet does. 73.8% of tablets offer this.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 53% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy
    This tablet does not support location privacy, while the average tablet does. 76.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No voice commands
    This tablet does not support voice commands, while the average tablet does. 96.3% of tablets offer this.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, while the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets offer this.
  • 1.9 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (9.9 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    9.9 mm vs 8 mm
  • 1 fewer speakers
    This tablet has less speakers than the average tablet (1 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    1 vs 2

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0
PhoneArena
≈ estimated
25/02/2014
First look · prototype hands-on at a trade show
Verdict
Alcatel One Touch Pixi 7 WiFi is a prototype that may suit buyers wanting a compact, cheap tablet with recent Android.
Overview video
Overview video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

4.0
pcmag.com
✓ explicit
29/01/2016
Lab test · Compact Android tablet
Verdict
The Alcatel OneTouch Pixi 7 is a compact tablet, but low resolution, cramped storage and sluggish performance make the Amazon Fire the better pick.
4.0
uk.pcmag.com
✓ explicit
29/01/2016
Review summary · Small Android tablet
Verdict
The Alcatel OneTouch Pixi 7 is a very small Android tablet whose battery is its strongest point, while its grainy screen and storage hold it back.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Alcatel One Touch Pixi 7 WiFi (1GB + 4GB)

  • Extremely affordable price point
  • Compact and lightweight 'petite' design makes it very portable
  • Near-stock Android experience with minimal bloatware
  • Includes a built-in infrared (IR) port to use as a universal TV remote
  • Solid battery life for its class (rated at 8+ hours in some tests)
  • MicroSD card slot available for storage expansion

What customers don't like about Alcatel One Touch Pixi 7 WiFi (1GB + 4GB)

  • Poor display quality with low resolution and grainy visuals
  • Very limited internal storage (as little as 1.5GB usable out of 4GB)
  • Sluggish performance due to dated processor and low RAM (often 512MB to 1GB)
  • Subpar cameras (0.3MP or 2MP depending on region) that struggle in low light
  • Frequent system lag and freezing reported during multitasking or gaming
  • Difficulty moving apps to external SD card storage
  • Hollow and tinny speaker quality

Verdict

The Alcatel One Touch Pixi 7 WiFi is an entry-level 7-inch tablet featuring a 960 x 540 QHD TFT display and a lightweight 285g plastic chassis. It is powered by a dual-core 1.2GHz MediaTek MTK8117 processor with 1GB of RAM and 4GB of internal storage, which can be expanded via a microSD slot. Key characteristics include an integrated infrared port for use as a universal remote, dual 0.3MP cameras, and a 2,840mAh battery providing approximately 4 hours of active use. Its main pros are its compact, portable design and affordable price point. However, significant cons include the extremely limited 4GB of storage (with only about 1.5GB usable), a low-resolution display with poor viewing angles, and lackluster overall performance.

Compare Alcatel One Touch Pixi 7 WiFi (1GB + 4GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Alcatel One Touch Pixi 7 WiFi (1GB + 4GB) and other tablets

No results found