OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Smartphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

vivo V60 Lite 4G (8GB + 128GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£320RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:6.77 inchesMain camera megapixels:50 MP & 8 MP

vivo V60 Lite 4G (8GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.6

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Score components

90%

6.6

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 52% of smartphones
6.6

Technical score

Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 52% of models
Score components

25%

5.3

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.2

Camera

15%

7.6

Display

15%

8.1

Battery

10%

8.8

Software

10%

6.1

Connectivity

4%

3.8

Audio

3%

6.9

Design

â–²Better than 52% of smartphones
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £320

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
8GB + 128GB8GB + 256GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone vivo V60 Lite 4G (8GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 52% of models
Score components:

25%

5.3

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.2

Camera

15%

7.6

Display

15%

8.1

Battery

10%

8.8

Software

10%

6.1

Connectivity

4%

3.8

Audio

3%

6.9

Design

6.6
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
vivo V60 Lite 4G (8GB + 128GB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is lower than 63.9% of smartphones.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
Score components:

60%

6.6

Overall score

40%

8.8

Price

7.3
Brand name
vivo
Processor model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
Processor model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
This smartphone uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 processor model which is slower than processors in 73% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.8% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
8 GB
RAM capacity
8 GB
â–¼ Worse than 41% of models
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 8 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 28.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 30.4% of smartphones.
Internal storage
128 GB
Internal storage
128 GB
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 128 GB which is smaller than the storage of 61.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 28.4% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.8 GHz
CPU boost clock speed
2.8 GHz
â–² Better than 64% of models
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.8 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 64.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.1% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15)
Android version
Android 15
Android version
Android 15
â–² Better than 71% of models
This smartphone runs Android version Android 15 which is newer than that found in 70.6% of smartphones and equal to that in 25.1% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
yes
Direct OS updates
yes
â–² Better than 79% of models
This smartphone receives direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
Open-source OS
yes
â–² Better than 5% of models
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
Dark mode
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
Multi-lens main camera
yes
â–² Better than 6% of models
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
50 MP & 8 MP
Main camera megapixels
50 MP & 8 MP
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 50 MP & 8 MP which is higher than that of 46.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 5.6% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.8 & f/2.2
Main camera aperture
f/1.8 & f/2.2
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 which is narrower than that of 52.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 5.2% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
32 mm²
Main camera sensor area
32 mm²
â–¼ Worse than 49% of models
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 32 mm² which is larger than the main camera sensor area of 42.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 8.2% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
0.8 µm
Main camera pixel size
0.8 µm
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 0.8 µm which is larger than in 35.5% of smartphones and equal to the size in 21.9% of smartphones.
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Number of SIM slots
2
â–² Better than 4% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
2 Nano-SIM (Hybrid Slot in some versions )
Cellular module
yes
Cellular module
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.77 inches
Screen size
6.77 inches
â–² Better than 71% of models
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.77 inches which is larger than the screens of 70.8% of smartphones and equal to those of 2.6% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1080x 2392 px
Screen resolution
1080x 2392 px
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1080x2392 px which is lower than that of 63.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.2% of smartphones.
Pixel density
388 ppi
Pixel density
388 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 388 ppi which is lower than that of 67.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 3.3% of smartphones.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
â–² Better than 41% of models
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.6% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
120 Hz
Refresh rate
120 Hz
â–² Better than 35% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 120 Hz which is higher than in 34.7% of smartphones and equal to that in 55.2% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
6,500 mAh
Battery capacity
6,500 mAh
â–² Better than 82% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 6,500 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 82.4% of smartphones and equal to those in 2.6% of smartphones.
Charging speed
90 W
Charging speed
90 W
â–² Better than 87% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 90 W which is faster than in 86.6% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 3.5% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
Fast charging
yes
â–² Better than 7% of models
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
55 min
GSMArena full wired charge time
55 min
â–² Better than 61% of models
Market range: <36 min – >120 min
This smartphone reaches a full wired charge in 55 min which is faster than 61.4% of smartphones and equal to the time of 1.8% of smartphones.
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 25% of models
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
Stereo speakers
yes
â–² Better than 36% of models
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
â–¼ Worse than 45% of models
This smartphone does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
2
Number of microphones
2
â–¼ Worse than 23% of models
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 10.5% of smartphones and equal to the number in 66.6% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–¼ Worse than 34% of models
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
aptX Lossless
no
â–¼ Worse than 13% of models
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
163.8 mm
Height
163.8 mm
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 163.8 mm which is taller than 53.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.1% of smartphones.
Width
76.3 mm
Width
76.3 mm
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 76.3 mm which is wider than 58.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.9% of smartphones.
Thickness
7.6 mm
Thickness
7.6 mm
â–² Better than 86% of models
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 7.6 mm which is thinner than 86% of smartphones and equal to that of 3.5% of smartphones.
Weight
194 g
Weight
194 g
â–² Better than 55% of models
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 194 g which is lighter than 54.7% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 1.8% of smartphones.
Device volume
86,716 cm³
Device volume
86,716 cm³
â–² Better than 76% of models
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 86,716 cm³ which is smaller than 76.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.7% of smartphones.
Show more

vivo V60 Lite 4G (8GB + 128GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • 30% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    6,500 mAh
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
    This smartphone has a larger battery capacity than the average smartphone (6500 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone battery is 5000 mAh.
    6,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 2.73x faster charging speed
    Charging speed
    90 W
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <15 W – >90 W
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (90 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    90 W vs 33 W
  • Direct OS updates
    Direct OS updates
    yes
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartphone supports direct OS updates, the average smartphone does not. 20.6% of smartphones support this feature.
  • Higher contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    8000000:1
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    This smartphone has a higher contrast ratio than the average smartphone (8000000:1 vs 1000000:1). The average smartphone contrast ratio is 1000000:1.
    8,000,000:1 vs 1,000,000:1
  • 16x more L1
    L1 cache
    512 KB
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <32 KB – >192 KB
    This smartphone has more L1 cache than the average smartphone (512 KB vs 32 KB). The average L1 cache is 32 KB.
    512 KB vs 32 KB
  • 62.3% higher PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark
    PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark
    1,276 min
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <487 min – >1.3k min
    This smartphone has a higher PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark score than the average smartphone (1276 min vs 786 min). The average score is 786 min.
    1,276 min vs 786 min
  • Supports HDR10+ support
    HDR10+ support
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartphone supports HDR10+, the average smartphone does not. 22.2% of smartphones include HDR10+ support.
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    On-device AI level
    productivity
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This smartphone runs on the productivity AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    AI Erase 3, AI Captions, AI Note Assist, AI Smart Call Assistant, AI Transcript Assist, AI SuperLink, AI Aura Light Portrait
    productivity vs fundamental
  • 16x more L1
    L1 cache
    512 KB
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <32 KB – >192 KB
    This smartphone has more L1 cache than the average smartphone (512 KB vs 32 KB). The average L1 cache is 32 KB.
    512 KB vs 32 KB
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    CPU base clock speed
    4 x 2.8 GHz & 4 x 1.9 GHz
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (4x2.8 GHz & 4x1.9 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    4x2.8 GHz & 4x1.9 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • 16.7% higher CPU boost clock speed
    CPU boost clock speed
    2.8 GHz
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • Direct OS updates
    Direct OS updates
    yes
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartphone supports direct OS updates, the average smartphone does not. 20.6% of smartphones support this feature.
  • Higher on-device AI tier
    On-device AI level
    productivity
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This smartphone runs on the productivity AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, enabling stronger on-device AI features.
    AI Erase 3, AI Captions, AI Note Assist, AI Smart Call Assistant, AI Transcript Assist, AI SuperLink, AI Aura Light Portrait
    productivity vs fundamental
  • Supports fast boot
    Fast boot
    yes
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    This smartphone supports fast boot, the average smartphone does not. 22.6% of smartphones include fast boot capabilities.
  • Newer Android version
    Android version
    Android 15
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    This smartphone features a newer Android version than the average smartphone (Android 15 vs Android 14). The average version is Android 14.
    Android 15 vs Android 14
  • Supports 360° panorama
    360° panorama
    yes
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This smartphone can capture 360° panoramas, the average smartphone cannot. 25.2% of smartphones support 360° panoramas.
  • Allows manual shutter speed
    Manual shutter speed
    yes
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    This smartphone allows manual shutter speed control, the average smartphone does not. 29.8% of smartphones include this.
  • Higher front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    32 MP
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <5 – >40
    This smartphone has more front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (32 MP vs 16 MP). The average front camera has 16 MP megapixels.
    32 MP vs 16 MP
  • Supports optical tracking
    Optical tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    This smartphone supports optical tracking, the average smartphone does not. 12.5% of smartphones include optical tracking.
  • Higher contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    8000000:1
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    This smartphone has a higher contrast ratio than the average smartphone (8000000:1 vs 1000000:1). The average smartphone contrast ratio is 1000000:1.
    8,000,000:1 vs 1,000,000:1
  • Supports HDR10+ support
    HDR10+ support
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartphone supports HDR10+, the average smartphone does not. 22.2% of smartphones include HDR10+ support.
  • Has an always-on display
    Always-on display
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • 0.1 inches inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    6.77 inches
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (6.8 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    6.77 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 800 nits higher peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    1,800 nits
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    Market range: <480 nits – >3.6k nits
    This smartphone has a higher peak brightness than the average smartphone (1800 nits vs 1000 nits). The average peak brightness is 1000 nits.
    1,800 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 132.5 nits higher GSMArena max display brightness
    GSMArena max display brightness
    1,026 nits
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    Market range: <537 nits – >1.4k nits
    This smartphone has a higher GSMArena max display brightness than the average smartphone (1026 nits vs 893.5 nits). The average max brightness is 893.5 nits.
    1,026 nits vs 893.5 nits
  • 30% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    6,500 mAh
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
    This smartphone has a larger battery capacity than the average smartphone (6500 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone battery is 5000 mAh.
    6,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 2.73x faster charging speed
    Charging speed
    90 W
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <15 W – >90 W
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (90 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    90 W vs 33 W
  • 62.3% higher PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark
    PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark
    1,276 min
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <487 min – >1.3k min
    This smartphone has a higher PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark score than the average smartphone (1276 min vs 786 min). The average score is 786 min.
    1,276 min vs 786 min
  • 7 min faster GSMArena full wired charge time
    GSMArena full wired charge time
    55 min
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    Market range: <36 min – >120 min
    This smartphone has a faster GSMArena full wired charge time than the average smartphone (55 min vs 62 min). The average charge time is 62 min.
    55 min vs 62 min
  • 0.7 mm thinner
    Thickness
    7.6 mm
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
    This smartphone is thinner than the average smartphone (7.6 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone thickness is 8.3 mm.
    7.6 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 1 year/s newer release date
    Release date
    2025
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartphone has a newer release date than the average smartphone (2025 vs 2024). 1.00% of smartphones are released annually.
    October 2025
    2025 vs 2024
  • Worse processor
    Processor model
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • No 5G connectivity
    5G connectivity
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • Worse main camera video quality
    Main camera video
    1080 x 30 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 50% less storage
    Internal storage
    128 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (128 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 256 GB
  • 30.5% lower PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    7,496
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <7.1k – >15.9k
    This smartphone performs worse in PCMark Work 3.0 than the average smartphone (7,496 vs 10,783). The average smartphone scores 10,783 in PCMark Work 3.0.
    7,496 vs 10,783
  • No NFC
    NFC
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This smartphone does not support NFC, the average smartphone does. 83.1% of smartphones feature NFC.
  • 79.4% lower 3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    643
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <661 – >11.1k
    This smartphone performs worse in the 3DMark Wild Life benchmark than the average smartphone (643 vs 3,115). The average smartphone scores 3,115 in this benchmark.
    643 vs 3,115
  • No LDAC support
    LDAC
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    This smartphone does not support LDAC, the average smartphone does. 60.3% of smartphones support LDAC.
  • 5.44x less popular
    vivo V60 Lite 4G (8GB + 128GB) is less popular than the average smartphone (1 vs 5.4).
    1 vs 5.44
  • Worse processor
    Processor model
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 50% less storage
    Internal storage
    128 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (128 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 256 GB
  • 30.5% lower PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    7,496
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <7.1k – >15.9k
    This smartphone performs worse in PCMark Work 3.0 than the average smartphone (7,496 vs 10,783). The average smartphone scores 10,783 in PCMark Work 3.0.
    7,496 vs 10,783
  • 79.4% lower 3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    643
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <661 – >11.1k
    This smartphone performs worse in the 3DMark Wild Life benchmark than the average smartphone (643 vs 3,115). The average smartphone scores 3,115 in this benchmark.
    643 vs 3,115
  • 42.9% lower maximum RAM capacity
    Maximum RAM
    8 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <8 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (8 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 14 GB
  • 50% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    471
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <392 – >2.2k
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (471 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in the Geekbench 6 single-core test.
    471 vs 942
  • 16.7% higher TDP (less efficient)
    TDP (Thermal design power)
    5 W
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <4 W – >10 W
    This smartphone has a higher TDP than the average smartphone (5 W vs 6 W). The average smartphone has a TDP of 6 W.
    5 W vs 6 W
  • 50% less L3 cache
    L3 cache
    2048 KB
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1k KB – >8.2k KB
    This smartphone has a smaller L3 cache than the average smartphone (2048 KB vs 4096 KB). The average smartphone has an L3 cache of 4096 KB.
    2,048 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • 39.5% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    1,532
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <1.4k – >6.7k
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (1,532 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in the Geekbench 6 multi-core test.
    1,532 vs 2,533
  • 22.4% slower memory speed
    Memory speed
    2,133 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    Market range: <1.8k MHz – >4.8k MHz
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (2133 MHz vs 2750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2750 MHz.
    2,133 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 68.7% lower 3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    384
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <313 – >4.7k
    This smartphone scores lower in 3DMark Wild Life Extreme than the average smartphone (384 vs 1,226). The average smartphone scores 1,226.
    384 vs 1,226
  • 50% fewer shader units
    N. of shading units
    128
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <32 – >1.5k
    This smartphone includes fewer shader units than the average smartphone (128 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    128 vs 256
  • Lacks extra dim mode
    Extra dim mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This smartphone does not have extra dim mode, the average smartphone does. 82.5% of smartphones offer extra dimming features.
  • Worse main camera video quality
    Main camera video
    1080 x 30 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/1.8 & f/2.2
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.8 & f/2.2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.8 & f/2.2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.45
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    This smartphone has a narrower front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2.45 vs f/2.2). The average smartphone front aperture is f/2.2.
    2.45
    f/2.45 vs f/2.2
  • No 5G connectivity
    5G connectivity
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • No NFC
    NFC
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This smartphone does not support NFC, the average smartphone does. 83.1% of smartphones feature NFC.
  • No memory card slot
    Memory card slot
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.0
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.0 vs 5.2
  • 1.8% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    388 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
    This smartphone has a lower pixel density than the average smartphone (388 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    388 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1080 x 2392 px
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartphone has a lower screen resolution than the average smartphone (1080x2392 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone has a resolution of 1080x2400 px.
    1080x2392 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • No LDAC support
    LDAC
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    This smartphone does not support LDAC, the average smartphone does. 60.3% of smartphones support LDAC.
  • No aptX HD
    aptX HD
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartphone does not support aptX HD, the average smartphone does. 50.7% of smartphones support aptX HD.
  • Lower IP rating
    IP rating
    IP65
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartphone has a lower IP rating than the average smartphone (IP65 vs IP67). 0.00% of smartphones have a higher IP rating.
    IP65 vs IP67

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

W
walastech.com
01/12/2025
Summary of the review
Charged for Life: How the vivo V60 Lite Powers Through Every Day
Y
yugatech.com
25/10/2025
Summary of the review
vivo V60 Lite (4G) Review - YugaTech
V
vivo.com
25/09/2025
Summary of the review
vivo V60 Lite - 6,500 mAh Battery, AMOLED Display, AI Tool: Would you like to compare the Snapdragon 685 processor performance of this 4G model with t...
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about vivo V60 Lite 4G (8GB + 128GB)

  • Elegant and premium-feeling design despite a plastic build, with a slim and lightweight profile making it comfortable to hold.
  • Excellent battery life (6,500 mAh) that can last up to two days with moderate use, a major highlight for users.
  • Fast 90W wired charging that recharges the phone quickly.
  • Bright, vibrant 6.77-inch AMOLED display with a smooth 120Hz refresh rate and HDR10+ support, providing a great viewing experience in various lighting conditions.
  • Dependable 50MP main camera (Sony IMX882 sensor) that captures clear, detailed, and color-balanced photos in good lighting conditions.
  • Good quality 32MP front-facing camera for crisp and detailed selfies.
  • Dual stereo speakers capable of loud volume (up to 400%) for an immersive audio experience.
  • IP65 rating for dust and water splash resistance and SGS Five-Star Drop Resistance certification, indicating good durability.
  • Smooth performance on daily tasks and multitasking due to the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 processor and ample RAM.
  • Useful software features, including AI editing tools like AI Erase and Google's Circle to Search.
  • Bypass charging support, which allows the phone to be used while plugged in without damaging the battery.
  • Ample storage options (256GB) for the price point.

What we don't like about vivo V60 Lite 4G (8GB + 128GB)

  • Performance struggles with graphic-intensive games, often capping at less than 30 fps, due to the mid-range processor.
  • Video recording resolution is limited to a maximum of 1080p at 30fps for both front and rear cameras, with 4K recording only available on the more expensive 5G variant.
  • Absence of a 3.5mm audio jack.
  • No microSD card slot for expandable storage.
  • The back panel, despite the premium feel, easily attracts fingerprints.
  • Low-light camera performance is not optimal, producing some graininess and softness in images due to the lack of OIS.
  • Fingerprint sensor registration can have a slight delay.
  • Considered slightly overpriced by some users for the specifications offered, especially when compared to competitor phones in the same price range.
  • Some bloatware is present in the Funtouch OS, although it can be removed.

Verdict

The vivo V60 Lite 4G (8GB + 128GB) is a sleek mid-range smartphone featuring a vibrant 6.77-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, HDR10+ support, and a peak brightness of 1800 nits. Under the hood, it is powered by a 6nm Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 chipset paired with 8GB of LPDDR4X RAM and 128GB of UFS 2.2 storage, running on Android 15 with Funtouch OS 15. Key highlights include a massive 6,500mAh BlueVolt battery supporting 90W FlashCharge and bypass charging, a dual rear camera setup led by a 50MP Sony IMX882 main sensor and an 8MP ultra-wide lens, and a high-resolution 32MP selfie camera. Main pros consist of its exceptional battery endurance, rapid charging speeds, premium slim design with an IP65 durability rating, and loud dual stereo speakers capable of 400% volume. However, its notable cons include the lack of 5G connectivity, the absence of a 3.5mm headphone jack, and a processor that may struggle with high-end, demanding gaming.Would you like to compare the pricing for this 128GB model against the 256GB variant, or should I find a list of compatible fast-charging accessories?

Compare vivo V60 Lite 4G (8GB + 128GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of vivo V60 Lite 4G (8GB + 128GB) and other smartphones

No results found