Google Pixel 2 XL (4GB + 64GB) review. Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among smartphones and if it's worth buying.
Overall score
What it is: An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters: When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score components:
90.0%
Technical Score
10.0%
User score
Technical Score
What it is: An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters: When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score components:
25.0%
Performance & Hardware
18.0%
Camera
15.0%
Display
15.0%
Battery
10.0%
Software
10.0%
Connectivity
4.0%
Audio
3.0%
Design
User score
What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters: When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score components:
70.0%
User reviews
30.0%
Popularity
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).
All: ranking among all products in the database.
#27 in Best Google Phones
#48 in Best Smartphones Under £100
#72 in Best 6-Inch Smartphones
#79 in Best Compact Smartphones
#368 in Best Smartphones Under £200
#515 in Best Smartphones Under £250
#622 in Best Smartphones Under £300
#766 in Best Smartphones Under £400
#837 in Best Value Smartphones
#839 in Best Smartphones Under £500
#959 in Best NFC Smartphones
#1029 in Best Android Smartphones
#1079 in Best AI Smartphones
#1082 in Best Smartphones
What it is: An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters: When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score components:
25.0%
Performance & Hardware
18.0%
Camera
15.0%
Display
15.0%
Battery
10.0%
Software
10.0%
Connectivity
4.0%
Audio
3.0%
Design
What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters: When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score components:
70.0%
User reviews
30.0%
Popularity
What it is: An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters: When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score components:
60.0%
Overall score
40.0%
Price
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >12 GB
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >256 GB
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >3.2 GHz
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >1500
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >4000
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: 8+
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >950 MHz
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >700
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >1000
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >2500
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >6000
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >8000
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >12000
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >5000
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >1800
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >3200 MHz
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: 5
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: > 50 GB/s
Importance: LOW
Good value: 4
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >16 GB
Importance: HIGH
Good value: <6 nm
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >9 W
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Good value: >8192 KB
Importance: LOW
Good value: >2048 KB
Importance: LOW
Good value: >512 KB
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >100000 million
Importance: LOW
Good value: 3.3
Importance: LOW
Good value: 3.2
Importance: LOW
Good value: 2.0/3.0
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >50 MP
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >60
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: ≥1.2 µm
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >2.5x
Importance: HIGH
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: ≥2
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >16 MP
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >130
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >120
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: ≥2
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Good value: >5.2
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Good value: 3.1/3.2
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: ≥2
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: ≥6.6 inches
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >400 ppi
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: ≥120 Hz
Importance: HIGH
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >300 Hz
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >800 nits
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >1300 nits
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >1000 nits
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >5000 mAh
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >60 W
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <45 min
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Good value: >40 W
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: >10 W
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >800
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: ≥3
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: <162 mm
Importance: LOW
Good value: <75 mm
Importance: LOW
Good value: <8 mm
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <190 g
Importance: LOW
Good value: <98cm³
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Good value: ≥1.5 m
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >8
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >400 ppi
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: ≥3
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: ≥1.2 µm
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >256 GB
Importance: HIGH
Good value: ≥120 Hz
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >5000 mAh
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >50 MP
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <45 min
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: ≥6.6 inches
(Reviews last updated: March 2026)
The Financial Post review by Ted Kritsonis positions the Google Pixel 2 and Pixel 2 XL as superior Android devices that, through a seamless marriage of software and hardware, offer a compelling alternative to iOS. The Pixel 2 XL is highlighted for its top-tier camera, which achieves excellent portrait shots and depth effects via software, despite lacking a dual-lens setup. However, the review notes the absence of a 3.5mm headphone jack, wireless charging, and expandable storage as significant drawbacks compared to competitors. Despite these omissions, the optimized performance makes it a standout choice for those seeking a premium, functional smartphone experience.
The TechRadar review describes the Google Pixel 2 XL as a cohesive, top-tier flagship that successfully balances advanced hardware with a superior, pure Android experience. Key pros include an industry-leading 12.2MP camera with exceptional Portrait Mode, robust battery life, and useful features like water resistance and Active Edge. However, the device is held back by a polarizing, high-priced design with large bezels and the omission of a headphone jack and wireless charging. The most critical con identified is the LG-made P-OLED display, which exhibits a noticeable blue tint at off-angles, poor viewing angles, and reports of early screen burn-in. While the software experience on Android Oreo is fast and clean, these hardware compromises, combined with a premium $849/£799 starting price, make it a significant investment compared to contemporary, more bezel-less competitors.
The Google Pixel 2 XL is praised for its exceptional 12.2MP camera, featuring a top-tier portrait mode, alongside a "super slick" user experience driven by the Snapdragon 835 processor and pure Android. While offering IP67 water resistance and the innovative Active Edge squeeze feature, the device faces significant drawbacks, including the removal of the headphone jack and a lack of wireless charging. Key criticisms focus on the 6-inch pOLED display, which suffers from poor viewing angles and a noticeable blue tint. Despite these, Tech Advisor considers the phone a strong contender for its camera and software capabilities, particularly at a reduced price point.
Gordon Kelly’s long-term review deems the Pixel 2 and Pixel 2 XL the best Android devices for blending hardware and software, with the Pixel Visual Core hinting at future potential. While the 2 XL is considered the better model, both deliver exceptional performance and a top-tier camera, despite the smaller model's dated, large-bezeled design. The 12.2MP camera remains a standout feature, outperforming rivals, backed by IP67 water resistance and excellent software optimization. Key drawbacks include the absence of a headphone jack and wireless charging, alongside the lack of a dual-lens system for optical zoom. The P-OLED display on the 2 XL, while improved over time, still falls short of competitor brightness levels.
The ITPro review hails the Google Pixel 2 XL as a top-tier Android device, highlighting its "buttery-smooth" performance, 4GB of RAM, and Snapdragon 835 chipset. Key features praised include the innovative Active Edge for Google Assistant, the debuting Google Lens, and a durable, comfortable design. Additionally, the 12.2MP camera is ranked among the best for its portrait mode, while battery life and fast charging are noted as strong, long-lasting pros. Conversely, the review heavily critiques the LG-made P-OLED display as a "nasty disappointment" due to muted colors, poor viewing angles, and a distinct blue tint. Other drawbacks highlighted include the lack of a 3.5mm headphone jack and wireless charging. Despite these flaws, the device is considered a compelling, though flawed, flagship for its time.
Here is a three-paragraph summary of the Google Pixel 2 XL review: The Google Pixel 2 XL is highlighted as an excellent smartphone that offers a top-tier Android experience, even if its hardware feels slightly less premium than its predecessor. While the device is constructed from glass and aluminum, the reviewer noted that it has a plastic-like feel that lacks the high-end touch of competitors like the iPhone X or Galaxy Note8. Despite this, the phone is solidly built, features IP67 water and dust resistance, and includes front-facing stereo speakers. It is powered by a Snapdragon 835 processor with 4GB of RAM, providing super-quick performance. A standout feature is the 12.2-megapixel camera, which was the highest-rated on the market at the time of the review. It utilizes software to deliver an impressive Portrait mode on both front and rear cameras, and it excels in low-light photography. On the software side, the phone runs a clean, "stock" version of Android 8.0 Oreo, featuring exclusive tools like Google Lens for visual searching and Active Edge squeezable sides to trigger Google Assistant. The...
In his review for Thurrott.com, Paul Thurrott describes the Google Pixel 2 XL as a high-quality, "future-proof" flagship with a superior camera, a clean Android experience, and excellent Google Fi integration. While he personally found the screen quality acceptable and the performance fast, he highlights the alarming volume of public complaints regarding hardware, specifically the display's blue tint and muted colors. Key pros include the exceptional camera, modern form factor, and smooth user interface, while major cons involve the lackluster display, missing headphone jack, and lack of wireless charging. Despite enjoying the device, Thurrott delivers a paradoxical verdict, refusing to recommend the $1,000 phone to others due to high-profile manufacturing issues like potential screen burn-in. He argues that these risks, paired with the premium price, make the device hard to justify when compared to more reliable alternatives from Apple or Samsung.
The GearBrain review of the Google Pixel 2 XL highlights a "function over form" design, focusing on an improved 6-inch P-OLED display, a comfortable, textured body, and the "squeeze" feature for launching Google Assistant. Key advantages, or pros, include a superb single-lens camera utilizing advanced machine learning, a fast fingerprint reader, reliable all-day battery life, and a pure Android experience. Conversely, the review identifies significant, or cons, regarding the display's sub-par quality, specifically noting a blue tint when viewed at an angle and potential screen burn-in. Furthermore, the device lacks a 3.5mm headphone jack, wireless charging, and has a less premium aesthetic compared to rivals.
The Outline's review praises the Pixel 2 XL for its fast, clean Android software, sturdy build, and exceptional camera performance, particularly noting the quality of photos and Portrait mode. However, the device is criticized for a display with "washed out" colors, the absence of a headphone jack and wireless charging, and limitations for users heavily invested in the Apple ecosystem. Ultimately, the Pixel 2 XL is presented as a highly functional, intelligent device, ideal for users prioritizing software experience and daily utility over hardware aesthetics.
One year after its release, the Google Pixel 2 XL remains a consistent, high-performing device with smooth software, even compared to newer 2018 alternatives, according to Android Central. Key strengths include an industry-leading camera, long-lasting battery, and useful features like Active Edge and Now Playing. Conversely, the device is held back by a controversial P-OLED screen prone to blue tint, dated large bezels, and potential, minor hardware issues like speaker rattling.
Six months after its launch, the Google Pixel 2 XL is described as a reliable flagship prioritizing function over trends, with pros including durability and stereo speakers, and a con being the lack of wireless charging. Its performance remains strong with a clean Android software experience, praised for a snappy fingerprint sensor and Active Edge feature, though the LG-made P-OLED display's dull colors and blue tint are noted as cons. The camera continues to be a market leader due to advanced computational photography, offering fast startup and reliable image quality despite the con of lacking a headphone jack and having a display less bright in direct sunlight compared to rivals.
The Google Pixel 2 XL is described as a flagship phone that combines elegant software with high-quality hardware. Key pros include terrific low-light camera performance, excellent battery life, and a sturdy build. However, its highly debated 6-inch OLED display, featuring a blue tint at angles and lower brightness, significantly detracts from the experience. The phone also lacks a headphone jack, microSD card slot, wireless charging, and Band 71 support. Despite these flaws, its superior software and camera make it a compelling choice for a pure Android experience.
According to The Verge's Circuit Breaker review, the Google Pixel 2 XL offered several strengths, including industry-leading camera performance, exceptional battery life, and a clean, fast Android experience. However, these pros were significantly overshadowed by numerous "inexcusable" flaws in its LG-made P-OLED display, such as a harsh blue color shift, muted colors, gritty texture, black smear, and potential burn-in, preventing the phone from achieving "true greatness" at its premium price point.
Ars Technica's review describes the Google Pixel 2 and 2 XL as offering the best Android experience due to superior software, despite differing hardware designs. The Pixel 2 XL features a modern, slim-bezel design and 1440p P-OLED display, while the standard Pixel 2 has criticized for its "old-school" large bezels. Key pros included the best-in-class camera, squeezable edges for Google Assistant, front-facing stereo speakers, and a clean Android OS with guaranteed updates, while cons included the lack of a headphone jack, divergent design quality between models, Pixel 2 XL display issues like blue tint, a high price point, and the absence of wireless charging or microSD expansion. Google Pixel 2 Smartphone£94.95& more prices4.6(1.5k)Google Pixel 2 XL 64GB 4G LTE Unlocked Android Smartphone£118.804.6(2k)
According to a Gizmodo review, Google's Pixel 2 and Pixel 2 XL prioritize seamless software and intelligence over flashy hardware, treating the phones as "utilitarian appliances" where hardware supports proactive software assistance. Key strengths include a refined user experience, industry-leading photography with excellent HDR processing, dual front-facing speakers, and IP67 water resistance. However, weaknesses noted are the smaller Pixel 2's "neglected" and "clunky" design and battery life, the absence of a headphone jack, microSD slot, and wireless charging, struggles with very low-light photos, and the Active Edge sensor's limitation to only launching Google Assistant.
CNET reviewed the Google Pixel 2 XL, highlighting its expanded screen, modern design, excellent 12.2-megapixel camera with advanced AI, IP67 waterproofing, and Google Lens as key advantages. However, the review noted significant display problems including screen burn-in and a "blue shift" effect, a muted color appearance compared to rivals, less smooth portrait mode software than dual-camera systems, the absence of a headphone jack and wireless charging, and only average battery life.
Wired's review of the Google Pixel 2 highlights its focus on smart features and reliability despite a design described as dated, particularly due to large bezels on the smaller model, though it is waterproof. A major drawback cited is the removal of the headphone jack, necessitating an adapter or Bluetooth options. The camera is praised as the standout feature, with impressive Portrait Mode and low-light performance achieved through software. However, the device lacks wireless charging, and battery life is considered "so-so" compared to competitors. Wired ultimately recommends the Pixel 2 as the best Android phone for those prioritizing a pure, fast software experience and an industry-leading camera, despite its design flaws and the missing headphone jack.
Engadget's review hails the 2017 Pixel 2 and Pixel 2 XL as top Android devices, driven by a world-class 12.2-megapixel camera, smooth performance, and unique "Active Edge" features. However, the 6-inch P-OLED display on the XL model was criticized for muted colors and, significant "blue shift" issues, alongside a lack of a 3.5mm headphone jack and wireless charging. While the XL offers a modern 18:9 design, the smaller Pixel 2's large bezels feel outdated, yet both devices retain excellent camera capabilities and clean software.
According to a 2017 review, The Google Pixel 2 XL prioritized utility with an aluminum unibody, textured coating for grip, front-facing stereo speakers, and IP67 water resistance, contrasting with competitors' focus on aesthetics. While lauded for its 12.2-megapixel camera using machine learning for Portrait Mode and the smooth Android 8.0 Oreo experience powered by a Snapdragon 835 processor, the device was significantly criticized for its LG-made P-OLED display, which featured muted colors, a blue tint at angles, and reported image retention issues. The review also noted the absence of a headphone jack and wireless charging as drawbacks.
The Google Pixel 2 XL offers the purest Android experience with exceptional performance and a world-class camera, making it feel fast and fluid despite 2017 hardware, according to NextPit. Key strengths include excellent battery life, a secure "Active Edge" for Google Assistant, and a durable, grippy design. However, the device is held back by a disappointing LG-made P-OLED screen with a noticeable blue tint, along with the omission of a headphone jack and wireless charging.
The Google Pixel 2 XL is presented as a high-end, bezel-less flagship offering a pure Android experience and excellent, grippy build quality. It features a fast Snapdragon 835 processor and innovative Active Edge technology for launching Google Assistant. However, the device is significantly hindered by its P-OLED display, which suffers from poor viewing angles and a noticeable blue tint, along with the omission of a headphone jack and wireless charging. Despite these flaws, the camera is lauded as a top-tier performer, utilizing advanced HDR+ to produce exceptional images.
Heise.de identifies the Google Pixel 2 and 2 XL as strong contenders against the iPhone, featuring top-tier specs like the Snapdragon 835 processor. While both devices share high-end internal components, the Pixel 2 XL offers a modern 18:9 display, whereas the smaller Pixel 2 retains a dated, large-bezel design. The camera is highly praised as a best-in-class, single-lens performer utilizing advanced computational photography for superior Portrait mode effects on both front and back. Additional highlights include the pure Android 8.0 experience, reliable fingerprint sensors, and the unique Active Edge, which allows users to squeeze the device to launch Google Assistant. Drawbacks include the Pixel 2 XL’s controversial display, criticized for muted colors and a notable blue tint, alongside a lack of a headphone jack and wireless charging on both models. While the XL provides a superior, modern experience, the smaller Pixel 2 is highlighted for offering better value despite its older aesthetics.
The Google Pixel 2 XL is characterized by a "boring" design that, while lacking visual flair compared to 2017 competitors, offers exceptional performance, a top-tier camera, and a grippy, durable body. However, the device is significantly hindered by a sub-par P-OLED display from LG, which exhibits a noticeable blue tint at angles, muted colors, and potential burn-in issues. Despite excellent camera performance and fast, clean software, the lack of a headphone jack, no wireless charging, and large bezels make it a tough recommendation given the premium price point.
Netzwelt's review highlights the Google Pixel 2 as a high-end device featuring an exceptional 12.2-megapixel camera, which utilizes advanced HDR+ processing for superb dynamic range and low-light performance, along with a convincing Portrait Mode. Powered by a Snapdragon 835 processor and 4GB of RAM, it offers a smooth, "pure Android" experience, complemented by a sharp 5-inch Full HD AMOLED display, IP67 water resistance, and the "Active Edge" feature. However, the design is considered dated due to large bezels, while key drawbacks include the removal of the 3.5mm headphone jack, no microSD card slot, and a lack of wireless charging.
After six months, the Google Pixel 2 XL maintains a "dreamily smooth" performance, with its Snapdragon 835, 4GB RAM, and software synergy holding up well. Key pros include an outstanding, top-tier single-lens camera, reliable all-day battery life, and front-firing stereo speakers, as highlighted in the DeathMetalMods review. However, notable cons persist, particularly the controversial, blue-tinted LG-made P-OLED display and the lack of a headphone jack and wireless charging. Despite these, the pure Android experience and 3-year update support make it a strong, albeit premium-priced, contender.
The Connect.de review highlights the Google Pixel 2 XL as a high-end, fast-performing device featuring a pure, updated Android experience. Its standout features include unique software capabilities like Active Edge and "Now Playing" music identification. The camera system is praised for its exceptional computational photography, portrait mode, and strong low-light performance. However, the device lacks a 3.5mm headphone jack, wireless charging, and expandable storage, limiting its hardware versatility. The primary criticism focuses on the LG-made P-OLED display, which exhibited a noticeable blue tint at angles and reported, early screen burn-in. While the design is functional and grippy, these display issues make it a controversial, yet powerful, flagship. For more details, visit Connect.de.
The Numerama review positions the Pixel 2 and Pixel 2 XL as refined, high-performance, and water-resistant flagship contenders, boasting superior, AI-driven camera capabilities. Key pros include exceptional single-lens photography, Portrait Mode on both cameras, Active Edge functionality, and premium software features. However, notable cons for the Pixel 2 XL include significant display issues—such as color dullness and blue tints—while the standard Pixel 2 is critiqued for dated, thick bezels. Additionally, both devices lack a headphone jack and wireless charging.
According to Frandroid, the Google Pixel 2 XL is a smartphone that pairs top-tier software with excellent performance, yet it is significantly hindered by its display quality. While the Snapdragon 835 processor and 4GB of RAM deliver a fluid experience, and the "pure" Android Oreo software with "Active Edge" is a major pro, the 6-inch P-OLED panel is considered "unworthy" of a flagship due to dull colors, poor viewing angles, and a noticeable blue tint. The 12.2-megapixel rear camera is praised as a standout feature, producing detailed, natural-looking photos and offering effective, software-driven portrait mode, even without a second lens. Audio is another strength, with the dual front-facing speakers providing a punchy, powerful sound. Despite these strengths, the device has notable cons, including a design criticized for its lack of symmetry and large bezels, alongside the omission of a headphone jack and wireless charging. Furthermore, concerns regarding potential screen burn-in persist, making the display the primary drawback in an otherwise high-performing package.
The Google Pixel 2 and Pixel 2 XL, aimed at the premium market, deliver a "pure" Android experience featuring top-tier, single-lens camera performance that rivals dual-lens competitors. Key pros include outstanding computational photography, the addition of IP67 water resistance, and the "Active Edge" squeeze feature for Google Assistant. However, significant cons involve the omission of a headphone jack and wireless charging, alongside reported display issues with the 2 XL's P-OLED panel, specifically a blue tint and washed-out colors.
The Google Pixel 2 and 2 XL are identified as top-tier, camera-focused Android devices offering exceptional photographic capabilities, including a standout 12.2MP sensor with advanced HDR+ and portrait modes. The devices boast superior performance with the Snapdragon 835 processor and stock Android, though they are marred by the lack of a headphone jack and the absence of wireless charging. While the smaller Pixel 2 features a vibrant AMOLED panel, the 2 XL faces criticism for display issues like blue tint and graininess. For more details, visit the original coverage at Phonandroid.
The Google Pixel 2 and Pixel 2 XL are highlighted for offering a "smarter" experience driven by software, with the 12.2-megapixel camera cited as a top-tier feature for its portrait mode and low-light capabilities. While the Pixel 2 XL boasts a modern 6-inch P-OLED display, it is criticized for a blue tint and potential screen burn-in. Conversely, the smaller Pixel 2 is easier to handle but features an outdated design with large bezels. Performance is exceptional due to the Snapdragon 835, and both models deliver strong battery life, although the lack of a headphone jack and wireless charging are noted as regressions. Tom'
The Google Pixel 2 XL is highlighted as a software-focused Android experience with exceptional performance, delivering a fluid user interface and smart features like Active Edge and Now Playing. The camera is identified as a primary strength, utilizing advanced HDR+ processing and a dedicated Pixel Visual Core for top-tier photos and portrait shots, while battery life proves robust. However, the device is criticized for a disappointing LG-manufactured P-OLED display that suffers from muted colors and a blue tint, alongside the omission of a headphone jack and wireless charging.
The Google Pixel 2 XL offers a pure Android experience with a high-performance Snapdragon 835 processor and an excellent single-lens camera capable of superior computational photography. Its 6-inch P-OLED display is sharp, though the device's overall design is considered less premium due to its matte finish and large, asymmetrical bezels. Key, and highly criticized, flaws include a dull, blue-tinted display, the absence of a headphone jack, and limited availability. While delivering solid battery life and useful features like Active Edge, the device is deemed a powerful tool marred by its mediocre screen quality.
The Google Pixel 2 XL is highlighted for its exceptional camera performance, driven by a 12.2 MP sensor and superior software, alongside a responsive, clean Android experience powered by a Snapdragon 835 processor. Key strengths include excellent battery life, fast charging, and unique features like "Active Edge" and front-facing stereo speakers. However, the 6-inch P-OLED display is a major drawback, plagued by a distinct blue shift at angles, weak color saturation, and screen burn-in concerns. Furthermore, the device lacks a 3.5mm headphone jack, expandable storage, and wireless charging capabilities. Ultimately, the Pixel 2 XL offers a premier photography experience and software support but is hindered by its underwhelming screen panel. It remains a strong option for users prioritizing camera quality and software, despite its display-related shortcomings.
The ABC.es review characterizes the Google Pixel 2 XL as a device of "mixed sensations," delivering top-tier software and camera performance while falling short in design and display hardware. It is highlighted as a premier 2017 Android option, emphasizing a "pure" software experience and deep, predictive Google AI integration. Key pros include the exceptional 12.2-megapixel camera with advanced image processing and Portrait Mode, alongside the smooth, bloatware-free Android Oreo operating system. Additionally, the inclusion of front-facing stereo speakers and IP67 water resistance are noted as significant upgrades. Conversely, the review cites cons such as the dated, large-bezeled design of the standard model and a disappointing OLED display on the XL, which produces muted colors and a blue tint. The omission of the 3.5mm headphone jack is also highlighted as a notable downside.
The Xataka Android review highlights the Google Pixel 2 XL for its top-tier 12.2MP camera, fluid, pure Android experience, and the unique "Active Edge" feature, making it a software powerhouse. While the design is noted for its grippy "hybrid coating" and dual front-facing speakers, significant criticisms center on the LG-made P-OLED display, which is criticized for a noticeable blue tint and early, premature burn-in issues. Despite these issues and the absence of a headphone jack or wireless charging, the device is considered to offer an exceptionally consistent Android experience.
The Xataka review describes the Google Pixel 2 XL as a bittersweet flagship with an industry-leading 12.2-megapixel camera and excellent Portrait Mode, but a deeply disappointing 6-inch P-OLED display. While the "pure Android" software provides a fluid experience, the screen suffers from poor color calibration, a blue tint at angles, and burn-in issues. Despite solid battery life, loud front-firing speakers, and a fast fingerprint sensor, the lack of a headphone jack and a high price make the hardware flaws hard to justify.
The Computer Hoy review highlights the Google Pixel 2 XL as a top-tier performer in software and photography, while heavily criticizing its display issues. Pros include the "pure" Android experience, advanced 12.2 MP camera, stereo speakers, and useful Active Edge, all backed by excellent battery life. However, the, the P-OLED panel suffers from a significant, noticeable blue tint and potential screen burn-in. Furthermore, the lack of a 3.5mm headphone jack, wireless charging, and expandable storage are noted as significant cons.
The Xataka review of the Pixel 2 XL highlights a device with a world-class 12.2MP camera and superior software experience, yet it is severely limited by a disappointing 6-inch pOLED display. While praised for its computational photography, excellent battery life, and loud stereo speakers, the phone suffers from a "blue tint" at angles, muted colors, and early reports of screen burn-in. Ultimately, Xataka concludes this is a device for photography enthusiasts that demands compromise, lacking premium hardware features like a headphone jack, wireless charging, or an ideal screen, making its high price point difficult to justify.
The Gizmodo review positions the Pixel 2 and Pixel 2 XL as premier devices blending top-tier hardware with a pure Android experience, highlighting an exceptional camera with HDR+ processing, fast performance, and unique "Active Edge" controls. While the XL model features a modern, bezel-less design and superior battery life, both models suffer from drawbacks like the missing headphone jack, lack of wireless charging, and notable, early display quality issues on the XL. Ultimately, the review defines them as the "iPhone of Android" for their software and camera superiority, recommending the smaller Pixel 2 for its reliability despite its dated look, and the larger model for its design.
The GQ Italia review identifies the 2017 Google Pixel 2 XL as an ideal choice for Google ecosystem users, offering a fast, clean Android experience with a refined, grippy design. It boasts an industry-leading 12.2MP camera with a powerful Portrait Mode, excellent battery life, and useful features like Active Edge. However, significant drawbacks include a flawed pOLED display with color/angle issues, the omission of the 3.5mm headphone jack, a high price point, and a lack of wireless charging.
One year after its 2017 release, the Google Pixel 2 XL remained a strong performer in late 2018, boasting smooth performance, timely Android 9.0 Pie updates, and decent battery life. Its standout feature was the industry-leading camera, which, driven by computational photography, often outperformed newer 2018 rivals, alongside quality stereo speakers and IP67 water resistance. However, the device was held back by a controversial P-OLED display with notable blue tint and burn-in issues, alongside a dated design with large bezels, lack of wireless charging, and no headphone jack. For more details, visit Android Central.
The Google Pixel 2 XL is praised for its exceptional software optimization and smooth user experience, powered by a clean version of Android 8.0 Oreo and a Snapdragon 835 chipset. While the design is noted for a "Panda" aesthetic, the 6-inch P-OLED display is criticized for a dull color profile and significant blue shifting at certain angles, coupled with the lack of a headphone jack. Performance stands out as a major pro, with the device offering top-tier speed and a reliable, all-day battery life from its 3520 mAh cell. The inclusion of Active Edge for Google Assistant is considered a practical feature, balancing against the omission of expandable storage. The rear 12.2 MP camera is highlighted as the standout feature, producing superior HDR+ images and impressive Portrait Mode effects that rivaled contemporaries at the time. Despite its high launch price and screen issues, the superior camera and software experience position the device as a top-tier option.
The Pixel 2 XL review by DDay.it presents the device as Google’s definitive attempt to challenge the premium smartphone market, characterized by its "Pure Android" experience and top-tier photography. The reviewer highlights the phone's unmatched speed and fluid performance, driven by the Snapdragon 835 processor, along with the unique "Active Edge" feature for launching Google Assistant. The camera is lauded as the undisputed champion of the device, producing professional-grade photos with a single lens through advanced HDR+ algorithms and machine learning for superior low-light performance. Additional software-driven innovations include Google Lens for real-time object recognition and the "Now Playing" feature for local music identification. However, the review is heavily critical of the LG-made P-OLED display, which is described as the device's "Achilles' heel" due to a blue tint at angles and muted color saturation. Further drawbacks include the lack of a 3.5mm headphone jack and the absence of wireless charging, which, combined with a high price, prevents the phone from achieving perfection.
The Google Pixel 2 XL is positioned as a definitive, AI-integrated flagship experience featuring a top-tier 12.2-megapixel camera with advanced Portrait Mode, as highlighted by Panorama. Performance is a major strength, with the device running a clean version of Android Oreo on a Snapdragon 835 processor, ensuring a fluid experience. Additional pros include a 3,520 mAh battery, IP67 water resistance, front-facing speakers, and the squeeze-activated Active Edge feature. However, the LG-made P-OLED display is considered a significant drawback, specifically noted for a persistent blue tint when viewed at an angle. Other cons include the omission of a 3.5mm headphone jack, lack of expandable storage, and absence of wireless charging. Despite these issues, the device is recognized for its comfortable design and solid performance, though at a high price point.
In his review for AndreaGaleazzi.com, Andrea Galeazzi describes the Google Pixel 2 XL as a device prioritizing substance, featuring an exceptional camera with top-tier bokeh and video stabilization. While the Android Oreo software experience is highlighted as fast and fluid, the device is plagued by a controversial LG-manufactured P-OLED display that exhibits a noticeable blue tint and dull colors. Despite the screen issues, the phone is praised for its excellent battery life, front-firing speakers, and a unique, grippy, yet scratch-prone coating.
According to the TuttoAndroid review, the Google Pixel 2 XL is a high-quality device delivering exceptional performance, a top-tier camera, and clean software. Key pros include the Snapdragon 835 processor's speed, excellent photo quality, front-facing stereo speakers, and reliable battery life. Conversely, the review identifies the LG-made P-OLED display as the main drawback, citing dull colors, poor viewing angles with a blue tint, and potential, though mitigated, screen burn-in. Other cons noted are the lack of a 3.5mm headphone jack and the absence of wireless charging. Ultimately, TuttoAndroid concludes that the Pixel 2 XL offers one of the best Android experiences despite the display flaws. The device is praised for its waterproof (IP67) unibody design and consistent software updates.
The Google Pixel 2 XL features a 6-inch pOLED display with thin bezels and is powered by a Snapdragon 835 processor for fluid performance, though early reviews noted issues with color saturation and viewing angles. Its 12.2-megapixel camera stands out through superior computational photography (Portrait Mode, HDR+), while the device benefits from a clean, prompt-updating Android experience. Key drawbacks include the absence of a 3.5mm headphone jack, lack of expandable storage, and a functional, albeit less luxurious, design.
The Androidworld review identifies the Pixel 2 XL as a top-tier Android experience hindered by significant hardware shortcomings, specifically citing issues with the 6-inch P-OLED display's color accuracy and potential burn-in. While lauded for its exceptional 12.2-megapixel camera, advanced HDR+ processing, and the unique Active Edge squeeze feature, the device lacks a 3.5mm headphone jack and wireless charging. Despite these drawbacks, the phone is praised for its fast performance, stock Android software, and reliable battery life.
Compare
