OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G review: 74 specs compared

Avg. price:~£140PassMark multi-core score:19670N. of physical cores:6CPU boost clock speed:4.4 GHzCPU socket:AM4TDP (Thermal design power):65 W

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G Review: Compare 74 technical specifications, 55 expert and video reviews and 4 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

7.5/10

▲Better than 81% of processors

8.2

★Better than 93%

6.5

▲Better than 61%

8.3

▲Better than 86%

8.2

★Better than 96%

5.3
Gaming
Gaming
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Measures single-core benchmark performance, peak boost clock speeds, and fast L3 cache sizing critical for high frame rates.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
30.0%
6.3
PassMark single-core score
25.0%
5.9
Geekbench 6 single-core score
20.0%
6.1
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
2.5
L3 cache
8.0%
3.6
N. of physical cores
5.3
Video editing
Video editing
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Assesses multi-core benchmark throughput, total physical core and thread count, and cache bandwidth for rapid video rendering.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this processors meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
6.4
Geekbench 6 multi-core score
20.0%
3.6
N. of physical cores
20.0%
6.6
CPU threads
15.0%
2.5
L3 cache

Where to buy

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

What reviewers say about the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

Based on 10 · 41

Reviewers see it as a great-value, cool-running budget chip, but are split on its integrated graphics for gaming and doubt its longevity.

Praised

Mixed views

Criticised

Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

Based on 201 owners sharing their experience in online comments

60%positive8%mixed32%negative

Owners praise its value and capable integrated graphics, while demanding games and setup or stability issues are common frustrations.

What owners like

Owners report smooth 1080p play in many modern and older titles, usually at low to medium settings. Capping the frame rate at 30 and lowering render scale keeps play steady.73
Owners say it delivers strong performance for a low-cost PC, and its built-in graphics let them game before buying a card.32
Owners run many recent AAA titles at 1080p, usually low to medium settings, using only built-in graphics, with some reaching 30 to 60 fps.31
Owners say esports titles such as Valorant, CS2 and Fortnite run at high frame rates, often above 100 fps at 1080p on low settings.18
Owners find most games playable at 1080p on low to medium settings, often around 30 to 60 fps, with newer titles needing lower detail.14
Owners pair it with mid-range cards such as the RX 6600 or GTX 1660 Super and report good high-setting results at 1080p.12
Owners run older games and console emulators, including Wii U and PS3 titles, smoothly at 1080p.7
If the dedicated graphics card fails, owners can still use the PC through the built-in graphics, which also lets them game until a card is bought.6
Owners use it for office work, photo and video editing and 3D rendering, and find it fast for daily tasks.5

What owners dislike

Owners report frame rates dropping to 15 to 40 in demanding games, such as Hogwarts Legacy, Starfield and GTA V, even at low settings.28
Many boards need a BIOS update before this chip works; some owners get no display or black screens until they flash it.19
Some owners get full freezes or game crashes, sometimes after 30 to 40 minutes of use, and some report sudden shutdowns.12
Owners say newer demanding titles need low settings or 720p, and some hold only about 30 fps at 1080p even with reduced detail.10
Many owners say their frame rates come in well below the review videos, even with the same specs, and some question the benchmarks.7
Some owners cannot open games such as Valorant or Warzone, or see the driver installer reject the built-in graphics as unsupported.6
Owners using the stock cooler report high temperatures during long gaming sessions and recommend a tower cooler or undervolting to keep it cooler.3
On some motherboards, owners cannot change the built-in graphics memory, which stays locked at 512 MB, and some BIOS menus lack the option.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of processor AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

7.5

Show more

Hide

Platform

8.4

Show more

Hide

Processor type

CPU socket

Chipset

CPU architecture

Instruction sets

Show more

What reviewers say

Performance

6.3

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

CPU threads

CPU boost clock speed

CPU base clock speed

PassMark multi-core score

Show more

What reviewers say

Architecture

6.0

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

Foundry

L3 cache

L2 cache

L1 cache

Show more

Memory & PCIe

6.9

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

Maximum memory speed

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

?

Maximum memory capacity

Show more

What reviewers say

Integrated graphics

7.5

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

Integrated GPU model

Integrated GPU execution units

Integrated GPU base frequency

Integrated media encoders/decoders

Show more

What reviewers say

Power & Thermal

8.0

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

Base power (PL1)

Boost power (PL2)

?

Tau (power duration limit)

N/A

Configurable TDP

Show more

What reviewers say

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs the average processor

Why is AMD Ryzen 5 5600G better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

71.5% higher PassMark score
This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (19,670 vs 11,469). The average processor scores 11,469 in PassMark benchmark.
19,670 vs 11,469
8 more PCIe lanes
This processor has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (24 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
24 vs 16
Unlocked for overclocking
This processor has an unlocked multiplier, while the average processor does not. 22.6% of processors offer this.
2 more performance cores
This processor has more performance cores than the average processor (6 vs 4). The average processor has 4 performance cores.
6 vs 4
Includes a cooler
This processor includes a cooler, while the average processor does not. 26.9% of processors include a cooler.
44.3% more L3 per core
This processor has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (2.7 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.85 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
2.67 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core
47.2% higher multi-core score
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (7,667 vs 5,209). The average processor scores 5,209 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
7,667 vs 5,209
More advanced microarchitecture
This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Cezanne vs Kaby Lake).
Cezanne vs Kaby Lake

23.9% higher review score
Reviews score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 86% of models
80%
7.9
Average grade
20%
9.9
Popularity
Grades by review (55)
16 reviews: 10 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. 39 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
8.3 vs 6.7
12.8% better value for money
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G has better value for money than the average processor (8.22 vs 7.3).
8.22 vs 7.29
5.1% higher list score
List score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (4)
List score: in 4 of 87 lists (5%)
8.2 vs 7.8

Modern CPU socket
This processor uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (AM4 vs FP5).
AM4 vs FP5

71.5% higher PassMark score
This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (19,670 vs 11,469). The average processor scores 11,469 in PassMark benchmark.
19,670 vs 11,469
Unlocked for overclocking
This processor has an unlocked multiplier, while the average processor does not. 22.6% of processors offer this.
2 more performance cores
This processor has more performance cores than the average processor (6 vs 4). The average processor has 4 performance cores.
6 vs 4
47.2% higher multi-core score
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (7,667 vs 5,209). The average processor scores 5,209 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
7,667 vs 5,209
24.3% better single-core performance
This processor has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (3,180 vs 2,558). The average processor scores 2,558 in PassMark single-core.
3,180 vs 2,558
45.2% better multi-core performance
This processor has a higher multi-core performance than the average processor (4,072 vs 2,804.5). The average processor scores 2,804.5 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
4,072 vs 2,804.5
Higher base clock
This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (6x3.9 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz).
6x3.9 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz
4 more CPU threads
This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (12 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
12 vs 8
25.9% higher single-core score
This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1933 vs 1,535). The average processor scores 1,535 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
1,933 vs 1,535
18% higher Cinebench R20 single-core score
This processor has a higher Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (578 vs 490). The average processor scores 490 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
578 vs 490
6.4x higher bus transfer rate
This processor has a higher bus transfer rate than the average processor (51.2 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor offers bus transfer rate of 8 GT/s.
51.2 GT/s vs 8 GT/s
11 higher clock multiplier
This processor has a higher clock multiplier than the average processor (39 vs 28). The average processor has a clock multiplier of 28.
39 vs 28

44.3% more L3 per core
This processor has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (2.7 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.85 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
2.67 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core
More advanced microarchitecture
This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Cezanne vs Kaby Lake).
Cezanne vs Kaby Lake
41.7% smaller process node
This processor has a lower process node than the average processor (7 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
7 nm vs 12 nm
More advanced foundry
This processor uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (TSMC 7 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
TSMC 7 nm vs Intel 14 nm
77.8% larger L3 cache
This processor has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (16 MB vs 9 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 9 MB.
16 MB vs 9 MB
2.16x more transistors
This processor has more transistors than the average processor (10.7 billion vs 4.95 billion). The average processor has 4.95 billion transistors.
10.7 billion vs 4.95 billion

8 more PCIe lanes
This processor has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (24 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
24 vs 16
Supports memory overclocking
This processor supports memory overclocking, while the average processor does not. 43.9% of processors support memory overclocking.
2x more memory capacity
This processor has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
128 GB vs 64 GB

5.43x higher GPU clock speed
This processor has a higher integrated GPU frequency than the average processor (1900 MHz vs 350 MHz). The average processor has integrated GPU frequency of 350 MHz.
1,900 MHz vs 350 MHz
1 more supported displays
This processor has more supported displays than the average processor (4 vs 3). The average processor supports 3 displays.
4 vs 3

Includes a cooler
This processor includes a cooler, while the average processor does not. 26.9% of processors include a cooler.
5 °C lower CPU temperature
This processor has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C

Why is AMD Ryzen 5 5600G worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

Weaker security extensions
This processor provides less advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP, Pluton vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK).
AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP, Pluton vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK
Narrower media codec support
This processor supports fewer media codecs than the average processor (VP9 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)).
VP9 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)
44.4% higher base power
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
65 W vs 45 W
5 °C lower temperature limit
This processor has a lower temperature limit than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor can run up to 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C
44.4% higher TDP
This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
65 W vs 45 W
70.8% fewer GPU execution units
This processor has fewer GPU execution units than the average processor (7 vs 24). The average processor has 24 GPU execution units.
7 vs 24
Limited PCIe bifurcation
This processor supports less flexible PCIe bifurcation than the average processor (x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4).
x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4
Narrower instruction support
This processor supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V).
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V

Weaker security extensions
This processor provides less advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP, Pluton vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK).
AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP, Pluton vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK
Narrower instruction support
This processor supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V).
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V
Older TPM support
This processor supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2 vs PTT 2).
fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0

Limited PCIe bifurcation
This processor supports less flexible PCIe bifurcation than the average processor (x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4).
x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4

Narrower media codec support
This processor supports fewer media codecs than the average processor (VP9 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)).
VP9 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode/encode)
70.8% fewer GPU execution units
This processor has fewer GPU execution units than the average processor (7 vs 24). The average processor has 24 GPU execution units.
7 vs 24

44.4% higher base power
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
65 W vs 45 W
5 °C lower temperature limit
This processor has a lower temperature limit than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor can run up to 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C
44.4% higher TDP
This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
65 W vs 45 W

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0

RandomGaminginHD

≈ estimated

12/05/2026

Hands-on review · gaming tests with integrated graphics

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is a solid default choice for integrated graphics gaming, but demanding games and heat hold it back.

8.0

RememberThisTech

≈ estimated

25/01/2026

Hands-on test · integrated graphics game performance at 1080p

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is dated, but still usable for light gaming if you temper your expectations and use FSR.

7.0

ProYamYamPC

≈ estimated

20/01/2023

Hands-on test · game FPS on integrated graphics

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is fine for gaming while you wait for a graphics card, but it is not a long-term solution.

9.0

WELSHYTECH

≈ estimated

20/10/2022

Hands-on review · gameplay and benchmark results

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is a brilliant budget chip for basic gaming, though 720p helps it reach 60 frames.

8.0

PinkyTech

≈ estimated

01/12/2021

Hands-on benchmarks · gaming, video editing and VRAM tests

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is a decent stopgap while you wait for a graphics card, but a dedicated GPU gives a better experience.

9.0

Mike's unboxing, reviews and how to

≈ estimated

05/11/2021

Hands-on review · 1080p gaming and temperature tests

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is a pleasant surprise and a strong pick for small no-GPU builds, though cooling depends on the chassis.

8.0

Daves Techway

≈ estimated

29/09/2021

Hands-on review · gaming benchmarks with integrated graphics

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is a decent stopgap for budget gaming until you add a dedicated GPU, mainly for lighter titles.

9.0

MOBHouse

✓ explicit

22/09/2021

Hands-on review · gaming, productivity and memory tests

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is great value for competitive gaming and ITX builds, a solid stopgap while GPU prices stay high.

8.0

PC Jack

≈ estimated

10/08/2021

Hands-on review · game FPS tests and Cinebench

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is an excellent budget option for entry-level gamers, but expect compromises in demanding AAA games.

8.0

Gear Seekers

≈ estimated

04/08/2021

Hands-on review · benchmarks and gaming tests

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is good value for budget gaming and small builds, though PCIe 3.0 holds it back.

9.0

goldfries

≈ estimated

03/08/2021

Hands-on review · thermals, productivity, memory and gaming tests

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is great value for multi-core work, but the 5600X is still better for high frame rates.

7.0

Hardware Unboxed

≈ estimated

03/08/2021

Full review · benchmarks, power and gaming tests

Verdict

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is a good stop-gap for cheap builds without a graphics card, but a weaker choice when paired with a discrete GPU.

More graded video reviews (4)

creator’s own scoreestimated by us

IsCR32 · 28/09/2026

Hands-on review · gaming tests with and without a dedicated GPU

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is a good pick for budget builds without a graphics card, but with a dedicated GPU, a processor without integrated graphics is better.

Likes

Integrated graphics make it a good choice without a dedicated GPU
Good option for a first budget PC
Very stable frame rates in the most demanding game with a dedicated GPU

Dislikes

Small L3 cache causes stutters and frame drops in Fortnite and GTA V
Integrated graphics create a bottleneck with a dedicated GPU
No longer performs at its best in modern games

Delcas · 11/09/2026

Hands-on review · gaming, Cinebench and integrated graphics tests

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is a strong value pick for 2026 gaming on AM4, especially paired with a dedicated graphics card.

Likes

Integrated Vega graphics run light games without a separate graphics card
Low power use and a cheap build leave money for a GPU upgrade later
AM4 platform uses cheaper DDR4 memory instead of DDR5

Dislikes

Integrated graphics are weaker than a dedicated card and need low settings in AAA games
Integrated graphics borrow part of system RAM, which hurts heavy tasks
AM5 chips perform better but cost slightly more

KlovrTH · 08/07/2025

Hands-on review · gaming tests and comparisons

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is still a solid choice for 1080p gaming in 2025, especially for a first PC.

Likes

Smooth 1080p gaming in popular and competitive titles
Good gaming performance without a dedicated graphics card
Good choice for a first PC with room for a later GPU

Dislikes

Graphics performance depends heavily on fast dual-channel RAM
Heavy modern games need lower settings to reach 60 fps
Not suitable for 4K or high resolutions

Kuita · 26/07/2024

Hands-on review · game benchmarks and build advice

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is still recommended for budget gaming, though the 8600G is a better step up if you can afford it.

Likes

Solid performance for a budget gaming build
Small frame rate gap versus the non-G 5600
Strong integrated graphics for its price

Dislikes

Needs two RAM sticks for good frame rates
PCIe 3.0 can limit graphics card and storage speed
Only modest gains over the cheaper 5500 with an RX 580

Ruben Jacapa · 07/04/2024

Gaming test · 1080p low settings across many games

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is just enough for 1080p gaming at low settings, around 60 fps, though some games struggle.

Likes

Around 60 fps at 1080p with low settings
Smooth, lag-free gameplay in the shooter tests
Integrated graphics handles many popular games

Dislikes

Some games drop to roughly 24 to 40 fps
Lowest settings look poor for only a few extra frames
Medium and high settings are too demanding in several titles

PT REVIEW · 29/11/2023

Hands-on test · 15+ games with integrated graphics

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is playable with upscaling, but native Full HD at 60 fps is missed in half the games.

Likes

Enough performance for many games with upscaling
Good results in esports and older titles at 1080p
Good value for a complete PC built around one chip
Reaches 60 fps quickly after a brief setup

Dislikes

Native 1080p falls short of 60 fps in many games
Needs FSR upscaling for smooth frame rates in demanding titles
Starfield is not playable at Full HD without heavy compromises

El Santi PC · 30/10/2023

Hands-on build test · gaming, streaming and editing performance

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is a strong budget choice for gaming and streaming, but pair it with 16GB dual-channel RAM and a better cooler.

Likes

Over 120 fps in competitive games like CS:GO and Fortnite
About 60 fps in demanding AAA titles like GTA V
Good for streaming and video editing
Cheap B450 and B550 boards work well with it

Dislikes

The bundled cooler may struggle under load
A single RAM stick cuts performance sharply, so dual channel is a must
Cheaper B450 boards need a BIOS update before the CPU will boot
Gaming performance trails the Xbox Series S

El Santi PC · 20/07/2023

Hands-on review · one month of gaming and editing tests

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is a top pick for budget gaming PCs, offering good performance for the price, but it needs a proper cooler.

Likes

Strong performance for gaming and fast video rendering
Good 1080p results in Fortnite, around 100 fps
Can be upgraded with dedicated GPUs, possibly up to an RTX 4070

Dislikes

Stock cooler is a serious problem and needs replacing for overclocking
Temperatures can exceed 70 degrees under load
Single-channel RAM setup gives very poor performance

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0

uk.pcmag.com

✓ explicit

03/08/2021

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G - Review 2021 - PCMag UK

Launch review · Integrated graphics

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is a six-core chip with strong built-in Vega graphics, best for esports and light gaming without a separate graphics card.

8.0

techspot.com

✓ explicit

05/08/2021

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G Review - TechSpot

Benchmark review · Built-in graphics

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is a six-core chip whose built-in graphics handle light and esports games at 1080p, but it trails the 5600X in CPU tests.

6.0

thetechrevolutionist.com

≈ estimated

09/01/2021

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G Review – Good enough for a Gaming PC?

Benchmark review · Integrated graphics

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is a strong six-core processor for productivity and light gaming, but its weaker integrated graphics rule it out for serious gaming PCs.

9.0

pcmag.com

✓ explicit

03/08/2021

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G Review - PCMag

Hands-on review · Productivity and gaming

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is a six-core chip that challenges Intel's Core i5-11600K in CPU work and offers strong built-in gaming, though video work favors the 5700G.

8.0

tomshardware.com

✓ explicit

07/08/2021

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G Review: The Value iGPU Gaming King

Benchmark review · Integrated graphics gaming

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is a strong pick for light gaming without a graphics card, reaching up to 96% of the Ryzen 7 5700G's integrated graphics performance.

7.7

pcgameshardware.de

✓ explicit

16/09/2021

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G Hands-On Review: Zen 3 Meets Time-Honored Vega Graphics

Hands-on test · Built-in Vega graphics

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G suits a small all-in-one PC for simple games at Full HD, but its Vega graphics can't handle Cyberpunk 2077.

7.0

connect-living.de

✓ explicit

03/12/2021

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G Review: The Perfect APU?

Benchmark review · Mini-ITX and stopgap use

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is a good fit for small Mini-ITX PCs and as a stopgap, but slow video encoding and PCIe 3.0 hold it back.

8.0

computerbase.de

≈ estimated

03/08/2021

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G and Ryzen 7 5700G Review

Desktop test · Zen 3 with Vega

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G pairs strong Zen 3 cores with integrated graphics that beat Intel's Xe, but it lacks PCIe 4.0 and AV1 acceleration.

8.0

galaxus.de

≈ estimated

12/08/2021

Ryzen 5 5600G im Praxistest: Was taugt der AMD-Chip mit

Hands-on test · Mini-ITX office use

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G fits compact office PCs well, though photo and video editing feel slower and it stays on PCIe 3.0.

7.0

lesnumeriques.com

✓ explicit

01/12/2021

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G Review: A chip that does it all

Lab test · Office PC chip

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G suits office and streaming PCs, letting you skip a graphics card, but its built-in graphics are too weak for serious gaming.

7.0

digitec.ch

≈ estimated

13/08/2021

Ryzen 5 5600G Review: What Is This AMD Chip with Integrated Graphics For?

Hands-on test · Mini-ITX office build

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G fits compact office PCs well, though photo and video editing feel slower and it stays on PCIe 3.0.

8.0

tweakers.net

≈ estimated

03/08/2021

AMD Ryzen 5000G APUs Review - Finally modern Ryzens with iGPU

Benchmark review · Desktop APU

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G trades some processor speed for built-in graphics, trailing the 5600X at 1080p but nearly matching Intel's Core i5 11600K at Ultra.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

Integrated graphics: Offers strong gaming performance for an iGPU, capable of handling 1080p esports and 720p mainstream titles smoothly.
Value for money: Excellent price-to-performance ratio, especially for budget builds that can skip a dedicated graphics card.
Efficiency: Exhibits impressive power consumption and thermal efficiency, even under load.
Bundled cooler: Comes with the Wraith Stealth cooler, which is adequate for standard out-of-the-box operation.
Compatibility: Supported on a wide range of existing AM4 motherboards (X570, B550, A520, and many B450/X470 with BIOS updates).
Productivity: Solid 6-core/12-thread Zen 3 performance makes it snappy for multitasking and office applications.

What customers don't like about AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

PCIe 3.0 limitation: Unlike other Ryzen 5000 series chips, this APU lacks PCIe 4.0 support, which may limit speeds for newer NVMe SSDs and high-end GPUs.
Reduced L3 cache: Features only 16MB of L3 cache—half that of the 5600X—resulting in lower performance in CPU-bound gaming with a discrete GPU.
Discrete GPU bottleneck: When paired with a powerful dedicated graphics card, it is roughly 10-20% slower than the 5600X in certain gaming scenarios.
AAA Gaming limitations: While great for esports, it struggles to hit 60 FPS in modern AAA titles at 1080p without significant setting compromises.
Memory dependence: Integrated graphics performance is heavily reliant on fast system RAM, often requiring higher-priced high-frequency DDR4 kits to excel.
Longevity: The AM4 platform is effectively end-of-life, offering no future upgrade path to newer architectures like Zen 4/5 on AM5.

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor built on the 7nm Zen 3 architecture for the AM4 socket, featuring a 3.9 GHz base clock, a 4.4 GHz max boost, and 16MB of L3 cache. Its primary characteristic is the integrated Radeon RX Vega 7 graphics (1900 MHz), which allows for playable 1080p esports and 720p casual gaming without a dedicated GPU. Main pros include its excellent price-to-performance ratio for budget builds, high power efficiency with a 65W TDP, and the inclusion of a Wraith Stealth cooler. However, its main cons are the lack of PCIe 4.0 support (limited to PCIe 3.0), half the L3 cache compared to the Ryzen 5 5600X, and slightly lower CPU performance when paired with a high-end discrete graphics card.

Best alternatives

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 7600

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 5700X

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 8600G

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

Processors

Intel Core i5-12400F

Processors

Intel Core i5-14400F

Processors

Intel Core i5-12600K

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 5700G

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G

Processors

Intel Core i5-12600KF

Processors

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare AMD Ryzen 5 5600G with other processors

Graphic comparison of AMD Ryzen 5 5600G and other processors

No results found