OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Doro 8100 (2GB + 32GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£190RAM capacity:2 GBInternal storage:32 GBScreen size:6.1 inchesMain camera megapixels:13 MP

Doro 8100 (2GB + 32GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

Doro 8100 (2GB + 32GB)
5.3/10

Overall score

Score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components

90%

5.0

Technical score

10%

8.3

User score

â–¼Worse than 97% of smartphones
6.6

Value for money

Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components

70%

5.3

Overall score

30%

9.5

Price

â–¼Worse than 93%
5.0

Technical score

Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components

25%

3.5

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.8

Camera

15%

5.2

Display

15%

4.6

Battery

10%

7.0

Software

10%

5.9

Connectivity

4%

3.2

Audio

3%

5.9

Design

â–¼Worse than 98%
8.3

User score

User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 73% of models
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

8.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 73%
  • doro-8100
  • doro-8100
  • doro-8100
  • doro-8100
  • doro-8100
  • doro-8100
  • doro-8100
doro-8100
doro-8100
doro-8100
doro-8100
doro-8100
doro-8100
doro-8100
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Doro 8100 (2GB + 32GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components:

25%

3.5

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.8

Camera

15%

5.2

Display

15%

4.6

Battery

10%

7.0

Software

10%

5.9

Connectivity

4%

3.2

Audio

3%

5.9

Design

5.0
User score
User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 73% of models
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

8.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.3
Popularity
Popularity
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Popularity:
Doro 8100 (2GB + 32GB) has a popularity of 8.4 points, which is higher than 80% of smartphones.
8.4
Value for money
Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components:

70%

5.3

Overall score

30%

9.5

Price

6.6
Brand name
Doro
Processor model
Unisoc SC9863A
This smartphone uses the Unisoc SC9863A processor model which is slower than processors in 98.3% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.6% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
2 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 2 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 98.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.2% of smartphones.
Internal storage
32 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 32 GB which is smaller than the storage of 97.6% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.7% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
1.6 GHz
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 1.6 GHz which is lower than the boost speed of 95.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.3% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 11
Android version
Android 11
This smartphone runs Android version Android 11 which is older than that found in 80.3% of smartphones and equal to that in 8.5% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
13 MP
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 13 MP which is lower than that of 91.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.4% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
?
Main camera sensor area
?
Main camera pixel size
?
Show more
Number of SIM slots
1
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 1 SIM slots, which is fewer than in 96.2% of smartphones and equal to the number in 3.7% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
no
This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.1 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.1 inches which is smaller than the screens of 92.1% of smartphones and equal to those of 2% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
720x 1560 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 720x1560 px which is lower than that of 97% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.5% of smartphones.
Pixel density
282 ppi
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 282 ppi which is lower than that of 78.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Display type
IPS LCD
This smartphone uses a IPS LCD display type. 0% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
?
Show more
Battery capacity
3,000 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 3,000 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 97.5% of smartphones and equal to those in 1.1% of smartphones.
Charging speed
?
Fast charging
no
This smartphone does not support fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
no
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
no
This smartphone does not include stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
This smartphone includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
?
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
?
Show more
Height
156 mm
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 156 mm which is shorter than 90.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Width
73 mm
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 73 mm which is narrower than 90.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.5% of smartphones.
Thickness
9.2 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 9.2 mm which is thicker than 82.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 1% of smartphones.
Weight
167 g
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 167 g which is lighter than 94.5% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 0.4% of smartphones.
Device volume
102,492 cm³
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 102,492 cm³ which is larger than 75.1% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Show more

Doro 8100 (2GB + 32GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • 4 x higher optical zoom
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (4 x vs 0 x).
    4 x vs 0 x
  • Has a dual-tone LED flash
    This smartphone features a dual-tone LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 41.4% of smartphones include dual-tone flash.
  • 14.9% lighter
    This smartphone is lighter than the average smartphone (167 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    167 g vs 196.2 g
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • 7.6 mm shorter
    This smartphone is shorter than the average smartphone (156 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone height is 163.6 mm.
    156 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • 3 mm narrower
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (73 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    73 mm vs 76 mm
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 2x more L1
    This smartphone has more L1 cache than the average smartphone (64 KB vs 32 KB). The average L1 cache is 32 KB.
    64 KB vs 32 KB
  • 3.5% higher user score
    User score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Doro 8100
    the average smartphone
    Doro 8100 (2GB + 32GB) has a higher user score than the average smartphone (8.28 vs 8.000).
    8.28 vs 8
  • 53.7% more popular
    Doro 8100 (2GB + 32GB) is more popular than the average smartphone (8.36 vs 5.4).
    8.36 vs 5.44
  • 36.8% cheaper
    Doro 8100 (2GB + 32GB) is cheaper than the average smartphone (£190 vs £260).
    £190 vs £260
  • 2x more L1
    This smartphone has more L1 cache than the average smartphone (64 KB vs 32 KB). The average L1 cache is 32 KB.
    64 KB vs 32 KB
  • 4 x higher optical zoom
    This smartphone offers higher optical zoom than the average smartphone (4 x vs 0 x).
    4 x vs 0 x
  • Has a dual-tone LED flash
    This smartphone features a dual-tone LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 41.4% of smartphones include dual-tone flash.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a wider front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • 14.9% lighter
    This smartphone is lighter than the average smartphone (167 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    167 g vs 196.2 g
  • 3 mm narrower
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (73 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    73 mm vs 76 mm
  • 7.6 mm shorter
    This smartphone is shorter than the average smartphone (156 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone height is 163.6 mm.
    156 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Unisoc SC9863A vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Unisoc SC9863A vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 87.5% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (32 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 256 GB
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • 4.67x larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (28 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    28 nm vs 6 nm
  • 42.1% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (550 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    550 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 59.7% lower PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    This smartphone performs worse in PCMark Work 3.0 than the average smartphone (4,350 vs 10,783). The average smartphone scores 10,783 in PCMark Work 3.0.
    4,350 vs 10,783
  • 6 GB less RAM
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (2 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 8 GB
  • 11.8% worse value for money
    Doro 8100 (2GB + 32GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (6.56 vs 7.3).
    6.56 vs 7.34
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Unisoc SC9863A vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Unisoc SC9863A vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 87.5% less storage
    This smartphone offers less internal storage than the average smartphone (32 GB vs 256 GB). The average smartphone includes 256 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 256 GB
  • 4.67x larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (28 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    28 nm vs 6 nm
  • 42.1% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (550 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    550 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 59.7% lower PCMark Work 3.0 Performance benchmark
    This smartphone performs worse in PCMark Work 3.0 than the average smartphone (4,350 vs 10,783). The average smartphone scores 10,783 in PCMark Work 3.0.
    4,350 vs 10,783
  • 6 GB less RAM
    This smartphone has less RAM than the average smartphone (2 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 8 GB
  • 82.6% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (164 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in the Geekbench 6 single-core test.
    164 vs 942
  • 50% higher TDP (less efficient)
    This smartphone has a higher TDP than the average smartphone (3 W vs 6 W). The average smartphone has a TDP of 6 W.
    3 W vs 6 W
  • 57.1% lower maximum RAM capacity
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (6 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    6 GB vs 14 GB
  • 33.3% lower CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a lower CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (1.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    1.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 87.5% less L3 cache
    This smartphone has a smaller L3 cache than the average smartphone (512 KB vs 4096 KB). The average smartphone has an L3 cache of 4096 KB.
    512 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • 66.1% slower memory speed
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (933 MHz vs 2750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2750 MHz.
    933 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 71.4% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This smartphone performs worse in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (725 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in the Geekbench 6 multi-core test.
    725 vs 2,533
  • 69.8% lower PassMark benchmark
    This smartphone has a lower PassMark score than the average smartphone (1,327 vs 4,389). The average smartphone scores 4,389 in PassMark.
    1,327 vs 4,389
  • 70.9% lower memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has lower memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (7.5 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average smartphone has a bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s.
    7.46 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • 51.6% lower PassMark single-core benchmark
    This smartphone has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average smartphone (478 vs 988). The average smartphone scores 988 for single-core performance.
    478 vs 988
  • Lower CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a lower CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (4x1.6 GHz & 4x1.2 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    4x1.6 GHz & 4x1.2 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • 50% fewer shader units
    This smartphone includes fewer shader units than the average smartphone (128 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    128 vs 256
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Older Android version
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 11 vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 11 vs Android 14
  • Does not allow app offloading
    This smartphone does not support app offloading, the average smartphone does. 51.9% of smartphones support app offloading to save space.
  • No scrolling screenshot support
    This smartphone does not support scrolling screenshots, the average smartphone does. 81.1% of smartphones allow scrolling screenshots.
  • Does not allow play while downloading
    This smartphone cannot play games while downloading, the average smartphone can. 77.3% of smartphones support play-while-downloading.
  • No dynamic theme support
    This smartphone does not support dynamic themes, the average smartphone does. 81.9% of smartphones support dynamic theming.
  • Lacks extra dim mode
    This smartphone does not have extra dim mode, the average smartphone does. 82.5% of smartphones offer extra dimming features.
  • Worse main camera video quality
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (13 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    13 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Lower front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has lower front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (2 MP vs 16 MP). The average smartphone has a 16 MP front camera.
    2 MP vs 16 MP
  • Lacks HDR mode
    This smartphone lacks an HDR mode, the average smartphone has one. 97.1% of smartphones support HDR photography.
  • No phase-detection autofocus (PDAF)
    This smartphone does not have phase-detection autofocus (PDAF), the average smartphone does. 97.6% of smartphones use PDAF.
  • No slow-motion recording
    This smartphone does not support slow-motion recording, the average smartphone does. 90.3% of smartphones offer slow-mo features.
  • No timelapse video
    This smartphone does not support timelapse video, the average smartphone does. 92.3% of smartphones include timelapse modes.
  • No burst mode
    This smartphone does not have a burst mode, the average smartphone does. 98.1% of smartphones support burst shooting.
  • No panorama mode
    This smartphone does not have a panorama mode, the average smartphone does. 99.7% of smartphones include panorama features.
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • No NFC
    This smartphone does not support NFC, the average smartphone does. 83.1% of smartphones feature NFC.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (4.2 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    4.2 vs 5.2
  • No compass
    This smartphone does not have a compass, the average smartphone does. 93.2% of smartphones include a built-in compass.
  • 1 fewer SIM slot/s
    This smartphone has fewer SIM slots than the average smartphone (1 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 SIM slots.
    1 vs 2
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    This smartphone uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • Inferior display type
    This smartphone has an inferior display type compared to the average smartphone (IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED). 0.00% of smartphones use the superior display type.
    IPS LCD vs OLED/AMOLED
  • 0.57 inches inch smaller screen size
    This smartphone has a smaller screen size than the average smartphone (6.1 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches.
    6.1 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • Lower screen resolution
    This smartphone has a lower screen resolution than the average smartphone (720x1560 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone has a resolution of 1080x2400 px.
    720x1560 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • 28.6% lower pixel density
    This smartphone has a lower pixel density than the average smartphone (282 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    282 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • 40% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (3000 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5000 mAh.
    3,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 51% lower PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark
    This smartphone scores lower in PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark than the average smartphone (385 min vs 786 min). The average smartphone scores 786 min.
    385 min vs 786 min
  • No fast charging support
    This smartphone does not support fast charging, the average smartphone does. 93.1% of smartphones feature fast charging.
  • No stereo speakers
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • No LDAC support
    This smartphone does not support LDAC, the average smartphone does. 60.3% of smartphones support LDAC.
  • No aptX HD
    This smartphone does not support aptX HD, the average smartphone does. 50.7% of smartphones support aptX HD.
  • Lower IP rating
    This smartphone has a lower IP rating than the average smartphone (IP54 vs IP67). 0.00% of smartphones have a higher IP rating.
    IP54 vs IP67
  • 16.3% lower French repairability index
    This smartphone has a lower French repairability index than the average smartphone (6.7 vs 8). The average smartphone scores 8.
    6.7 vs 8
  • 0.9 mm thicker
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (9.2 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    9.2 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 2 year/s older release date
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2022 vs 2024). 2.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    May 2022
    2022 vs 2024
  • Poor brand origin
    This smartphone has a poorer brand origin compared to the average smartphone. 0.00% of smartphones come from top-tier brand origins.
    Sweden vs China

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

Y
yours.co.uk
02/12/2025
Summary of the review
Best Doro phones 2025, tried and tested by REAL seniors
D
doro.com
04/03/2022
Summary of the review
8,100 rated Excellent. Would you like a summary of the pros and cons for one of these tests?
(Translated)Show original
N
nextpit.de
15/01/2023
Summary of the review
Doro 8100 Review: Old Tech for Seniors and the 'Digitally Brave'
(Translated)Show original
C
connect.de
04/03/2022
Summary of the review
Doro 8100 senior smartphone review - connect
(Translated)Show original
D
darty.com
05/01/2025
Summary of the review
Customer reviews for Doro 8100 Plus 32GB Anthracite Grey
(Translated)Show original
G
guideachatsenior.fr
31/08/2025
Summary of the review
Doro 8100 review 2025 – Full test of the entry-level senior smartphone
(Translated)Show original
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
24/01/2023
Summary of the review
Doro 8100 Lab Test: Disastrous battery life for a smartphone that's hard to recommend
(Translated)Show original
N
nextpit.fr
23/01/2023
Summary of the review
Doro 8100 Review: Is a senior-friendly smartphone actually worth it?
(Translated)Show original
M
moverte.com
20/08/2025
Summary of the review
Doro 8100 Plus Large Screen Touchscreen Smartphone
(Translated)Show original
O
ortoleku.com
No especificada
Summary of the review
Doro 8100 Smartphone for Seniors | Simplified Technology
(Translated)Show original
C
consumentenbond.nl
No specific date
Summary of the review
Doro smartphones Independent test | Consumentenbond
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: August 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Doro 8100 (2GB + 32GB)

  • Intuitive simplified interface with large, high-contrast icons for easier navigation
  • Loud and clear sound quality, specifically optimized for hearing aid users and clearer conversations
  • Physical 'Response by Doro' assistance button for sending emergency alerts to trusted contacts
  • Remote support capability allowing family members to assist with settings via the TeamViewer app
  • Durable build with IP54 water and dust resistance rating
  • Good value for money as an entry-level smartphone for seniors

What we don't like about Doro 8100 (2GB + 32GB)

  • Battery life performance is frequently cited as poor, with reports of it draining quickly or failing to charge
  • Slow processing speeds and overall low-end hardware specs (2GB RAM) compared to standard smartphones
  • Initial setup can be time-consuming and sometimes requires the help of a more tech-savvy relative
  • Poor camera quality, often described as only adequate for basic snaps
  • The charging cradle may not fit the phone if a protective case is attached
  • Issues with certain software features, such as unreliable facial recognition

Verdict

The Doro 8100 (2GB RAM + 32GB storage) is a 4G smartphone specifically designed for seniors, running on Android 11 Go Edition with Doro's simplified EVA interface featuring large icons and text on its 6.1-inch HD+ (1560x720) display. Key features include a 13MP triple camera system, a 3000mAh battery, enhanced amplified sound (up to 35dB earpiece volume) with hearing aid compatibility (HAC), and an IP54 splash-resistant rating. Main pros include a dedicated emergency assistance button with GPS location sharing, the ability for a trusted contact to provide remote support via the pre-installed TeamViewer app, and an included charging cradle. Cons often mentioned by users are its slower processor and limited 2GB RAM, which can result in performance hiccups with heavy use, and mixed feedback on battery life and sound quality.

Compare Doro 8100 (2GB + 32GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Doro 8100 (2GB + 32GB) and other smartphones

No results found