OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact (4GB + 64GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£520RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:5 inchesMain camera megapixels:19 MP

Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact (4GB + 64GB)
5.7/10

Overall score

Score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

90%

5.4

Technical score

10%

8.8

User score

â–¼Worse than 87% of smartphones
6.4

Value for money

Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

70%

5.7

Overall score

30%

7.8

Price

â–¼Worse than 96%
5.4

Technical score

Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components

25%

5.0

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.0

Camera

15%

4.0

Display

15%

5.3

Battery

10%

6.7

Software

10%

6.9

Connectivity

4%

7.3

Audio

3%

7.1

Design

â–¼Worse than 91%
8.8

User score

User score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 89% of models
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

8.6

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 89%
  • sony-xperia-xz2-compact
  • sony-xperia-xz2-compact
  • sony-xperia-xz2-compact
  • sony-xperia-xz2-compact
  • sony-xperia-xz2-compact
  • sony-xperia-xz2-compact
  • sony-xperia-xz2-compact
  • sony-xperia-xz2-compact
sony-xperia-xz2-compact
sony-xperia-xz2-compact
sony-xperia-xz2-compact
sony-xperia-xz2-compact
sony-xperia-xz2-compact
sony-xperia-xz2-compact
sony-xperia-xz2-compact
sony-xperia-xz2-compact
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components:

25%

5.0

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.0

Camera

15%

4.0

Display

15%

5.3

Battery

10%

6.7

Software

10%

6.9

Connectivity

4%

7.3

Audio

3%

7.1

Design

5.4
User score
User score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 89% of models
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

8.6

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.8
Popularity
Popularity
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 82% of models
Popularity:
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact (4GB + 64GB) has a popularity of 8.6 points, which is higher than 82.2% of smartphones.
8.6
Value for money
Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components:

70%

5.7

Overall score

30%

7.8

Price

6.4
Brand name
Sony
Processor model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
This smartphone uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 processor which is faster than processors in 52.3% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.9% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
4 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 82.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 14% of smartphones.
Internal storage
64 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is smaller than the storage of 89.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 7.9% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.8 GHz
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.8 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 64.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.1% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 8 Oreo
Android version
Android 8 Oreo
This smartphone runs Android version Android 8 Oreo which is older than that found in 96.6% of smartphones and equal to that in 1.7% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
no
This smartphone does not include a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
19 MP
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 19 MP which is lower than that of 85.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/2.0 which is narrower than that of 93.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 2% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
28.3 mm²
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 28.3 mm² which is smaller than the main camera sensor area of 70.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
1.22 µm
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 1.22 µm which is larger than in 88.8% of smartphones and equal to the size in 3% of smartphones.
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
no
This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
5 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 5 inches which is smaller than the screens of 98.9% of smartphones and equal to those of 0.4% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1080x 2160 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1080x2160 px which is lower than that of 75.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.4% of smartphones.
Pixel density
483 ppi
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 483 ppi which is higher than that of 92.2% of smartphones.
Display type
IPS LCD
This smartphone uses a IPS LCD display type. 0% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is lower than in 84.3% of smartphones and equal to that in 15.7% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
2,870 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 2,870 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 98.8% of smartphones.
Charging speed
18 W
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 18 W which is slower than in 76% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 11.7% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
yes
This smartphone supports wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
This smartphone does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 10.5% of smartphones and equal to the number in 66.6% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
135 mm
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 135 mm which is shorter than 99.3% of smartphones.
Width
65 mm
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 65 mm which is narrower than 99.4% of smartphones.
Thickness
12.1 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 12.1 mm which is thicker than 90.8% of smartphones.
Weight
168 g
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 168 g which is lighter than 94.1% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 0.4% of smartphones.
Device volume
105,300 cm³
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 105,300 cm³ which is larger than 78.2% of smartphones.
Show more

Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact (4GB + 64GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • 0.42 µm larger main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a larger main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (1.2 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average pixel size is 0.8 µm.
    1.22 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • 22.3% higher pixel density
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (483 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    483 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 2.48x higher PassMark single-core benchmark
    This smartphone has a better PassMark single-core score than the average smartphone (2,446 vs 988). The average single-core score is 988.
    2,446 vs 988
  • 8x more L1
    This smartphone has more L1 cache than the average smartphone (256 KB vs 32 KB). The average L1 cache is 32 KB.
    256 KB vs 32 KB
  • 50% lower TDP
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (9 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    9 W vs 6 W
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • 10.5% higher user score
    User score
    8.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
    the average smartphone
    Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact (4GB + 64GB) has a higher user score than the average smartphone (8.84 vs 8.000).
    8.84 vs 8
  • 58.3% more popular
    Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact (4GB + 64GB) is more popular than the average smartphone (8.61 vs 5.4).
    8.61 vs 5.44
  • 8x more L1
    This smartphone has more L1 cache than the average smartphone (256 KB vs 32 KB). The average L1 cache is 32 KB.
    256 KB vs 32 KB
  • 2.48x higher PassMark single-core benchmark
    This smartphone has a better PassMark single-core score than the average smartphone (2,446 vs 988). The average single-core score is 988.
    2,446 vs 988
  • 50% lower TDP
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (9 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    9 W vs 6 W
  • 2 more memory channels
    This smartphone has more memory channels than the average smartphone (4 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 memory channels.
    4 vs 2
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (4x2.8 GHz & 4x1.77 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    4x2.8 GHz & 4x1.77 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • 16.7% higher CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 50% more L2 cache
    This smartphone has more L2 cache than the average smartphone (1536 KB vs 1024 KB). The average L2 cache is 1024 KB.
    1,536 KB vs 1,024 KB
  • 50% more shader units
    This smartphone features more shader units than the average smartphone (384 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    384 vs 256
  • 16.8% higher memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has higher memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (29.9 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average memory bandwidth is 25.6 GB/s.
    29.9 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • 0.42 µm larger main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a larger main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (1.2 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average pixel size is 0.8 µm.
    1.22 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • Supports laser autofocus
    This smartphone features laser autofocus, the average smartphone does not. 21.4% of smartphones include laser AF.
  • Supports HDR10 video recording
    This smartphone supports HDR10 video recording, the average smartphone does not. 35.9% of smartphones support HDR10.
  • Newer USB version
    This smartphone supports a newer USB version than the average smartphone (3.1 vs 2). The average version is USB 2.0.
    3.1 vs 2.0
  • Has a barometer
    This smartphone features a barometer, the average smartphone does not. 19.9% of smartphones include a barometer.
  • 22.3% higher pixel density
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (483 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    483 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • Supports aptX
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • 1.5 m deeper water resistance
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1.5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1.5 m vs 0 m
  • 14.4% lighter
    This smartphone is lighter than the average smartphone (168 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    168 g vs 196.2 g
  • 11 mm narrower
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (65 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    65 mm vs 76 mm
  • 28.6 mm shorter
    This smartphone is shorter than the average smartphone (135 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone height is 163.6 mm.
    135 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/2.0 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • 50% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 75% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (64 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    64 GB vs 256 GB
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • 42.6% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (2870 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5000 mAh.
    2,870 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 1.67 inches inch smaller screen size
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (5 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    5 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 4 GB less RAM
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 8 GB
  • 15.4% worse value for money
    Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact (4GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (6.36 vs 7.3).
    6.36 vs 7.34
  • 2x more expensive
    Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact (4GB + 64GB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£520 vs £260).
    £520 vs £260
  • 75% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (64 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    64 GB vs 256 GB
  • 4 GB less RAM
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 8 GB
  • 25.3% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (710 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    710 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 66.7% larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (10 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    10 nm vs 6 nm
  • 42.9% lower maximum RAM capacity
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (8 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 14 GB
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 20% lower PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    This smartphone performs worse in PCMark Work 3.0 than the average smartphone (8,623 vs 10,783). The average smartphone scores 10,783 in PCMark Work 3.0.
    8,623 vs 10,783
  • 39.5% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (570 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in the Geekbench 6 single-core test.
    570 vs 942
  • 32.1% slower memory speed
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (1866 MHz vs 2750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2750 MHz.
    1,866 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 50% less L3 cache
    This smartphone has a smaller L3 cache than the average smartphone (2048 KB vs 4096 KB). The average smartphone has an L3 cache of 4096 KB.
    2,048 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • 68% lower 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited benchmark
    This smartphone scores lower in 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited than the average smartphone (1,223 vs 3,825). The average smartphone scores 3,825.
    1,223 vs 3,825
  • 54.1% lower 3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    This smartphone performs worse in the 3DMark Wild Life benchmark than the average smartphone (1,431 vs 3,115). The average smartphone scores 3,115 in this benchmark.
    1,431 vs 3,115
  • 59% lower 3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    This smartphone scores lower in 3DMark Wild Life Extreme than the average smartphone (503 vs 1,226). The average smartphone scores 1,226.
    503 vs 1,226
  • 13.5% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (2,191 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in the Geekbench 6 multi-core test.
    2,191 vs 2,533
  • 11% lower PassMark benchmark
    This smartphone has a lower PassMark score than the average smartphone (3,908 vs 4,389). The average smartphone scores 4,389 in PassMark.
    3,908 vs 4,389
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Older Android version
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 8 Oreo vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 8 Oreo vs Android 14
  • No Wi-Fi password sharing
    This smartphone does not support Wi-Fi password sharing, the average smartphone does. 57.9% of smartphones allow easy Wi-Fi sharing.
  • No scrolling screenshot support
    This smartphone does not support scrolling screenshots, the average smartphone does. 81.1% of smartphones allow scrolling screenshots.
  • Does not allow play while downloading
    This smartphone cannot play games while downloading, the average smartphone can. 77.3% of smartphones support play-while-downloading.
  • Lacks extra dim mode
    This smartphone does not have extra dim mode, the average smartphone does. 82.5% of smartphones offer extra dimming features.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/2.0 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (19 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    19 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Single-lens main camera
    This smartphone has a single-lens main camera, while the average smartphone has a multi-lens setup. 93.7% of smartphones use multiple lenses.
  • Lower front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has lower front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (5 MP vs 16 MP). The average smartphone has a 16 MP front camera.
    5 MP vs 16 MP
  • 34.2% lower DxOMark Mobile score
    This smartphone has a lower DxOMark Mobile score than the average smartphone (79 vs 120). The average smartphone scores 120.
    79 vs 120
  • No timelapse video
    This smartphone does not support timelapse video, the average smartphone does. 92.3% of smartphones include timelapse modes.
  • 11.6% smaller main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (28.3 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    28.3 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • No manual focus mode
    This smartphone does not have a manual focus mode, the average smartphone does. 91.2% of smartphones offer manual focus.
  • No manual exposure control
    This smartphone does not offer manual exposure control, the average smartphone does. 94% of smartphones have manual exposure.
  • No burst mode
    This smartphone does not have a burst mode, the average smartphone does. 98.1% of smartphones support burst shooting.
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.0 vs 5.2
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 50% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 1.67 inches inch smaller screen size
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (5 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    5 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 317.5 nits lower GSMArena max display brightness
    This smartphone has a lower GSMArena max display brightness than the average smartphone (576 nits vs 893.5 nits). The average smartphone scores 893.5 nits.
    576 nits vs 893.5 nits
  • Lower contrast ratio
    This smartphone has a lower contrast ratio than the average smartphone (1400:1 vs 1000000:1). The average smartphone has a contrast ratio of 1000000:1.
    1,400:1 vs 1,000,000:1
  • Lower screen resolution
    This smartphone has a lower screen resolution than the average smartphone (1080x2160 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone has a resolution of 1080x2400 px.
    1080x2160 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 250 nits lower peak brightness
    This smartphone has a lower peak brightness than the average smartphone (750 nits vs 1000 nits). The average smartphone peak brightness is 1000 nits.
    750 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 12.7% lower screen brightness
    This smartphone has a lower screen brightness than the average smartphone (576 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone has a brightness of 660 nits.
    576 nits vs 660 nits
  • 42.6% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (2870 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5000 mAh.
    2,870 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 45.5% slower charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower charging speed than the average smartphone (18 W vs 33 W). The average smartphone charges at 33 W.
    18 W vs 33 W
  • No reverse wired charging
    This smartphone does not support reverse wired charging, the average smartphone does. 60.8% of smartphones support reverse wired charging.
  • Lower GSMArena battery endurance score
    This smartphone has a lower GSMArena battery endurance score than the average smartphone (88 vs 99.5). The average smartphone scores 99.5.
    88 vs 99.5
  • 6 year/s older release date
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2018 vs 2024). 6.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    April 2018
    2018 vs 2024
  • 3.8 mm thicker
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (12.1 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    12.1 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • Poor brand origin
    This smartphone has a poorer brand origin compared to the average smartphone. 0.00% of smartphones come from top-tier brand origins.
    Japan vs China

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

A
androidauthority.com
09/06/2018
Summary of the review
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact Review: Good Phone, Bad Deal
T
techradar.com
16/07/2018
Summary of the review
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact review - Page 3 - TechRadar
G
gsmarena.com
17/03/2018
Summary of the review
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact review - Reader comments
C
consumerreports.org
02/02/2026
Summary of the review
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact - Cell Phones - Consumer Reports
P
pcmag.com
26/02/2018
Summary of the review
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact Preview
T
tomsguide.com
23/06/2018
Summary of the review
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact Review - Tom's Guide
E
ephotozine.com
15/08/2018
Summary of the review
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact Review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
28/08/2019
Summary of the review
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact review: Dinky smartphone is currently on sale
A
androidcentral.com
12/08/2020
Summary of the review
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact review: The new standard for small
T
techradar.com
16/07/2018
Summary of the review
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact review If you'd like, I can create a side-by-side comparison table of the camera performance or battery life details mentioned...
C
cnet.com
14/06/2018
Summary of the review
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact review: The small phone you want
B
basic-tutorials.com
08/07/2018
Summary of the review
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact Review
(Translated)Show original
H
handyhase.de
22/11/2021
Summary of the review
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact Review: Small, Chunky, and Packs a Punch
(Translated)Show original
I
inside-digital.de
30/03/2018
Summary of the review
Xperia XZ2 Compact Review: Sony's Powerhouse has a Little Belly
(Translated)Show original
H
heise.de
09/04/2018
Summary of the review
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact review: small, thick, and powerful!
(Translated)Show original
C
computerbase.de
13/04/2018
Summary of the review
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact review - ComputerBase
(Translated)Show original
C
connect.de
26/02/2018
Summary of the review
Sony Xperia XZ2 and XZ2 Compact: Hands-on Review
(Translated)Show original
V
video.golem.de
11/04/2018
Summary of the review
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact - Review - Video.Golem.de
(Translated)Show original
C
cnetfrance.fr
18/05/2018
Summary of the review
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact review: small but mighty
(Translated)Show original
T
tomsguide.fr
14/08/2018
Summary of the review
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact: Full Review
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: August 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact (4GB + 64GB)

  • Compact size and ergonomic curved design for easy one-handed use and pocketability
  • Flagship-level performance with a fast Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 processor and 4GB of RAM
  • Excellent battery life and endurance for a smaller device, often lasting a full day or more with regular use
  • High-quality and bright 5-inch Full HD+ HDR display with vibrant colors
  • Good quality 19MP Motion Eye rear camera that takes crisp, detailed photos in good lighting conditions
  • Ability to record 4K HDR video and Full HD 960fps super slow-motion video
  • Loud and clear front-firing stereo speakers
  • Near-stock Android software with minimal bloatware and fast, smooth performance
  • Durable build quality with Gorilla Glass 5 front and a high-quality, matte plastic back that resists fingerprints
  • Water and dust resistance (IP68 certified)
  • Expandable storage via a microSD card slot (up to 400GB)

What we don't like about Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact (4GB + 64GB)

  • Lack of a 3.5mm headphone jack, requiring a USB-C adapter (included) or Bluetooth headphones
  • No wireless charging support, a feature found in the larger XZ2 model and other flagships of its time
  • Mediocre 5MP front-facing (selfie) camera that produces soft, sometimes blurry images
  • Rear camera performance suffers in very low-light conditions (some noise and overexposure issues)
  • Fingerprint sensor placement is low on the back, often leading users to accidentally touch the camera lens instead
  • The phone is somewhat thick and heavy compared to some other phones on the market at the time of its release
  • Occasional software stutters or minor performance hiccups sometimes reported by users
  • Some users reported issues with call quality or network compatibility on certain carriers (e.g., Verizon without specific settings enabled)
  • The plastic back, while durable and fingerprint-resistant, may feel less premium than glass/metal alternatives to some users

Verdict

The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features a powerful Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 processor with 4GB of RAM and 64GB of expandable UFS storage, all packed into an ergonomic, IP65/68 water-resistant, compact body with a 5-inch Full HD+ HDR IPS LCD display. Main pros include its high-end flagship performance in a rare small form factor, a very capable 19MP Motion Eye main camera that was the first to record 4K HDR video, and loud stereo front-facing speakers. Cons of the device are its relatively thick plastic back that feels less premium than its glass-backed rivals, the absence of a 3.5mm headphone jack (requiring an included adapter), and a low-resolution 5MP front camera with mediocre low-light performance.

Compare Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact (4GB + 64GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact (4GB + 64GB) and other smartphones

No results found