OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G review: 74 specs compared

Avg. price:~£120PassMark multi-core score:21443N. of physical cores:6CPU boost clock speed:5.0 GHzCPU socket:AM5TDP (Thermal design power):65 W

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G Review: Compare 74 technical specifications, 17 expert and video reviews and 2 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G

7.7/10

▲Better than 84% of processors

8.3

★Better than 95%

7.5

▲Better than 77%

7.8

▲Better than 61%

8.1

★Better than 94%

6.6
Gaming
Gaming
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Measures single-core benchmark performance, peak boost clock speeds, and fast L3 cache sizing critical for high frame rates.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
30.0%
8.1
PassMark single-core score
25.0%
7.3
Geekbench 6 single-core score
20.0%
8.1
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
2.5
L3 cache
8.0%
3.6
N. of physical cores
6.1
Video editing
Video editing
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Assesses multi-core benchmark throughput, total physical core and thread count, and cache bandwidth for rapid video rendering.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this processors meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
8.2
Geekbench 6 multi-core score
20.0%
3.6
N. of physical cores
20.0%
6.6
CPU threads
15.0%
2.5
L3 cache

Where to buy

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

What reviewers say about the AMD Ryzen 5 8500G

Based on 4 · 12

Reviewers praise the value and efficiency for everyday use, but are split on gaming and find CPU performance weak.

Praised

Mixed views

Criticised

Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the AMD Ryzen 5 8500G

Based on 140 owners sharing their experience in online comments

44%positive9%mixed47%negative

Owners value its affordable AM5 upgrade path and capable gaming, while many report low frame rates and stability problems.

What owners like

Owners report Halo Infinite and Forza Horizon 5 near 60 fps at 1080p, and Valorant past 150 fps on low, using the built-in graphics.20
Owners bought it as the cheapest AM5 chip available, which let them build on AM5 with DDR5 memory on a tight budget.12
Modern games run on the built-in graphics at low to medium, about 35 to 45 fps, with AMD upscaling or more BIOS VRAM.8
Owners plan to add a graphics card later or swap to a faster AM5 chip like the Ryzen 5 9600X on the same board.7
Owners use it for studying, everyday tasks and photo or video editing in Photoshop and Premiere, which they say runs well.5
Owners pair it with RTX 4060, 4070 or RX 6800 and report no bottleneck, with the GPU at full load at 1440p and 4K.5
Owners overclocked DDR5 from 6000 to 7200 MT/s with no trouble, for a small gain they call snappier.5
Owners moving from an i3-9600F, a Haswell chip or a GTX 1050 system report a large, noticeable speed-up.4
Owners who escalated with a formal legal notice say the refund was then issued, within about 30 days.3

What owners dislike

Owners with an RTX 4060 see big drops in some games, like Dota 2 falling from 145 to 70 fps, with GPU use dipping.38
Owners report crashes in games like Fortnite and PUBG, and some PCs restart after about an hour of heavy load.8
Owners with one RAM stick get far lower fps, such as Valorant at 100 to 150, and say dual channel helps a lot.7
Some owners get black screens in games or no video at all; lowering RAM to 4800 MHz in BIOS partly helped.7
Owners say replacements and refunds took months, with sellers asking for waits, and some had to file a consumer complaint.7
Stock cooler runs hot, with some owners hitting 87 to 93°C under load, while a better cooler kept it under 75°C.5
Some buyers received used, damaged or duplicate units, including a chip with bent pins and an AM4 processor instead of AM5.5
Owners with an RTX 4060 report frame drops and micro-stutters in some games, which some link to the CPU or single-channel memory.5
The chip offers only four PCIe lanes for graphics, against 16 on the 7600X, which some owners say limits a card like the RTX 4060.4
Some owners running DDR5 at 6000 MT/s hit blue screens or flicker, and had to drop to 4800 or 5200 MHz to stay stable.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of processor AMD Ryzen 5 8500G

7.7

Show more

Hide

Platform

8.9

Show more

Hide

Processor type

CPU socket

Chipset

CPU architecture

Instruction sets

Show more

Performance

7.3

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

CPU threads

CPU boost clock speed

CPU base clock speed

PassMark multi-core score

Show more

What reviewers say

Architecture

7.4

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

Foundry

L3 cache

L2 cache

L1 cache

Show more

Memory & PCIe

7.7

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

Maximum memory speed

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

Maximum memory capacity

Show more

What reviewers say

Integrated graphics

7.9

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

Integrated GPU model

Integrated GPU execution units

Integrated GPU base frequency

Integrated media encoders/decoders

Show more

What reviewers say

Power & Thermal

8.0

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

Base power (PL1)

Boost power (PL2)

?

Tau (power duration limit)

N/A

Configurable TDP

Show more

What reviewers say

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G vs the average processor

Why is AMD Ryzen 5 8500G better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

More advanced microarchitecture
This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Phoenix 2 vs Kaby Lake).
Phoenix 2 vs Kaby Lake
51.6% better single-core performance
This processor has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (3,877 vs 2,558). The average processor scores 2,558 in PassMark single-core.
3,877 vs 2,558
93.9% higher multi-core score
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (10,102 vs 5,209). The average processor scores 5,209 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
10,102 vs 5,209
87% higher PassMark score
This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (21,443 vs 11,469). The average processor scores 11,469 in PassMark benchmark.
21,443 vs 11,469
53.4% higher single-core score
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (2,354 vs 1,535). The average processor scores 1,535 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
2,354 vs 1,535
13.6% higher boost clock
This processor has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (5 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.4 GHz.
5.0 GHz vs 4.4 GHz
4x more memory capacity
This processor has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
256 GB vs 64 GB
66.7% smaller process node
This processor has a lower process node than the average processor (4 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
4 nm vs 12 nm

16.4% higher review score
Reviews score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 61% of models
80%
7.4
Average grade
20%
9.1
Popularity
Grades by review (17)
5 reviews: 3 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
7.8 vs 6.7
14.3% better value for money
AMD Ryzen 5 8500G has better value for money than the average processor (8.33 vs 7.3).
8.33 vs 7.29

Modern CPU socket
This processor uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (AM5 vs FP5).
AM5 vs FP5
4 years newer release date
This processor has a newer release date than the average processor (2024 vs 2020).
January 2024
2024 vs 2020
Supports heterogeneous scheduling
This processor uses heterogeneous multi-processing, while the average processor does not. 24.8% of processors use it.
More extensive crypto acceleration
This processor offers more extensive crypto acceleration than the average processor (AES, VAES, SHA vs AES, SHA).
AES, VAES, SHA vs AES, SHA

51.6% better single-core performance
This processor has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (3,877 vs 2,558). The average processor scores 2,558 in PassMark single-core.
3,877 vs 2,558
93.9% higher multi-core score
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (10,102 vs 5,209). The average processor scores 5,209 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
10,102 vs 5,209
87% higher PassMark score
This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (21,443 vs 11,469). The average processor scores 11,469 in PassMark benchmark.
21,443 vs 11,469
53.4% higher single-core score
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (2,354 vs 1,535). The average processor scores 1,535 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
2,354 vs 1,535
13.6% higher boost clock
This processor has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (5 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.4 GHz.
5.0 GHz vs 4.4 GHz
4 more CPU threads
This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (12 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
12 vs 8
Higher base clock
This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (6x3.5 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz).
6x3.5 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz

More advanced microarchitecture
This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Phoenix 2 vs Kaby Lake).
Phoenix 2 vs Kaby Lake
66.7% smaller process node
This processor has a lower process node than the average processor (4 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
4 nm vs 12 nm
44.3% more L3 per core
This processor has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (2.7 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.85 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
2.67 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core
Mixed big and small cores
This processor uses a big.LITTLE design, while the average processor does not. 22.6% of processors use one.
Zen 4 + Zen 4c cores
More advanced foundry
This processor uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (TSMC 4 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
TSMC 4 nm vs Intel 14 nm
2x more L2 per core
This processor has more L2 cache per core than the average processor (1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
4.22x more transistors
This processor has more transistors than the average processor (20.9 billion vs 4.95 billion). The average processor has 4.95 billion transistors.
20.9 billion vs 4.95 billion
2x larger L2 cache
This processor has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (6 MB vs 3 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 3 MB.
6 MB vs 3 MB
22.6% smaller die size
This processor has a lower die size than the average processor (137 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
137 mm² vs 177 mm²
77.8% larger L3 cache
This processor has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (16 MB vs 9 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 9 MB.
16 MB vs 9 MB

4x more memory capacity
This processor has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
256 GB vs 64 GB
Newer PCIe version
This processor supports a newer PCIe version than the average processor (4 vs 3).
4.0 vs 3.0
Supports memory overclocking
This processor supports memory overclocking, while the average processor does not. 43.9% of processors support memory overclocking.
77.4% higher memory bandwidth
This processor has a higher memory bandwidth than the average processor (83.2 GB/s vs 46.9 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s.
83.2 GB/s vs 46.9 GB/s
Newer DDR support
This processor supports a newer DDR generation than the average processor (DDR5 vs DDR4).
DDR5 vs DDR4
62.5% higher memory speed
This processor has a higher maximum memory speed than the average processor (5,200 MHz vs 3,200 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 3,200 MHz.
5,200 MHz vs 3,200 MHz
Higher JEDEC memory speed
This processor has a higher JEDEC memory speed than the average processor (DDR5-5200 MHz vs DDR4-3200 MHz). The average processor supports JEDEC memory speed of DDR4-3200 MHz.
DDR5-5,200 MHz vs DDR4-3,200 MHz

Better integrated GPU
This processor uses a better integrated GPU than the average processor (Radeon 740M vs Intel UHD Graphics 630).
Radeon 740M vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
2.29x higher GPU clock speed
This processor has a higher integrated GPU frequency than the average processor (800 MHz vs 350 MHz). The average processor has integrated GPU frequency of 350 MHz.
800 MHz vs 350 MHz
1 more supported displays
This processor has more supported displays than the average processor (4 vs 3). The average processor supports 3 displays.
4 vs 3

Includes a cooler
This processor includes a cooler, while the average processor does not. 26.9% of processors include a cooler.
5 °C lower CPU temperature
This processor has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C

Why is AMD Ryzen 5 8500G worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

Weaker security extensions
This processor provides less advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK).
AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK
Narrower media codec support
This processor supports fewer media codecs than the average processor (VP9 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)).
VP9 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)
44.4% higher base power
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
65 W vs 45 W
5 °C lower temperature limit
This processor has a lower temperature limit than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor can run up to 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C
44.4% higher TDP
This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
65 W vs 45 W
2 fewer PCIe lanes
This processor has fewer PCIe lanes than the average processor (14 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
10 usable lanes
14 vs 16
83.3% fewer GPU execution units
This processor has fewer GPU execution units than the average processor (4 vs 24). The average processor has 24 GPU execution units.
4 vs 24
Older TPM support
This processor supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2 vs PTT 2).
fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0

Weaker security extensions
This processor provides less advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK).
AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK
Older TPM support
This processor supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2 vs PTT 2).
fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0

2 fewer PCIe lanes
This processor has fewer PCIe lanes than the average processor (14 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
10 usable lanes
14 vs 16

Narrower media codec support
This processor supports fewer media codecs than the average processor (VP9 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)).
VP9 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)
83.3% fewer GPU execution units
This processor has fewer GPU execution units than the average processor (4 vs 24). The average processor has 24 GPU execution units.
4 vs 24

44.4% higher base power
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
65 W vs 45 W
5 °C lower temperature limit
This processor has a lower temperature limit than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor can run up to 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C
44.4% higher TDP
This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
65 W vs 45 W

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0

Sid The Geek

≈ estimated

07/01/2025

Benchmarks · 1080p gaming and iGPU tests for budget builds

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G is a great choice for budget builds that want solid performance and efficiency, but less suited if expandability matters.

8.0

WnDTech

≈ estimated

18/10/2024

Gaming build · parts, assembly and game tests

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G is good value for budget 1080p gaming, but demanding games need lower settings and upscaling.

8.0

RandomGaminginHD

≈ estimated

17/02/2024

Hands-on review · gaming tests and PCIe limits

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G is best for integrated-graphics-only builds; with a discrete card later, the 7500F or 8600G makes more sense.

9.0

GD Tech

≈ estimated

04/08/2025

Long-term test · 2 months of daily use

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G is a very good budget pick for daily and heavy desktop work without a graphics card.

8.0

TechPowerUp

≈ estimated

05/10/2024

Short review · gaming and application benchmarks, power tests

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G is a low-power, budget pick for entry-level builds, though the Ryzen 5 7600 is much faster.

Not graded

Overview video

Overview video

Not graded

Not graded

Not graded

Not graded

Sumocomputacion · 13/06/2026

Hands-on test · gaming, PCIe lanes and buying advice

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G is not recommended: it has too few PCIe lanes and is weak in demanding games, so choose the 8600G instead.

Likes

Tomb Raider runs without problems, though not at high frame rates
Valorant puts less load on the processor than expected

Dislikes

Only four PCIe lanes for the graphics card, limiting mid-range GPUs
Resident Evil Village runs at around 20 fps
Hybrid core layout is significantly weaker than the 8600G in heavy workloads

Byte de Tecnología por Dr Hoodman · 24/04/2026

Hands-on review · integrated graphics and GPU pairing tests

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G is a good, affordable AM5 starting point that you can upgrade with a stronger graphics card later.

Likes

Cheapest entry point to the AM5 platform
Good upgrade path to stronger graphics cards
Easy to build up gradually over several years

Dislikes

Integrated graphics limit gaming until you add a discrete GPU
Graphics card choice can bottleneck the CPU

xMauro · 17/04/2026

Hands-on review · game FPS tests and temperatures

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G is still worth it for budget gaming without a graphics card, unless the 8600G costs the same.

Likes

Solid 1080p frame rates on low settings in esports games
Stronger integrated graphics than the Ryzen 5 5600G
Temperatures stay moderate with the stock cooler
Good upgrade path on the AM5 platform

Dislikes

Demanding games like Hogwarts Legacy hit only about 30 FPS
The Ryzen 5 8600G is the better pick at the same price

xMauro · 04/03/2026

PC build review · in-house FPS tests in popular games

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G is an excellent starter gaming CPU for 2026, though demanding titles like Hogwarts Legacy stay near 30 FPS.

Likes

Strong frame rates in Fortnite
Good results in esports titles like CS2 and Valorant
Good foundation for a later upgrade

Dislikes

Hogwarts Legacy drops to around 30 FPS on low settings
Needs a second RAM stick to enable dual-channel mode for stable FPS
Integrated graphics limit performance in heavy games

Chozza TV · 25/04/2024

Game test walkthrough · integrated graphics at low settings

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G is playable with integrated graphics for entry-level PC gaming, though demanding titles will need a graphics card upgrade later.

Likes

Playable frame rates in many titles at low settings
Good entry point for budget PC gaming
Runs Resident Evil 4 Remake smoothly

Dislikes

Demanding games drop to around 30 FPS
Heavy games need lower resolutions to stay playable
Players with higher standards will need a dedicated graphics card

CoreDump · 17/07/2026

Long-term test · several weeks of everyday and gaming use

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G is a strong pick for a DDR5 build without a dedicated GPU, but not worth upgrading from a 5600G.

Likes

Smooth everyday use with Windows and browsing
Strong performance without a graphics card
Good entry point for a budget DDR5 platform

Dislikes

A single 16GB stick limits Minecraft shader performance
Upgrading from a 5600G isn't worth it
CS2 frame rates drop to around 80 FPS while recording

BitPc · 30/05/2026

Hands-on review · game tests and buying advice

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G suits a narrow group wanting a cheap AM5 entry point; the 8600G is the better buy.

Likes

Good value for an AM5 entry point
Playable 1080p gaming with FSR
No graphics card needed to get started

Dislikes

Needs dual-channel DDR5-6000 for full integrated graphics performance
Only 14 PCIe lanes may hold back a dedicated GPU
Game performance depends heavily on FSR

VZX · 13/03/2024

Hands-on review · gaming tests and RAM comparison

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G is a good fit for office work, light gaming and a budget build that adds a graphics card later.

Likes

Solid frame rates in Valorant, CS:GO and Rocket League
Fortnite holds steady at 60 to 70 FPS
Clean build with all fans working correctly
Big performance gain from faster RAM

Dislikes

Integrated graphics too weak for demanding games without a graphics card
Performance drops noticeably with slower or single-stick RAM
Rear fan cable routing is awkward

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0

techpowerup.com

✓ explicit

24/07/2024

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G Review - Machine Learning / AI

AI workload tests · Processor review

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 8500G is tested on AI tasks such as GPT-2 text generation, Stable Diffusion images and BERT training, but this text gives no overall verdict.

7.0

pcmag.com

✓ explicit

22/05/2026

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G Review: This Budget CPU Revs Up the

Lab test · Built-in graphics chip

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 8500G is a budget chip whose Radeon 740M graphics beat most rivals, but it trails in CPU tasks and in games with a separate graphics card.

5.0

tweakers.net

≈ estimated

12/02/2024

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G - The first desktop CPU with Zen 4c cores

Benchmark review · Zen 4c chip

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 8500G is the first desktop chip with Zen 4c cores, matching the 8600G in some tasks while trailing it by about a quarter in others.

5.0

ct.nl

≈ estimated

01/10/2024

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G review: budget-friendly AM5 processor, but...

Benchmark test · Budget desktop chip

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 8500G is a budget AM5 chip that suits office PCs needing fast single-core speed, but it falls behind the Ryzen 5 8600G in multi-core work.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about AMD Ryzen 5 8500G

Unbeatable energy efficiency, often drawing under 40W–50W even under load
Most affordable entry point into the future-proof AM5 platform and DDR5 memory
Capable integrated Radeon 740M graphics for light 1080p gaming, media PCs, and office workloads without a dedicated GPU
Runs remarkably cool, making it ideal for Small Form Factor (SFF) or silent builds
Includes a functional stock Wraith Stealth cooler, saving extra cost on budget builds
Fast boot times and snappy everyday responsiveness compared to older generations

What customers don't like about AMD Ryzen 5 8500G

Severely limited PCIe bandwidth (only 4 lanes for a dedicated GPU), which can bottleneck mid-to-high-end graphics card upgrades
Uses a hybrid core design (2 Zen 4 + 4 Zen 4c) which can result in lower performance than the standard Ryzen 5 7600
Reduced L3 cache (16MB vs 32MB on standard 7000 series) impacts gaming performance when paired with a dedicated GPU
Lack of a dedicated AI NPU, which is found on higher-tier 8000 series chips like the 8600G
Locked multiplier prevents traditional manual overclocking of CPU cores
Hidden costs for a 'budget' build due to the requirement of more expensive DDR5 RAM and AM5 motherboards

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 8500G is a 6-core, 12-thread APU built on the AM5 platform, featuring a hybrid architecture of two Zen 4 and four Zen 4c cores with a max boost clock of 5.0 GHz. Key pros include its highly efficient 65W TDP (often drawing under 50W in real-world use), support for DDR5 memory, and the inclusion of RDNA 3-based Radeon 740M integrated graphics which enables entry-level 1080p gaming without a discrete card. However, its primary cons are significant connectivity limitations, specifically its restriction to only four PCIe 4.0 lanes for dedicated GPUs and two lanes for M.2 SSDs, alongside having a reduced 16MB L3 cache compared to standard Ryzen 7000 series chips.

Best alternatives

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 7600

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 8600G

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 5700

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

Processors

Intel Core i3-14100

Processors

Intel Core i7-5930K

Processors

Intel Core i3-12100T

Processors

Intel Core i7-5820K

Processors

AMD Ryzen 3 3300X

Processors

Intel Core i3-8300

Processors

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare AMD Ryzen 5 8500G with other processors

Graphic comparison of AMD Ryzen 5 8500G and other processors

No results found