OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Smartphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Unihertz Jelly 2E (4GB + 64GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£130RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:3 inchesMain camera megapixels:16 MP

Unihertz Jelly 2E (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

5.4

Overall score

Score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

90%

5.1

Technical score

10%

7.7

User score

â–¼Worse than 96% of smartphones
5.1

Technical score

Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

25%

4.5

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.9

Camera

15%

4.2

Display

15%

3.5

Battery

10%

7.8

Software

10%

6.3

Connectivity

4%

4.4

Audio

3%

6.9

Design

â–¼Worse than 96% of smartphones
7.7

User score

User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

7.0

Number of reviews

Based on 526 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 78% of smartphones
  • unihertz-jelly-2e
  • unihertz-jelly-2e
  • unihertz-jelly-2e
  • unihertz-jelly-2e
  • unihertz-jelly-2e
  • unihertz-jelly-2e
  • unihertz-jelly-2e
unihertz-jelly-2e
unihertz-jelly-2e
unihertz-jelly-2e
unihertz-jelly-2e
unihertz-jelly-2e
unihertz-jelly-2e
unihertz-jelly-2e

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Unihertz Jelly 2E (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components:

25%

4.5

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.9

Camera

15%

4.2

Display

15%

3.5

Battery

10%

7.8

Software

10%

6.3

Connectivity

4%

4.4

Audio

3%

6.9

Design

5.1
User score
User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

7.0

Number of reviews

Based on 526 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.7
Popularity
Popularity
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 65% of models
Popularity:
Unihertz Jelly 2E (4GB + 64GB) has a popularity of 7 points, which is higher than 65.1% of smartphones.
7.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components:

60%

5.4

Overall score

40%

9.8

Price

6.7
Brand name
Unihertz
Processor model
MediaTek Helio A20
Processor model
MediaTek Helio A20
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
This smartphone uses the MediaTek Helio A20 processor model which is slower than processors in 97.5% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.1% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
4 GB
RAM capacity
4 GB
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 82.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 14% of smartphones.
Internal storage
64 GB
Internal storage
64 GB
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is smaller than the storage of 89.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 7.9% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
1.8 GHz
CPU boost clock speed
1.8 GHz
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 1.8 GHz which is lower than the boost speed of 92.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 2% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 12
Android version
Android 12
Android version
Android 12
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
This smartphone runs Android version Android 12 which is older than that found in 67.1% of smartphones and equal to that in 13.2% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
Direct OS updates
no
â–¼ Worse than 21% of models
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
Open-source OS
yes
â–² Better than 5% of models
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
Dark mode
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
no
Multi-lens main camera
no
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
This smartphone does not include a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
16 MP
Main camera megapixels
16 MP
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 16 MP which is lower than that of 87.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
?
Main camera sensor area
?
Main camera pixel size
?
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Number of SIM slots
2
â–² Better than 4% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
Cellular module
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
3 inches
Screen size
3 inches
â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 3 inches which is smaller than the screens of 100% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
480x 854 px
Screen resolution
480x 854 px
â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 480x854 px which is lower than that of 99.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Pixel density
326 ppi
Pixel density
326 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 326 ppi which is lower than that of 76.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.4% of smartphones.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
This smartphone uses a IPS LCD display type. 0% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is lower than in 84.3% of smartphones and equal to that in 15.7% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
2000 mAh
Battery capacity
2000 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 2000 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 99.6% of smartphones and equal to those in 0.2% of smartphones.
Charging speed
10 W
Charging speed
10 W
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 10 W which is slower than in 93.7% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 5.8% of smartphones.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
This smartphone does not support fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 25% of models
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
no
Stereo speakers
no
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
This smartphone does not include stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
â–² Better than 55% of models
This smartphone includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
2
Number of microphones
2
â–¼ Worse than 23% of models
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 10.5% of smartphones and equal to the number in 66.6% of smartphones.
FM radio
yes
FM radio
yes
â–² Better than 66% of models
This smartphone includes an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
?
Show more
Height
95 mm
Height
95 mm
★ Better than 100% of models
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 95 mm which is shorter than 100% of smartphones.
Width
49.4 mm
Width
49.4 mm
★ Better than 100% of models
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 49.4 mm which is narrower than 100% of smartphones.
Thickness
16.5 mm
Thickness
16.5 mm
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 16.5 mm which is thicker than 94.5% of smartphones.
Weight
110 g
Weight
110 g
★ Better than 100% of models
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 110 g which is lighter than 99.9% of smartphones.
Device volume
74,480 cm³
Device volume
74,480 cm³
★ Better than 97% of models
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 74,480 cm³ which is smaller than 96.6% of smartphones.
Show more

Unihertz Jelly 2E (4GB + 64GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • 43.9% lighter
    Weight
    110 g
    ★ Better than 100% of models
    Market range: <175 g – >256 g
    This smartphone is lighter than the average smartphone (110 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    110 g vs 196.2 g
  • 26.6 mm narrower
    Width
    49.4 mm
    ★ Better than 100% of models
    Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (49.4 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    49.4 mm vs 76 mm
  • 68.6 mm shorter
    Height
    95 mm
    ★ Better than 100% of models
    Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
    This smartphone is shorter than the average smartphone (95 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone height is 163.6 mm.
    95 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    3.5 mm headphone jack
    yes
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Has FM radio
    FM radio
    yes
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    This smartphone features an FM radio, the average smartphone does not. 34.2% of smartphones include an FM tuner.
  • 2x cheaper
    Unihertz Jelly 2E (4GB + 64GB) is cheaper than the average smartphone (£130 vs £260).
    £130 vs £260
  • 23.8% smaller volume
    Device volume
    74,480 cm³
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
    This smartphone has a smaller device volume than the average smartphone (74480 cm³ vs 97800 cm³). The average smartphone volume is 97800 cm³.
    74,480 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³
  • 2x cheaper
    Unihertz Jelly 2E (4GB + 64GB) is cheaper than the average smartphone (£130 vs £260).
    £130 vs £260
  • 28.3% more popular
    Unihertz Jelly 2E (4GB + 64GB) is more popular than the average smartphone (6.98 vs 5.4).
    6.98 vs 5.44
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    3.5 mm headphone jack
    yes
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Has FM radio
    FM radio
    yes
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    This smartphone features an FM radio, the average smartphone does not. 34.2% of smartphones include an FM tuner.
  • 43.9% lighter
    Weight
    110 g
    ★ Better than 100% of models
    Market range: <175 g – >256 g
    This smartphone is lighter than the average smartphone (110 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    110 g vs 196.2 g
  • 26.6 mm narrower
    Width
    49.4 mm
    ★ Better than 100% of models
    Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (49.4 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    49.4 mm vs 76 mm
  • 68.6 mm shorter
    Height
    95 mm
    ★ Better than 100% of models
    Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
    This smartphone is shorter than the average smartphone (95 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone height is 163.6 mm.
    95 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 23.8% smaller volume
    Device volume
    74,480 cm³
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
    This smartphone has a smaller device volume than the average smartphone (74480 cm³ vs 97800 cm³). The average smartphone volume is 97800 cm³.
    74,480 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³
  • Worse processor
    Processor model
    MediaTek Helio A20
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Helio A20 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Helio A20 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    IPS LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 50% lower refresh rate
    Refresh rate
    60 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 75% less storage
    Internal storage
    64 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (64 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    64 GB vs 256 GB
  • No 5G connectivity
    5G connectivity
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • 2x larger process node
    Process node
    12 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >12 nm
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (12 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    12 nm vs 6 nm
  • 60% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    2000 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (2000 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5000 mAh.
    2,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • Worse main camera video quality
    Main camera video
    1080 x 30 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 9.1% worse value for money
    Unihertz Jelly 2E (4GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (6.72 vs 7.3).
    6.72 vs 7.34
  • 4% lower user score
    User score
    7.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Unihertz Jelly 2E
    the average smartphone
    Unihertz Jelly 2E (4GB + 64GB) has a lower user score than the average smartphone (7.69 vs 8.000).
    7.69 vs 8
  • Worse processor
    Processor model
    MediaTek Helio A20
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Helio A20 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Helio A20 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 75% less storage
    Internal storage
    64 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (64 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    64 GB vs 256 GB
  • 2x larger process node
    Process node
    12 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >12 nm
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (12 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    12 nm vs 6 nm
  • 31.6% slower GPU clock
    GPU frequency
    650 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <646 MHz – >1.2k MHz
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (650 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    650 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 4 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    4 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 8 GB
  • 82.7% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    163
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <392 – >2.2k
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (163 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in the Geekbench 6 single-core test.
    163 vs 942
  • 71.4% lower maximum RAM capacity
    Maximum RAM
    4 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <8 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 14 GB
  • 25% lower CPU boost clock speed
    CPU boost clock speed
    1.8 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
    This smartphone has a lower CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (1.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    1.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 56.4% slower memory speed
    Memory speed
    1,200 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <1.8k MHz – >4.8k MHz
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (1200 MHz vs 2750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2750 MHz.
    1,200 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • Lacks big.LITTLE architecture
    big.LITTLE Architecture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    This smartphone does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average smartphone does. 98.4% of smartphones use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    4
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <4 – >14
    This smartphone supports fewer CPU threads than the average smartphone (4 vs 8). The average smartphone supports 8 threads.
    4 vs 8
  • 87.5% fewer shader units
    N. of shading units
    32
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <32 – >1.5k
    This smartphone includes fewer shader units than the average smartphone (32 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    32 vs 256
  • Supports older OpenCL version
    OpenCL version
    1.2
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    This smartphone supports a lower OpenCL version than the average smartphone (1.2 vs 2). The average smartphone supports OpenCL version 2.0.
    1.2 vs 2.0
  • Lower CPU base clock speed
    CPU base clock speed
    4 x 1.8 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    This smartphone has a lower CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (4x1.8 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    4x1.8 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • No live text recognition
    Live text recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Older Android version
    Android version
    Android 12
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 12 vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 12 vs Android 14
  • Worse main camera video quality
    Main camera video
    1080 x 30 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    Main camera megapixels
    16 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <10 – >100
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (16 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    16 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Single-lens main camera
    Multi-lens main camera
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    This smartphone has a single-lens main camera, while the average smartphone has a multi-lens setup. 93.7% of smartphones use multiple lenses.
  • Lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    8 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <5 – >40
    This smartphone has lower front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (8 MP vs 16 MP). The average smartphone has a 16 MP front camera.
    8 MP vs 16 MP
  • No 5G connectivity
    5G connectivity
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • No NFC
    NFC
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This smartphone does not support NFC, the average smartphone does. 83.1% of smartphones feature NFC.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.1
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (4.1 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    4.1 vs 5.2
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    IPS LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 50% lower refresh rate
    Refresh rate
    60 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 3.67 inches inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    3 inches
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (3 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    3 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    480 x 854 px
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    This smartphone has a lower screen resolution than the average smartphone (480x854 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone has a resolution of 1080x2400 px.
    480x854 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 17.5% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    326 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
    This smartphone has a lower pixel density than the average smartphone (326 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    326 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Worse display glass type
    Display glass type
    Corning Gorilla Glass
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This smartphone uses a worse display glass type than the average smartphone (Corning Gorilla Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5). 0.00% of smartphones use the better glass type.
    Corning Gorilla Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5
  • 60% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    2000 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (2000 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5000 mAh.
    2,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 69.7% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    10 W
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <15 W – >90 W
    This smartphone has a slower charging speed than the average smartphone (10 W vs 33 W). The average smartphone charges at 33 W.
    10 W vs 33 W
  • 34.1% lower PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark
    PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark
    518 min
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <487 min – >1.3k min
    This smartphone scores lower in PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark than the average smartphone (518 min vs 786 min). The average smartphone scores 786 min.
    518 min vs 786 min
  • No fast charging support
    Fast charging
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    This smartphone does not support fast charging, the average smartphone does. 93.1% of smartphones feature fast charging.
  • No ultra power-saving mode
    Ultra power-saving mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    This smartphone does not have an ultra power-saving mode, the average smartphone does. 93.8% of smartphones include ultra power-saving.
  • No stereo speakers
    Stereo speakers
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • No aptX HD
    aptX HD
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartphone does not support aptX HD, the average smartphone does. 50.7% of smartphones support aptX HD.
  • 8.2 mm thicker
    Thickness
    16.5 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (16.5 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    16.5 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 2 year/s older release date
    Release date
    2022
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2022 vs 2024). 2.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    November 2022
    2022 vs 2024

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

J
jmcomms.com
01/11/2022
Summary of the review
Unihertz Jelly 2E Review: The tiny phone with a big heart - JMComms

Third-party reviews

Based on 526 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: August 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Unihertz Jelly 2E (4GB + 64GB)

  • Ultra-compact form factor that is highly portable and fits easily in small pockets
  • Effective as a 'digital detox' or secondary device to reduce mindless scrolling
  • Includes a physical programmable shortcut button for quick access to apps or flashlight
  • Retains essential legacy features like a 3.5mm headphone jack and an infrared (IR) blaster
  • Good value for money, often positioned as a more affordable alternative to the original Jelly 2
  • Responsive for basic day-to-day tasks despite modest hardware

What we don't like about Unihertz Jelly 2E (4GB + 64GB)

  • Significantly downgraded performance compared to the original Jelly 2, with noticeable lag in some apps
  • Lack of NFC support, meaning it cannot be used for Google Wallet tap-to-pay
  • Poor camera quality, particularly in low-light conditions and with video focus
  • Supremely small keyboard makes typing long messages difficult and prone to errors
  • Short battery life compared to standard-sized smartphones, often requiring daily charging
  • Unlikely to receive significant long-term Android OS or security updates

Verdict

The Unihertz Jelly 2E is a very compact, credit-card sized 4G smartphone designed for portability or as a secondary "digital detox" device. It features a tiny 3.0-inch LCD display with 480 x 854 pixel resolution, runs Android 12, and is powered by a MediaTek A20 quad-core processor with 4GB of RAM and 64GB of expandable storage via microSD. The phone includes a 16MP rear camera, an 8MP front camera, a 2000mAh battery, a 3.5mm headphone jack, an infrared port, and a programmable side key. Pros include its incredibly small and lightweight design (110g), full Google Play Store support, dual-SIM capability, and the inclusion of both a headphone jack and IR blaster. Cons, however, are significant given its budget nature and size: a notably less powerful processor compared to its predecessor (the Jelly 2), sluggish performance in some applications, a very small and challenging-to-type-on keyboard, basic camera quality especially in low light, the absence of NFC for mobile payments, and no charger adapter included in the box.

Compare Unihertz Jelly 2E (4GB + 64GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Unihertz Jelly 2E (4GB + 64GB) and other smartphones

No results found