OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0

Shark RV2620WD review: 118 specs compared

Avg. price:~£440Max suction power:2500 PaRuntime:110 minDustbin capacity:300 mLMax threshold height:19 mm

Shark RV2620WD Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Robot Vacuums category and whether it is worth buying.

Shark RV2620WD
6.9/10

Overall score

Score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the robot vacuum's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best robot vacuums on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Score components

80%

6.5

Technical score

20%

8.7

User score

â–¼Worse than 57% of robot vacuums
7.3

Value for money

Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the robot vacuum's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a robot vacuum with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

8.2

Price

â–¼Worse than 71%
6.5

Technical score

Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of robot-vacuum performance across cleaning, navigation, mopping, battery life, filtration, brush design, smart features, and dimensions.
When it matters
When you want to compare robot vacuums based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

30%

5.9

Cleaning

23%

7.4

Navigation

18%

6.9

Mopping

12%

4.9

Battery

10%

8.1

Smart Features

7%

5.6

Design

â–¼Worse than 62%
8.7

User score

User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
When it matters
When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 91% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

9.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
★Better than 91%
  • shark-rv2620wd
  • shark-rv2620wd
  • shark-rv2620wd
  • shark-rv2620wd
  • shark-rv2620wd
  • shark-rv2620wd
  • shark-rv2620wd
  • shark-rv2620wd
  • shark-rv2620wd
  • shark-rv2620wd
  • shark-rv2620wd
  • shark-rv2620wd
shark-rv2620wd
shark-rv2620wd
shark-rv2620wd
shark-rv2620wd
shark-rv2620wd
shark-rv2620wd
shark-rv2620wd
shark-rv2620wd
shark-rv2620wd
shark-rv2620wd
shark-rv2620wd
shark-rv2620wd
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of robot vacuum Shark RV2620WD

Technical score
Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of robot-vacuum performance across cleaning, navigation, mopping, battery life, filtration, brush design, smart features, and dimensions.
When it matters
When you want to compare robot vacuums based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components:

30%

5.9

Cleaning

23%

7.4

Navigation

18%

6.9

Mopping

12%

4.9

Battery

10%

8.1

Smart Features

7%

5.6

Design

6.5
User score
User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
When it matters
When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 91% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

9.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.7
Popularity
Popularity
9.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the robot vacuum.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 87% of models
Popularity:
Shark RV2620WD has a popularity index of 9.5, higher than that of 87.1% of robot vacuums and equal to that of 1.2% of robot vacuums.
9.5
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the robot vacuum's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a robot vacuum with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components:

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

8.2

Price

7.3
Max suction power
2,500 Pa
Market range: <1.6k Pa – >12k Pa
This robot vacuum has a maximum suction pressure of 2,500 Pa, which is lower than 68.8% of robot vacuums and equal to 4.2% of robot vacuums.
N. of suction power levels
3
Market range: <2 – >4
This robot vacuum has 3 suction power levels, which is fewer than 50.5% of robot vacuums offer and the same number as 35.5% of robot vacuums offer.
Motor type
brushless
This robot vacuum uses a brushless motor, a type that is generally more efficient than those used by 2.7% of robot vacuums and also used by 97.3% of robot vacuums.
Power
?
Cleaning modes
2
Market range: <2 – >5
This robot vacuum offers 2 cleaning modes, which is fewer than 89.9% of robot vacuums offer and the same number as 10.1% of robot vacuums offer.
Show more
Mopping capability
yes
This robot vacuum can mop floors. 78.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Mopping system type
vibrating pad
This robot vacuum uses vibrating pad for mopping. This system is more effective than those on 66.9% of robot vacuums and as effective as those on 12.5% of robot vacuums.
Mop pad type
semi-circular
Mop pad material
microfiber
Mop pressure
?
Show more
Primary navigation technology
LiDAR
This robot vacuum uses LiDAR as its primary navigation system, which is more capable than the systems in 34.7% of robot vacuums and matched by 60.4% of robot vacuums.
Mapping capability
yes
This robot vacuum maps the floor. 74% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Real-time mapping
no
This robot vacuum does not update its map in real time, although 68.7% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Multiple map storage
no
This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, although 56.6% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Map editing
yes
This robot vacuum lets you edit maps. 63.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Show more
App control
yes
This robot vacuum supports app control. 5.5% of robot vacuums support app control.
App name
SharkClean
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This robot vacuum supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 6.3% of robot vacuums support Wi-Fi connectivity.
Supported Wi-Fi bands
2.4 GHz
Bluetooth connectivity
yes
This robot vacuum supports Bluetooth connectivity. 35.5% of robot vacuums support Bluetooth connectivity.
Show more
Battery capacity
2,500 mAh
Market range: <2.4k mAh – >5.2k mAh
This robot vacuum has a battery capacity of 2,500 mAh, which is lower than 86.1% of robot vacuums and equal to 3% of robot vacuums.
Battery type
Li-ion
Battery voltage
14.4 V
Runtime
110 min
Market range: <90 min – >240 min
This robot vacuum runs for 110 min per charge, which is shorter than 77.6% of robot vacuums and equal to 5.2% of robot vacuums.
Recharge and resume
yes
This robot vacuum resumes cleaning after charging. 83.1% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Show more
Shape
round
Height
?
Width
340 mm
Length
340 mm
Weight
4.4 kg
Market range: <2.59 kg – >4.76 kg
This robot vacuum weighs 4.4 kg, making it heavier than 82.2% of robot vacuums and the same weight as 1.5% of robot vacuums.
Show more

Shark RV2620WD vs the average robot vacuum

246810TotalBatteryDesignSmart FeaturesNavigationCleaningMopping
  • Has anti-tangle technology
    This robot vacuum has anti-tangle technology, while the average robot vacuum does not. 42.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
  • Vibrating mop
    This robot vacuum has a vibrating mop, while the average robot vacuum does not. 11.3% of robot vacuums have a vibrating mop.
  • Better mopping system
    This robot vacuum uses vibrating pad for mopping, while the average robot vacuum uses static pad.
    vibrating pad vs static pad
  • Supports cleaning solution
    This robot vacuum supports cleaning solution for mopping, while the average robot vacuum does not. 44.8% of robot vacuums support this.
  • 60 mL more onboard water capacity
    This robot vacuum has a larger onboard water tank than the average robot vacuum (300 mL vs 240 mL). The average robot vacuum's onboard water tank holds 240 mL.
    300 mL vs 240 mL
  • 9% higher user score
    User score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Shark RV2620WD
    the average robot vacuum
    Shark RV2620WD has a higher user score than the average robot vacuum (8.72 vs 8.000).
    8.72 vs 8
  • 45% more popular
    Shark RV2620WD is more popular than the average robot vacuum (9.47 vs 6.5).
    9.47 vs 6.53
  • 9% higher user score
    User score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Shark RV2620WD
    the average robot vacuum
    Shark RV2620WD has a higher user score than the average robot vacuum (8.72 vs 8.000).
    8.72 vs 8
  • 45% more popular
    Shark RV2620WD is more popular than the average robot vacuum (9.47 vs 6.5).
    9.47 vs 6.53
  • Has anti-tangle technology
    This robot vacuum has anti-tangle technology, while the average robot vacuum does not. 42.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
  • Vibrating mop
    This robot vacuum has a vibrating mop, while the average robot vacuum does not. 11.3% of robot vacuums have a vibrating mop.
  • Better mopping system
    This robot vacuum uses vibrating pad for mopping, while the average robot vacuum uses static pad.
    vibrating pad vs static pad
  • Supports cleaning solution
    This robot vacuum supports cleaning solution for mopping, while the average robot vacuum does not. 44.8% of robot vacuums support this.
  • 60 mL more onboard water capacity
    This robot vacuum has a larger onboard water tank than the average robot vacuum (300 mL vs 240 mL). The average robot vacuum's onboard water tank holds 240 mL.
    300 mL vs 240 mL
  • More basic obstacle avoidance
    This robot vacuum uses LiDAR for obstacle avoidance, while the average robot vacuum uses hybrid.
    LiDAR vs hybrid
  • 2 fewer cleaning modes
    This robot vacuum offers fewer cleaning modes than the average robot vacuum (2 vs 4). The average robot vacuum offers 4 cleaning modes.
    2 vs 4
  • Does not store multiple maps
    This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, while the average robot vacuum stores multiple maps.
  • Does not update its map in real time
    This robot vacuum does not update its map in real time, while the average robot vacuum updates its map in real time.
  • 1,500 Pa weaker maximum suction
    This robot vacuum has weaker maximum suction than the average robot vacuum (2,500 Pa vs 4,000 Pa). The average robot vacuum has a maximum suction pressure of 4,000 Pa.
    2,500 Pa vs 4,000 Pa
  • 1 fewer suction power levels
    This robot vacuum offers fewer suction power levels than the average robot vacuum (3 vs 4). The average robot vacuum offers 4 suction power levels.
    3 vs 4
  • Does not show its location in real time
    This robot vacuum does not show its location in real time, while the average robot vacuum shows its location in real time.
  • Non-washable filter
    This robot vacuum does not have a washable filter, while the average robot vacuum does. 72.5% of robot vacuums have a washable filter.
  • 69.2% more expensive
    Shark RV2620WD is more expensive than the average robot vacuum (£440 vs £260).
    £440 vs £260
  • 3.7% worse value for money
    Shark RV2620WD has worse value for money than the average robot vacuum (7.32 vs 7.6).
    7.32 vs 7.59
  • 40 min shorter runtime
    This robot vacuum runs for less time per charge than the average robot vacuum (110 min vs 150 min). The average robot vacuum runs for 150 min.
    110 min vs 150 min
  • 700 mAh smaller battery capacity
    This robot vacuum has a smaller battery capacity than the average robot vacuum (2,500 mAh vs 3,200 mAh). The average robot vacuum has a battery capacity of 3,200 mAh.
    2,500 mAh vs 3,200 mAh
  • 1.5 h longer charging time
    This robot vacuum takes longer to recharge fully than the average robot vacuum (6 h vs 4.5 h). The average robot vacuum takes 4.5 h.
    6 h vs 4.5 h
  • 23.2% heavier
    This robot vacuum is heavier than the average robot vacuum (4.4 kg vs 3.57 kg). The average robot vacuum weighs 3.57 kg.
    4.4 kg vs 3.57 kg
  • 4 dB louder
    This robot vacuum has a higher reported cleaning noise level than the average robot vacuum (69 dB vs 65 dB). The average robot vacuum has a reported noise level of 65 dB.
    69 dB vs 65 dB
  • Older model
    This robot vacuum was released in 2022, earlier than the average robot vacuum in 2023. The average release year for robot vacuums is 2023.
    2022 vs 2023
  • No maintenance notifications
    This robot vacuum does not provide maintenance notifications, while the average robot vacuum does. 76.8% of robot vacuums offer these.
  • 14 fewer languages supported
    This robot vacuum supports fewer languages than the average robot vacuum (3 vs 17). The average robot vacuum supports 17 languages.
    3 vs 17
  • More basic obstacle avoidance
    This robot vacuum uses LiDAR for obstacle avoidance, while the average robot vacuum uses hybrid.
    LiDAR vs hybrid
  • Does not store multiple maps
    This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, while the average robot vacuum stores multiple maps.
  • Does not update its map in real time
    This robot vacuum does not update its map in real time, while the average robot vacuum updates its map in real time.
  • Does not show its location in real time
    This robot vacuum does not show its location in real time, while the average robot vacuum shows its location in real time.
  • 1 mm lower threshold clearance
    This robot vacuum can only cross lower thresholds than the average robot vacuum (19 mm vs 20 mm). The average robot vacuum can cross thresholds up to 20 mm high.
    19 mm vs 20 mm
  • 2 fewer cleaning modes
    This robot vacuum offers fewer cleaning modes than the average robot vacuum (2 vs 4). The average robot vacuum offers 4 cleaning modes.
    2 vs 4
  • 1,500 Pa weaker maximum suction
    This robot vacuum has weaker maximum suction than the average robot vacuum (2,500 Pa vs 4,000 Pa). The average robot vacuum has a maximum suction pressure of 4,000 Pa.
    2,500 Pa vs 4,000 Pa
  • 1 fewer suction power levels
    This robot vacuum offers fewer suction power levels than the average robot vacuum (3 vs 4). The average robot vacuum offers 4 suction power levels.
    3 vs 4
  • Non-washable filter
    This robot vacuum does not have a washable filter, while the average robot vacuum does. 72.5% of robot vacuums have a washable filter.
  • 38 mm narrower main brush
    This robot vacuum has a narrower main brush than the average robot vacuum (140 mm vs 178 mm). The average robot vacuum has a main brush 178 mm wide.
    140 mm vs 178 mm
  • 4 % lower filter efficiency
    This robot vacuum has lower filter efficiency than the average robot vacuum (95 % vs 99 %). The average robot vacuum has a filter efficiency of 99 %.
    95 % vs 99 %
  • 100 mL smaller dustbin
    This robot vacuum has a smaller onboard dustbin than the average robot vacuum (300 mL vs 400 mL). The average robot vacuum has a dustbin capacity of 400 mL.
    300 mL vs 400 mL
  • Does not include a cleaning tool
    This robot vacuum does not include a cleaning tool, while the average robot vacuum includes a cleaning tool.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techradar.com
15/09/2024
Summary of the review
Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 robot vacuum review
T
trustedreviews.com
04/10/2024
Summary of the review
Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 Self-Empty Robot Vacuum and Mop RV2620WAUK Review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Shark RV2620WD

  • Excellent suction on both carpets and hard floors
  • Sonic mopping effectively handles everyday floor dirt
  • Matrix Clean navigation makes multiple passes over dirt in an accurate grid pattern
  • Good pet-hair handling and excellent corner cleaning with CleanEdge technology
  • Convenient two-in-one design compared with similar robot vacuums

What customers don't like about Shark RV2620WD

  • The app and management software contain several bugs and are less intuitive than competitors
  • Mapping and navigation sometimes fail, causing the robot to become lost or stuck in unselected areas
  • Mopping can be inaccurate in large rooms, overworking small areas while skipping others
  • Some users report lower-than-expected battery performance and durability over time

Verdict

The Shark RV2620WD is a 35-watt 2-in-1 robot vacuum and mop featuring 360° LiDAR precision mapping, Matrix Clean grid navigation, an anti-hair wrap brush roll, and a 14.4V lithium-ion battery supplying up to 110 minutes of runtime. Main pros include its multi-angle deep carpet cleaning, an integrated CleanEdge air blast system for corners, and a sonic mopping module that scrubs hard surfaces 100 times per minute. Notable cons involve software limitations, as users report an un-intuitive mobile application that struggles with multi-floor maps, sporadic Wi-Fi disconnection errors, and an inability to lift the mopping pad over carpeted areas.

Compare Shark RV2620WD with other robot vacuums

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Shark RV2620WD and other robot vacuums

No results found