OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Google Pixel 3 (4GB + 64GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£760RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:5.5 inchesMain camera megapixels:12.2 MP

Google Pixel 3 (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.1/10

Overall score

Score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components

90%

5.8

Technical score

10%

8.1

User score

â–¼Worse than 77% of smartphones
6.2

Value for money

Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components

70%

6.1

Overall score

30%

6.5

Price

â–¼Worse than 98%
5.8

Technical score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components

25%

5.1

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.0

Camera

15%

5.0

Display

15%

5.0

Battery

10%

8.1

Software

10%

6.8

Connectivity

4%

6.9

Audio

3%

7.7

Design

â–¼Worse than 79%
8.1

User score

User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 69% of models
Score components

70%

8.7

User ratings

30%

6.6

Number of reviews

â–²Better than 69%
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Google Pixel 3 (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components:

25%

5.1

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.0

Camera

15%

5.0

Display

15%

5.0

Battery

10%

8.1

Software

10%

6.8

Connectivity

4%

6.9

Audio

3%

7.7

Design

5.8
User score
User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 69% of models
Score components

70%

8.7

User ratings

30%

6.6

Number of reviews

8.1
Popularity
Popularity
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models
Popularity:
Google Pixel 3 (4GB + 64GB) has a popularity of 6.6 points, which is higher than 60.2% of smartphones.
6.6
Value for money
Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components:

70%

6.1

Overall score

30%

6.5

Price

6.2
Brand name
Google
Processor model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
This smartphone uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 processor which is faster than processors in 52.3% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.9% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
4 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 82.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 14% of smartphones.
Internal storage
64 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is smaller than the storage of 89.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 7.9% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.8 GHz
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.8 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 64.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.1% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 9 Pie
Android version
Android 9 Pie
This smartphone runs Android version Android 9 Pie which is older than that found in 93.9% of smartphones and equal to that in 2.6% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
yes
This smartphone receives direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
no
This smartphone does not include a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
12.2 MP
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 12.2 MP which is lower than that of 94.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.8
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 which is narrower than that of 71.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 5% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
23.9 mm²
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 23.9 mm² which is smaller than the main camera sensor area of 73.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
1.4 µm
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 1.4 µm which is larger than in 92.7% of smartphones and equal to the size in 4% of smartphones.
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
no
This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
5.5 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 5.5 inches which is smaller than the screens of 97% of smartphones and equal to those of 0.8% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1080x 2160 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1080x2160 px which is lower than that of 75.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.4% of smartphones.
Pixel density
443 ppi
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 443 ppi which is higher than that of 77.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.6% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is lower than in 84.3% of smartphones and equal to that in 15.7% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
2,915 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 2,915 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 98.7% of smartphones.
Charging speed
18 W
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 18 W which is slower than in 76% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 11.7% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
yes
This smartphone supports wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
This smartphone does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 3 microphones, which is more than in 77.2% of smartphones and equal to the number in 19.7% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
145.6 mm
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 145.6 mm which is shorter than 97.9% of smartphones.
Width
68.2 mm
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 68.2 mm which is narrower than 98.4% of smartphones.
Thickness
7.9 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 7.9 mm which is thinner than 72.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 5% of smartphones.
Weight
148 g
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 148 g which is lighter than 98.8% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 0.1% of smartphones.
Device volume
69,020 cm³
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 69,020 cm³ which is smaller than 98.9% of smartphones.
Show more

Google Pixel 3 (4GB + 64GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • Direct OS updates
    This smartphone supports direct OS updates, the average smartphone does not. 20.6% of smartphones support this feature.
  • 0.6 µm larger main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a larger main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (1.4 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average pixel size is 0.8 µm.
    1.4 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • 50% lower TDP
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (9 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    9 W vs 6 W
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Supports RAW photo capture
    This smartphone supports RAW photo capture, the average smartphone does not. 37.1% of smartphones allow RAW files.
  • 12.2% higher pixel density
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (443 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    443 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 0.9% higher user score
    User score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Google Pixel 3
    the average smartphone
    Google Pixel 3 (4GB + 64GB) has a higher user score than the average smartphone (8.07 vs 8.000).
    8.07 vs 8
  • 50% lower TDP
    This smartphone has a lower TDP than the average smartphone (9 W vs 6 W). The average TDP for smartphones is 6 W.
    9 W vs 6 W
  • 2 more memory channels
    This smartphone has more memory channels than the average smartphone (4 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 memory channels.
    4 vs 2
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (4x2.8 GHz & 4x1.77 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    4x2.8 GHz & 4x1.77 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • 16.7% higher CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 50% more L2 cache
    This smartphone has more L2 cache than the average smartphone (1,536 KB vs 1,024 KB). The average L2 cache is 1,024 KB.
    1,536 KB vs 1,024 KB
  • 16.8% higher memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has higher memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (29.9 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average memory bandwidth is 25.6 GB/s.
    29.9 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • Direct OS updates
    This smartphone supports direct OS updates, the average smartphone does not. 20.6% of smartphones support this feature.
  • Includes cross-site tracking protection
    This smartphone supports cross-site tracking prevention, the average smartphone does not. 32.2% of smartphones include this feature.
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 0.6 µm larger main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a larger main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (1.4 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average pixel size is 0.8 µm.
    1.4 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • Supports RAW photo capture
    This smartphone supports RAW photo capture, the average smartphone does not. 37.1% of smartphones allow RAW files.
  • Supports 360° panorama
    This smartphone can capture 360° panoramas, the average smartphone cannot. 25.2% of smartphones support 360° panoramas.
  • 1 more flash LEDs
    This smartphone has more flash LEDs than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone has 1 flash LEDs.
    2 vs 1
  • Supports HDR10 video recording
    This smartphone supports HDR10 video recording, the average smartphone does not. 35.9% of smartphones support HDR10.
  • Has a dual-tone LED flash
    This smartphone features a dual-tone LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 41.4% of smartphones include dual-tone flash.
  • 25.5% higher DxOMark Selfie score
    This smartphone has a higher DxOMark Selfie score than the average smartphone (123 vs 98). The average smartphone scores 98 for selfies.
    123 vs 98
  • Includes crash detection
    This smartphone features crash detection, the average smartphone does not. 5.7% of smartphones include automatic crash detection.
  • Newer USB version
    This smartphone supports a newer USB version than the average smartphone (3.1 vs 2). The average version is USB 2.0.
    3.1 vs 2.0
  • Has a barometer
    This smartphone features a barometer, the average smartphone does not. 19.9% of smartphones include a barometer.
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • 12.2% higher pixel density
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (443 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    443 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Has an always-on display
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • Has a curved display
    This smartphone features a curved display, the average smartphone does not. 24.5% of smartphones have curved screens.
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This smartphone has more microphones than the average smartphone (3 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 microphones.
    3 vs 2
  • Supports aptX
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • 24.6% lighter
    This smartphone is lighter than the average smartphone (148 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    148 g vs 196.2 g
  • 1.5 m deeper water resistance
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1.5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1.5 m vs 0 m
  • 7.8 mm narrower
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (68.2 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    68.2 mm vs 76 mm
  • 18 mm shorter
    This smartphone is shorter than the average smartphone (145.6 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone height is 163.6 mm.
    145.6 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 0.4 mm thinner
    This smartphone is thinner than the average smartphone (7.9 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone thickness is 8.3 mm.
    7.9 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • Better IP rating
    This smartphone has a better IP rating than the average smartphone (IP68 vs IP67). The average IP rating is IP67.
    IP68 vs IP67
  • 29.4% smaller volume
    This smartphone has a smaller device volume than the average smartphone (69,020 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³). The average smartphone volume is 97,800 cm³.
    69,020 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³
  • 50% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 75% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (64 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    64 GB vs 256 GB
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.8 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.8 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • 41.7% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (2,915 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5,000 mAh.
    2,915 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (12.2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    12.2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • 1.17 inches inch smaller screen size
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (5.5 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    5.5 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 4 GB less RAM
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 8 GB
  • 18.4% worse value for money
    Google Pixel 3 (4GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (6.2 vs 7.3).
    6.2 vs 7.34
  • 2.92x more expensive
    Google Pixel 3 (4GB + 64GB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£760 vs £260).
    £760 vs £260
  • 75% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (64 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    64 GB vs 256 GB
  • 4 GB less RAM
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 8 GB
  • 25.3% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (710 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    710 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 66.7% larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (10 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    10 nm vs 6 nm
  • 42.9% lower maximum RAM capacity
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (8 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 14 GB
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 43.3% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (534 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in the Geekbench 6 single-core test.
    534 vs 942
  • 32.1% slower memory speed
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (1,866 MHz vs 2,750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2,750 MHz.
    1,866 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 50% less L3 cache
    This smartphone has a smaller L3 cache than the average smartphone (2048 KB vs 4,096 KB). The average smartphone has an L3 cache of 4,096 KB.
    2,048 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • 33.1% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (1,694 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in the Geekbench 6 multi-core test.
    1,694 vs 2,533
  • 47.1% lower 3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    This smartphone performs worse in the 3DMark Wild Life benchmark than the average smartphone (1,647 vs 3,115). The average smartphone scores 3,115 in this benchmark.
    1,647 vs 3,115
  • 58.2% lower 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited benchmark
    This smartphone scores lower in 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited than the average smartphone (1,600 vs 3,825). The average smartphone scores 3,825.
    1,600 vs 3,825
  • 63.7% lower 3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    This smartphone scores lower in 3DMark Wild Life Extreme than the average smartphone (445 vs 1,226). The average smartphone scores 1,226.
    445 vs 1,226
  • 24.7% lower PassMark benchmark
    This smartphone has a lower PassMark score than the average smartphone (3,307 vs 4,389). The average smartphone scores 4,389 in PassMark.
    3,307 vs 4,389
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Older Android version
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 9 Pie vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 9 Pie vs Android 14
  • No Wi-Fi password sharing
    This smartphone does not support Wi-Fi password sharing, the average smartphone does. 57.9% of smartphones allow easy Wi-Fi sharing.
  • Does not allow app offloading
    This smartphone does not support app offloading, the average smartphone does. 51.9% of smartphones support app offloading to save space.
  • No scrolling screenshot support
    This smartphone does not support scrolling screenshots, the average smartphone does. 81.1% of smartphones allow scrolling screenshots.
  • Does not allow play while downloading
    This smartphone cannot play games while downloading, the average smartphone can. 77.3% of smartphones support play-while-downloading.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.8 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.8 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (12.2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    12.2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Single-lens main camera
    This smartphone has a single-lens main camera, while the average smartphone has a multi-lens setup. 93.7% of smartphones use multiple lenses.
  • 25.3% smaller main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (23.9 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    23.9 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • 15% lower DxOMark Mobile score
    This smartphone has a lower DxOMark Mobile score than the average smartphone (102 vs 120). The average smartphone scores 120.
    102 vs 120
  • No manual focus mode
    This smartphone does not have a manual focus mode, the average smartphone does. 91.2% of smartphones offer manual focus.
  • Lower front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has lower front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (8 MP & 8 MP vs 16 MP). The average smartphone has a 16 MP front camera.
    8 MP & 8 MP vs 16 MP
  • No continuous autofocus in video
    This smartphone does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average smartphone does. 94.2% of smartphones have continuous AF.
  • No manual exposure control
    This smartphone does not offer manual exposure control, the average smartphone does. 94% of smartphones have manual exposure.
  • No touch autofocus
    This smartphone does not support touch autofocus, the average smartphone does. 99.8% of smartphones allow touch-to-focus.
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.0 vs 5.2
  • 50% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 1.17 inches inch smaller screen size
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (5.5 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    5.5 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 36.4% lower screen brightness
    This smartphone has a lower screen brightness than the average smartphone (420 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone has a brightness of 660 nits.
    420 nits vs 660 nits
  • 580 nits lower peak brightness
    This smartphone has a lower peak brightness than the average smartphone (420 nits vs 1,000 nits). The average smartphone peak brightness is 1,000 nits.
    420 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 75% lower touch sampling rate
    This smartphone has a lower touch sampling rate than the average smartphone (60 Hz vs 240 Hz). The average smartphone has a sampling rate of 240 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 240 Hz
  • Lower screen resolution
    This smartphone has a lower screen resolution than the average smartphone (1080x2160 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone has a resolution of 1080x2400 px.
    1080x2160 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 41.7% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (2,915 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5,000 mAh.
    2,915 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 56.4% lower PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark
    This smartphone scores lower in PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark than the average smartphone (343 min vs 786 min). The average smartphone scores 786 min.
    343 min vs 786 min
  • 45.5% slower charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower charging speed than the average smartphone (18 W vs 33 W). The average smartphone charges at 33 W.
    18 W vs 33 W
  • 50% slower wireless charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (10 W vs 20 W). The average smartphone wireless charging speed is 20 W.
    10 W vs 20 W
  • 6 year/s older release date
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2018 vs 2024). 6.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    October 2018
    2018 vs 2024

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0
Unboxio
≈ estimated
08/10/2023
Long-term use review · battery, camera and software in 2023
Verdict
Google Pixel 3 is still a decent phone in 2023, but battery life and low screen brightness are clear weaknesses.
8.0
Real World Review
≈ estimated
13/09/2020
Hands-on review · 2020 value, battery, screen and cameras
Verdict
Google Pixel 3 is recommended at a reasonable price, though the screen is only semi-bright and recording options are limited.
9.0
Android Digest
≈ estimated
14/08/2019
Review · ownership and buying advice for 2019
Verdict
Google Pixel 3 is worth buying in 2019 at the right price, with its camera, software and updates as its main strengths.
9.0
Billy Kyle
≈ estimated
16/11/2018
Hands-on review · several weeks of daily use
Verdict
Google Pixel 3 is light, well built and excellent at photos, though video colours look washed out next to the iPhone.
7.0
GSMArena Official
≈ estimated
11/11/2018
Full review · camera, battery, navigation and reliability
Verdict
Google Pixel 3 is not perfect and hard to recommend, but it is worth it for camera enthusiasts.
8.0
MrMobile [Michael Fisher]
≈ estimated
25/10/2018
Hands-on review · camera, software and battery
Verdict
Google Pixel 3 delivers most of what most people need, though it asks a bit too much.
9.0
Dave2D
≈ estimated
24/10/2018
Two-week review · daily use, camera, performance and stock Android
Verdict
Google Pixel 3 is a great phone for most people who value the Google experience and camera, despite some flaws.
5.0
Android Headlines - Android News & Tech News
≈ estimated
23/10/2018
Hands-on review · software, design and value
Verdict
Google Pixel 3 is hard to recommend, since rivals offer more for the price and the software feels less like Android.
9.0
Digital Trends
≈ estimated
15/10/2018
Hands-on review · heavy daily use, battery and camera
Verdict
Google Pixel 3 is probably worth the higher price, despite an average battery and no memory card slot.
5.0
Unboxio
≈ estimated
10/03/2024
Retrospective review · 2024 buying check after daily use
Verdict
Google Pixel 3 is probably not worth buying in 2024 because of weak battery life and old security updates.
9.0
The Wall Street Journal
≈ estimated
16/10/2018
Camera test · shooting scenarios against rival phones
Verdict
Google Pixel 3's camera is its strongest part, though zoom and photo booth mode fall short.
Overview video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
cnet.com
15/10/2018
Summary of the review
CNET | Google Pixel 3 review: The best Android phone of 2018
pcmag.com
15/10/2018
Hands-on review · Compact flagship
Verdict
The Pixel 3 offers flagship performance and consistently good photos in a small body, though it has no headphone jack or expandable storage.
wired.com
15/10/2018
Review · Software-led flagship
Verdict
The Pixel 3 is one of the best Android phones this year, with a strong camera, long battery life and useful Assistant tricks, though some features are still missing.
nytimes.com
15/10/2018
Review · AI-powered camera
Verdict
The Pixel 3 is a modest update whose AI camera and clean interface beat Samsung's top Galaxy devices, though its hardware barely changes.
9to5google.com
15/10/2018
Review · Software-first flagship
Verdict
The Pixel 3 and Pixel 3 XL deliver strong speed, software and a soft matte back, though their vibration feedback still trails the iPhone.
gizmodo.com
15/10/2018
Review · Software-first camera phone
Verdict
The Pixel 3 is a camera-first phone whose software and photos beat rivals, though its skimpy hardware and bulky bezels make it weak value.
techradar.com
26/06/2020
Hands-on review · Camera-led phone
Verdict
The Google Pixel 3 is a compact phone with a strong camera that holds up against multi-lens rivals, though its battery and missing headphone jack hold it back.
androidcentral.com
15/10/2018
Hands-on review · Android software
Verdict
The Google Pixel 3 is a small Android phone with very good cameras and simple software, though its battery only comfortably covers a typical day.
digitaltrends.com
29/10/2018
Hands-on review · Compact flagship
Verdict
The Google Pixel 3 is a compact, easy-to-hold flagship with a strong camera and useful AI features, but its battery life falls short of rivals.
itpro.com
15/10/2018
Lab test · Smart software
Verdict
The Google Pixel 3 stands out in no single area, yet its AI and software tweaks make it a useful phone, held back by weak battery life.
thegate.ca
15/10/2018
Hands-on review · Everyday use
Verdict
The Google Pixel 3 is a clean, easy-to-hold phone whose single camera takes good shots, suiting Google fans who want simple, capable everyday use.
theguardian.com
18/10/2018
Hands-on review · Camera and polish
Verdict
The Google Pixel 3 is a compact Android phone with arguably the best camera on the market, though its battery life is only acceptable for a day.
expertreviews.co.uk
30/09/2019
Lab test · Camera and screen
Verdict
The Google Pixel 3 has a very good camera and screen, though its battery trails last year's model and its price rose.
andreagaleazzi.com
15/10/2018
Hands-on review · Compact flagship
Verdict
The Google Pixel 3 is a small, well-designed phone offering the best Android experience, though its battery lasts about a day and it has no headphone jack.
G
gqitalia.it
02/11/2018
Summary of the review
Google Pixel 3 review: Looks like Clark Kent, but it's Superman
(Translated)Show original
tuttoandroid.net
07/11/2018
Hands-on review · Compact Pixel
Verdict
The Google Pixel 3 is a compact flagship with a strong camera and fast Android performance, suiting buyers who want a small phone, though battery life is modest.
smartworld.it
19/11/2018
Hands-on review · Build and display
Verdict
The Google Pixel 3 is a small, well-built phone with a bright display and consistently good camera results, though its price feels steep for its size.
it.techreviewer.de
01/10/2024
Full review · Compact flagship
Verdict
The Google Pixel 3 is a compact flagship with a bright, colour-accurate OLED screen and no notch, but its matte back coating scratches easily.
global.techradar.com
19/09/2019
Review · Camera-first compact phone
Verdict
The Google Pixel 3 is a small one-handed phone with one of the best cameras around, but its 2915 mAh battery makes long days hard.
tech.everyeye.it
15/10/2019
Long-term test · Year-old flagship
Verdict
The Google Pixel 3 still feels comfortable and takes very good photos a year on, though its thick bezels and missing headphone jack show their age.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Google Pixel 3 (4GB + 64GB)

  • Class-leading camera with exceptional low-light performance using Night Sight
  • Clean, bloatware-free 'Pure Android' experience with timely software updates
  • Compact and ergonomic design, highly rated for comfortable one-handed use
  • Vibrant and high-quality OLED display with accurate colors
  • Addition of wireless charging and IP68 water resistance
  • Powerful dual front-facing stereo speakers

What customers don't like about Google Pixel 3 (4GB + 64GB)

  • Below-average battery life that often struggles to last a full day under heavy use
  • Lack of a 3.5mm headphone jack and no expandable storage via microSD
  • Limited RAM (4GB) compared to other flagship competitors of its time
  • Large bezels on the standard Pixel 3 (and a massive display notch on the XL model)
  • Fragile all-glass back that is prone to breaking without a protective case
  • Sluggish camera processing times in certain intensive modes like Portrait

Verdict

The Google Pixel 3 (4GB + 64GB) delivers a premium software experience driven by its highly-praised 12.2MP single rear camera and immediate access to the latest Android updates. Key hardware specs include the Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 processor, 4GB of RAM, 64GB of non-expandable storage, and a vibrant 5.5-inch OLED display. Its primary pros are the exceptional, best-in-class camera quality and clean, bloatware-free Android OS. Common cons for the device usually note its average battery life, the lack of a headphone jack, and relatively dated hardware specifications compared to newer models, such as the limited 4GB of RAM.

Compare Google Pixel 3 (4GB + 64GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Google Pixel 3 (4GB + 64GB) and other smartphones

No results found