OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Ulefone Watch Pro Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£45Screen size:1.55 inchBattery life:25 daysDisplay type:TFT LCD

Ulefone Watch Pro Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and expert reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

5.9

Overall score

Score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components

70%

5.5

Technical score

30%

7.0

Review score

Review score 30% · 7.0 · no independent reviews yet
Until reviews appear, its review part counts as 7/10. Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%.
â–¼Worse than 76% of smartwatches
5.5

Technical score

Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components

24%

6.7

Health

21%

5.5

Fitness

16%

6.9

Battery

14%

4.2

Smart features

12%

2.6

Connectivity

9%

5.8

Display & Design

4%

4.6

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 72% of smartwatches
?

Review score

Review score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet, so its review part counts as 7/10.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
No expert tests yet
  • No image
No image

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Ulefone Watch Pro

Technical score
Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components:

24%

6.7

Health

21%

5.5

Fitness

16%

6.9

Battery

14%

4.2

Smart features

12%

2.6

Connectivity

9%

5.8

Display & Design

4%

4.6

Hardware

5.5
Review score
Review score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet, so its review part counts as 7/10.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
?
Popularity
Popularity
4.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Popularity:
Ulefone Watch Pro has a popularity of 4.1 points, which is lower than 64.2% of smartwatches.
4.1
Value for money
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components:

60%

5.9

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.2
Brand name
Ulefone
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
?
Show more
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
Barometer
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 49.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
â–² Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
no
Distance tracking
no
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
This smartwatch does not support distance tracking. 96% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
25 days
Battery life
25 days
★ Better than 95% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 25 days which is longer than that of 94.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.9% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery power
210 mAh
Battery power
210 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 210 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 83.4% of smartwatches and equal to those in 2.7% of smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
Charge time
120 min
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 120 min which is faster than 13.1% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 44.2% of smartwatches.
Normalized from hour-based sources to 120 minutes.
Show more
Operating system
Proprietary OS
Operating system
Proprietary OS
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS which is less advanced than the operating system in 53.5% of smartwatches and the same as that in 42.8% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
Software update frequency
ended
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 42.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 57.5% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
no
Third-party app support
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 47.7% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
no
Voice assistant support
no
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
This smartwatch does not support voice assistants. 67.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
This smartwatch does not support GPS. 56.2% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
no
Compass
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch does not include a compass. 52.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
Screen size
1.55 inch
Screen size
1.55 inch
â–² Better than 71% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.55 inch which is larger than the screens of 71.3% of smartwatches and equal to those of 1% of smartwatches.
Display type
TFT LCD
Display type
TFT LCD
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
This smartwatch uses a TFT LCD display type which is less advanced than that of 74.1% of smartwatches and the same as that of 15.9% of smartwatches.
Resolution
320x 360
Resolution
320x 360
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 320x360 which is lower than that of 55.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1.3% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
311 ppi
Pixel density
311 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 311 ppi which is lower than that of 59.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
550 nits
Display brightness
550 nits
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 550 nits of display brightness, which is lower than that of 61.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 7.7% of smartwatches.
Show more
CPU speed
0.1 GHz
CPU speed
0.1 GHz
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 0.1 GHz which is slower than that in 87.2% of smartwatches and equal to that in 2.4% of smartwatches.
Processor model
Apollo3.5 Blue Plus
Processor model
Apollo3.5 Blue Plus
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
This smartwatch uses the Apollo3.5 Blue Plus processor model.
RAM
?
Internal storage
4 GB
Internal storage
4 GB
â–² Better than 40% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 4 GB for internal storage which is larger than that of 40.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 27% of smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Ulefone Watch Pro vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • 18 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    25 days
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 25 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    25 days vs 7 days
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
    Measurements are for wellness guidance, not medical diagnosis.
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.2
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.2 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    5.2 vs 5.0
  • 0.15 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.55 inch
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.6 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.55 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 5.9 mm narrower watch width
    Width
    36.1 mm
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is narrower than the average smartwatch (36.1 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    36.1 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • 2.89x cheaper
    Ulefone Watch Pro is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£45 vs £130).
    £45 vs £130
  • 2.89x cheaper
    Ulefone Watch Pro is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£45 vs £130).
    £45 vs £130
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
    Measurements are for wellness guidance, not medical diagnosis.
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • 18 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    25 days
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 25 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    25 days vs 7 days
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.2
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.2 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    5.2 vs 5.0
  • 0.15 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.55 inch
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.6 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.55 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 5.9 mm narrower watch width
    Width
    36.1 mm
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is narrower than the average smartwatch (36.1 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    36.1 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This smartwatch uses TFT LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    TFT LCD vs AMOLED
  • No route tracking
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support route tracking, the average smartwatch does. 74.6% of smartwatches support route tracking.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No always-on display
    Always-On Display
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • 5.1% worse value for money
    Ulefone Watch Pro has a lower value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (7.15 vs 7.5).
    7.15 vs 7.52
  • 47.6% less popular
    Ulefone Watch Pro has a lower popularity than the average smartwatch (4.14 vs 6.1).
    4.14 vs 6.12
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No route tracking
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support route tracking, the average smartwatch does. 74.6% of smartwatches support route tracking.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No distance tracking
    Distance tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    This smartwatch does not support distance tracking, the average smartwatch does. 95.9% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
  • 66 fewer exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    14
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports fewer exercise modes than the average smartwatch (14 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    14 vs 80
  • No voice feedback
    Voice feedback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice feedback, the average smartwatch does. 61.9% of smartwatches support voice feedback.
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • 90 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery life
    210 mAh days
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartwatch (210 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    210 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This smartwatch uses TFT LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    TFT LCD vs AMOLED
  • No always-on display
    Always-On Display
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • Less practical form
    Form
    rectangular
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This smartwatch uses a rectangular form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    rectangular vs round
  • 0.6 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    12.20 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (12.2 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    12.20 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 3.7 mm taller watch height
    Height
    48.7 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is taller than the average smartwatch (48.7 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    48.7 mm vs 45 mm
  • 50 nits lower display brightness
    Display brightness
    550 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has lower display brightness than the average smartwatch (550 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    550 nits vs 600 nits
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No voice assistant
    Voice assistant support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 67.7% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No call answering
    Call answering
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No gesture control
    Gesture control
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    This smartwatch does not support gesture control, the average smartwatch does. 77.7% of smartwatches support gesture control.
  • No speaker
    Built-in speaker
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • Slower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    0.1 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 0.1 GHz, while the average smartwatch uses 1 GHz.
    0.1 GHz vs 1 GHz
  • 1 year/s older release date
    Release date
    2020
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch is an older model than the average smartwatch (2020 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    October 2020
    2020 vs 2021

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Ulefone Watch Pro

  • Exceptional battery life (up to 40 days on a single charge)
  • Comprehensive health tracking including Blood Oxygen (SpO2), heart rate, and sleep monitoring
  • Large 1.55-inch display with good pixel density (311 ppi)
  • Waterproof design suitable for swimming (50m depth rating)
  • Lightweight and comfortable for daily wear (approx. 40g)
  • Includes niche sensors like a barometer and altimeter
  • Competitive pricing compared to major brand smartwatches

What we don't like about Ulefone Watch Pro

  • No Always-On Display (AOD) functionality
  • Lacks a built-in speaker and microphone for answering calls directly
  • Missing an OLED screen (uses LCD technology)
  • No built-in GPS (relies on connected smartphone for mapping)
  • Limited app ecosystem and lack of third-party app support
  • Horrible speaker quality according to some user reports
  • No NFC for wireless mobile payments

Verdict

The Ulefone Watch Pro is a budget-friendly smartwatch featuring a 1.55-inch TFT LCD touch display with a 320 x 360 pixel resolution and 311 PPI density. Encased in a lightweight 40g body with 5 ATM water resistance, it offers comprehensive health tracking including 24-hour heart rate monitoring, SpO2 blood oxygen levels, and REM sleep analysis. Main pros include its exceptional battery life of up to 40 days on a single 210 mAh charge, Bluetooth 5.2 connectivity for reliable smartphone syncing, and a durable build with a glass front and plastic frame. However, notable cons include the lack of built-in GPS for independent route tracking, the absence of an Always-On Display, and a proprietary operating system that does not support third-party apps.

Compare Ulefone Watch Pro with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Ulefone Watch Pro and other Smartwatches

No results found