Google Pixel 2 (4GB + 128GB) review. Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among smartphones and if it's worth buying.
Overall score
What it is: An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters: When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score components:
90.0%
Technical Score
10.0%
User score
Technical Score
What it is: An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters: When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score components:
25.0%
Performance & Hardware
18.0%
Camera
15.0%
Display
15.0%
Battery
10.0%
Software
10.0%
Connectivity
4.0%
Audio
3.0%
Design
User score
What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters: When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score components:
70.0%
User reviews
30.0%
Popularity
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).
All: ranking among all products in the database.
#3 in Best 5-Inch Smartphones
#28 in Best Google Phones
#86 in Best Compact Smartphones
#974 in Best NFC Smartphones
#1049 in Best Android Smartphones
#1098 in Best AI Smartphones
#1102 in Best Smartphones
What it is: An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters: When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score components:
25.0%
Performance & Hardware
18.0%
Camera
15.0%
Display
15.0%
Battery
10.0%
Software
10.0%
Connectivity
4.0%
Audio
3.0%
Design
What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters: When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score components:
70.0%
User reviews
30.0%
Popularity
What it is: An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters: When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score components:
60.0%
Overall score
40.0%
Price
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >12 GB
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >256 GB
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >3.2 GHz
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >1500
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >4000
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: 8+
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >950 MHz
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >700
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >1000
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >2500
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >6000
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >8000
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >12000
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >5000
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >1800
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >3200 MHz
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: 5
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: > 50 GB/s
Importance: LOW
Good value: 4
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >16 GB
Importance: HIGH
Good value: <6 nm
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >9 W
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Good value: >8192 KB
Importance: LOW
Good value: >2048 KB
Importance: LOW
Good value: >512 KB
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >100000 million
Importance: LOW
Good value: 3.3
Importance: LOW
Good value: 3.2
Importance: LOW
Good value: 2.0/3.0
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >50 MP
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >60
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: ≥1.2 µm
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >2.5x
Importance: HIGH
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: ≥2
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >16 MP
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >130
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >120
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: ≥2
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Good value: >5.2
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Good value: 3.1/3.2
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: ≥2
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: ≥6.6 inches
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >400 ppi
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: ≥120 Hz
Importance: HIGH
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >300 Hz
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >800 nits
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >1300 nits
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >1000 nits
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >5000 mAh
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >60 W
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <45 min
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Good value: >40 W
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: >10 W
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >800
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: ≥3
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Good value: <162 mm
Importance: LOW
Good value: <75 mm
Importance: LOW
Good value: <8 mm
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <190 g
Importance: LOW
Good value: <98cm³
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: LOW
Good value: ≥1.5 m
Importance: LOW
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >8
Importance: LOW
Importance: LOW
Importance: HIGH
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <190 g
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >400 ppi
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: ≥1.2 µm
Importance: MEDIUM
Importance: HIGH
Good value: ≥120 Hz
Importance: HIGH
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >5000 mAh
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: ≥6.6 inches
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >50 MP
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >256 GB
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >16 GB
(Reviews last updated: March 2026)
The Financial Post review positions the Google Pixel 2 and 2 XL as a shift toward cohesive, Apple-like integration of software and hardware, offering a "buttery-smooth" Android experience. Key strengths include a top-tier single-lens camera with Portrait Mode, front-facing stereo speakers, IP67 water resistance, and the "Active Edge" feature. Despite these pros, the devices suffer from the removal of the 3.5mm headphone jack, lack wireless charging, and the Pixel 2 XL specifically received criticism for poor P-OLED display color reproduction and "blue tint" issues.
Trusted Reviews describes the Google Pixel 2 as a software-driven device focusing on performance over design, featuring a "nippy" Snapdragon 835 processor and a pure, bloatware-free Android experience. The standout 12.2-megapixel camera produces detailed, high-quality images with excellent low-light capability and portrait modes, though it lacks a dedicated telephoto lens. Major cons include an outdated design with large bezels, the lack of a headphone jack and wireless charging, and limited battery life.
In its 2017 review, Engadget hailed the Pixel 2 and Pixel 2 XL as top-tier Android devices, praised for their exceptional, industry-leading 12.2-megapixel camera and clean software experience, including the useful Active Edge feature. The phones excelled in performance with the Snapdragon 835 processor and added practical IP67 waterproofing, although they lacked wireless charging. Key criticisms focused on the hardware, particularly the standard Pixel 2’s dated, bezel-heavy design. The larger Pixel 2 XL, while featuring a more modern, edge-to-edge display, suffered from muted colors and a notable blue tint. Both models removed the 3.5mm headphone jack, requiring a sometimes glitchy USB-C adapter. Ultimately, the review concluded that the Pixel 2 series set the standard for Android flagships by prioritizing superior camera software and performance over premium, bezel-less hardware. Despite the design flaws, their cohesive, AI-driven experience rendered them exceptional devices for 2017.
In the Ars Technica review, the Pixel 2 and 2 XL are deemed the best Android phones of 2017 due to an exceptional software experience, top-tier camera performance, and the addition of IP67 water resistance. While the smaller Pixel 2 features an outdated, large-bezel design, the 2 XL boasts a modern, slim-bezel, 6-inch P-OLED display. Key hardware pros include a fast rear fingerprint sensor and front-firing stereo speakers, though the removal of the 3.5mm headphone jack is a significant con for both models. The camera excels with its computational Portrait Mode, and the Snapdragon 835 processor ensures a fast, fluid experience. However, the 2 XL’s display suffers from a blue tint at angles and muted colors, and the devices lack wireless charging and expandable storage.
The Tech Advisor review highlights the Google Pixel 2 as a top-tier performer with a "best-in-class" 12.2MP camera and incredibly fast, fluid stock Android software. Despite these strengths, the design is heavily criticized for its dated, "cheap" look featuring large bezels. Key features include "squeezable sides" for Google Assistant, "Now Playing" music identification, and a grippy, textured aluminum body. Conversely, the review notes significant drawbacks, most notably the removal of the 3.5mm headphone jack, labeled as "user hostile". The 2,700mAh battery provides only "adequate" longevity, while the lack of wireless charging and lower IP67 water resistance rating are deemed disappointing for a 2017 flagship. Ultimately, the Pixel 2 is presented as a camera-focused device that sacrifices modern design and certain conveniences for raw performance and software integration. It is a strong choice for photography enthusiasts and those prioritizing clean software, provided they can overlook its dated aesthetic and lack of a headphone jack. Tech Advisor
The TechRadar review hails the Google Pixel 2 as having a best-in-class 12.2MP camera, producing superior photos via advanced software without a second lens. Key advantages include its fast performance, clean stock Android experience, dual front-facing speakers, and IP67 water resistance. Conversely, the review highlights drawbacks like dated aesthetics with large bezels, a 1080p display described as uninspiring, and the removal of the 3.5mm headphone jack. The Active Edge feature, while useful for summoning Google Assistant, cannot be remapped, adding to the list of limitations. Ultimately, the phone is praised for delivering a powerful, albeit traditional, smartphone experience driven by the Snapdragon 835 chipset and top-tier photography capabilities.
The DPReview of the Google Pixel 2 highlights its position as a pioneer in computational photography, using advanced HDR+ processing to achieve industry-leading image quality from a single 12.2MP 1/2.6" sensor. The review praises its exceptional dynamic range, impressive portrait mode, and "fused" video stabilization, while noting the lack of a secondary lens and limited manual controls as downsides. Ultimately, the device is lauded for its point-and-shoot reliability, though critics noted the large bezels and aggressive noise reduction in low-light scenarios.
The Android Central review highlights the Google Pixel 2 as a new standard for Android, driven by exceptional software optimization, a best-in-class 12.2MP camera with superior HDR+ processing, and three years of guaranteed updates. Despite featuring a dated design with large bezels, the phone delivers a highly consistent user experience, utilizing the Snapdragon 835 processor and featuring practical additions like IP67 water resistance, dual front-facing speakers, and "Active Edge" squeeze functionality. Significant drawbacks include the lack of a 3.5mm headphone jack, the absence of wireless charging, and a relatively small 2,700mAh battery that only provides a full day of use.
In a 2017 review for Canadian Reviewer, Stefan Etienne highlights the Google Pixel 2 and 2 XL as the pinnacle of Google’s hardware and AI integration. The Pixel 2 XL features a modern, bezel-less design, while the smaller Pixel 2 retains larger, traditional bezels. Both devices offer exceptional, "buttery-smooth" performance, enhanced by the active-edge feature and unique software capabilities. The camera is a major strength, with machine learning providing high-quality portrait modes on a single lens. The inclusion of the Pixel Visual Core enhances third-party app photography, alongside excellent video stabilization and significant hardware upgrades like IP67 water resistance and front-facing speakers. What Hi-Fi? +2However, the Pixel 2 XL is criticized for display issues, including blue tint and burn-in, which the reviewer finds unacceptable for the price point. Additional drawbacks include the removal of the headphone jack and the lack of included USB-C headphones. The review concludes that while the Pixel 2 is a safer choice, both devices represent the best Android experience available at the time.
Here is a three-paragraph summary of the Google Pixel 2 review: The Google Pixel 2 is a high-performance smartphone that packs the powerful internal specifications of its larger sibling into a more compact 5-inch FHD AMOLED frame. It is powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 processor with 4GB of RAM, offering one of the smoothest Android 8.0 Oreo experiences available at the time. While its performance and IP67 water resistance are top-tier, the hardware design is criticized for being dated due to disappointingly large bezels that make the device feel like a phone from 2015 rather than 2017. The device’s standout feature is its 12.2MP rear camera, which uses HDR+ processing to deliver exceptionally detailed and balanced photos, even in low light. Users also benefit from unlimited photo and video backup via Google Photos and unique AI features like "Now Playing" for offline music recognition and "Active Edge" squeezable sides to launch Google Assistant. Battery life is another strong point, lasting over 28 hours on a single charge during testing. However, the review highlights several notable drawbacks, including the lack...
In a 2017 review, Business Insider described the Google Pixel 2 as a reliable "workhorse" featuring a sharp 5-inch OLED display, a durable, water-resistant design, and an efficient "always-on" screen. The device's primary pros included exceptional camera performance, particularly with its single-lens portrait mode, along with high-speed performance and long-lasting battery life. Conversely, the review highlighted significant cons, such as an outdated, bezel-heavy design compared to competitors and the removal of the headphone jack.
The TechCrunch review describes the Google Pixel 2 as a fast, "workhorse" device that prioritizes software, AI, and a top-tier camera, while acting as a safe, evolutionary step over the original Pixel. Featuring a 12.2-megapixel sensor, the camera excels with HDR+ and a capable portrait mode, although the phone's design is criticized for large, dated bezels. While offering a pure Android experience with features like Active Edge, the phone lacks a 3.5mm headphone jack, wireless charging, and expandable storage.
review, WIRED defines as the "iPhone of Android phones," highlighting its stable, "pure" Android experience, water resistance, and durable, though traditional, design. The device is praised as a "workhorse" with an incredible camera that excels in low-light and portrait shots, though software can occasionally over-process images with high contrast. While the intelligent Google Assistant, Active Edge, and Now Playing features are lauded, the review notes the significant drawbacks of removing the headphone jack and omitting wireless charging. WIRED +3
In his review for The Verge, Dieter Bohn describes the Google Pixel 2 XL as a top-tier Android experience prioritizing performance over aesthetics. Key pros include exceptional, bloat-free software performance, a 12.2MP camera with superb low-light capabilities, and a reliable, long-lasting battery. The review highlights significant cons regarding the LG-manufactured P-OLED display, noting muted, lackluster colors and a distinct blue color shift when viewed off-angle. Further criticism centers on the "inelegant" design, the absence of a headphone jack, and a lack of wireless charging. Ultimately, the Pixel 2 XL is deemed a "kitchen counter" device designed for daily utility, offering one of the best cameras and AI experiences on the market. Despite its high $849 price and screen issues, it is praised for providing the best Android software experience available at the time.
The Google Pixel 2 is recognized for its top-tier camera and software performance, featuring an aluminum body with "Active Edge" for Google Assistant, but is criticized for a dated design with large bezels. Its 12.2-megapixel camera offers excellent dynamic range and portrait effects, though it may exhibit minor color issues in 4K video. While providing a smooth, pure Android experience, the device lacks a 3.5mm headphone jack and wireless charging.
The 2017 Google Pixel 2 review highlights a device focused on software intelligence and top-tier photography, despite a dated design with large bezels. Key pros include the "best-in-class" 12.2MP rear camera using HDR+ for superior detail, a high-quality 5-inch AMOLED display, and a "squeezable" frame for Assistant access. The software experience is lauded for its "pure" Android 8.0 Oreo interface, which remains snappy and consistent, bolstered by features like Google Lens and automatic music recognition. Additionally, users benefit from fast performance and unlimited full-resolution cloud storage for photos. Cons center on the uninspiring, boxy design and an average 2,700mAh battery that requires daily recharging. Furthermore, the lack of wireless charging and the removal of the 3.5mm headphone jack are noted as significant drawbacks. For more details, visit CNET.
The Google Pixel 2 focuses on a refined, functional user experience over aesthetics, featuring a textured aluminum body with dated, large bezels. Key pros include exceptional performance from the Snapdragon 835, optimized stock Android, and IP67 water resistance. The standout, top-tier camera uses software magic for excellent low-light and portrait shots, though audio recording quality is a drawback. Downsides include the lack of a 3.5mm headphone jack, no microSD slot, and a relatively small 2,700 mAh battery, notes NextPit.
According to a Heise review, the Google Pixel 2 and 2 XL are positioned as premier Android alternatives, offering a pure software experience, fast performance, and an industry-leading 12.2-megapixel camera that utilizes advanced computational photography for superior results. While both devices feature IP67 water resistance, the 2 XL faces criticism for a P-OLED display prone to blue tinting, and the smaller Pixel 2 is noted for a dated design with large bezels. Despite excellent cameras, both models lack a 3.5mm headphone jack and wireless charging.
Connect rated points, highlighting -certified housing, outstanding single-lens camera, and strong battery life. Despite positive performance metrics, the review points out significant drawbacks, including a noticeable blue tint on the P-OLED display, the mm headphone jack, and no expandable storage. The analysis concludes that while the device delivers a superior Android experience with features like Active Edge, its high price and display issues prevent a perfect score. Expert Reviews +4
The Google Pixel 2 and Pixel 2 XL, detailed on Phonandroid, introduced a 5-inch standard model with traditional bezels and a 6-inch P-OLED 18:9 aspect ratio display for the XL. Both devices feature the Snapdragon 835, 4GB RAM, and water resistance, though they lack headphone jacks and wireless charging. The 12.2MP camera remains a major pro with advanced software, while the P-OLED panel on the XL received criticism for quality issues.
The Google Pixel 2 is highlighted by UFC-Que Choisir as a high-performing device with exceptional software and photography capabilities, powered by a Snapdragon 835 processor and Android 8.0. Its 12.2MP camera excels in low-light and portrait modes, while the 5-inch AMOLED screen delivers excellent contrast. Despite these strengths, the design is considered dated due to large bezels, lacking features like a headphone jack and wireless charging.
The Digitec.ch review highlights the Google Pixel 2 as a highly functional, compact device prioritizing usability, featuring exceptional camera performance, IP67 water resistance, and the intuitive "Active Edge" feature. Key advantages include the top-tier, natural photo quality and the "smart" integration of Android, offering a refined, fluid user experience in a 5-inch form factor. However, the device suffers from dated design, specifically the large display bezels and a 5-inch OLED screen that lacks vibrant colors, appearing pale to the reviewer. Significant cons mentioned include the high price point and the absence of a headphone jack. While software is a major strength, the overall aesthetic feels dated compared to contemporary, bezel-less flagships. The review concludes that while it is an excellent choice for Android purists, it requires a design update to truly excel.
The Google Pixel 2 review highlights a device prioritizing functional, compact design and premium build quality over aesthetics, though it suffers from large screen bezels and the removal of the 3.5mm headphone jack. Performance is exceptionally fluid, driven by the Snapdragon 835, stock Android, and useful features like "Active Edge," but early software bugs led to minor app crashes. The camera is lauded for industry-leading HDR+ and portrait mode performance, despite the 5-inch OLED display showing slight color dullness and a blue tint at angles.
The Tom's Guide review highlights the Pixel 2 and 2 XL for prioritizing intelligent software over raw hardware, specifically praising the class-leading camera performance and "Active Edge" squeeze feature. Key drawbacks noted in the review include the omission of a headphone jack and the lack of wireless charging. While the Pixel 2 XL is lauded for its modern 6-inch pOLED display, the smaller Pixel 2 is criticized for its large, outdated bezels. Both devices excel with exceptional battery life, with the XL model exceeding 12 hours in testing. Despite some criticism of the XL's screen for a blue tint at off-angles, the Snapdragon 835 processor ensures fast, real-world performance, with the XL recommended as the superior flagship option. Tom'
The CNET France review highlights the Google Pixel 2 as a top-tier Android device, defined by its exceptional 12.2 MP camera, which delivers impressive, balanced photos in low-light and high-contrast scenarios using OIS and HDR+. Despite lacking a dual-lens setup, the phone offers a clean, pure Android experience and, for the time, superior image processing. CNET FranceKey drawbacks identified include the omission of a 3.5mm headphone jack, the absence of wireless charging, and an average battery life that falls short of competitors like the OnePlus 5. Furthermore, the design is criticized for large, dated bezels, making it feel less modern than rivals. CNET FranceUltimately, the review praises the Pixel 2 for its fast, reliable performance and unique features like "Active Edge," which allows users to squeeze the device for Google Assistant. While the Portrait Mode bokeh is less refined than dual-camera systems, it remains highly usable, securing the device's place as a top-tier flagship. CNET France
Frandroid describes the Google Pixel 2 as a compact, 5-inch "minimalist flagship" focusing on a premium user experience, featuring a well-balanced AMOLED screen and a pure Android Oreo interface. The device is highly praised for its exceptional camera performance, particularly through Google's Portrait Mode, as well as IP67 water resistance and dual front-facing speakers. However, the review highlights significant drawbacks, most notably a dated design with large, 2015-style bezels that contrast sharply with modern, bezel-less competitors. Additionally, the omission of a 3.5mm headphone jack, lack of wireless charging, and only moderate battery life are cited as key weaknesses, despite the device's high-end performance.
The Xataka review highlights the Google Pixel 2 and 2 XL as devices prioritizing software,, stock Android performance, and elite single-lens computational photography over raw hardware specs, featuring an "Active Edge" for Google Assistant. Key strengths include an industry-leading camera with superior Portrait Mode and low-light performance, alongside unlimited original-quality photo storage, though the smaller model features a dated design with large bezels. Major drawbacks highlighted in the review include the removal of the 3.5mm headphone jack and, specifically for the Pixel 2 XL, screen quality issues regarding color reproduction, off-axis blue tint, and potential burn-in.
The Google Pixel 2 and 2 XL focus on a "software-first" experience, offering fluid performance, top-tier cameras with impressive HDR+ and portrait modes, and unique features like Active Edge. However, the 2 XL faced criticism for a blue tint and muted colors on its P-OLED display, while the smaller Pixel 2 was noted for having large, outdated bezels. Despite omitting a headphone jack and wireless charging, these devices are recommended for their superior software experience and photographic capabilities.
The Pixel 2 and 2 XL elevate Google’s hardware with IP67 water resistance, front-facing speakers, and a refined design featuring the Active Edge squeeze feature. A major strength is the industry-leading HDR photo processing that rivals dual-camera systems, complemented by the pure Android experience and efficient, specialized Google Lens integration. While the Pixel 2 XL offers superior battery life, both devices suffer from the removal of the headphone jack, no microSD slot, and a lack of wireless charging. Additionally, the smaller Pixel 2 is hampered by large, dated bezels, and the 2 XL's screen quality falls short of its high price point.
The Wired Italy review highlights the Google Pixel 2 as an "intelligent" smartphone prioritizing a seamless, pure Android 8 Oreo experience, enhanced by the "Active Edge" feature for instant Google Assistant access. Its primary strength is an industry-leading camera that produces "insane" photos through advanced software, HDR+, and machine learning-based portrait modes. However, the device is criticized for a dated, bezel-heavy design, the lack of a 3.5mm headphone jack, and average battery life.
The SmartWorld review identifies the Google Pixel 2 as a high-performance, compact flagship offering the same powerful Snapdragon 835 processor, 4GB of RAM, and top-tier camera capabilities as the larger Pixel 2 XL. Key pros include the exceptional 12.2-megapixel camera with advanced HDR+ processing, portrait mode functionality, IP67 water resistance, and the functional Active Edge feature. Conversely, the review highlights significant cons, most notably the dated aesthetic with large screen bezels, the lack of a 3.5mm headphone jack, no wireless charging, and no expandable storage. While the build is described as solid, the overall design feels less premium compared to competitors, ultimately resulting in a "missed opportunity" regarding its looks, despite its technical excellence.
The Google Pixel 2 review from Androidworld.nl highlights the device as a software-focused, high-performance successor with a clean Android 8.0 Oreo experience and exclusive features like Active Edge. Key advantages include its top-tier 12.2-megapixel camera with advanced HDR+ processing, front-facing stereo speakers, IP67 water resistance, and unlimited Google Photos storage. However, drawbacks include a dated design with large bezels, the removal of the 3.5mm headphone jack, and the lack of wireless charging.
The Tweakers review characterizes the Google Pixel 2 as a "fast and straightforward" device prioritizing a refined, pure Android software experience with immediate updates over flashy, modern hardware design. While lauded for its high build quality and lightweight aluminium construction, the phone's design is considered dated due to large bezels surrounding the 5-inch OLED display. The camera is identified as a top-tier performer, utilizing superior software for excellent low-light and portrait shots, though it lacks a dual-camera setup, an ultra-wide lens, and exhibits oversaturated 4K video. Performance-wise, the device is quick and IP67 water-resistant, yet the 2700mAh battery proves mediocre in longevity compared to competitors. Significant drawbacks noted in the review include the lack of a headphone jack and microSD expansion, along with a high price point, especially regarding its "grey import" status in the Netherlands. Overall, the review highlights the device's exceptional camera and software experience against dated aesthetics and limited battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 2 is recognized for its powerful performance, driven by a Snapdragon 835 processor, and a clean, "pure" Android experience that includes the unique Active Edge feature. Its camera, featuring 12.2MP resolution and advanced HDR+ algorithms, delivers exceptional, industry-leading, low-light, and portrait-mode photography. However, the device is characterized by a dated design with large bezels, the absence of a 3.5mm headphone jack, and a lack of wireless charging, while offering only average battery life.
The Hardware Info review portrays the Google Pixel 2 as a device prioritizing AI-driven software over cutting-edge hardware design, featuring Active Edge and Google Lens on a 5-inch OLED display. While powered by the fast Snapdragon 835, the phone’s aesthetics are considered dated due to large bezels, yet it offers a "nippy" user experience. Pros include an industry-leading camera with excellent portrait mode and unlimited cloud storage, alongside cons such as the lack of a headphone jack and no wireless charging.
The Google Pixel 2 is highlighted as a highly efficient device, pairing clean, fast software with top-tier hardware in a compact, durable metal body. Key advantages include its IP67 water resistance, excellent one-handed ergonomics, and immediate access to Android updates. The camera is described as a "masterpiece" for its time, utilizing advanced HDR+ algorithms to produce exceptional photos, while free, high-quality Google Photos storage adds significant value. Battery life is sufficient for a full day, and overall performance is described as "buttery" smooth. However, the design is criticized for large, outdated bezels relative to its screen size. Significant drawbacks include the lack of a 3.5mm headphone jack, no microSD slot, and the absence of wireless charging.
Compare
