OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Noise Noisefit Core 2 Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£20Screen size:1.28 inchBattery life:7 daysDisplay type:TFT LCD

Noise Noisefit Core 2 Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 9 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

5.3

Overall score

Score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components

70%

4.8

Technical score

30%

6.5

Review score ( 0 · 9)

Review score 30% · 6.5 · based on 9 videos
9 videos count as 4 of the 5 needed; the rest counts as 7/10. Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. A video or a short review counts less than a full test.
▼Worse than 92% of smartwatches
4.8

Technical score

Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components

24%

4.6

Health

21%

6.2

Fitness

16%

4.3

Battery

14%

5.5

Smart features

12%

2.5

Connectivity

9%

4.6

Display & Design

4%

6.1

Hardware

▼Worse than 89% of smartwatches
6.5

Review score

Review score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 95% of models
Grades by review (9)
Video reviews 9

10%

9.0

Techarsh

10%

8.0

Budget Product

10%

7.0

S.R technical

10%

7.0

Tricky Ansh

10%

5.0

ANUPAM Dev official

10%

5.0

Jstech

10%

4.0

J.K 4 TECH

5%

7.0

Techno Masterjee

5%

4.0

YT Bigyan

estimated from the review
9 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
▼Worse than 95% of smartwatches
  • noise-noisefit-core-2
  • noise-noisefit-core-2
  • noise-noisefit-core-2
  • noise-noisefit-core-2
  • noise-noisefit-core-2
  • noise-noisefit-core-2
  • noise-noisefit-core-2
  • noise-noisefit-core-2
  • noise-noisefit-core-2
noise-noisefit-core-2
noise-noisefit-core-2
noise-noisefit-core-2
noise-noisefit-core-2
noise-noisefit-core-2
noise-noisefit-core-2
noise-noisefit-core-2
noise-noisefit-core-2
noise-noisefit-core-2

Best prices

    N/A~ £20

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Noise Noisefit Core 2

Technical score
Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components:

24%

4.6

Health

21%

6.2

Fitness

16%

4.3

Battery

14%

5.5

Smart features

12%

2.5

Connectivity

9%

4.6

Display & Design

4%

6.1

Hardware

4.8
Review score
Review score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 95% of models
Grades by review (9)
Video reviews 9

10%

9.0

Techarsh

10%

8.0

Budget Product

10%

7.0

S.R technical

10%

7.0

Tricky Ansh

10%

5.0

ANUPAM Dev official

10%

5.0

Jstech

10%

4.0

J.K 4 TECH

5%

7.0

Techno Masterjee

5%

4.0

YT Bigyan

estimated from the review
9 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
6.5
Value for money
Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components:

60%

5.3

Overall score

40%

10

Price

6.7
Brand name
Noise
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
▲ Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
▲ Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
▼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
▼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 48.2% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
▲ Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
Barometer
no
▼ Worse than 50% of models
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 49.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
no
Gyroscope
no
▼ Worse than 70% of models
This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope. 70% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
▼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
▲ Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
7 days
Battery life
7 days
▼ Worse than 44% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 7 days which is longer than that of 38.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 17.1% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
7 h
Battery life in training mode
7 h
▼ Worse than 78% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 7 h in training mode which is shorter than 77.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 4.6% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery power
260 mAh
Battery power
260 mAh
▼ Worse than 66% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 260 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 66.1% of smartwatches and equal to those in 2.8% of smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
Charge time
120 min
▼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 120 min which is faster than 13.1% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 44.2% of smartwatches.
Show more
Operating system
Noise OS
Operating system
Noise OS
▲ Better than 50% of models
This smartwatch runs Noise OS which is more advanced than the operating system in 49.9% of smartwatches and the same as that in 0.6% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
?
Third-party app support
no
Third-party app support
no
▼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 47.7% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
▲ Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
▼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
no
GPS
no
▼ Worse than 56% of models
This smartwatch does not support GPS. 56.2% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
▼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
no
Compass
no
▼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch does not include a compass. 52.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
Screen size
1.28 inch
Screen size
1.28 inch
▼ Worse than 78% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.28 inch which is smaller than the screens of 78.2% of smartwatches and equal to those of 5.2% of smartwatches.
Display type
TFT LCD
Display type
TFT LCD
▼ Worse than 74% of models
This smartwatch uses a TFT LCD display type which is less advanced than that of 74.1% of smartwatches and the same as that of 15.9% of smartwatches.
Resolution
240x 240
Resolution
240x 240
▼ Worse than 74% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 240x240 which is lower than that of 73.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 15.2% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
265 ppi
Pixel density
265 ppi
▼ Worse than 72% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 265 ppi which is lower than that of 71.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1.9% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
500 nits
Display brightness
500 nits
▼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 500 nits of display brightness, which is lower than that of 70% of smartwatches and equal to that of 15.6% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
?
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Noise Noisefit Core 2 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Noise OS
    ▲ Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Noise OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Noise OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    ▲ Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • 6.5x cheaper
    Noise Noisefit Core 2 is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£20 vs £130).
    £20 vs £130
  • 6 g lighter weight
    Weight
    39.0 g
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (39 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    39.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 6.5x cheaper
    Noise Noisefit Core 2 is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£20 vs £130).
    £20 vs £130
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    ▲ Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • 6 g lighter weight
    Weight
    39.0 g
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (39 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    39.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Noise OS
    ▲ Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Noise OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Noise OS vs Proprietary OS
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    ▼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    ▼ Worse than 74% of models
    This smartwatch uses TFT LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    TFT LCD vs AMOLED
  • 48.5 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • No route tracking
    Route support
    no
    ▼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support route tracking, the average smartwatch does. 74.6% of smartwatches support route tracking.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    ▼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    ▼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    ▼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • 6.12x less popular
    Noise Noisefit Core 2 has a lower popularity than the average smartwatch (1 vs 6.1).
    1 vs 6.12
  • 11.9% worse value for money
    Noise Noisefit Core 2 has a lower value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (6.72 vs 7.5).
    6.72 vs 7.52
  • No cycle tracking
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    no
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • No smart scale support
    Smart scale compatibility
    no
    ▼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 53.7% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No route tracking
    Route support
    no
    ▼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support route tracking, the average smartwatch does. 74.6% of smartwatches support route tracking.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    ▼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    ▼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • No gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    no
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 69.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • No voice feedback
    Voice feedback
    no
    ▼ Worse than 62% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice feedback, the average smartwatch does. 61.9% of smartwatches support voice feedback.
  • 30 fewer exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    50
    Category Benchmark
    This smartwatch supports fewer exercise modes than the average smartwatch (50 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    50 vs 80
  • 12.25 h shorter training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    7 h
    ▼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts less in training mode than the average smartwatch (7 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    7 h vs 19.25 h
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    ▼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • 40 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery life
    260 mAh days
    ▼ Worse than 44% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartwatch (260 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    260 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    ▼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    ▼ Worse than 74% of models
    This smartwatch uses TFT LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    TFT LCD vs AMOLED
  • 48.5 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • No always-on display
    Always-On Display
    no
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • No ambient light sensor
    Ambient light sensor
    no
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 60.7% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • 0.12 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    1.28 inch
    ▼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen size than the average smartwatch (1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.28 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 100 nits lower display brightness
    Display brightness
    500 nits
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
    This smartwatch has lower display brightness than the average smartwatch (500 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    500 nits vs 600 nits
  • Lower resolution
    Display type
    240 x 240
    ▼ Worse than 74% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 240x240, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    240x240 vs 352x430
  • 61 ppi lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    265 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a lower pixel density than the average smartwatch (265 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    265 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 2.5 mm taller watch height
    Height
    47.5 mm
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is taller than the average smartwatch (47.5 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    47.5 mm vs 45 mm
  • 3.5 mm wider watch width
    Width
    45.5 mm
    ▼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (45.5 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    45.5 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    ▼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No passcode
    Passcode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not include passcode protection, the average smartwatch does. 67.8% of smartwatches include passcode protection.
  • No speaker
    Built-in speaker
    no
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0
S.R technical
≈ estimated
26/08/2022
Unboxing and detailed review · features and battery test
Verdict
Noise Noisefit Core 2 is fine for its price, though plain and short on features; some pricier watches are better.
5.0
ANUPAM Dev official
≈ estimated
25/08/2022
Unboxing and review · price, accuracy and battery checks
Verdict
Noise Noisefit Core 2 is a hard sell at its price, with a plastic build and few added features.
9.0
Techarsh
≈ estimated
23/08/2022
Hands-on review · build, display and health sensor checks
Verdict
Noise Noisefit Core 2 is good value for its price, with no major problems found during use.
4.0
J.K 4 TECH
≈ estimated
23/08/2022
Unboxing and review · build, features and value check
Verdict
Noise Noisefit Core 2 is poor value for the money, and the creator advises against buying it.
Not graded
Hands-on video, no verdict

What reviewers agree on

Based on 0 · 9

Reviewers praise the display and design, but many find the build flimsy and the watch poor value.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Third-party reviews

What we like about Noise Noisefit Core 2

  • Affordable and budget-friendly price point
  • Sleek and stylish metallic finish with a 1.28-inch vibrant touchscreen
  • Long battery life, lasting up to 7–9 days on a single charge
  • Comprehensive fitness tracking with 50+ sports modes and SpO2 monitoring
  • IP68 water resistance rating, making it suitable for light water activities
  • Lightweight and comfortable for long-term wear

What we don't like about Noise Noisefit Core 2

  • Questionable long-term durability; some users reported devices going dead after 3–4 months
  • Slow wrist-wake sensor response times reported by some users
  • Limited customisation options for watch faces compared to higher-end models
  • Inconsistent sleep and heart rate recording in some units
  • Lack of built-in GPS, requiring a smartphone for route tracking
  • Basic user interface that lacks the smooth transitions found in premium smartwatches

Verdict

The Noise NoiseFit Core 2 is an affordable smartwatch featuring a circular 1.28-inch TFT LCD display with 240 x 240 pixel resolution and 500 nits of peak brightness. It is equipped with a 230mAh battery that offers up to 7 days of runtime and 30 days of standby on a single 2-hour charge. The device includes an IP68 water-resistance rating, 50 sports modes, and the Noise Health Suite for 24/7 heart rate monitoring, SpO2 tracking, and sleep analysis. Main pros include its lightweight design, durable metallic finish, and broad compatibility with both Android and iOS through the NoiseFit Sync app. However, it lacks advanced features such as Bluetooth calling, built-in GPS, and an Always-On Display.

Compare Noise Noisefit Core 2 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Noise Noisefit Core 2 and other Smartwatches

No results found