OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£120PassMark benchmark result:8727N. of physical cores:4CPU boost clock speed:3.9 GHzCPU socket:AM4TDP (Thermal design power):65 W

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

5.0

▼Worse than 63% of processors

4.4

▼Worse than 73% of processors

9.6

★Better than 97% of processors

3.1
Gaming
Gaming
3.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Measures single-core benchmark performance, peak boost clock speeds, and fast L3 cache sizing critical for high frame rates.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
30.0%
3.6
PassMark single-core benchmark score
25.0%
3.0
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
20.0%
4.5
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
1.4
L3 cache
8.0%
2.3
N. of physical cores
2.9
Video editing
Video editing
2.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Assesses multi-core benchmark throughput, total physical core and thread count, and cache bandwidth for rapid video rendering.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this processors meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
3.0
Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
20.0%
2.3
N. of physical cores
20.0%
4.4
CPU threads
15.0%
1.4
L3 cache

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of processor AMD Ryzen 5 2400G

5.0

Show more

Hide

Platform

8.5

Show more

Hide

Brand name

AMD

Processor type

CPU socket

Chipset

CPU architecture

Show more

Performance

3.7

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

CPU threads

Threads per core

CPU boost clock speed

CPU base clock speed

Show more

Cache & Architecture

4.3

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

Foundry

L3 cache

L2 cache

L1 cache

Show more

Memory & PCIe

5.0

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

Maximum memory speed

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

?

Maximum memory capacity

Show more

Integrated Graphics

7.4

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

Integrated GPU model

Integrated GPU execution units

Integrated GPU base frequency

Integrated media encoders/decoders

Show more

Power & Thermal

8.0

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

Base power (PL1)

Boost power (PL2)

?

Tau (power duration limit)

N/A

Configurable TDP

Show more

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G vs the average processor

Why is AMD Ryzen 5 2400G better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

Unlocked for overclocking
Unlocked multiplier
yes
▲ Better than 78% of models
This processor has an unlocked multiplier, the average processor does not. 21.7% of processors have an unlocked multiplier.
Includes stock cooler
Cooler included
yes
▲ Better than 74% of models
This processor includes a stock cooler, the average processor does not. 25.9% of processors include a stock cooler.
Supports memory overclocking
Memory overclocking
yes
▲ Better than 56% of models
This processor supports memory overclocking, the average processor does not. 43.6% of processors support memory overclocking.
Advanced security extensions
Security extensions
AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP, Secure Processor, Secure Boot, SME, SEV
▲ Better than 79% of models
This processor provides more advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP, Secure Processor, Secure Boot, SME, SEV vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Processor).
AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP, Secure Processor, Secure Boot, SME, SEV vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Processor
5 °C lower CPU temperature
CPU temperature
95 °C
▲ Better than 72% of models
Market range: <95 °C – >105 °C
This processor has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C
10x more popular
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G is more popular than the average processor (10 vs 1).
10 vs 1
Modern CPU socket
CPU socket
AM4
▲ Better than 77% of models
This processor uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (AM4 vs FP4).
AM4 vs FP4
19.7% higher user score
User score
9.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
the average processor
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has a higher user score than the average processor (9.58 vs 8.000).
9.58 vs 8

10x more popular
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G is more popular than the average processor (10 vs 1).
10 vs 1
19.7% higher user score
User score
9.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
the average processor
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G has a higher user score than the average processor (9.58 vs 8.000).
9.58 vs 8

Advanced security extensions
Security extensions
AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP, Secure Processor, Secure Boot, SME, SEV
▲ Better than 79% of models
This processor provides more advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP, Secure Processor, Secure Boot, SME, SEV vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Processor).
AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, SMAP, SMEP, Secure Processor, Secure Boot, SME, SEV vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Processor
Modern CPU socket
CPU socket
AM4
▲ Better than 77% of models
This processor uses a more modern CPU socket than the average processor (AM4 vs FP4).
AM4 vs FP4
Broader instruction support
Instruction sets
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, BMI1, BMI2, AMD-V
▲ Better than 85% of models
This processor supports a broader instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, BMI1, BMI2, AMD-V vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, BMI1, BMI2, AMD-V vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA

Unlocked for overclocking
Unlocked multiplier
yes
▲ Better than 78% of models
This processor has an unlocked multiplier, the average processor does not. 21.7% of processors have an unlocked multiplier.

Supports memory overclocking
Memory overclocking
yes
▲ Better than 56% of models
This processor supports memory overclocking, the average processor does not. 43.6% of processors support memory overclocking.

3.57x higher GPU clock speed
Integrated GPU base frequency
1,250 MHz
★ Better than 96% of models
Market range: <300 MHz – >800 MHz
This processor has a higher integrated GPU frequency than the average processor (1250 MHz vs 350 MHz). The average processor has integrated GPU frequency of 350 MHz.
1,250 MHz vs 350 MHz
Better integrated GPU
Integrated GPU model
Radeon Vega 11
▲ Better than 77% of models
This processor uses a better integrated GPU than the average processor (Radeon Vega 11 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630).
Radeon Vega 11 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630

Includes stock cooler
Cooler included
yes
▲ Better than 74% of models
This processor includes a stock cooler, the average processor does not. 25.9% of processors include a stock cooler.
5 °C lower CPU temperature
CPU temperature
95 °C
▲ Better than 72% of models
Market range: <95 °C – >105 °C
This processor has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C

Why is AMD Ryzen 5 2400G worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

Less advanced microarchitecture
Microarchitecture codename
Raven Ridge
▼ Worse than 85% of models
This processor uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Raven Ridge vs Kaby Lake).
Raven Ridge vs Kaby Lake
2 fewer CPU cores
N. of physical cores
4
▼ Worse than 51% of models
Market range: <2 – >12
This processor has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (4 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
4 vs 6
29.3% lower single-core score
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
1,040
▼ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <561 – >2.7k
This processor has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1,040 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
1,040 vs 1,471
41.7% less L3 per core
L3 per core
1 MB/core
▼ Worse than 81% of models
Market range: <1 MB/core – >3 MB/core
This processor has less L3 cache per core than the average processor (1 MB/core vs 1.7 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
1 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core
32.9% lower multi-core score
Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
3,239
▼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <763 – >14k
This processor has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (3,239 vs 4,829). The average processor scores 4,829 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
3,239 vs 4,829
9.3% lower boost clock
CPU boost clock speed
3.9 GHz
▼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <3 GHz – >5.5 GHz
This processor has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.9 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
3.9 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
8 fewer PCIe lanes
PCIe lane count
8
▼ Worse than 92% of models
Market range: <10 – >30
This processor has fewer PCIe lanes than the average processor (8 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
8 vs 16
33.7% weaker multi-core performance
Cinebench R20 multi-core benchmark score
1,850
▼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <702 – >10.8k
This processor has a lower multi-core performance than the average processor (1,850 vs 2,791). The average processor scores 2,791 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
1,850 vs 2,791

2 years older release date
Release date
2018
▼ Worse than 62% of models
Market range: <2k – >2k
This processor has an older release date than the average processor (2018 vs 2020).
February 2018
2018 vs 2020
Older TPM support
TPM type
fTPM 2.0
▼ Worse than 59% of models
This processor supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2 vs PTT 2).
fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0

2 fewer CPU cores
N. of physical cores
4
▼ Worse than 51% of models
Market range: <2 – >12
This processor has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (4 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
4 vs 6
29.3% lower single-core score
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
1,040
▼ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <561 – >2.7k
This processor has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1,040 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
1,040 vs 1,471
32.9% lower multi-core score
Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
3,239
▼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <763 – >14k
This processor has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (3,239 vs 4,829). The average processor scores 4,829 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
3,239 vs 4,829
9.3% lower boost clock
CPU boost clock speed
3.9 GHz
▼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <3 GHz – >5.5 GHz
This processor has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.9 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
3.9 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
33.7% weaker multi-core performance
Cinebench R20 multi-core benchmark score
1,850
▼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <702 – >10.8k
This processor has a lower multi-core performance than the average processor (1,850 vs 2,791). The average processor scores 2,791 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
1,850 vs 2,791
14.3% weaker single-core performance
PassMark single-core benchmark score
2,143
▼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <1.4k – >4k
This processor has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (2,143 vs 2,500). The average processor scores 2,500 in PassMark single-core.
2,143 vs 2,500
59.8% slower classroom rendering
Blender (bmw27) benchmark result
134.28
▼ Worse than 53% of models
Market range: <97 – >1.3k
This processor has a higher Blender Classroom render time than the average processor (134.3 vs 334.1). The average processor needs 334.1 for the Blender Classroom test.
134.28 vs 334.1
17.5% lower PassMark score
PassMark benchmark result
8,727
▼ Worse than 55% of models
Market range: <2.5k – >32.5k
This processor has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (8,727 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.
8,727 vs 10,572.5
50% lower bus speed
Bus speed
4 GT/s
▼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <3 GT/s – >8 GT/s
This processor has a lower bus speed than the average processor (4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor runs at bus speed of 8 GT/s.
4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s

Less advanced microarchitecture
Microarchitecture codename
Raven Ridge
▼ Worse than 85% of models
This processor uses a less advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Raven Ridge vs Kaby Lake).
Raven Ridge vs Kaby Lake
41.7% less L3 per core
L3 per core
1 MB/core
▼ Worse than 81% of models
Market range: <1 MB/core – >3 MB/core
This processor has less L3 cache per core than the average processor (1 MB/core vs 1.7 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
1 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core
16.7% larger process node
Semiconductor size
14 nm
▼ Worse than 51% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >24 nm
This processor has a higher process node than the average processor (14 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
14 nm vs 12 nm
18.6% larger die size
Die size
210 mm²
▼ Worse than 69% of models
Market range: <99 mm² – >257 mm²
This processor has a higher die size than the average processor (210 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
210 mm² vs 177 mm²
50% smaller L3 cache
L3 cache
4 MB
▼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <2 MB – >32 MB
This processor has a lower L3 cache than the average processor (4 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
4 MB vs 8 MB
20% smaller L2 cache
L2 cache
2 MB
▼ Worse than 51% of models
Market range: <1 MB – >16 MB
This processor has a lower L2 cache than the average processor (2 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
2 MB vs 2.5 MB

8 fewer PCIe lanes
PCIe lane count
8
▼ Worse than 92% of models
Market range: <10 – >30
This processor has fewer PCIe lanes than the average processor (8 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
8 vs 16

Narrower media codec support
Integrated media encoders/decoders
H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode)
▲ Better than 56% of models
This processor supports fewer media codecs than the average processor (H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode)).
H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode)
54.2% fewer GPU execution units
Integrated GPU execution units
11
▼ Worse than 72% of models
Market range: <6 – >64
This processor has fewer GPU execution units than the average processor (11 vs 24). The average processor has 24 GPU execution units.
11 vs 24

44.4% higher base power
Base power (PL1)
65 W
▼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This processor has a higher base power draw than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
65 W vs 45 W
5 °C lower TJ Max
Maximum operating temperature (TJ Max)
95 °C
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Market range: <95 °C – >105 °C
This processor has a lower TJ Max than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.
95 °C vs 100 °C
44.4% higher TDP
TDP (Thermal design power)
65 W
▼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This processor has a higher TDP than the average processor (65 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
65 W vs 45 W

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

pcmag.com

22/02/2019

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Review Are you looking for these benchmarks to compare the 2400G against a specific newer APU, or do you need help with a particular...

The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G is highlighted by PCMag as a premier choice for budget gaming, featuring powerful Radeon RX Vega 11 integrated graphics and 14nm architecture with SMT. A major pro is its ability to deliver playable 1080p gaming without a dedicated GPU, saving on overall build costs. The chip is fully unlocked for overclocking, allowing for performance gains on both CPU and GPU components. While excellent in graphics, the review notes the 2400G's general computing power lags slightly behind competitors like the Intel Core i5-8400, specifically in productivity tasks. Despite this, the chip offers robust compatibility with existing AM4 motherboards via BIOS updates, providing a cost-effective upgrade path. Positioned as an inexpensive, high-value option for e-sports, the 2400G is considered "nearly perfect" for budget builds, offering a strong alternative to entry-level discrete cards. However, the review clarifies that despite the "Vega" branding, it cannot compete with dedicated high-end cards like the Vega 56 or 64.

rockpapershotgun.com

17/04/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G review: Impressive 1080p gaming without the need for a dedicated graphics card

The Rock Paper Shotgun review identifies the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G as a significant, budget-friendly "all-in-one" solution for PC gaming, combining a quad-core Zen CPU with Radeon RX Vega 11 graphics to deliver 1080p performance without a dedicated GPU. While capable of handling titles like Skyrim at high settings, the chip requires lowering settings to low or medium for more demanding games, but it offers a, pro in its AM4 motherboard compatibility and included cooler. Key cons include the necessity for fast, expensive system RAM to avoid performance bottlenecks and the narrow performance advantage over the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G, though it remains a recommended choice for future-proofed, low-cost gaming builds. Copy

overclockers.com

12/02/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G APU Review

The Overclockers.com review of the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G APUs highlights a significant, cost-effective leap for budget computing, combining Zen CPU cores with Vega integrated graphics. These processors, featuring a single CCX design, provide solid 1080p gaming performance, often rivaling entry-level discrete cards. While offering high value with unlocked multipliers and modern features, the review notes reduced PCIe lanes and reliance on fast memory for optimal graphics performance.

trustedreviews.com

12/02/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and 2200G Review

The Trusted Reviews assessment highlights the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and 2200G as game-changing APUs, combining quad-core Zen CPUs with capable Radeon Vega graphics suitable for budget or HTPC builds. A major pro is their "all-in-one" design, allowing solid 1080p gaming in titles like CS:GO without a dedicated GPU, while maintaining low 24W idle power consumption. However, the review notes a con: CPU clock speeds lag behind competitors like Intel’s Core i3-8350K, making them less ideal if pairing with a high-end discrete card. Additionally, demanding titles such as The Witcher 3 require significant compromises, reducing to 900p medium settings for playable framerates. Ultimately, these chips are highly dependent on fast, 3200MHz RAM to maximize performance, notes Trusted Reviews. While overclocking to 4GHz on a stock cooler is a pro, the verdict is that they are unmatched for entry-level gaming but lose appeal if a dedicated GPU is within budget.

extremetech.com

12/02/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Review: The Best Blend of CPU and GPU Performance We've Ever Seen

The ExtremeTech review describes the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G as an exceptional, high-value chip, delivering unprecedented integrated Radeon Vega 11 graphics performance alongside a quad-core Zen CPU. While offering a massive pro of viable 1080p gaming without a discrete card, the cons include reduced 4MB L3 cache and a limited x8 PCIe lane configuration, causing it to trail Intel competitors in CPU-bound tasks. Overall, the 2400G is touted as an excellent budget solution, provided users utilize high-speed DDR4 memory to unlock its full potential.

techradar.com

12/02/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G review

The TechRadar review praises the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G as a landmark, budget-friendly APU that delivers "discrete-class" integrated Radeon Vega 11 graphics, making it ideal for entry-level gaming and compact PCs. Key advantages include its ability to play modern titles like Overwatch at 4K/30fps, outclassing Intel competitors, and offering superior CPU/GPU value at a $169 launch price compared to its predecessor. However, the 2400G faces limitations with only 8 PCIe lanes, struggled to maintain 30fps in Destiny 2 at high settings, and ran warm at 56°C due to integrated heat density.

tomshardware.com

12/02/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Review: Zen, Meet Vega

The Tom’s Hardware review characterizes the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G as a landmark $170 "Raven Ridge" APU, blending four Zen cores with robust Vega-based graphics that redefine budget computing. The chip offers solid 720p performance and playable 1080p entry-level gaming, supported by unlocked multipliers for easy overclocking and the efficient Wraith Stealth cooler. However, the APU faces limitations, including the use of thermal paste instead of solder, reliance on high-speed, dual-channel RAM for optimal performance, and weaker single-core performance compared to Intel competitors.

techspot.com

12/02/2018

Summary of the review

Ryzen CPU + Vega Graphics on a Chip: AMD Ryzen 5 2400G & Ryzen 3 2200G Review

The TechSpot review highlights the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G ("Raven Ridge") as significant budget-oriented APUs, combining 14nm+ Zen CPU cores with integrated Radeon Vega graphics. These processors offer an exceptional price-to-performance ratio for entry-level gaming, capable of running titles like Overwatch and Fortnite at 720p or 1080p without a dedicated GPU. Key advantages include unlocked multipliers for overclocking, Precision Boost 2 technology, and low power consumption. However, the APUs are heavily dependent on fast, dual-channel system memory to maximize the integrated graphics performance. Potential downsides include a reduced 4MB L3 cache and only 8 PCIe lanes, which could limit future high-end GPU upgrades. The review also noted initial driver immaturity at launch which caused some gaming performance issues. Copy

pcgamer.com

12/02/2018

Summary of the review

AMD's Ryzen 5 2400G is a good option for a budget gaming PC

The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G serves as a high-performance integrated graphics solution combining four Zen CPU cores and 11 Vega compute units, offering an ideal, affordable foundation for budget-conscious and HTPC builds. Key advantages include superior integrated graphics performance compared to Intel counterparts, enabling entry-level gaming in titles like Overwatch and Dota 2, along with full overclocking support, low power consumption, and compatibility with the AM4 ecosystem. However, the chip's performance is highly dependent on fast system memory, and it faces limitations against discrete GPUs and internal competition from the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G. Copy

hardwarecooking.fr

25/01/2018

Summary of the review

The first benchmarks of the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G

The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G acts as a powerful "all-in-one" solution, combining a quad-core/eight-thread CPU with Radeon RX Vega 11 integrated graphics. A major advantage is its significant graphical superiority over competitors like the Intel Core i5-8400, providing capable gaming performance without a dedicated graphics card. HardwareCookingTechnically, the 2400G runs at a 3.6 GHz base/3.9 GHz boost, offering strong overclocking potential via the AM4 platform. While offering excellent value, the processor may slightly lag behind Intel counterparts in non-graphical productivity tasks. In practical application, the 2400G maintains playable frame rates for eSports in 1080p, though intensive titles might require lower settings. While the Wraith Stealth cooler is included, it may struggle with high temperatures under stress, making an upgrade necessary for overclocking.

lesnumeriques.com

14/02/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Review: When a Solid CPU Meets a Compelling iGPU

The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G is a hybrid processor pairing four Zen cores with Vega 11 graphics, providing strong performance for general productivity and entry-level gaming. The integrated graphics excel at 720p gaming, outperforming Intel’s UHD solutions of the era. Key benefits include high value for budget builds without a dedicated GPU and full AM4 platform compatibility. Limitations include lower performance compared to entry-level discrete GPUs and a high sensitivity to memory speed, requiring fast dual-channel RAM for optimal performance.

tomshardware.fr

03/01/2019

Summary of the review

Mini Test: The Ryzen 5 2400G APU vs the competition in QHD and 4K in BioShock

The Tom’s Hardware France review of the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G reveals that the APU's integrated Vega 11 graphics are capable of delivering playable 30–40 FPS in BioShock Remastered at 1440p (QHD) and 4K, significantly outperforming Intel UHD 630 graphics. Key advantages include its potential for small form factor builds and improved performance through overclocking, though it relies heavily on fast system RAM and still produces occasional stuttering compared to dedicated GPUs. While positioned as a versatile "budget gaming" solution, the chip uses thermal paste instead of solder, which can lead to higher operating temperatures. igor´ Copy

tomshardware.fr

12/02/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 5 2400G Review: Gaming Without a Graphics Card

The Tom's Hardware review of the AMD Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 5 2400G "Raven Ridge" APUs highlights a breakthrough for budget gaming by successfully merging Zen CPU cores with Vega graphics on a single die. These chips provide a major advantage, delivering playable 720p performance in modern titles and decent 1080p results in lighter games, effectively eliminating the need for a low-end discrete graphics card in entry-level builds. However, the integrated Vega graphics are heavily reliant on fast system memory, making expensive high-speed DDR4-2933 or faster RAM essential to avoid significant performance bottlenecks, while a reduced L3 cache and lower thermal headroom are notable compromises. Copy

tomshardware.fr

20/02/2018

Summary of the review

Ryzen 5 2400G Review: Delidding and Liquid Metal Thermal Paste

Tom's Hardware France tested the impact of replacing the stock thermal paste with liquid metal on a delidded AMD Ryzen 5 2400G, aiming to reduce thermal bottlenecks. While the modification yielded significantly lower temperatures and a roughly 3W power saving due to reduced leakage, it provided almost no practical performance gains, limiting overclocking to an extra 75 MHz due to voltage constraints. The review concluded that the high-risk, warranty-voiding process is not worth the effort for most, as the stock thermal solution is sufficient, and the modification is only useful for extreme small-form-factor builds. Copy

hardware.fr

21/02/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G review

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, based on the GP102 architecture, delivers approximately 35% better performance than the GTX 1080, bringing Titan X-level power to a consumer flagship with 11GB of GDDR5X memory. Key strengths include top-tier single-GPU performance for 4K gaming and a revised cooler design that enhances thermal efficiency despite removing the DVI port for improved airflow. However, the card has a high 250W TDP, causing significant noise under load, and its premium price point, combined with potential thermal throttling in restricted cases, limits its accessibility.

geeknetic.es

12/02/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G with RX Vega 11 Graphics - Geeknetic

The Geeknetic.es review highlights the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G as a transformative APU, pairing a 4-core/8-thread "Zen" CPU with potent "Vega 11" integrated graphics to deliver capable 1080p eSports gaming. Key advantages include an excellent price-to-performance ratio, AM4 platform compatibility, and significant overclocking potential, particularly for the GPU, which can reach 1500 MHz. However, the APU requires fast DDR4 memory to achieve maximum performance, and while the integrated graphics are strong, the CPU performance can be trailing against some competitors in single-threaded tasks.

tech.everyeye.it

12/02/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and 2200G Review: APUs with Ryzen and Vega Architecture

According to the Everyeye.it review, the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G combine Zen CPU architecture with Vega graphics to offer strong entry-level gaming capabilities on a single chip. Key advantages include impressive integrated performance for 1080p gaming, the high-value proposition of the 2200G, and efficient Precision Boost 2 technology. Conversely, thermal performance is limited by the use of thermal paste instead of solder, and PCIe lanes are reduced to 8 for discrete GPUs.

multiplayer.it

12/02/2018

Summary of the review

Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G Review

The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G ("Raven Ridge") APUs combine Zen CPU architecture with Vega graphics to create highly efficient, budget-friendly chips for small-form-factor systems. Offering superior integrated graphics compared to Intel's UHD 630, the 2400G and 2200G provide capable entry-level gaming at 1080p, though performance is heavily dependent on fast DDR4 memory. While providing great value and solid CPU performance, the chips are limited by a reduced L3 cache, lower PCIe lane count for dedicated GPUs, and higher thermal output under load.

tomshw.it

11/02/2018

Summary of the review

Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G Review: When Zen Meets Vega

The Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G merge Zen CPU architecture with Vega graphics on a 14nm+ node, acting as a cost-effective alternative for budget, entry-level gaming setups. Featuring integrated Radeon Vega graphics, these APUs deliver superior 720p/1080p performance compared to Intel UHD 630, with high dependence on fast dual-channel RAM to avoid bottlenecks. While providing excellent value and overclocking potential, drawbacks include higher operating temperatures from using thermal paste rather than solder, halved L3 cache, and reduced PCIe lanes for future upgrades.

hwupgrade.it

12/02/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G: now with integrated Vega graphics

The HWUpgrade.it review highlights the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G (Raven Ridge) as transformative, budget-friendly APUs merging Zen CPU cores with integrated Vega graphics. Utilizing a single-CCX design, these chips provide strong entry-level gaming and productivity performance, rendering low-end discrete GPUs largely unnecessary. Key disadvantages include limited PCIe lanes (8x), a dependence on fast DDR4 memory to avoid bottlenecks, and higher thermal output due to the use of thermal paste instead of solder. Copy

tweakers.net

17/01/2020

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Boxed - User Experience

The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G review on Tweakers (product review 228972) highlights the APU as a breakthrough for budget gaming, combining a quad-core Zen CPU with integrated Radeon RX Vega 11 graphics to offer a powerful all-in-one solution. Key advantages include "remarkably good" Vega 11 graphics capable of 1080p gaming in titles like GTA V, excellent value for small-form-factor builds, and high overclocking potential, according to user feedback. However, users noted limitations such as the reduction to 8 PCIe lanes, thermal challenges with the included Wraith Stealth cooler when overclocked, and a high dependency on fast dual-channel RAM for optimal performance.

tweakers.net

31/07/2021

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Boxed - Product Review

The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G is highlighted as a high-value, 8-thread CPU featuring an integrated RX Vega 11 GPU, providing strong "bang-for-the-buck" for budget-conscious, all-round micro PC builds. The review praises the powerful integrated graphics for delivering solid gaming performance, making it an ideal, versatile choice for compact systems without a dedicated graphics card. Key cons include limited gaming performance on the most demanding titles, restricting users to lower or medium settings, and a significantly diminished value proposition due to high prices caused by market scarcity. Ultimately, the Ryzen 5 2400G is characterized as a "perfect" entry-level processor for those requiring a capable CPU-GPU combo, though its appeal is hampered by inflated pricing. For more details, visit the Tweakers review.

id.nl

22/02/2018

Summary of the review

Ryzen 5 2400G - Gaming without a graphics card?

The ID.nl review identifies the AMD Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 5 2400G as excellent budget solutions for 1080p gaming without a dedicated graphics card. Featuring Radeon Vega graphics, these APUs provide playable frame rates on low-to-medium settings while utilizing a single CCX design to improve latency, though this reduces L3 cache. Pros include strong multi-threaded performance, especially on the 2400G, as well as unlocked multipliers and FreeSync support for improved gaming experiences. However, performance is heavily dependent on fast system memory, and the chips run hotter than predecessors due to a change in thermal interface material. Additionally, the 2400G’s higher cost makes the 2200G a better value for overclockers, and the APUs are limited to 8 PCIe lanes.

techtesters.eu

12/02/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 5 2400G Review

The AMD Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 5 2400G APUs are positioned as budget-friendly game-changers, offering strong integrated Vega graphics that render low-end dedicated GPUs like the GT 1030 obsolete. Pros include exceptional value, 4-core performance with capable iGPUs, and compatibility with AM4 motherboards. A significant con is the heavy reliance on fast DDR4-2933+ memory to avoid crippled gaming performance and higher operating temperatures due to the shift from soldering to thermal paste. Performance-wise, both chips deliver playable 1080p gaming in titles like Overwatch at low-to-medium settings, with the 2400G's SMT providing a productivity advantage while the 2200G offers high overclocking potential. Key advantages include low 65W TDP, improved single CCX architecture, and a solid upgrade path for HTPC or entry-level gaming builds. However, potential drawbacks include early driver issues and a limitation to 8x PCIe lanes for future dedicated graphics cards.

hardware.info

12/02/2018

Summary of the review

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G & Ryzen 3 2200G Raven Ridge Review: MMO Champions?

The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G "Raven Ridge" APUs integrate Zen CPU cores with Vega graphics, offering a significant breakthrough for budget-conscious gaming and mini-ITX systems. Key advantages include impressive integrated GPU performance capable of playing popular titles like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 1080p without a dedicated card, alongside support for the existing AM4 socket. However, constraints include limited PCIe lanes for external GPUs and reduced L3 cache compared to predecessors, with the switch to non-metallic thermal interface material leading to higher operating temperatures. The 2200G is highlighted for its excellent sub-$100 value, while both chips thrive with fast DDR4 memory to maximize the Vega graphics core's potential. For more details, visit Hardware.info Hardware.info.

tweakers.net

12/02/2018

Summary of the review

AMD 2400G and 2200G Review - Budget 1080p Gaming with Integrated Graphics

The Tweakers.net review of AMD’s Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G "Raven Ridge" APUs highlights a significant shift for budget 1080p gaming by integrating Vega graphics onto a single CCX design, effectively eliminating latency issues. These chips, featuring Precision Boost 2, provide exceptional value and make older "Summit Ridge" models, such as the Ryzen 5 1400, largely obsolete. Key advantages include strong integrated performance, allowing for gaming without a discrete card, with the 2400G providing 4 cores/8 threads and the 2200G offering excellent overclocking potential. However, technical compromises include reduced L3 cache, halved PCIe lanes (x8), and higher operating temperatures due to non-metallic thermal paste under the heat spreader. Performance is heavily dependent on fast DDR4 memory, and the chips require a BIOS update for 300-series AM4 motherboards.

ct.nl

25/06/2018

Summary of the review

Motherboards for AMD Ryzen G: Integrated Graphics and Their Limits

The test on ct.nl evaluates motherboards optimized for AMD Ryzen G-series processors, highlighting their ability to balance cost-effective pricing with robust support for integrated graphics and high-speed memory. Key advantages include the presence of multiple video outputs (HDMI/DisplayPort) for multi-monitor setups and reliable VRM cooling to maintain stability during intensive tasks. However, the review notes constraints, specifically limited PCIe lane allocation which hinders future expansion for dedicated graphics cards or additional fast storage. Furthermore, some budget-friendly models lack advanced BIOS features and use older audio or network components to reduce costs. Overall, the review concludes these boards are excellent for building budget "APU-only" systems suited for office work or light gaming, provided users prioritize memory speed for optimal APU performance. Copy

Third-party reviews

Based on 2,925 buyer reviews from online shops.

Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about AMD Ryzen 5 2400G

Excellent value for budget builders as it eliminates the immediate need for a dedicated GPU
Class-leading integrated graphics (Vega 11) capable of 1080p gaming on low-to-medium settings
Unlocked multiplier allows for easy overclocking of both CPU and GPU cores
Broad compatibility with existing AM4 motherboards (though may require a BIOS update)
Includes a capable stock Wraith Stealth cooler in the box
Supports Simultaneous Multi-Threading (SMT) for 8 threads, aiding in multi-core productivity

What we don't like about AMD Ryzen 5 2400G

General CPU processing performance lags slightly behind similarly priced Intel Core i5 alternatives
Highly dependent on fast, dual-channel RAM (ideally 3000MHz+) to reach its graphics potential
PCIe lanes are limited to x8 for discrete GPUs, which may bottleneck high-end cards in the future
Reduced L3 cache (4MB) compared to non-G Ryzen models can impact some gaming workloads
Integrated graphics are still significantly slower than even entry-level dedicated cards like the GTX 1050

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G is a 4-core, 8-thread APU based on the 14nm Zen architecture, featuring a 3.6 GHz base clock and a 3.9 GHz boost frequency. Designed for the AM4 socket with a 65W TDP, its standout characteristic is the integrated Radeon RX Vega 11 graphics, which includes 11 compute units clocked up to 1250 MHz. Main pros include its ability to handle budget 1080p gaming without a discrete GPU, an unlocked multiplier for easy overclocking, and support for high-speed DDR4-2933 memory. However, cons include limited PCIe lanes (only 8), a relatively small 4MB L3 cache compared to non-G Ryzen models, and a heavy reliance on expensive high-frequency RAM to achieve peak graphical performance.

Best alternatives

AMD Ryzen 5 8500G

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 7600

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 7500F

Processors

AMD Ryzen 7 5700

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 8600G

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

Processors

Intel Core i3 14100

Processors

Intel Core Ultra 5 225

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 8400F

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT

Processors

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X

Processors

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare AMD Ryzen 5 2400G with other processors

Graphic comparison of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and other processors

No results found