OVERALL

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

ALTERNATIVES

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price in UK: ~£1,660
Avg. price in US: ~$1,840
PassMark benchmark result: 75012
N. of physical cores: 32
CPU boost clock speed: 4.5 GHz

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX review. Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among processors and if it is worth buying.

7.6

Very good

7.7

Very good

7.2

Very good

7.0
Gaming
Score components:
30.0%
6.1
PassMark single-core benchmark score
25.0%
5.9
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
20.0%
6.1
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
10
L3 cache
8.0%
10
N. of physical cores
8.8
Video editing
Score components:
45.0%
7.4
Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
20.0%
10
N. of physical cores
20.0%
10
CPU threads
15.0%
10
L3 cache

Best prices in UK

£?

Best rankings

#15 in Best Workstation CPUs

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is a high-end workstation processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, featuring 32 cores and 64 threads with a 3.6 GHz base clock and up to 4.5 GHz boost. Key characteristics include 128 MB of L3 cache, support for 8-channel DDR4-3200 ECC memory up to 2 TB, and 128 PCIe 4.0 lanes, all within a 280W TDP. Its main pros are exceptional multi-threaded performance for professional 3D rendering and simulations, massive I/O expandability, and compatibility with the WRX80 chipset. Notable cons include its high platform cost, the requirement for a premium cooling solution as none is included, and lower single-core efficiency compared to newer consumer-grade flagship CPUs.

Technical Specifications of processor AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX

Overall score

7.6

Show more

Hide

Popularity

What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the processor.

When it matters: When you prefer to choose a processor reviewed and selected by many other buyers.

Platform

8.9

Show more

Hide

Brand name

What it is: The manufacturer or brand of the product.

When it matters: When you prefer a specific ecosystem, support network, or design philosophy.

Importance: MEDIUM

AMD

Processor type

What it is: The kind of system the processor is built for, such as desktop PCs, laptops, workstations, or servers.

When it matters: When you want a processor meant for the kind of machine you are actually building or buying, rather than a chip aimed at a different class of system.

Importance: HIGH

CPU socket

What it is: The physical socket the processor fits into on the motherboard.

When it matters: When you need to make sure the CPU can actually be installed on a specific motherboard.

Importance: HIGH

Chipset

What it is: The motherboard chipset families officially meant to work with the processor.

When it matters: When you are checking whether a CPU will work with the motherboard features and platform you plan to use.

Importance: HIGH

CPU architecture

What it is: The processor family or design generation behind the chip, such as Zen 4 or Raptor Lake.

When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs across generations and want a clearer sense of their design age, feature level, and expected performance class.

Importance: HIGH

Show more

Performance

8.1

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.

When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 8+

CPU threads

What it is: The total number of processing threads the CPU can handle at once.

When it matters: When you run heavily threaded workloads or multitask a lot.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 16+

Threads per core

What it is: The number of threads each physical core can handle at once.

When it matters: When you want to understand how much thread-level parallelism each core can provide in multitasking or heavily threaded work.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: 2

CPU boost clock speed

What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.

When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >4.7 GHz

CPU base clock speed

What it is: The processor's normal all-core starting frequency before boost behavior raises clocks temporarily.

When it matters: When you care about steadier performance in longer workloads rather than short burst speed alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

Show more

Cache & Architecture

7.5

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

What it is: The manufacturing process node used to produce the processor, usually expressed in nanometers.

When it matters: When efficiency, heat, and the relative modernity of the chip-making process matter to your comparison.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <10 nm

Foundry

What it is: The semiconductor manufacturer that physically fabricates the processor chip.

When it matters: When process source, manufacturing generation, or foundry differences matter to your comparison more than day-to-day performance alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

L3 cache

What it is: The total amount of L3 cache available on the processor.

When it matters: When you want better performance in cache-sensitive workloads and games.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=16 MB

L2 cache

What it is: The total amount of L2 cache available across the processor.

When it matters: When you want to compare CPU design efficiency and how much fast intermediate cache the cores have available.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=6 MB

L1 cache

What it is: The total amount of L1 cache built into the processor, which sits closest to the cores.

When it matters: When you are comparing low-level CPU design details rather than the broader performance picture buyers usually notice first.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=512 KB

Show more

Memory & PCIe

8.0

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

What it is: The RAM generation the processor is designed to support, such as DDR4 or DDR5.

When it matters: When you need the CPU to match the kind of memory platform you want to buy or reuse.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: DDR5

Maximum memory speed

What it is: The highest official memory speed supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you choose RAM and want to know the supported speed ceiling.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=4800 MHz

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

What it is: The highest official RAM speed the processor supports under standard JEDEC settings, before any memory overclocking profiles are applied.

When it matters: When officially supported stock RAM speed matters more than XMP, EXPO, or manual memory tuning.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5600 MHz

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

What it is: The highest memory speed supported through XMP or EXPO profiles.

When it matters: When you want faster RAM through memory profiles.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5200 MHz

N/A

Maximum memory capacity

What it is: The largest total amount of memory officially supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you plan a system with very large RAM capacity.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=128 GB

Show more

Integrated Graphics

2.8

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

What it is: Includes built-in graphics, so the system can output video without a separate graphics card.

When it matters: When you want the PC to work without a dedicated GPU, or you are building an office, media, compact, or troubleshooting-friendly system.

Importance: HIGH

Integrated GPU model

What it is: The model name of the integrated graphics processor, if present.

When it matters: When you plan to use the CPU's built-in graphics.

Importance: MEDIUM

N/A

Integrated GPU execution units

What it is: The number of execution units available in the integrated graphics part of the processor.

When it matters: When you plan to rely on built-in graphics and want a better sense of its light gaming, display, or media capability.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=24

N/A

Integrated GPU base frequency

What it is: The base operating frequency of the integrated GPU.

When it matters: When integrated graphics performance matters to you.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=350 MHz

N/A

Integrated media encoders/decoders

What it is: The hardware media formats the processor can encode or decode directly.

When it matters: When you stream, edit video, or rely on hardware media acceleration.

Importance: LOW

N/A

Show more

Power & Thermal

3.4

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.

When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <30 W

Base power (PL1)

What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.

When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <30 W

Boost power (PL2)

What it is: The short-term boost power limit the processor may draw under heavier turbo loads.

When it matters: When you size cooling and power delivery for peak turbo behavior.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <50 W

?

Tau (power duration limit)

What it is: The time limit the CPU can stay at higher boost power before dropping toward sustained power.

When it matters: When you want to understand turbo behavior under longer loads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <=28 s

N/A

Configurable TDP

What it is: Allows the processor to run in alternate power modes instead of being fixed to one default TDP target.

When it matters: When you want more control over heat, noise, and power draw in compact systems, quieter builds, or thermally limited machines.

Importance: LOW

Show more

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX vs the average processor

Why is AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

7.12x higher PassMark score
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (75,012 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.
What it is: A benchmark score that gives a broad idea of overall processor performance.
When it matters: When you want a quick overall performance comparison.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >19000
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (75,012 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.75,012 vs 10,532.5
26 more CPU cores
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has more CPU cores than the average processor (32 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.
When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: 8+
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has more CPU cores than the average processor (32 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.32 vs 6
7.51x better multi-core performance
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a higher multi-core performance than the average processor (20,892 vs 2,783). The average processor scores 2,783 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
What it is: A Cinebench R20 score that reflects how well the processor handles long, heavy rendering workloads across many cores.
When it matters: When you care about sustained multi-core performance in rendering, compiling, heavy creation work, or productivity workloads that use many threads.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >4700
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a higher multi-core performance than the average processor (20,892 vs 2,783). The average processor scores 2,783 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.20,892 vs 2,783
56 more CPU threads
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has more CPU threads than the average processor (64 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
What it is: The total number of processing threads the CPU can handle at once.
When it matters: When you run heavily threaded workloads or multitask a lot.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: 16+
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has more CPU threads than the average processor (64 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.64 vs 8
3.44x higher multi-core score
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (16,473 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
What it is: A Geekbench 6 score that reflects multi-core CPU performance in mixed modern workloads.
When it matters: When you want a quick picture of multi-core speed in everyday mixed workloads, multitasking, and broadly optimized software.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >8500
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (16,473 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.16,473 vs 4,793
16x larger L3 cache
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (128 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
What it is: The total amount of L3 cache available on the processor.
When it matters: When you want better performance in cache-sensitive workloads and games.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >=16 MB
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (128 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.128 MB vs 8 MB
6.4x larger L2 cache
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (16 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
What it is: The total amount of L2 cache available across the processor.
When it matters: When you want to compare CPU design efficiency and how much fast intermediate cache the cores have available.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >=6 MB
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (16 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.16 MB vs 2.5 MB
112 more PCIe lanes
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (128 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
What it is: The number of PCIe lanes provided directly by the processor.
When it matters: When you connect fast GPUs, SSDs, or expansion cards.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >=20
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (128 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.128 vs 16
Modern CPU socket
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (sWRX8 vs FP2).
Higher-end processor class
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX belongs to a higher-end processor class than the average processor (workstation vs mobile).
Includes crypto acceleration
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX includes crypto acceleration, the average processor does not.
7.12x higher PassMark score
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (75,012 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.
26 more CPU cores
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has more CPU cores than the average processor (32 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
7.51x better multi-core performance
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a higher multi-core performance than the average processor (20,892 vs 2,783). The average processor scores 2,783 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
56 more CPU threads
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has more CPU threads than the average processor (64 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
3.44x higher multi-core score
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (16,473 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
33.7% better single-core performance
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (3,321 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.
38.7% higher single-core score
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (2,041 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
20.9% higher Cinebench R20 single-core score
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a higher Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (585 vs 484). The average processor scores 484 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
4.7% higher boost clock
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (4.5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
16x larger L3 cache
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (128 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
6.4x larger L2 cache
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (16 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
2.33x more L3 per core
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (4 MB/core vs 1,714 MB/core). The average processor provides 1,714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
5.33x larger L1 cache
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a higher L1 cache than the average processor (2,048 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
41.7% smaller process node
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a lower process node than the average processor (7 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
3.35x more transistors
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has more transistors than the average processor (16.6 billion vs 4.95 billion). The average processor has 4.95 billion transistors.
More advanced foundry
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (TSMC 7 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
112 more PCIe lanes
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (128 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
32x more memory capacity
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (2,048 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
4.47x higher memory bandwidth
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a higher memory bandwidth than the average processor (204.8 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 45.8 GB/s.
Newer PCIe version
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX supports a newer PCIe version than the average processor (4 vs 3.0).
Supports ECC memory
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX supports ECC memory, the average processor does not.
5 °C lower CPU temperature
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.

Cache & Architecture

Power & Thermal

Why is AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

Older TPM support
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0).
Less advanced microarchitecture
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Chagall PRO vs Kaby Lake).
6 fewer memory channels
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has fewer memory channels than the average processor (8 vs 2). The average processor supports 2 memory channels.
No integrated graphics
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX does not include integrated graphics, the average processor does.
6.22x higher base power
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a higher base power draw than the average processor (280 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
6.22x higher TDP
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a higher TDP than the average processor (280 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
No configurable TDP
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does.
5 °C lower TJ Max
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a lower TJ Max than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.
6.22x higher base power
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a higher base power draw than the average processor (280 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.
When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <30 W
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a higher base power draw than the average processor (280 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.280 W vs 45 W
Less advanced microarchitecture
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Chagall PRO vs Kaby Lake).
What it is: The internal core-design codename used for this processor generation.
When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs at a deeper design level and want to identify the exact architecture behind marketing names.
Importance: LOW
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Chagall PRO vs Kaby Lake).Chagall PRO vs Kaby Lake
6.22x higher TDP
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a higher TDP than the average processor (280 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.
When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: <30 W
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a higher TDP than the average processor (280 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.280 W vs 45 W
No configurable TDP
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does.
What it is: Allows the processor to run in alternate power modes instead of being fixed to one default TDP target.
When it matters: When you want more control over heat, noise, and power draw in compact systems, quieter builds, or thermally limited machines.
Importance: LOW
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX does not support configurable TDP, the average processor does.
6.64x more expensive
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX is more expensive than the average processor (£1,660 vs £250).
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX is more expensive than the average processor (£1,660 vs £250).£1,660 vs £250
5 °C lower TJ Max
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a lower TJ Max than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.
What it is: The highest safe operating junction temperature before the CPU starts throttling or protecting itself.
When it matters: When you tune cooling or monitor thermals under load.
Importance: LOW
Good value: >=100 °C
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a lower TJ Max than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.95 °C vs 100 °C
No integrated graphics
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX does not include integrated graphics, the average processor does.
What it is: Includes built-in graphics, so the system can output video without a separate graphics card.
When it matters: When you want the PC to work without a dedicated GPU, or you are building an office, media, compact, or troubleshooting-friendly system.
Importance: HIGH
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX does not include integrated graphics, the average processor does.
10.6% lower user score
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a lower user score than the average processor (7.24 vs 8,000).
What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters: When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX has a lower user score than the average processor (7.24 vs 8,000).7.24 vs 8

Cache & Architecture

Integrated Graphics

Power & Thermal

Graphic comparison of AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX and other processors

Attribute category

Attribute

No results found

Third-party reviews

United Kingdom

(Reviews last updated: May 2026)

What customers like about AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX?

Exceptional multi-threaded performance for professional workloads like rendering, scientific simulations, and complex compositions
Industry-leading connectivity with 128 PCIe 4.0 lanes, ideal for multi-GPU and high-speed storage setups
Significant generational performance leap (up to 15-45% faster) over the previous 3975WX model
Eight-channel memory support provides massive bandwidth for memory-intensive applications
Competitive single-core performance that rivals high-end consumer desktop chips in certain tasks
More 'rational' choice than the 5995WX for many, offering similar performance in many apps at half the price

What customers dislike about AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX?

Extremely high entry price for the CPU, motherboard, and required octa-channel memory
Niche market appeal; overkill and not cost-effective for standard gaming or general office use
High power consumption and significant cooling requirements, especially under full load
Limited upgrade path for users on older TRX40 platforms as it requires a WRX80 socket
Some games and lightly-threaded apps still perform better on standard consumer chips with higher clock speeds

Expert reviews

tomshardware.com

21/08/2022

AMD Threadripper Pro 5995WX and 5975WX Review: Sheer Threaded Dominance

a little longer The Tom’s Hardware review identifies the Zen 3-based AMD Threadripper Pro 5995WX and 5975WX as premier workstation CPUs, boasting a 19% IPC increase and massive connectivity, including 128 PCIe 4.0 lanes and 8-channel DDR4-3200 memory. The 64-core 5995WX dominates in specialized, highly threaded applications like rendering, while the 32-core 5975WX is recommended for...Read more

linkedin.com

21/07/2022

AMD Threadripper PRO 5000 WX-Series Content Creation Review

The AMD Threadripper PRO 5000 WX-Series advances workstation performance by upgrading to the "Zen 3" architecture, offering significant IPC gains and higher boost clocks (up to 4.5GHz) while retaining the 64-core maximum. Pros include up to 40% faster rendering in V-Ray/Blender and improved Adobe After Effects performance compared to previous generations, along with continued...Read more

kitguru.net

14/02/2023

AMD Threadripper Pro 5000 WX-Series: Three CPUs tested!

Luke Hill's review of the AMD Threadripper Pro 5000 WX-Series (5995WX, 5975WX, 5965WX) on the WRX80 platform highlights a significant performance leap driven by the Zen 3 architecture, offering faster clock speeds up to 4.5 GHz. The 24-core 5965WX is identified as a valuable addition to the lineup for bridging performance gaps, while 8-channel DDR4 memory and 128 PCIe 4.0 lanes...Read more

amd.com

09/09/2025

AMD RYZEN™ THREADRIPPER™ PRO PROCESSORS (Technical Comparison)

The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7000 WX-Series ("Shimada Peak") leverages Zen 4 architecture and 5nm technology to deliver up to 96 cores and 192 threads, aimed at high-performance workstation computing. The platform supports 8-channel DDR5-5200 memory and 128 PCIe 5.0 lanes, facilitating massive bandwidth for AI and simulation workloads. Key performance improvements include up to...Read more

tomshardware.com

21/08/2022

AMD Threadripper Pro 5995WX and 5975WX Review: Pure Performance", "AMD Threadripper Pro 5995WX and 5975WX Review: Sheer Power

The Tom's Hardware review of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5995WX and 5975WX highlights a transition to Zen 3 architecture, delivering a substantial 19% IPC increase over the previous generation. The 64-core 5995WX dominates in highly parallel workloads like rendering, while the 32-core 5975WX is identified as a more rational choice for most professionals. Key advantages include...Read more

Video reviews

Best alternatives

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9965WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9995WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9985WX

Processors

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9975WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7985WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 9950x3d

Processors

Intel Core i9 13900K

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7965WX

Processors

Compare AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 5975WX with other processors

Compare