Scored using Processors Methodology v3.0
Processors Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Processors Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Processors Methodology v3.0

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X review: 74 specs compared

Avg. price:~£150PassMark multi-core score:27699N. of physical cores:8CPU boost clock speed:4.7 GHzCPU socket:AM4TDP (Thermal design power):105 W

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X Review: Compare 74 technical specifications, 41 expert and video reviews and 4 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
8.0/10

Overall score

Score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

40%

7.2

Technical score

25%

8.4

Reviews score

25%

8.2

List score

10%

9.8

Sentiment score

★Better than 95% of processors
8.5

Value for money

Value for money
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the processor's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a processor with a good balance between performance, efficiency, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.0

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

★Better than 97%
7.2

Technical score

Technical score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

60%

7.7

Performance

18%

6.4

Architecture

10%

7.3

Memory & PCIe

7%

4.9

Power & Thermal

4%

8.7

Platform

1%

4.0

Integrated graphics

▲Better than 72%
8.4

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

80%

8.0

Average grade

20%

9.7

Popularity

Grades by review (41)
22 reviews: 12 with a printed score, 10 estimated from the review. 19 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▲Better than 89%
8.2

List score

List score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (4)
List score: in 4 of 87 lists (5%)
★Better than 96%
  • amd-ryzen-7-5800x
  • amd-ryzen-7-5800x
  • amd-ryzen-7-5800x
  • amd-ryzen-7-5800x
  • amd-ryzen-7-5800x
  • amd-ryzen-7-5800x
  • amd-ryzen-7-5800x
  • amd-ryzen-7-5800x
amd-ryzen-7-5800x
amd-ryzen-7-5800x
amd-ryzen-7-5800x
amd-ryzen-7-5800x
amd-ryzen-7-5800x
amd-ryzen-7-5800x
amd-ryzen-7-5800x
amd-ryzen-7-5800x
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

Based on 10 · 20

Reviewers praise fast gaming and all-round performance, but it runs hot, ships without a cooler, and many find it overpriced.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

Based on 170 owners sharing their experience in online comments

80%positive9%mixed11%negative

Owners praise its fast gaming and work performance, while high temperatures and frequent tuning cause the most frustration.

What owners dislike

  • Stock settings can push temperatures near 85 to 90°C under heavy multi-core loads like Cinebench, and some owners see high idle temps.83
  • Owners feel the price was high at launch, and the 5900X was only slightly faster for the extra cost.10
  • Auto board settings often raise voltage to about 1.4 to 1.5 V, which pushes temperatures up, and owners lower it in BIOS to fix this.8
  • Under heavy multi-core stress, the chip reaches about 90°C and reduces clock speed to protect itself, and some systems shut down during temperature spikes.5
  • Under heavy load the cooler fans ramp up loudly, and some owners find the noise bothersome.5
  • Some owners see very high temperatures right after installation and need to check the cooler, paste, or BIOS settings to bring them down.5
  • Owners say a strong cooler is needed, and many move to a large air cooler or a 240 to 360 mm AIO to keep temperatures in check.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

Technical score
Technical score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

7.7

Performance

18%

6.4

Architecture

10%

7.3

Memory & PCIe

7%

4.9

Power & Thermal

4%

8.7

Platform

1%

4.0

Integrated graphics

7.2
Reviews score
8.4
List score
8.2
Value for money
Value for money
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the processor's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a processor with a good balance between performance, efficiency, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

8.0

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

8.5
Processor type
desktop
This processor belongs to the desktop processor class, which is more advanced than that of 54.7% of processors and equal to that of 39.5% of processors.
CPU socket
AM4
This processor uses the AM4 CPU socket, which is newer than that of 75.1% of processors and equal to that of 9.4% of processors.
Chipset
AMD 300 Series, AMD 400 Series, AMD 500 Series
This processor supports AMD 300 Series, AMD 400 Series, AMD 500 Series chipsets, which is broader compatibility than 72.1% of processors and equal to that of 1.9% of processors.
CPU architecture
x86-64
This processor uses the x86-64 architecture, which is more advanced than that of 1.8% of processors and equal to that of 98.2% of processors.
Instruction sets
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, BMI1, BMI2, AMD-V
This processor supports MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, BMI1, BMI2, AMD-V instruction sets, which is broader support than 85.3% of processors and equal to that of 6% of processors.
Show more
What reviewers say
N. of physical cores
8
This processor has 8 CPU cores, which is more than 61.2% of processors and equal to 13.9% of processors.
CPU threads
16
This processor offers 16 CPU threads, which is more than 69% of processors and equal to 14.6% of processors.
CPU boost clock speed
4.7 GHz
This processor reaches a boost clock of 4.7 GHz which is higher than that of 64.8% of processors and equal to that of 4% of processors.
CPU base clock speed
8x 3.8 GHz
This processor has a base clock of 8x3.8 GHz which is higher than that of 84% of processors and equal to that of 1.3% of processors.
PassMark multi-core score
27,699
This processor scores 27,699 in PassMark, which is higher than 83.8% of processors.
Show more
What reviewers say
Semiconductor size
7 nm
This processor uses a 7 nm process node, which is more advanced than that of 70.4% of processors and equal to that of 10.5% of processors.
Foundry
TSMC 7 nm
This processor is built on the TSMC 7 nm foundry process, which is more advanced than that of 55.6% of processors and equal to that of 9.2% of processors.
L3 cache
32 MB
This processor has an L3 cache of 32 MB which is larger than that of 89% of processors and equal to that of 2.7% of processors.
L2 cache
4 MB
This processor has an L2 cache of 4 MB which is larger than that of 53.6% of processors and equal to that of 9.2% of processors.
L1 cache
512 KB
This processor has an L1 cache of 512 KB which is larger than that of 62.8% of processors and equal to that of 9.4% of processors.
Show more
DDR memory version
DDR4
This processor supports DDR DDR4, which is newer than that of 25.2% of processors and equal to that of 31.1% of processors.
Maximum memory speed
3,200 MHz
This processor supports memory speeds up to 3,200 MHz, which is higher than that of 49.8% of processors and equal to 8.5% of processors.
Max memory speed (JEDEC)
DDR4-3200 MHz
This processor supports JEDEC memory speeds up to DDR4-3200 MHz, which is higher than that of 46.1% of processors and equal to 9.4% of processors.
Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)
3,733 MHz
This processor supports XMP/EXPO memory speeds up to 3,733 MHz, which is higher than that of 93.3% of processors.
Maximum memory capacity
128 GB
This processor supports up to 128 GB of memory, which is more than 59.3% of processors and equal to 22.8% of processors.
Show more
Integrated graphics
no
This processor does not include integrated graphics. 85.4% of processors offer this.
Integrated GPU model
N/A
Integrated GPU execution units
N/A
Integrated GPU base frequency
N/A
Integrated media encoders/decoders
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
TDP (Thermal design power)
105 W
This processor has a TDP of 105 W which is higher than that of 89.7% of processors and equal to that of 1% of processors.
Base power (PL1)
105 W
This processor has a base power of 105 W which is higher than that of 89.9% of processors and equal to that of 1% of processors.
Boost power (PL2)
?
Tau (power duration limit)
N/A
Configurable TDP
no
This processor does not support configurable TDP. 53.7% of processors offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X vs the average processor

246810TotalPlatformPerformanceArchitectureMemory & PCIeIntegrated graphicsPower & Thermal
  • 2.42x higher PassMark score
    This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (27,699 vs 11,469). The average processor scores 11,469 in PassMark benchmark.
    27,699 vs 11,469
  • 95.7% higher multi-core score
    This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (10,193 vs 5,209). The average processor scores 5,209 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    10,193 vs 5,209
  • 4 more performance cores
    This processor has more performance cores than the average processor (8 vs 4). The average processor has 4 performance cores.
    8 vs 4
  • 2.1x better multi-core performance
    This processor has a higher multi-core performance than the average processor (5,894 vs 2,804.5). The average processor scores 2,804.5 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
    5,894 vs 2,804.5
  • 8 more CPU threads
    This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (16 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
    16 vs 8
  • 8 more PCIe lanes
    This processor has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (24 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
    20 usable lanes
    24 vs 16
  • 34.8% better single-core performance
    This processor has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (3,449 vs 2,558). The average processor scores 2,558 in PassMark single-core.
    3,449 vs 2,558
  • Unlocked for overclocking
    This processor has an unlocked multiplier, while the average processor does not. 22.6% of processors offer this.
  • 25.4% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    80%

    8.0

    Average grade

    20%

    9.7

    Popularity

    Grades by review (41)
    22 reviews: 12 with a printed score, 10 estimated from the review. 19 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.4 vs 6.7
  • 36.1% higher sentiment score
    9.8 vs 7.2
  • 17% better value for money
    AMD Ryzen 7 5800X has better value for money than the average processor (8.52 vs 7.3).
    8.52 vs 7.29
  • 5.1% higher list score
    List score
    8.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (4)
    List score: in 4 of 87 lists (5%)
    8.2 vs 7.8
  • Modern CPU socket
    This processor uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (AM4 vs FP5).
    AM4 vs FP5
  • More extensive crypto acceleration
    This processor offers more extensive crypto acceleration than the average processor (AES, VAES, SHA, RSA/PKA vs AES, SHA).
    AES, VAES, SHA, RSA/PKA vs AES, SHA
  • Broader instruction support
    This processor supports a broader instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, BMI1, BMI2, AMD-V vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V).
    MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, BMI1, BMI2, AMD-V vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V
  • 2.42x higher PassMark score
    This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (27,699 vs 11,469). The average processor scores 11,469 in PassMark benchmark.
    27,699 vs 11,469
  • 95.7% higher multi-core score
    This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (10,193 vs 5,209). The average processor scores 5,209 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    10,193 vs 5,209
  • 4 more performance cores
    This processor has more performance cores than the average processor (8 vs 4). The average processor has 4 performance cores.
    8 vs 4
  • 2.1x better multi-core performance
    This processor has a higher multi-core performance than the average processor (5,894 vs 2,804.5). The average processor scores 2,804.5 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
    5,894 vs 2,804.5
  • 8 more CPU threads
    This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (16 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
    16 vs 8
  • Unlocked for overclocking
    This processor has an unlocked multiplier, while the average processor does not. 22.6% of processors offer this.
  • 34.8% better single-core performance
    This processor has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (3,449 vs 2,558). The average processor scores 2,558 in PassMark single-core.
    3,449 vs 2,558
  • Higher base clock
    This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (8x3.8 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz).
    8x3.8 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz
  • 42.9% higher single-core score
    This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (2,193 vs 1,535). The average processor scores 1,535 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    2,193 vs 1,535
  • 27.6% higher Cinebench R20 single-core score
    This processor has a higher Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (625 vs 490). The average processor scores 490 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
    625 vs 490
  • 2 more CPU cores
    This processor has more CPU cores than the average processor (8 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
    8 vs 6
  • 6.8% higher boost clock
    This processor has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (4.7 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.4 GHz.
    4.7 GHz vs 4.4 GHz
  • 2x higher bus transfer rate
    This processor has a higher bus transfer rate than the average processor (16 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor offers bus transfer rate of 8 GT/s.
    16 GT/s vs 8 GT/s
  • 10 higher clock multiplier
    This processor has a higher clock multiplier than the average processor (38 vs 28). The average processor has a clock multiplier of 28.
    38 vs 28
  • 2.16x more L3 per core
    This processor has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (4 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.85 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
    4 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core
  • 3.56x larger L3 cache
    This processor has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (32 MB vs 9 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 9 MB.
    32 MB vs 9 MB
  • 58.2% smaller die size
    This processor has a lower die size than the average processor (74 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
    74 mm² vs 177 mm²
  • More advanced microarchitecture
    This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Vermeer vs Kaby Lake).
    Vermeer vs Kaby Lake
  • 41.7% smaller process node
    This processor has a lower process node than the average processor (7 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
    7 nm vs 12 nm
  • More advanced foundry
    This processor uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (TSMC 7 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
    TSMC 7 nm vs Intel 14 nm
  • 33.3% larger L1 cache
    This processor has a higher L1 cache than the average processor (512 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
    512 KB vs 384 KB
  • 8 more PCIe lanes
    This processor has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (24 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
    20 usable lanes
    24 vs 16
  • Newer PCIe version
    This processor supports a newer PCIe version than the average processor (4 vs 3).
    4.0 vs 3.0
  • Supports memory overclocking
    This processor supports memory overclocking, while the average processor does not. 43.9% of processors support memory overclocking.
  • 2x more memory capacity
    This processor has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • Supports ECC memory
    This processor supports ECC memory, while the average processor does not. 32% of processors support it.
  • 10 °C lower CPU temperature
    This processor has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (90 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.
    90 °C vs 100 °C
  • No configurable TDP
    This processor does not support configurable TDP, while the average processor does. 53.7% of processors support configurable TDP.
  • 2.33x higher base power
    This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (105 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
    105 W vs 45 W
  • 10 °C lower temperature limit
    This processor has a lower temperature limit than the average processor (90 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor can run up to 100 °C.
    90 °C vs 100 °C
  • 2.33x higher TDP
    This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (105 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
    105 W vs 45 W
  • Weaker security extensions
    This processor provides less advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP, Shadow Stack, SME vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK).
    AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP, Shadow Stack, SME vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK
  • No integrated graphics
    This processor does not include integrated graphics, while the average processor does. 85.4% of processors include integrated graphics.
  • 39.6% slower classroom rendering
    This processor has a higher Blender Classroom render time than the average processor (205.2 vs 340.1). The average processor needs 340.075 for the Blender Classroom test.
    205.24 vs 340.075
  • Older TPM support
    This processor supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2 vs PTT 2).
    fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0
  • Weaker security extensions
    This processor provides less advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP, Shadow Stack, SME vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK).
    AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP, Shadow Stack, SME vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK
  • Older TPM support
    This processor supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2 vs PTT 2).
    fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0
  • 39.6% slower classroom rendering
    This processor has a higher Blender Classroom render time than the average processor (205.2 vs 340.1). The average processor needs 340.075 for the Blender Classroom test.
    205.24 vs 340.075
  • No integrated graphics
    This processor does not include integrated graphics, while the average processor does. 85.4% of processors include integrated graphics.
  • No configurable TDP
    This processor does not support configurable TDP, while the average processor does. 53.7% of processors support configurable TDP.
  • 2.33x higher base power
    This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (105 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
    105 W vs 45 W
  • 10 °C lower temperature limit
    This processor has a lower temperature limit than the average processor (90 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor can run up to 100 °C.
    90 °C vs 100 °C
  • 2.33x higher TDP
    This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (105 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
    105 W vs 45 W

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
SwitchyTV
≈ estimated
07/07/2025
Hands-on gaming test · Fortnite and BeamNG
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is still a great budget gaming CPU in 2025, worth buying used or on sale despite its small cache.
8.0
Mr.K8
≈ estimated
24/07/2022
Benchmark comparison · long-term ownership and value check
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is still worth buying at a good price, though it trails Intel's 12th gen and needs decent RAM.
8.0
DannyzReviews
≈ estimated
04/01/2022
Power-limit tuning · gaming, temperature and power tests
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X keeps its gaming performance with lowered power limits, cutting heat and noise, so tuning is worth it for hot chips.
9.0
Tech Arena
≈ estimated
03/12/2021
Hands-on review · one week of use and value check
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is a sound 5000 series buy now, despite running hot.
9.0
The Tech Tank
≈ estimated
14/09/2021
Hands-on review · gaming and productivity benchmarks vs 11700K
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is a fairly easy recommendation for gamers who also do creative work, especially against the 11700K.
9.0
DannyzReviews
≈ estimated
06/06/2021
Late review · test bench use and gaming benchmarks
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is a strong upgrade choice after price drops, especially for gaming, though the 5900X suits heavy multicore work.
8.0
talkingStuff Network
≈ estimated
20/04/2021
Hands-on benchmark review · upgrade from Ryzen 5 3600
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is strong for video editing and rendering, but gaming gains are small, so it may be overkill for games.
4.0
Tech Notice
≈ estimated
15/02/2021
Opinion video · stress test and temperature check
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is one to avoid for video editing and rendering, since it throttles and runs too hot under heavy multi-core load.
9.0
Nicolas11x12 English
≈ estimated
23/01/2021
Hands-on review · gaming, productivity, temperatures and power tests
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is an excellent gaming CPU that also handles heavy workloads well, though it runs hotter and needs solid cooling.
8.0
KitGuruTech
≈ estimated
16/11/2020
Full review · benchmarks, gaming, thermals and value
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X handles productivity and gaming well, though its price feels high for an eight-core chip.
4.0
Hardware Unboxed
≈ estimated
07/11/2020
Hands-on review · gaming, productivity and value tests
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is the fastest eight-core desktop chip, but its launch price makes it hard to recommend.
9.0
Hardware Husky
≈ estimated
05/11/2020
Benchmarks and unboxing · comparison with Ryzen 7 3800X
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is recommended if you are buying new and game at high fps or do productivity work.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
pcmag.com
✓ explicit
05/11/2020
Benchmark review · Zen 3 CPU
Verdict
The Ryzen 7 5800X beats the Core i9-10900K in most tests despite having two fewer cores, suiting heavy workloads, but it ships without a cooler.
7.5
techspot.com
✓ explicit
07/11/2020
Benchmark tests · Gaming chip
Verdict
The Ryzen 7 5800X is a fast 8-core chip, averaging 23% more frames per second in games than the Ryzen 7 3700X, though overclocking gains little.
8.0
tomshardware.com
✓ explicit
26/12/2020
Benchmark review · Desktop processor
Verdict
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is a strong 8-core chip for gaming and applications, but its two extra cores add little gaming speed over the 6-core 5600X.
7.5
kitguru.net
✓ explicit
20/11/2020
Lab test · Overclocking
Verdict
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is a strong 8-core chip that clocks above the 12-core 5900X, but overclocking gains are small and it has half the cache of the 5900X.
8.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
06/04/2021
Group test · Desktop processor
Verdict
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is a balanced all-rounder for content work and gaming, but it runs hot under load and Intel wins several games.
10
techradar.com
✓ explicit
05/05/2021
Lab test · Gaming processor
Verdict
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is a top gaming chip with a big single-core lead, but it gains little for creative work over Ryzen 3000 chips and runs hot.
9.0
eathealthy365.com
≈ estimated
23/01/2026
Test bench review · Gaming CPU
Verdict
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X suits 1440p gamers and AM4 upgraders, handling games and multitasking well, but it trails newer chips at 1080p and on the fastest GPUs.
7.0
chip.de
✓ explicit
11/12/2023
Lab test · Desktop processor
Verdict
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is a strong gaming and multi-core chip, but it has no integrated graphics and needs a BIOS update on many older boards.
9.4
geeknetic.es
✓ explicit
05/11/2020
Lab test · Zen 3 chip
Verdict
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is an 8-core, 16-thread chip that boosts to 4.7GHz, but needs strong cooling and ships without a cooler.
7.0
geektopia.es
≈ estimated
13/11/2020
Lab test · Gaming and power
Verdict
The Ryzen 7 5800X leads single-core tests and keeps pace with top Intel chips in games, but runs near 85°C under load.
8.0
codigoespagueti.com
≈ estimated
Not Dated
Benchmark review · Gaming and productivity
Verdict
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is a strong 8-core chip for gaming and creative work, but twelve-core rivals pull ahead in heavy multi-core tasks.
9.0
hwupgrade.it
≈ estimated
11/11/2020
Benchmark review · Eight-core chip
Verdict
The Ryzen 7 5800X is a strong 8-core chip that beats the Core i7-10700KF consistently, but it draws far more power than the 3800XT.
8.0
thegamesmachine.it
≈ estimated
29/01/2021
Benchmark test · Gaming CPU
Verdict
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is a fast 8-core gaming chip, but at high resolutions a GTX 1080 Ti holds it back, so pair it with a newer graphics card.
9.0
pcgaming.tech
✓ explicit
24/12/2020
Review · Gaming CPU
Verdict
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is a strong gaming processor, but you only see its gains with a current graphics card, such as an RTX 3000 or Radeon RX 6000.
9.0
tweakers.net
≈ estimated
02/02/2022
Owner reviews · Desktop CPU
Verdict
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is a fast chip for gaming and heavy workloads, but it runs hot and ships without a cooler, so budget for a good one.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

  • Exceptional single-core performance, making it a top-tier choice for high-refresh-rate gaming
  • Strong multi-threaded capability suitable for heavy productivity tasks like video editing and 3D rendering
  • Excellent drop-in upgrade path for users already on the AM4 motherboard platform
  • Unified 8-core complex (single CCD) design reduces inter-core latency compared to previous generations
  • High power efficiency relative to Intel competitors of the same generation
  • Supports PCIe 4.0 for faster storage and next-gen GPU compatibility

What customers don't like about AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

  • Does not include a bundled thermal cooler, requiring an additional purchase of a high-quality aftermarket solution
  • Known to run quite hot, often reaching high temperatures even with capable cooling setups
  • Poor value proposition at its original MSRP compared to the Ryzen 5 5600X for gaming or the Ryzen 9 5900X for productivity
  • Very limited manual overclocking headroom as the chip is already pushed near its limits out of the box
  • Part of the now-retired AM4 platform, which lacks a future upgrade path to DDR5 or newer Zen architectures

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is a high-performance desktop processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads with a base clock of 3.8 GHz and a max boost of up to 4.7 GHz. It includes a 32 MB L3 cache, supports PCIe 4.0, and operates on the AM4 socket with a 105W TDP. Main pros include stellar single-core and multi-threaded performance for gaming and content creation, significant IPC gains over previous generations, and broad compatibility with 400 and 500-series motherboards. Notable cons include the lack of a bundled thermal solution, limited overclocking headroom, and a tendency to run hot, requiring a premium cooling solution for optimal operation.

Compare AMD Ryzen 7 5800X with other processors

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and other processors

No results found