OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0

Shark AV2810ZEWH review: 118 specs compared

Avg. price:~ÂŁ620Max suction power:?Runtime:120 minDustbin capacity:330 mLMax threshold height:20 mm

Shark AV2810ZEWH Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Robot Vacuums category and whether it is worth buying.

Shark AV2810ZEWH
8.0/10

Overall score

Score
8.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
An overall evaluation of the robot vacuum's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best robot vacuums on the market.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 82% of models
Score components

80%

7.9

Technical score

20%

8.3

User score

â–˛Better than 82% of robot vacuums
7.8

Value for money

Value for money
7.8/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the robot vacuum's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a robot vacuum with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 60% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

Overall score

30%

7.2

Price

â–˛Better than 60%
7.9

Technical score

Technical score
7.9/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of robot-vacuum performance across cleaning, navigation, mopping, battery life, filtration, brush design, smart features, and dimensions.
When it matters
When you want to compare robot vacuums based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 78% of models
Score components

30%

8.7

Cleaning

23%

8.6

Navigation

18%

8.4

Mopping

12%

5.1

Battery

10%

8.2

Smart Features

7%

5.5

Design

â–˛Better than 78%
8.3

User score

User score
8.3/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
When it matters
When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 79% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

9.1

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–˛Better than 79%
  • shark-av2810zewh
  • shark-av2810zewh
  • shark-av2810zewh
  • shark-av2810zewh
  • shark-av2810zewh
  • shark-av2810zewh
  • shark-av2810zewh
  • shark-av2810zewh
  • shark-av2810zewh
  • shark-av2810zewh
shark-av2810zewh
shark-av2810zewh
shark-av2810zewh
shark-av2810zewh
shark-av2810zewh
shark-av2810zewh
shark-av2810zewh
shark-av2810zewh
shark-av2810zewh
shark-av2810zewh
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of robot vacuum Shark AV2810ZEWH

Technical score
Technical score
7.9/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of robot-vacuum performance across cleaning, navigation, mopping, battery life, filtration, brush design, smart features, and dimensions.
When it matters
When you want to compare robot vacuums based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 78% of models
Score components:

30%

8.7

Cleaning

23%

8.6

Navigation

18%

8.4

Mopping

12%

5.1

Battery

10%

8.2

Smart Features

7%

5.5

Design

7.9
User score
User score
8.3/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
When it matters
When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 79% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

9.1

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.3
Popularity
Popularity
9.1/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the robot vacuum.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 84% of models
Popularity:
Shark AV2810ZEWH has a popularity index of 9.1, higher than that of 83.6% of robot vacuums and equal to that of 1.2% of robot vacuums.
9.1
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the robot vacuum's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a robot vacuum with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 60% of models
Score components:

70%

8.0

Overall score

30%

7.2

Price

7.8
Max suction power
?
N. of suction power levels
3
Market range: <2 – >4
This robot vacuum has 3 suction power levels, which is fewer than 50.5% of robot vacuums offer and the same number as 35.5% of robot vacuums offer.
Motor type
brushless
This robot vacuum uses a brushless motor, a type that is generally more efficient than those used by 2.7% of robot vacuums and also used by 97.3% of robot vacuums.
Power
35 W
Cleaning modes
4
Market range: <2 – >5
This robot vacuum offers 4 cleaning modes, which is more than 38.2% of robot vacuums offer and the same number as 47.5% of robot vacuums offer.
Show more
Mopping capability
yes
This robot vacuum can mop floors. 78.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Mopping system type
vibrating pad
This robot vacuum uses vibrating pad for mopping. This system is more effective than those on 66.9% of robot vacuums and as effective as those on 12.5% of robot vacuums.
Mop pad type
arc-shaped
Mop pad material
microfiber
Mop pressure
?
Show more
Primary navigation technology
LiDAR
This robot vacuum uses LiDAR as its primary navigation system, which is more capable than the systems in 34.7% of robot vacuums and matched by 60.4% of robot vacuums.
Mapping capability
yes
This robot vacuum maps the floor. 74% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Real-time mapping
no
This robot vacuum does not update its map in real time, although 68.7% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Multiple map storage
no
This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, although 56.6% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Map editing
yes
This robot vacuum lets you edit maps. 63.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Show more
App control
yes
This robot vacuum supports app control. 5.5% of robot vacuums support app control.
App name
SharkClean
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This robot vacuum supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 6.3% of robot vacuums support Wi-Fi connectivity.
Supported Wi-Fi bands
2.4 GHz
Bluetooth connectivity
yes
This robot vacuum supports Bluetooth connectivity. 35.5% of robot vacuums support Bluetooth connectivity.
Show more
Battery capacity
3,200 mAh
Market range: <2.4k mAh – >5.2k mAh
This robot vacuum has a battery capacity of 3,200 mAh, which is higher than 46.5% of robot vacuums and equal to 11.9% of robot vacuums.
Battery type
Li-ion
Battery voltage
14.8 V
Runtime
120 min
Market range: <90 min – >240 min
This robot vacuum runs for 120 min per charge, which is shorter than 57.6% of robot vacuums and equal to 19.8% of robot vacuums.
Recharge and resume
yes
This robot vacuum resumes cleaning after charging. 83.1% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Show more
Shape
round
Height
105 mm
Width
340 mm
Length
340 mm
Weight
6.7 kg
Market range: <2.59 kg – >4.76 kg
This robot vacuum weighs 6.7 kg, making it heavier than 99% of robot vacuums and the same weight as 0.2% of robot vacuums.
Show more

Shark AV2810ZEWH vs the average robot vacuum

246810TotalBatteryDesignSmart FeaturesNavigationCleaningMopping
  • Has anti-tangle technology
    This robot vacuum has anti-tangle technology, while the average robot vacuum does not. 42.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
  • Lifts its mop over carpets
    This robot vacuum lifts its mop over carpets, while the average robot vacuum does not lift its mop automatically.
  • Empties its dustbin automatically
    This robot vacuum empties its dustbin automatically, while the average robot vacuum requires manual dustbin emptying.
  • Cleans its mop automatically at the dock
    This robot vacuum cleans its mop automatically at the dock, while the average robot vacuum does not clean its mop automatically at the dock.
  • Detects dirtier areas
    This robot vacuum detects dirtier areas, while the average robot vacuum does not detect dirtier areas.
  • Adjusts its cleaning height automatically
    This robot vacuum adjusts its cleaning height automatically, while the average robot vacuum uses a fixed cleaning height.
  • Refills its water tank automatically
    This robot vacuum refills its water tank automatically, while the average robot vacuum requires manual water refilling.
  • 0.97 % higher filter efficiency
    This robot vacuum has higher filter efficiency than the average robot vacuum (100 % vs 99 %). The average robot vacuum has a filter efficiency of 99 %.
    99.97 % vs 99 %
  • 39.8% more popular
    Shark AV2810ZEWH is more popular than the average robot vacuum (9.13 vs 6.5).
    9.13 vs 6.53
  • 4.2% higher user score
    User score
    8.3/ 10
    âś•
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–Ľ
    â–Ľ
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Shark AV2810ZEWH
    the average robot vacuum
    Shark AV2810ZEWH has a higher user score than the average robot vacuum (8.34 vs 8.000).
    8.34 vs 8
  • 0.5 h shorter charging time
    This robot vacuum takes less time to recharge fully than the average robot vacuum (4 h vs 4.5 h). The average robot vacuum takes 4.5 h.
    4 h vs 4.5 h
  • 0.33 m longer power cord
    This robot vacuum has a longer power cord than the average robot vacuum (1.8 m vs 1.5 m). The average robot vacuum's power cord is 1.5 m long.
    1.83 m vs 1.5 m
  • Newer model
    This robot vacuum was released in 2024, later than the average robot vacuum in 2023. The average release year for robot vacuums is 2023.
    2024 vs 2023
  • Has anti-tangle technology
    This robot vacuum has anti-tangle technology, while the average robot vacuum does not. 42.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
  • Empties its dustbin automatically
    This robot vacuum empties its dustbin automatically, while the average robot vacuum requires manual dustbin emptying.
  • Detects dirtier areas
    This robot vacuum detects dirtier areas, while the average robot vacuum does not detect dirtier areas.
  • Adjusts its cleaning height automatically
    This robot vacuum adjusts its cleaning height automatically, while the average robot vacuum uses a fixed cleaning height.
  • 0.97 % higher filter efficiency
    This robot vacuum has higher filter efficiency than the average robot vacuum (100 % vs 99 %). The average robot vacuum has a filter efficiency of 99 %.
    99.97 % vs 99 %
  • 1 more side brushes
    This robot vacuum has more side brushes than the average robot vacuum (2 vs 1). The average robot vacuum has 1 side brushes.
    2 vs 1
  • Lifts its mop over carpets
    This robot vacuum lifts its mop over carpets, while the average robot vacuum does not lift its mop automatically.
  • Cleans its mop automatically at the dock
    This robot vacuum cleans its mop automatically at the dock, while the average robot vacuum does not clean its mop automatically at the dock.
  • Refills its water tank automatically
    This robot vacuum refills its water tank automatically, while the average robot vacuum requires manual water refilling.
  • Vibrating mop
    This robot vacuum has a vibrating mop, while the average robot vacuum does not. 11.3% of robot vacuums have a vibrating mop.
  • Better mopping system
    This robot vacuum uses vibrating pad for mopping, while the average robot vacuum uses static pad.
    vibrating pad vs static pad
  • Dispenses cleaning solution automatically
    This robot vacuum dispenses cleaning solution automatically, while the average robot vacuum does not. 26.4% of robot vacuums offer this.
  • Supports cleaning solution
    This robot vacuum supports cleaning solution for mopping, while the average robot vacuum does not. 44.8% of robot vacuums support this.
  • Does not store multiple maps
    This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, while the average robot vacuum stores multiple maps.
  • Does not update its map in real time
    This robot vacuum does not update its map in real time, while the average robot vacuum updates its map in real time.
  • 1 fewer suction power levels
    This robot vacuum offers fewer suction power levels than the average robot vacuum (3 vs 4). The average robot vacuum offers 4 suction power levels.
    3 vs 4
  • 2,300 mL less clean water capacity
    This robot vacuum has a smaller base station clean water tank than the average robot vacuum (1,700 mL vs 4,000 mL). The average base station clean water tank holds 4,000 mL.
    1,700 mL vs 4,000 mL
  • Does not show its location in real time
    This robot vacuum does not show its location in real time, while the average robot vacuum shows its location in real time.
  • 33 mm narrower main brush
    This robot vacuum has a narrower main brush than the average robot vacuum (145 mm vs 178 mm). The average robot vacuum has a main brush 178 mm wide.
    145 mm vs 178 mm
  • 87.7% heavier
    This robot vacuum is heavier than the average robot vacuum (6.7 kg vs 3.57 kg). The average robot vacuum weighs 3.57 kg.
    6.7 kg vs 3.57 kg
  • 30 min shorter runtime
    This robot vacuum runs for less time per charge than the average robot vacuum (120 min vs 150 min). The average robot vacuum runs for 150 min.
    120 min vs 150 min
  • 2.38x more expensive
    Shark AV2810ZEWH is more expensive than the average robot vacuum (ÂŁ620 vs ÂŁ260).
    ÂŁ620 vs ÂŁ260
  • 30 min shorter runtime
    This robot vacuum runs for less time per charge than the average robot vacuum (120 min vs 150 min). The average robot vacuum runs for 150 min.
    120 min vs 150 min
  • 60 m² smaller cleaning area
    This robot vacuum has a smaller maximum cleaning area than the average robot vacuum (120 m² vs 180 m²). The average robot vacuum has a maximum cleaning area of 180 m².
    120 m² vs 180 m²
  • 87.7% heavier
    This robot vacuum is heavier than the average robot vacuum (6.7 kg vs 3.57 kg). The average robot vacuum weighs 3.57 kg.
    6.7 kg vs 3.57 kg
  • 3 dB louder
    This robot vacuum has a higher reported cleaning noise level than the average robot vacuum (68 dB vs 65 dB). The average robot vacuum has a reported noise level of 65 dB.
    68 dB vs 65 dB
  • No voice prompts
    This robot vacuum does not provide voice prompts, while the average robot vacuum does. 76.3% of robot vacuums offer these.
  • Does not store multiple maps
    This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, while the average robot vacuum stores multiple maps.
  • Does not update its map in real time
    This robot vacuum does not update its map in real time, while the average robot vacuum updates its map in real time.
  • Does not show its location in real time
    This robot vacuum does not show its location in real time, while the average robot vacuum shows its location in real time.
  • 1 fewer suction power levels
    This robot vacuum offers fewer suction power levels than the average robot vacuum (3 vs 4). The average robot vacuum offers 4 suction power levels.
    3 vs 4
  • 33 mm narrower main brush
    This robot vacuum has a narrower main brush than the average robot vacuum (145 mm vs 178 mm). The average robot vacuum has a main brush 178 mm wide.
    145 mm vs 178 mm
  • Does not include a cleaning tool
    This robot vacuum does not include a cleaning tool, while the average robot vacuum includes a cleaning tool.
  • 70 mL smaller dustbin
    This robot vacuum has a smaller onboard dustbin than the average robot vacuum (330 mL vs 400 mL). The average robot vacuum has a dustbin capacity of 400 mL.
    330 mL vs 400 mL
  • 2,300 mL less clean water capacity
    This robot vacuum has a smaller base station clean water tank than the average robot vacuum (1,700 mL vs 4,000 mL). The average base station clean water tank holds 4,000 mL.
    1,700 mL vs 4,000 mL

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

W
wired.com
15/09/2024
Summary of the review
Shark PowerDetect 2-in-1 Robot Vacuum and Mop Review: A Clever But Flawed Cleaner
T
the-ambient.com
22/01/2025
Summary of the review
Shark PowerDetect NeverTouch Pro 2-in-1 review
B
businessinsider.com
11/08/2025
Summary of the review
Shark PowerDetect 2-in-1 Robot Vacuum and Mop Review: An efficient but expensive cleaner
P
pcwelt.de
23/01/2025
Summary of the review
Shark Powerdetect Nevertouch Pro 2-in-1 review - PC-WELT
(Translated)Show original
C
chip.de
06/11/2025
Summary of the review
Shark PowerDetect NeverTouch Pro (RV2800ZEEU) review
(Translated)Show original
C
chip.de
30/10/2025
Summary of the review
Is it any good? We test the Shark PowerDetect ... - CHIP
(Translated)Show original
E
etm-testmagazin.de
06/01/2025
Summary of the review
The PowerDetect NeverTouch Pro 2-in-1 Robot Vacuum - ETM Testmagazin
(Translated)Show original
S
smart-home-fox.de
22/01/2025
Summary of the review
Shark PowerDetect NeverTouch Pro 2-in-1 Review
(Translated)Show original
B
businessinsider.de
31/07/2026
Summary of the review
Best Robot Vacuum and Mop: Save 340 Euros Right Here
(Translated)Show original
O
ouest-france.fr
19/06/2025
Summary of the review
Shark PowerDetect NeverTouch Pro review: Our thoughts on this robot vacuum and mop
(Translated)Show original
F
frandroid.com
23/02/2026
Summary of the review
Shark PowerDetect NeverTouch Pro 2-in-1 Review: A Serious Alternative Under 800 Euros
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
20/12/2024
Summary of the review
Review of the Shark PowerDetect NeverTouch Pro 2-in-1 (RV2800ZEEU)
(Translated)Show original
N
nomadeurbain.fr
03/03/2026
Summary of the review
Shark PowerDetect NeverTouch Pro 2-in-1 Review: A Real Mid-Range Alternative
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Shark AV2810ZEWH

  • Great cleaning performance on both hard floors and carpets, effectively lifting hair and dust bunnies.
  • Bagless auto-empty station eliminates the need and recurring cost for disposable dust bags.
  • NeverStuck active lifting technology efficiently navigates over thresholds and higher obstacles.
  • Convenient self-refilling and self-cleaning base station that washes and dries the mop pads automatically.
  • EdgeDetect air blast system successfully pushes corner and baseboard debris into the vacuum path.
  • DirtDetect sensor automatically increases suction or initiates a figure-eight deep-cleaning pattern upon finding heavy messes.

What customers don't like about Shark AV2810ZEWH

  • The official smartphone application provides very basic functionality and limited customization controls.
  • The app lacks essential features such as multi-level mapping, real-time cleaning paths, or adjustable water levels.
  • Object avoidance can be unreliable, occasionally bumping into smaller hazards or getting tangled in light fabrics like socks.
  • The self-cleaning base uses ambient-temperature water and cold air, sometimes leaving the mop pads damp even after long drying cycles.
  • The unit can be quite loud due to its plastic shell composition and intensive scrubbing mechanisms.
  • Occasional mechanical docking faults, forcing users to manually guide the vacuum onto its base to empty or charge.

Verdict

The Shark PowerDetect NeverTouch Pro 2-in-1 Robot Vacuum and Mop (AV2810ZEWH) is a premium autonomous cleaning system equipped with 3D 360° LiDAR navigation, 5 intelligent PowerDetect technologies (including Edge Detect air blasts and Stain Mode), and a comprehensive 650-watt docking station featuring a 2.3-litre bagless debris bin and a 1.7-litre clean water tank. Key pros include complete hands-free maintenance with a base that self-empties debris for up to 60 days, self-refills water for up to 30 days, and automatically washes and air-dries the mopping pad, alongside NeverStuck technology that lifts the chassis over obstacles and an anti-hair wrap brush roll. However, its notable cons include a shorter maximum battery runtime of around 110 minutes on low settings, below-average obstacle avoidance capabilities compared to other flagship models, and a basic, occasionally buggy mobile app that lacks advanced multi-floor customization.

Compare Shark AV2810ZEWH with other robot vacuums

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Shark AV2810ZEWH and other robot vacuums

No results found