OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy S9 (4GB + 64GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£750RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:5.8 inchesMain camera megapixels:12 MP

Samsung Galaxy S9 (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.3/10

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components

90%

6.0

Technical score

10%

8.9

User score

â–¼Worse than 67% of smartphones
6.4

Value for money

Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

6.6

Price

â–¼Worse than 96%
6.0

Technical score

Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components

25%

5.2

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.7

Camera

15%

6.0

Display

15%

4.9

Battery

10%

6.4

Software

10%

7.0

Connectivity

4%

7.2

Audio

3%

7.7

Design

â–¼Worse than 72%
8.9

User score

User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 89% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

9.9

Number of reviews

â–²Better than 89%
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
4GB + 64GB
Other versions:
6GB + 64GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Samsung Galaxy S9 (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components:

25%

5.2

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.7

Camera

15%

6.0

Display

15%

4.9

Battery

10%

6.4

Software

10%

7.0

Connectivity

4%

7.2

Audio

3%

7.7

Design

6.0
User score
User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 89% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

9.9

Number of reviews

8.9
Popularity
Popularity
9.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy S9 (4GB + 64GB) has a popularity of 9.9 points, which is higher than 93.3% of smartphones.
9.9
Value for money
Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components:

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

6.6

Price

6.4
Brand name
Samsung
Processor model
Snapdragon 845
This smartphone uses the Snapdragon 845 processor which is faster than processors in 52.1% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.1% of smartphones.
Snapdragon 845 or Exynos 9,810
RAM capacity
4 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 82.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 14% of smartphones.
Internal storage
64 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is smaller than the storage of 89.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 7.9% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.9 GHz
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.9 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 74.2% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.4% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 10
Android version
Android 10
This smartphone runs Android version Android 10 which is older than that found in 88.8% of smartphones and equal to that in 5.1% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
no
This smartphone does not include a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
12 MP
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 12 MP which is lower than that of 97.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.8% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.5 & f/2.4
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.5 & f/2.4 which is wider than that of 96.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
23.5 mm²
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 23.5 mm² which is smaller than the main camera sensor area of 73.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.1% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
1.4 µm
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 1.4 µm which is larger than in 92.7% of smartphones and equal to the size in 4% of smartphones.
Show more
Number of SIM slots
1
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 1 SIM slots, which is fewer than in 96.2% of smartphones and equal to the number in 3.7% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
no
This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
5.8 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 5.8 inches which is smaller than the screens of 95.9% of smartphones and equal to those of 0.4% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1440x 2960 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1440x2960 px which is higher than that of 92.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Pixel density
570 ppi
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 570 ppi which is higher than that of 99.4% of smartphones.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.6% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is lower than in 84.3% of smartphones and equal to that in 15.7% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
3,000 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 3,000 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 97.5% of smartphones and equal to those in 1.1% of smartphones.
Charging speed
15 W
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 15 W which is slower than in 87.7% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 5.9% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
yes
This smartphone supports wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
This smartphone includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 10.5% of smartphones and equal to the number in 66.6% of smartphones.
FM radio
yes
This smartphone includes an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
147.7 mm
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 147.7 mm which is shorter than 96.7% of smartphones.
Width
68.7 mm
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 68.7 mm which is narrower than 98.2% of smartphones.
Thickness
8.5 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 8.5 mm which is thicker than 60.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.3% of smartphones.
Weight
163 g
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 163 g which is lighter than 96% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 0.4% of smartphones.
Device volume
79,968 cm³
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 79,968 cm³ which is smaller than 94.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy S9 (4GB + 64GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • Higher screen resolution
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1440x2960 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1440x2960 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 0.6 µm larger main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a larger main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (1.4 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average pixel size is 0.8 µm.
    1.4 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • 44.3% higher pixel density
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (570 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    570 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 12x more L1
    This smartphone has more L1 cache than the average smartphone (384 KB vs 32 KB). The average L1 cache is 32 KB.
    384 KB vs 32 KB
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.7 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/1.7 vs f/2.2
  • 20.8% higher CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 10.9% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy S9
    the average smartphone
    Samsung Galaxy S9 (4GB + 64GB) has a higher user score than the average smartphone (8.88 vs 8.000).
    8.88 vs 8
  • 81.5% more popular
    Samsung Galaxy S9 (4GB + 64GB) is more popular than the average smartphone (9.87 vs 5.4).
    9.87 vs 5.44
  • 12x more L1
    This smartphone has more L1 cache than the average smartphone (384 KB vs 32 KB). The average L1 cache is 32 KB.
    384 KB vs 32 KB
  • 20.8% higher CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (4x2.9 GHz & 4x1.9 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    4x2.9 GHz & 4x1.9 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • 2x more L2 cache
    This smartphone has more L2 cache than the average smartphone (2048 KB vs 1,024 KB). The average L2 cache is 1,024 KB.
    2,048 KB vs 1,024 KB
  • 2 more memory channels
    This smartphone has more memory channels than the average smartphone (4 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 memory channels.
    4 vs 2
  • Supports desktop mode
    This smartphone includes desktop mode, the average smartphone does not. 9.4% of smartphones support desktop functionality.
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 0.6 µm larger main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a larger main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (1.4 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average pixel size is 0.8 µm.
    1.4 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.7 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/1.7 vs f/2.2
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.5 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.5 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Supports RAW photo capture
    This smartphone supports RAW photo capture, the average smartphone does not. 37.1% of smartphones allow RAW files.
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • Supports 360° panorama
    This smartphone can capture 360° panoramas, the average smartphone cannot. 25.2% of smartphones support 360° panoramas.
  • Better main camera video
    This smartphone records better main camera video than the average smartphone. 22.60x of smartphones support 4K or higher.
    2160x60 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Supports HDR10 video recording
    This smartphone supports HDR10 video recording, the average smartphone does not. 35.9% of smartphones support HDR10.
  • Has a heart rate monitor
    This smartphone features a heart rate monitor, the average smartphone does not. 4.9% of smartphones include a built-in heart rate sensor.
  • Newer USB version
    This smartphone supports a newer USB version than the average smartphone (3.1 vs 2). The average version is USB 2.0.
    3.1 vs 2.0
  • Supports ANT+
    This smartphone supports ANT+ technology, the average smartphone does not. 6% of smartphones are ANT+ compatible.
  • Has a barometer
    This smartphone features a barometer, the average smartphone does not. 19.9% of smartphones include a barometer.
  • Has an iris scanner
    This smartphone features an iris scanner, the average smartphone does not. 0.7% of smartphones include iris recognition.
  • Higher screen resolution
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1440x2960 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1440x2960 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 44.3% higher pixel density
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (570 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    570 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Has an always-on display
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • Has a curved display
    This smartphone features a curved display, the average smartphone does not. 24.5% of smartphones have curved screens.
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Has FM radio
    This smartphone features an FM radio, the average smartphone does not. 34.2% of smartphones include an FM tuner.
  • Supports aptX
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • 16.9% lighter
    This smartphone is lighter than the average smartphone (163 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    163 g vs 196.2 g
  • 1.5 m deeper water resistance
    This smartphone has a deeper water resistance rating than the average smartphone (1.5 m vs 0 m). The average depth rating is 0 m.
    1.5 m vs 0 m
  • 7.3 mm narrower
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (68.7 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    68.7 mm vs 76 mm
  • 15.9 mm shorter
    This smartphone is shorter than the average smartphone (147.7 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone height is 163.6 mm.
    147.7 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • Better IP rating
    This smartphone has a better IP rating than the average smartphone (IP68 vs IP67). The average IP rating is IP67.
    IP68 vs IP67
  • 18.2% smaller volume
    This smartphone has a smaller device volume than the average smartphone (79,968 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³). The average smartphone volume is 97,800 cm³.
    79,968 cm³ vs 97,800 cm³
  • 50% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 75% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (64 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    64 GB vs 256 GB
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (12 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    12 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • 39.8% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (572 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    572 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 40% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (3,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5,000 mAh.
    3,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 0.87 inches inch smaller screen size
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (5.8 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    5.8 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 4 GB less RAM
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 8 GB
  • 15.1% worse value for money
    Samsung Galaxy S9 (4GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (6.37 vs 7.3).
    6.37 vs 7.34
  • 2.88x more expensive
    Samsung Galaxy S9 (4GB + 64GB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£750 vs £260).
    £750 vs £260
  • 75% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (64 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    64 GB vs 256 GB
  • 39.8% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (572 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    572 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 4 GB less RAM
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (4 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    4 GB vs 8 GB
  • 66.7% larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (10 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    10 nm vs 6 nm
  • 42.9% lower maximum RAM capacity
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (8 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 14 GB
  • 48.5% fewer transistors
    This smartphone contains fewer transistors than the average smartphone (5,300 million vs 10,300 million). The average smartphone has 10,300 million transistors.
    5,300 million vs 10,300 million
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Snapdragon 845 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Snapdragon 845 or Exynos 9,810
    Snapdragon 845 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 34.5% slower memory speed
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (1,800 MHz vs 2,750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2,750 MHz.
    1,800 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 41.6% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (550 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in the Geekbench 6 single-core test.
    550 vs 942
  • 68.1% lower 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited benchmark
    This smartphone scores lower in 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited than the average smartphone (1,220 vs 3,825). The average smartphone scores 3,825.
    1,220 vs 3,825
  • 28.8% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (1,804 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in the Geekbench 6 multi-core test.
    1,804 vs 2,533
  • 59.5% lower 3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    This smartphone scores lower in 3DMark Wild Life Extreme than the average smartphone (497 vs 1,226). The average smartphone scores 1,226.
    497 vs 1,226
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Lacks app tracking protection
    This smartphone does not have app tracking protection, the average smartphone does. 70.2% of smartphones include app tracking protection.
  • Older Android version
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 10 vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 10 vs Android 14
  • No Wi-Fi password sharing
    This smartphone does not support Wi-Fi password sharing, the average smartphone does. 57.9% of smartphones allow easy Wi-Fi sharing.
  • No battery health monitoring
    This smartphone lacks battery health monitoring, the average smartphone includes it. 66.3% of smartphones provide battery health stats.
  • Does not allow app offloading
    This smartphone does not support app offloading, the average smartphone does. 51.9% of smartphones support app offloading to save space.
  • No scrolling screenshot support
    This smartphone does not support scrolling screenshots, the average smartphone does. 81.1% of smartphones allow scrolling screenshots.
  • Does not allow play while downloading
    This smartphone cannot play games while downloading, the average smartphone can. 77.3% of smartphones support play-while-downloading.
  • No dynamic theme support
    This smartphone does not support dynamic themes, the average smartphone does. 81.9% of smartphones support dynamic theming.
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (12 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    12 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Single-lens main camera
    This smartphone has a single-lens main camera, while the average smartphone has a multi-lens setup. 93.7% of smartphones use multiple lenses.
  • 26.6% smaller main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (23.5 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    23.5 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • Lower front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has lower front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (8 MP vs 16 MP). The average smartphone has a 16 MP front camera.
    8 MP vs 16 MP
  • 17.3% lower DxOMark Selfie score
    This smartphone has a lower DxOMark Selfie score than the average smartphone (81 vs 98). The average smartphone scores 98.
    81 vs 98
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.0 vs 5.2
  • 1 fewer SIM slot/s
    This smartphone has fewer SIM slots than the average smartphone (1 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 SIM slots.
    1 vs 2
  • 50% lower refresh rate
    This smartphone has a lower refresh rate than the average smartphone (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average smartphone has a refresh rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 0.87 inches inch smaller screen size
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (5.8 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    5.8 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • 342 nits lower peak brightness
    This smartphone has a lower peak brightness than the average smartphone (658 nits vs 1,000 nits). The average smartphone peak brightness is 1,000 nits.
    658 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • 40% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (3,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5,000 mAh.
    3,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • Lower GSMArena battery endurance score
    This smartphone has a lower GSMArena battery endurance score than the average smartphone (78 vs 99.5). The average smartphone scores 99.5.
    78 vs 99.5
  • 54.5% slower charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower charging speed than the average smartphone (15 W vs 33 W). The average smartphone charges at 33 W.
    15 W vs 33 W
  • 75% slower wireless charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (5 W vs 20 W). The average smartphone wireless charging speed is 20 W.
    5 W vs 20 W
  • 6 year/s older release date
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2018 vs 2024). 6.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    March 2018
    2018 vs 2024
  • Poor brand origin
    This smartphone has a poorer brand origin compared to the average smartphone. 0.00% of smartphones come from top-tier brand origins.
    South Korea vs China
  • 0.2 mm thicker
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (8.5 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    8.5 mm vs 8.3 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
cnet.com
08/03/2018
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy S9 review - CNET
W
wired.com
09/03/2018
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy S9 review: A great phone that doesn't live up to its own hype
P
pcmag.com
12/03/2018
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy S9 Review - PCMag
C
consumerreports.org
13/04/2018
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy S9 Cell Phone Review - Consumer Reports
R
reviewed.com
07/05/2018
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy S9 Smartphone Review - Reviewed
T
techradar.com
30/06/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy S9 review - TechRadar(www.phonearena.com) | June 05 2020 | Samsung Galaxy S9 and S9+ Review - PhoneArena
D
digitaltrends.com
02/02/2026
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy S9 review - Digital Trends Would you like a similar list of comparison articles between the Galaxy S9 and its successor, the Galaxy S10...
T
time.com
08/03/2018
Summary of the review
Galaxy S9 Review: Samsung Nails It Again | TIME
W
wsj.com
09/03/2018
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy S9 Is Impressive and Infuriating - WSJ
C
consumerreports.org
13/04/2018
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy S9 Phones Review | Ratings
T
theverge.com
08/03/2018
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy S9 review: predictably great
A
androidcentral.com
08/03/2018
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy S9 review: A fantastic phone for the masses
A
androidcentral.com
20/03/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy S9, two years later: The best of new and old Would you like to see a similar comparison for its long-term durability or current softwar...
S
smartworld.it
08/03/2018
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy S9 review (photos and video) - SmartWorld
(Translated)Show original
T
tuttoandroid.net
08/03/2018
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy S9 Review: Perfection, almost touched
(Translated)Show original
D
dday.it
08/03/2018
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy S9 full review: Minor refinements to an already solid product
(Translated)Show original
A
andreagaleazzi.com
12/04/2026
Summary of the review
SAMSUNG GALAXY S9 Review and Comparison with S9+ – Andrea Galeazzi
(Translated)Show original
G
gianlucagentile.com
03/09/2018
Summary of the review
Samsung S9 Review: The 2018 Smartphone
(Translated)Show original
R
recensionivere.com
27/02/2018
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy S9 Review - Real Reviews
(Translated)Show original
W
wired.it
08/03/2018
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy S9 Review - Wired Italy
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Samsung Galaxy S9 (4GB + 64GB)

  • Gorgeous Super AMOLED display with sharp 1440p resolution and vibrant colors
  • Premium, compact build that is easy to hold and comfortable for one-handed use
  • Strong overall performance driven by the Snapdragon 845 / Exynos 9810 processor
  • Improved fingerprint sensor placement, now located more accessibly below the camera
  • Rich audio quality from the dual-speaker system with Dolby Atmos support
  • Retention of the 3.5mm headphone jack and microSD card slot
  • Excellent daytime camera performance with a dual-aperture lens for better lighting control
  • IP68 water and dust resistance for added durability

What we don't like about Samsung Galaxy S9 (4GB + 64GB)

  • Battery life is often reported as average to poor, especially under heavy usage
  • AR Emoji feature feels gimmicky and often tracks facial expressions poorly
  • Low-light photos can sometimes appear over-exposed or lack fine detail compared to competitors
  • Software updates have ceased, leaving the device on older Android versions without new security patches
  • Iterative design that feels very similar to the preceding Galaxy S8
  • Lacks the dual-camera system (telephoto lens) found on the larger S9+ model
  • Glass body is fragile and highly prone to fingerprints and smudges

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy S9 (4GB + 64GB) is a compact, premium flagship smartphone from 2018, featuring a 5.8-inch Quad HD+ Super AMOLED display with a 2960x1440 resolution, and powered by either the Exynos 9810 or Snapdragon 845 processor. It includes a highly-praised 12MP rear camera with a unique variable aperture (f/1.5-f/2.4) for excellent low-light performance and an 8MP front camera, plus a 3,000 mAh battery, IP68 water resistance, stereo speakers tuned by AKG, a 3.5mm headphone jack, and expandable storage up to 400GB. Main pros include the stunning display, fast performance at the time of release, and versatile camera, while cons include a modest battery capacity, a sometimes blurry low-light camera performance due to slower shutter speeds, and a lack of modern software and security updates in 2025.

Compare Samsung Galaxy S9 (4GB + 64GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy S9 (4GB + 64GB) and other smartphones

No results found