OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Smartphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy A14 (4GB + 64GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:6.6 inchesMain camera megapixels:50 MP & 5 MP & 2 MP

Samsung Galaxy A14 (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

5.8

Overall score

Score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components

90%

5.5

Technical score

10%

9.0

User score

â–¼Worse than 84% of smartphones
5.5

Technical score

Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components

25%

5.2

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.3

Camera

15%

5.5

Display

15%

5.4

Battery

10%

7.2

Software

10%

5.8

Connectivity

4%

1.5

Audio

3%

6.7

Design

â–¼Worse than 90% of smartphones
9.0

User score

User score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 8,767 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
★Better than 92% of smartphones
  • samsung-galaxy-a14-4gb-64gb
  • samsung-galaxy-a14-4gb-64gb
  • samsung-galaxy-a14-4gb-64gb
  • samsung-galaxy-a14-4gb-64gb
  • samsung-galaxy-a14-4gb-64gb
  • samsung-galaxy-a14-4gb-64gb
  • samsung-galaxy-a14-4gb-64gb
  • samsung-galaxy-a14-4gb-64gb
  • samsung-galaxy-a14-4gb-64gb
  • samsung-galaxy-a14-4gb-64gb
samsung-galaxy-a14-4gb-64gb
samsung-galaxy-a14-4gb-64gb
samsung-galaxy-a14-4gb-64gb
samsung-galaxy-a14-4gb-64gb
samsung-galaxy-a14-4gb-64gb
samsung-galaxy-a14-4gb-64gb
samsung-galaxy-a14-4gb-64gb
samsung-galaxy-a14-4gb-64gb
samsung-galaxy-a14-4gb-64gb
samsung-galaxy-a14-4gb-64gb

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
4GB + 64GB4GB + 128GBCheck price
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Samsung Galaxy A14 (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components:

25%

5.2

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.3

Camera

15%

5.5

Display

15%

5.4

Battery

10%

7.2

Software

10%

5.8

Connectivity

4%

1.5

Audio

3%

6.7

Design

5.5
User score
User score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 8,767 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
9.0
Popularity
Popularity
10.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 94% of models
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy A14 (4GB + 64GB) has a popularity of 10 points, which is higher than 94.1% of smartphones.
10
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components:

60%

5.8

Overall score

40%

9.9

Price

7.1
Brand name
Samsung
Processor model
Samsung Exynos 850
Processor model
Samsung Exynos 850
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
This smartphone uses the Samsung Exynos 850 processor model which is slower than processors in 93.6% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.3% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
4 GB
RAM capacity
4 GB
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 82.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 14% of smartphones.
Internal storage
64 GB
Internal storage
64 GB
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is smaller than the storage of 89.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 7.9% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2 GHz
CPU boost clock speed
2 GHz
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2 GHz which is lower than the boost speed of 84.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 8.3% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 13
Android version
Android 13
Android version
Android 13
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
This smartphone runs Android version Android 13 which is older than that found in 50.6% of smartphones and equal to that in 16.5% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
Direct OS updates
no
â–¼ Worse than 21% of models
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
Open-source OS
yes
â–² Better than 5% of models
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
Dark mode
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
Multi-lens main camera
yes
â–² Better than 6% of models
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
50 MP & 5 MP & 2 MP
Main camera megapixels
50 MP & 5 MP & 2 MP
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 50 MP & 5 MP & 2 MP which is lower than that of 53.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.3% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4
Main camera aperture
f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4
â–² Better than 53% of models
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 which is wider than that of 53.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 10.7% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
20.5 mm²
Main camera sensor area
20.5 mm²
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 20.5 mm² which is smaller than the main camera sensor area of 76.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 12.9% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
0.64 µm
Main camera pixel size
0.64 µm
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 0.64 µm which is smaller than in 75.1% of smartphones and equal to the size in 18.6% of smartphones.
1.28 binned
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Number of SIM slots
2
â–² Better than 4% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
Cellular module
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.6 inches
Screen size
6.6 inches
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.6 inches which is smaller than the screens of 62.9% of smartphones and equal to those of 4.9% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1080x 2408 px
Screen resolution
1080x 2408 px
â–² Better than 57% of models
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1080x2408 px which is higher than that of 56.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.2% of smartphones.
Pixel density
400 ppi
Pixel density
400 ppi
â–² Better than 56% of models
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 400 ppi which is higher than that of 56.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.4% of smartphones.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
This smartphone uses a IPS LCD display type. 0% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
90 Hz
Refresh rate
90 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 90 Hz which is lower than in 65.4% of smartphones and equal to that in 18.9% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,000 mAh
Battery capacity
5,000 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 5,000 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 28.3% of smartphones and equal to those in 28.8% of smartphones.
Charging speed
15 W
Charging speed
15 W
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 15 W which is slower than in 87.7% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 5.9% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
Fast charging
yes
â–² Better than 7% of models
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 25% of models
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
no
Stereo speakers
no
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
This smartphone does not include stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
â–² Better than 55% of models
This smartphone includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
1
Number of microphones
1
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone has 1 microphones, which is fewer than in 89.6% of smartphones and equal to the number in 10.4% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–¼ Worse than 34% of models
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
aptX Lossless
no
â–¼ Worse than 13% of models
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
167.7 mm
Height
167.7 mm
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 167.7 mm which is taller than 82.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Width
78 mm
Width
78 mm
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 78 mm which is wider than 84.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.9% of smartphones.
Thickness
9.1 mm
Thickness
9.1 mm
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 9.1 mm which is thicker than 81.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.6% of smartphones.
Weight
201 g
Weight
201 g
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 201 g which is heavier than 60.2% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 0.9% of smartphones.
Device volume
117,234 cm³
Device volume
117,234 cm³
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 117,234 cm³ which is larger than 86.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy A14 (4GB + 64GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    3.5 mm headphone jack
    yes
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.0
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 16.7% lower TDP
    TDP (Thermal design power)
    7 W
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    Market range: <4 W – >10 W
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (7 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    7 W vs 6 W
  • 12.8% higher user score
    User score
    9.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy A14
    the average smartphone
    Samsung Galaxy A14 (4GB + 64GB) has a higher user score than the average smartphone (9.02 vs 8.000).
    9.02 vs 8
  • 2.36x cheaper
    Samsung Galaxy A14 (4GB + 64GB) is cheaper than the average smartphone (£110 vs £260).
    £110 vs £260
  • 83.9% more popular
    Samsung Galaxy A14 (4GB + 64GB) is more popular than the average smartphone (10 vs 5.4).
    10 vs 5.44
  • Higher screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1080 x 2408 px
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1080x2408 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1080x2408 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 1.3% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    400 ppi
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (400 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    400 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 12.8% higher user score
    User score
    9.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy A14
    the average smartphone
    Samsung Galaxy A14 (4GB + 64GB) has a higher user score than the average smartphone (9.02 vs 8.000).
    9.02 vs 8
  • 2.36x cheaper
    Samsung Galaxy A14 (4GB + 64GB) is cheaper than the average smartphone (£110 vs £260).
    £110 vs £260
  • 83.9% more popular
    Samsung Galaxy A14 (4GB + 64GB) is more popular than the average smartphone (10 vs 5.4).
    10 vs 5.44
  • 16.7% lower TDP
    TDP (Thermal design power)
    7 W
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    Market range: <4 W – >10 W
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (7 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    7 W vs 6 W
  • Wider front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.0
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Higher screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1080 x 2408 px
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1080x2408 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1080x2408 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 1.3% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    400 ppi
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (400 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    400 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    3.5 mm headphone jack
    yes
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Worse processor
    Processor model
    Samsung Exynos 850
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Samsung Exynos 850 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Samsung Exynos 850 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    IPS LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 75% less storage
    Internal storage
    64 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (64 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    64 GB vs 256 GB
  • No 5G connectivity
    5G connectivity
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • Worse main camera video quality
    Main camera video
    1080 x 30 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 25% lower refresh rate
    Refresh rate
    90 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (90 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 4 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    4 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 8 GB
  • 35.9% smaller main camera sensor area
    Main camera sensor area
    20.5 mm²
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (20.5 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    20.5 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • 3.9% worse value for money
    Samsung Galaxy A14 (4GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (7.06 vs 7.3).
    7.06 vs 7.34
  • Worse processor
    Processor model
    Samsung Exynos 850
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Samsung Exynos 850 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Samsung Exynos 850 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 75% less storage
    Internal storage
    64 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (64 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    64 GB vs 256 GB
  • 4 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    4 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 8 GB
  • 76.5% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    221
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <392 – >2.2k
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (221 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in the Geekbench 6 single-core test.
    221 vs 942
  • 42.9% lower maximum RAM capacity
    Maximum RAM
    8 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <8 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (8 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 14 GB
  • 16.7% lower CPU boost clock speed
    CPU boost clock speed
    2.0 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
    This smartphone has a lower CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2.0 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 33.3% larger process node
    Process node
    8 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >12 nm
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (8 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    8 nm vs 6 nm
  • 32.1% slower memory speed
    Memory speed
    1,866 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <1.8k MHz – >4.8k MHz
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (1866 MHz vs 2750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2750 MHz.
    1,866 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 85.3% lower 3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    180
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <313 – >4.7k
    This smartphone scores lower in 3DMark Wild Life Extreme than the average smartphone (180 vs 1,226). The average smartphone scores 1,226.
    180 vs 1,226
  • 50% less L2 cache
    L2 cache
    512 KB
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <512 KB – >4.1k KB
    This smartphone has a smaller L2 cache than the average smartphone (512 KB vs 1024 KB). The average smartphone has an L2 cache of 1024 KB.
    512 KB vs 1,024 KB
  • Lower CPU base clock speed
    CPU base clock speed
    4 x 2 GHz & 4 x 2 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    This smartphone has a lower CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (4x2 GHz & 4x2 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    4x2 GHz & 4x2 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • No live text recognition
    Live text recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Lacks app tracking protection
    App tracking protection
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This smartphone does not have app tracking protection, the average smartphone does. 70.2% of smartphones include app tracking protection.
  • Older Android version
    Android version
    Android 13
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 13 vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 13 vs Android 14
  • Worse main camera video quality
    Main camera video
    1080 x 30 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 35.9% smaller main camera sensor area
    Main camera sensor area
    20.5 mm²
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (20.5 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    20.5 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • 0.16 µm smaller main camera pixel size
    Main camera pixel size
    0.64 µm
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (0.6 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average smartphone has a pixel size of 0.8 µm.
    1.28 binned
    0.64 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    13 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    Market range: <5 – >40
    This smartphone has lower front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (13 MP vs 16 MP). The average smartphone has a 16 MP front camera.
    13 MP vs 16 MP
  • No 5G connectivity
    5G connectivity
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • No NFC
    NFC
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This smartphone does not support NFC, the average smartphone does. 83.1% of smartphones feature NFC.
  • No gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    This smartphone does not have a gyroscope, the average smartphone does. 84.4% of smartphones feature a gyroscope.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.1
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5.1 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.1 vs 5.2
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    IPS LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 25% lower refresh rate
    Refresh rate
    90 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (90 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 21.2% lower screen brightness
    Screen brightness
    520 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <437 nits – >1.3k nits
    This smartphone has a lower screen brightness than the average smartphone (520 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone has a brightness of 660 nits.
    520 nits vs 660 nits
  • 0.07 inches inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    6.6 inches
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (6.6 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    6.6 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 54.5% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    15 W
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <15 W – >90 W
    This smartphone has a slower charging speed than the average smartphone (15 W vs 33 W). The average smartphone charges at 33 W.
    15 W vs 33 W
  • No reverse wired charging
    Reverse wired charging
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartphone does not support reverse wired charging, the average smartphone does. 60.8% of smartphones support reverse wired charging.
  • No stereo speakers
    Stereo speakers
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • No LDAC support
    LDAC
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    This smartphone does not support LDAC, the average smartphone does. 60.3% of smartphones support LDAC.
  • No aptX HD
    aptX HD
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartphone does not support aptX HD, the average smartphone does. 50.7% of smartphones support aptX HD.
  • 1 fewer microphone/s
    Number of microphones
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <1 – >3
    This smartphone has fewer microphones than the average smartphone (1 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 0.8 mm thicker
    Thickness
    9.1 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (9.1 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    9.1 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 2 mm wider
    Width
    78 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
    This smartphone is wider than the average smartphone (78 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone has a width of 76 mm.
    78 mm vs 76 mm
  • 4.1 mm taller
    Height
    167.7 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
    This smartphone is taller than the average smartphone (167.7 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm.
    167.7 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 1 year/s older release date
    Release date
    2023
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2023 vs 2024). 1.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    March 2023
    2023 vs 2024
  • Poor brand origin
    Brand origin
    South Korea
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    This smartphone has a poorer brand origin compared to the average smartphone. 0.00% of smartphones come from top-tier brand origins.
    South Korea vs China
  • 2.4% heavier
    Weight
    201 g
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <175 g – >256 g
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (201 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    201 g vs 196.2 g
  • 19.9% larger volume
    Device volume
    117,234 cm³
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
    This smartphone has a larger volume than the average smartphone (117234 cm³ vs 97800 cm³). The average smartphone volume is 97800 cm³.
    117,234 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

B
businessinsider.com
29/06/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Review
N
nextpit.com
29/06/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy A14 review: Approved!
T
techadvisor.com
15/06/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy A14 Review
W
wired.com
27/01/2023
Summary of the review
Review: Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
P
pcmag.com
19/04/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Review
A
alltag-digital.de
22/12/2025
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Review: A Good Compromise for the Entry-Level Class?!
(Translated)Show original
N
nextpit.de
25/04/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy A14 Review: Tested and Approved!
(Translated)Show original
N
netzwelt.de
18/12/2023
Summary of the review
Galaxy A14 and A14 5G Review: How Good Are These Budget Samsung Phones?
(Translated)Show original
P
pcwelt.de
22/06/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy A14 Review: Affordable Entry-Level Phone with Long Battery Life
(Translated)Show original
S
smartzone.de
02/10/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy A14 Review - Plenty of Room for Improvement!
(Translated)Show original
S
smartzone.de
30/09/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Review: Clear Strengths and Weaknesses
(Translated)Show original
F
frandroid.com
07/07/2023
Summary of the review
Galaxy A14 4G vs. Galaxy A14 5G: Key differences to help you choose
(Translated)Show original
T
techadvisor.com
15/06/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy A14 review and test
(Translated)Show original
N
nextpit.fr
26/04/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy A14 Review: Huge screen, tiny price
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
04/04/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Review: A sluggish entry-level model
(Translated)Show original
0
01net.com
10/04/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy A14 (4G) review: is this budget smartphone worth it?
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
05/01/2024
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy A14 4G Review: A smartphone that's a bit (too) simple
(Translated)Show original
F
frandroid.com
16/11/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Review: Charming but Flawed
(Translated)Show original
S
smartworld.it
04/01/2024
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy A14 Review: Why is it the best-seller?
(Translated)Show original
A
androidworld.nl
15/03/2023
Summary of the review
Buying the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G?
(Translated)Show original
C
consumentenbond.nl
01/03/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy A14 (64 GB) - Black - Test, Reviews & Prices
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
08/02/2025
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G - Reviews - Tweakers
(Translated)Show original
H
hardware.info
23/05/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy A14: Is Samsung's €200 entry-level phone a good choice?
(Translated)Show original
A
androidworld.nl
14/04/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G review: best budget phone isn't the best buy
(Translated)Show original
G
galaxyclub.nl
14/04/2023
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy A14 review: a lot of phone for little money
(Translated)Show original
A
androidplanet.nl
15/03/2023
Summary of the review
Buying a Samsung Galaxy A14? SIM-free or with a contract - Android Planet
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 8,767 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: August 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
Based on 5,239 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: August 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Samsung Galaxy A14 (4GB + 64GB)

  • Excellent battery life, typically lasting up to two days on a single charge.
  • Large, sharp 6.6-inch FHD+ display with a smooth 90Hz refresh rate.
  • Generous software support for a budget device, including four years of security updates.
  • Includes essential legacy features like a 3.5mm headphone jack and a microSD card slot for expandable storage.
  • Reliable 5G connectivity and NFC support for contactless payments, which is rare at this price point.
  • Solid daylight photography and selfie quality from the 50MP main and 13MP front cameras.

What we don't like about Samsung Galaxy A14 (4GB + 64GB)

  • Slow charging speeds, limited to 15W, which can take over two hours to reach full capacity.
  • Sluggish performance and lag, especially when multitasking or running demanding apps with only 4GB of RAM.
  • The single mono speaker lacks depth and is easily blocked when holding the phone in landscape mode.
  • Bulky and uncomfortable design due to thick bezels and a heavy, boxy build.
  • Poor low-light camera performance and the absence of an ultrawide lens.
  • Reported issues with touch screen sensitivity and inconsistent fingerprint sensor recognition.

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy A14 (4GB + 64GB) is an entry-level smartphone designed for basic daily use, powered by an Octa-core processor (specific chipset varies by region, often the MediaTek Helio G80 or Exynos 850) and running Android 13 or 14 with One UI Core. Its main pros include a large 6.6-inch Full HD+ LCD display for clear viewing, a versatile 50MP triple-camera system capable of decent photos in good light, a generous 5000mAh battery that easily lasts all day, and Samsung's reliable software support life cycle. However, key cons are its plastic build quality, the 60Hz standard refresh rate on the display rather than 90Hz, the inclusion of a micro-USB 2.0 port instead of a more modern USB-C 3.0 (on some variants), and limited internal storage of just 64GB, which necessitates using a microSD card for users with many apps or media files.

Compare Samsung Galaxy A14 (4GB + 64GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy A14 (4GB + 64GB) and other smartphones

No results found