OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0

Shark RV2800YEUK review: 118 specs compared

Avg. price:~£410Max suction power:?Runtime:110 minDustbin capacity:300 mLMax threshold height:25 mm

Shark RV2800YEUK Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Robot Vacuums category and whether it is worth buying.

7.6/10

Overall score

Score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the robot vacuum's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best robot vacuums on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 68% of models
Score components

80%

7.6

Technical score

20%

?

User score

â–²Better than 68% of robot vacuums
7.8

Value for money

Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the robot vacuum's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a robot vacuum with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models
Score components

70%

7.6

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

â–²Better than 60%
7.6

Technical score

Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of robot-vacuum performance across cleaning, navigation, mopping, battery life, filtration, brush design, smart features, and dimensions.
When it matters
When you want to compare robot vacuums based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Score components

30%

8.2

Cleaning

23%

7.4

Navigation

18%

8.4

Mopping

12%

5.6

Battery

10%

8.4

Smart Features

7%

5.9

Design

â–²Better than 70%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
When it matters
When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £410
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of robot vacuum Shark RV2800YEUK

Technical score
Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of robot-vacuum performance across cleaning, navigation, mopping, battery life, filtration, brush design, smart features, and dimensions.
When it matters
When you want to compare robot vacuums based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Score components:

30%

8.2

Cleaning

23%

7.4

Navigation

18%

8.4

Mopping

12%

5.6

Battery

10%

8.4

Smart Features

7%

5.9

Design

7.6
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
When it matters
When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the robot vacuum.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Shark RV2800YEUK has a popularity index of 1, lower than that of 70.7% of robot vacuums and equal to that of 29.3% of robot vacuums.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the robot vacuum's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a robot vacuum with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models
Score components:

70%

7.6

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

7.8
Max suction power
?
N. of suction power levels
4
Market range: <2 – >4
This robot vacuum has 4 suction power levels, which is more than 49.7% of robot vacuums offer and the same number as 43.8% of robot vacuums offer.
Motor type
brushless
This robot vacuum uses a brushless motor, a type that is generally more efficient than those used by 2.7% of robot vacuums and also used by 97.3% of robot vacuums.
Power
?
Cleaning modes
4
Market range: <2 – >5
This robot vacuum offers 4 cleaning modes, which is more than 38.2% of robot vacuums offer and the same number as 47.5% of robot vacuums offer.
Show more
Mopping capability
yes
This robot vacuum can mop floors. 78.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Mopping system type
vibrating pad
This robot vacuum uses vibrating pad for mopping. This system is more effective than those on 66.9% of robot vacuums and as effective as those on 12.5% of robot vacuums.
Mop pad type
flat
Mop pad material
microfiber
Mop pressure
?
Show more
Primary navigation technology
LiDAR
This robot vacuum uses LiDAR as its primary navigation system, which is more capable than the systems in 34.7% of robot vacuums and matched by 60.4% of robot vacuums.
Mapping capability
yes
This robot vacuum maps the floor. 74% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Real-time mapping
no
This robot vacuum does not update its map in real time, although 68.7% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Multiple map storage
no
This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, although 56.6% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Map editing
yes
This robot vacuum lets you edit maps. 63.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Show more
App control
yes
This robot vacuum supports app control. 5.5% of robot vacuums support app control.
App name
SharkClean
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This robot vacuum supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 6.3% of robot vacuums support Wi-Fi connectivity.
Supported Wi-Fi bands
2.4 GHz
Bluetooth connectivity
yes
This robot vacuum supports Bluetooth connectivity. 35.5% of robot vacuums support Bluetooth connectivity.
Show more
Battery capacity
2,900 mAh
Market range: <2.4k mAh – >5.2k mAh
This robot vacuum has a battery capacity of 2,900 mAh, which is lower than 57.2% of robot vacuums and equal to 1% of robot vacuums.
Battery type
Li-ion
Battery voltage
14.8 V
Runtime
110 min
Market range: <90 min – >240 min
This robot vacuum runs for 110 min per charge, which is shorter than 77.6% of robot vacuums and equal to 5.2% of robot vacuums.
Recharge and resume
yes
This robot vacuum resumes cleaning after charging. 83.1% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Show more
Shape
round
Height
110 mm
Width
340 mm
Length
340 mm
Weight
3.89 kg
Market range: <2.59 kg – >4.76 kg
This robot vacuum weighs 3.89 kg, making it heavier than 66.6% of robot vacuums and the same weight as 0.6% of robot vacuums.
Show more

Shark RV2800YEUK vs the average robot vacuum

246810TotalBatteryDesignSmart FeaturesNavigationCleaningMopping
  • Has anti-tangle technology
    This robot vacuum has anti-tangle technology, while the average robot vacuum does not. 42.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
  • Lifts its mop over carpets
    This robot vacuum lifts its mop over carpets, while the average robot vacuum does not lift its mop automatically.
  • Empties its dustbin automatically
    This robot vacuum empties its dustbin automatically, while the average robot vacuum requires manual dustbin emptying.
  • Cleans its mop automatically at the dock
    This robot vacuum cleans its mop automatically at the dock, while the average robot vacuum does not clean its mop automatically at the dock.
  • Detects dirtier areas
    This robot vacuum detects dirtier areas, while the average robot vacuum does not detect dirtier areas.
  • Adjusts its cleaning height automatically
    This robot vacuum adjusts its cleaning height automatically, while the average robot vacuum uses a fixed cleaning height.
  • Dries the mop automatically
    This robot vacuum dries its mop automatically at the dock, while the average robot vacuum does not. 18.5% of robot vacuums offer this.
  • Refills its water tank automatically
    This robot vacuum refills its water tank automatically, while the average robot vacuum requires manual water refilling.
  • 0.5 h shorter charging time
    This robot vacuum takes less time to recharge fully than the average robot vacuum (4 h vs 4.5 h). The average robot vacuum takes 4.5 h.
    4 h vs 4.5 h
  • Newer model
    This robot vacuum was released in 2024, later than the average robot vacuum in 2023. The average release year for robot vacuums is 2023.
    2024 vs 2023
  • 5 mm higher threshold clearance
    This robot vacuum can cross higher thresholds than the average robot vacuum (25 mm vs 20 mm). The average robot vacuum can cross thresholds up to 20 mm high.
    25 mm vs 20 mm
  • Has anti-tangle technology
    This robot vacuum has anti-tangle technology, while the average robot vacuum does not. 42.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
  • Empties its dustbin automatically
    This robot vacuum empties its dustbin automatically, while the average robot vacuum requires manual dustbin emptying.
  • Detects dirtier areas
    This robot vacuum detects dirtier areas, while the average robot vacuum does not detect dirtier areas.
  • Adjusts its cleaning height automatically
    This robot vacuum adjusts its cleaning height automatically, while the average robot vacuum uses a fixed cleaning height.
  • 0.9 % higher filter efficiency
    This robot vacuum has higher filter efficiency than the average robot vacuum (99.9 % vs 99 %). The average robot vacuum has a filter efficiency of 99 %.
    99.9 % vs 99 %
  • Lifts its mop over carpets
    This robot vacuum lifts its mop over carpets, while the average robot vacuum does not lift its mop automatically.
  • Cleans its mop automatically at the dock
    This robot vacuum cleans its mop automatically at the dock, while the average robot vacuum does not clean its mop automatically at the dock.
  • Dries the mop automatically
    This robot vacuum dries its mop automatically at the dock, while the average robot vacuum does not. 18.5% of robot vacuums offer this.
  • Refills its water tank automatically
    This robot vacuum refills its water tank automatically, while the average robot vacuum requires manual water refilling.
  • Vibrating mop
    This robot vacuum has a vibrating mop, while the average robot vacuum does not. 11.3% of robot vacuums have a vibrating mop.
  • Better mopping system
    This robot vacuum uses vibrating pad for mopping, while the average robot vacuum uses static pad.
    vibrating pad vs static pad
  • Supports cleaning solution
    This robot vacuum supports cleaning solution for mopping, while the average robot vacuum does not. 44.8% of robot vacuums support this.
  • More basic obstacle avoidance
    This robot vacuum uses LiDAR for obstacle avoidance, while the average robot vacuum uses hybrid.
    LiDAR vs hybrid
  • Does not have a floating main brush
    This robot vacuum does not have a floating main brush, while the average robot vacuum has a floating main brush.
  • Does not store multiple maps
    This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, while the average robot vacuum stores multiple maps.
  • Does not update its map in real time
    This robot vacuum does not update its map in real time, while the average robot vacuum updates its map in real time.
  • 2,300 mL less clean water capacity
    This robot vacuum has a smaller base station clean water tank than the average robot vacuum (1,700 mL vs 4,000 mL). The average base station clean water tank holds 4,000 mL.
    1,700 mL vs 4,000 mL
  • Does not show its location in real time
    This robot vacuum does not show its location in real time, while the average robot vacuum shows its location in real time.
  • Non-washable filter
    This robot vacuum does not have a washable filter, while the average robot vacuum does. 72.5% of robot vacuums have a washable filter.
  • 40 min shorter runtime
    This robot vacuum runs for less time per charge than the average robot vacuum (110 min vs 150 min). The average robot vacuum runs for 150 min.
    110 min vs 150 min
  • 6.53x less popular
    Shark RV2800YEUK is less popular than the average robot vacuum (1 vs 6.5).
    1 vs 6.53
  • 57.7% more expensive
    Shark RV2800YEUK is more expensive than the average robot vacuum (£410 vs £260).
    £410 vs £260
  • 40 min shorter runtime
    This robot vacuum runs for less time per charge than the average robot vacuum (110 min vs 150 min). The average robot vacuum runs for 150 min.
    110 min vs 150 min
  • 300 mAh smaller battery capacity
    This robot vacuum has a smaller battery capacity than the average robot vacuum (2,900 mAh vs 3,200 mAh). The average robot vacuum has a battery capacity of 3,200 mAh.
    2,900 mAh vs 3,200 mAh
  • 10 dB louder
    This robot vacuum has a higher reported cleaning noise level than the average robot vacuum (75 dB vs 65 dB). The average robot vacuum has a reported noise level of 65 dB.
    75 dB vs 65 dB
  • 9% heavier
    This robot vacuum is heavier than the average robot vacuum (3.9 kg vs 3.57 kg). The average robot vacuum weighs 3.57 kg.
    3.89 kg vs 3.57 kg
  • 1.56 kg heavier base station
    This robot vacuum has a heavier base station than the average robot vacuum (5.9 kg vs 4.3 kg). The average robot vacuum's base station weighs 4.3 kg.
    5.86 kg vs 4.3 kg
  • More basic obstacle avoidance
    This robot vacuum uses LiDAR for obstacle avoidance, while the average robot vacuum uses hybrid.
    LiDAR vs hybrid
  • Does not store multiple maps
    This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, while the average robot vacuum stores multiple maps.
  • Does not update its map in real time
    This robot vacuum does not update its map in real time, while the average robot vacuum updates its map in real time.
  • Does not show its location in real time
    This robot vacuum does not show its location in real time, while the average robot vacuum shows its location in real time.
  • Does not have a floating main brush
    This robot vacuum does not have a floating main brush, while the average robot vacuum has a floating main brush.
  • Non-washable filter
    This robot vacuum does not have a washable filter, while the average robot vacuum does. 72.5% of robot vacuums have a washable filter.
  • 38 mm narrower main brush
    This robot vacuum has a narrower main brush than the average robot vacuum (140 mm vs 178 mm). The average robot vacuum has a main brush 178 mm wide.
    140 mm vs 178 mm
  • 100 mL smaller dustbin
    This robot vacuum has a smaller onboard dustbin than the average robot vacuum (300 mL vs 400 mL). The average robot vacuum has a dustbin capacity of 400 mL.
    300 mL vs 400 mL
  • Does not include a cleaning tool
    This robot vacuum does not include a cleaning tool, while the average robot vacuum includes a cleaning tool.
  • Non-washable dustbin
    This robot vacuum does not have a washable dustbin, while the average robot vacuum does. 83.6% of robot vacuums have a washable dustbin.
  • 2,300 mL less clean water capacity
    This robot vacuum has a smaller base station clean water tank than the average robot vacuum (1,700 mL vs 4,000 mL). The average base station clean water tank holds 4,000 mL.
    1,700 mL vs 4,000 mL

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Shark RV2800YEUK

  • Excellent hands-free cleaning with automated dustbin self-emptying, water tank self-refilling, and mop pad drying at the base station.
  • Strong vacuuming capabilities, especially for picking up pet hair, litter, and daily debris from both hard floors and carpets.
  • NeverStuck technology effectively lifts the chassis over high thresholds and raises the wet mop pad to prevent wetting carpets.
  • Intelligent 'Detect' cleaning features automatically boost suction on hidden dirt and use air blasts to pull debris from edges.
  • Anti-microbial, self-cleaning brush roll performs well with minimal hair wrap.
  • Bagless auto-empty base eliminates the recurring cost of buying disposable replacement bags.

What customers don't like about Shark RV2800YEUK

  • The SharkClean app feels outdated, lacking advanced options like adjustable water levels, adjustable power settings, and live progress tracking.
  • Software limitations restrict the system to only one saved map, making it unsuitable for multi-floor mapping.
  • Below-average battery life and slow, inefficient navigation lead to longer overall cleaning times.
  • The base station lacks high-end flagship features such as heated water for washing the mop pads or a self-cleaning base tray.
  • Operational noise can be quite loud, particularly the mechanical clicks of the lifting mechanism and the sloshing sound of the self-cleaning cycle.
  • Object avoidance can occasionally be overly sensitive or struggle with soft obstacles like socks and paper towels.

Verdict

The Shark PowerDetect NeverTouch 2-in-1 RV2800YEUK is an automated robot vacuum and mop featuring a 650W power rating, 360° LiDAR mapping, and a multi-functional base that provides up to 30 days of hands-free self-emptying and water self-refilling. Key advantages include its 110-minute maximum runtime, NeverStuck threshold-lifting technology, an Anti Hair Wrap brush roll, and an automatic mopping pad drying cycle. Main drawbacks are its inability to support multi-room mapping, below-average obstacle avoidance relative to flagship competitors, and occasional app connectivity issues.

Compare Shark RV2800YEUK with other robot vacuums

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Shark RV2800YEUK and other robot vacuums

No results found