Scored using Headphones Methodology v1.0
Headphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Headphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Headphones Methodology v1.0

Skullcandy Hesh Evo Wireless Review | 93 Data compared

Avg. price:~£70Form factor:over-earConnectivity:wirelessBattery life:36 hoursActive noise cancellation (ANC):no

Skullcandy Hesh Evo Wireless Review: Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Headphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.8

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

6.2

Technical score

20%

9.2

User score

â–²Better than 70% of headphones
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

52%

6.0

Sound

20%

5.4

Features

10%

7.4

Design

8%

5.8

Connectivity

6%

7.8

Battery

4%

7.2

Calls & Controls

â–²Better than 62% of headphones
9.2

User score

User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 16,898 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
★Better than 96% of headphones
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of pair of headphones Skullcandy Hesh Evo Wireless

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

52%

6.0

Sound

20%

5.4

Features

10%

7.4

Design

8%

5.8

Connectivity

6%

7.8

Battery

4%

7.2

Calls & Controls

6.2
User score
User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 16,898 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
9.2
Popularity
Popularity
10.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Skullcandy Hesh Evo Wireless has a popularity score of 10 points, which is higher than that of 91.9% of products in this category.
10
Value for money
Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

6.8

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.7
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
no
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
no
This pair of headphones does not support active noise cancellation. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
dynamic
Driver size
40 mm
Driver size
40 mm
This pair of headphones uses a driver size of 40 mm, larger driver size than 28.6% of headphones and equal to 53.3% of headphones.
Number of drivers
1
Number of drivers
1
This pair of headphones uses 1 drivers, fewer drivers than 4% of headphones and equal to 96% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
20 Hz
Lowest frequency
20 Hz
This pair of headphones reaches a lowest frequency of 20 Hz, higher lowest frequency than 50.8% of headphones and equal to 47.3% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
no
Noise-canceling microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not support a noise-canceling microphone. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
yes
Can be used as a headset
yes
This pair of headphones is headset-ready, 84.8% is not. 15.2% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
1
Number of microphones
1
This pair of headphones has 1 microphones, more microphones than 26.9% of headphones and equal to 50.9% of headphones.
Boom microphone
no
Boom microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not include a boom microphone. 13.5% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
?
Show more
Connectivity
wireless
Connectivity
wireless
This pair of headphones supports wireless connectivity, more flexible connectivity than 50.8% of headphones and equal to 49.2% of headphones.
Bluetooth version
5
Bluetooth version
5
This pair of headphones uses Bluetooth version 5, newer Bluetooth version than 70.9% of headphones and equal to 13.1% of headphones.
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
This pair of headphones offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m, higher Bluetooth range than 2.7% of headphones and equal to 80.6% of headphones.
Audio latency
46 ms
Audio latency
46 ms
This pair of headphones has audio latency of 46 ms, lower audio latency than 76.1% of headphones.
Multipoint support
no
Multipoint support
no
This pair of headphones does not support multipoint. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
no
Ambient sound mode
no
This pair of headphones does not offer ambient sound mode. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
EQ support
yes
EQ support
yes
This pair of headphones supports EQ customization. 76.8% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
no
Companion app
no
This pair of headphones does not work with a companion app. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
N/A
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
This pair of headphones supports voice assistants. 39.2% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
36 hours
Battery life
36 hours
This pair of headphones offers battery life of 36 hours, higher battery life than 61.1% of headphones and equal to 0.3% of headphones.
Battery life with ANC
N/A
Charging time
1.5 hours
Charging time
1.5 hours
This pair of headphones needs 1.5 hours to charge, lower charging time than 87.2% of headphones and equal to 7.6% of headphones.
Quick charge
yes
Quick charge
yes
This pair of headphones supports quick charge. 67% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
560 mAh
Battery capacity
560 mAh
This pair of headphones has a battery capacity of 560 mAh, lower battery capacity than 50.4% of headphones and equal to 1.2% of headphones.
Show more
Brand name
Skullcandy
Form factor
over-ear
Weight
213 g
Weight
213 g
This pair of headphones weighs 213 g, lighter than 51.6% of headphones and equal to 0.2% of headphones.
Acoustic design
closed-back
Clamp force
4.4
Clamp force
4.4
This pair of headphones has a clamp force of 4.4, higher clamp force than 50.9% of headphones and equal to 4.2% of headphones.
Show more

Skullcandy Hesh Evo Wireless vs the average pair of headphones

246810TotalDesignSoundBatteryConnectivityCalls & ControlsFeatures
  • Spatial audio support
    Spatial audio
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports spatial audio, the average pair of headphones does not. 15.9% of headphones support spatial audio.
  • EQ customization
    EQ support
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports EQ customization, the average pair of headphones does not. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
  • More flexible connectivity
    Connectivity
    wireless
    This pair of headphones offers more flexible connectivity than the average pair of headphones (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    wireless vs wired
  • 104 ms lower audio latency
    Audio latency
    46 ms
    This pair of headphones has a lower audio latency than the average pair of headphones (46 ms vs 150 ms). The average headphones have audio latency of 150 ms.
    46 ms vs 150 ms
  • Quick charge support
    Quick charge
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports quick charge, the average pair of headphones does not. 33% of headphones support quick charge.
  • On-device controls
    On-device controls
    yes
    This pair of headphones includes on-device controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
  • 35 mm more spacious earcup height
    Earcup inner height
    95 mm
    This pair of headphones offers more spacious earcup height than the average pair of headphones (95 mm vs 60 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup height of 60 mm.
    95 mm vs 60 mm
  • 0.5 hours shorter charging time
    Charging time
    1.5 hours
    This pair of headphones has a lower charging time than the average pair of headphones (1.5 hours vs 2 hours). The average headphones need 2 hours to charge.
    1.5 hours vs 2 hours
  • 15% higher user score
    User score
    9.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Skullcandy Hesh Evo Wireless
    the average pair of headphones
    Skullcandy Hesh Evo Wireless has a higher user score than the average pair of headphones (9.20 vs 8.000).
    9.2 vs 8
  • 70.4% more popular
    Skullcandy Hesh Evo Wireless is more popular than the average pair of headphones (10 vs 5.9).
    10 vs 5.87
  • 35 mm more spacious earcup height
    Earcup inner height
    95 mm
    This pair of headphones offers more spacious earcup height than the average pair of headphones (95 mm vs 60 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup height of 60 mm.
    95 mm vs 60 mm
  • Foldable design
    Foldable
    yes
    This pair of headphones has a foldable design, the average pair of headphones does not. 48.3% of headphones are foldable.
  • Spatial audio support
    Spatial audio
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports spatial audio, the average pair of headphones does not. 15.9% of headphones support spatial audio.
  • Quick charge support
    Quick charge
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports quick charge, the average pair of headphones does not. 33% of headphones support quick charge.
  • 0.5 hours shorter charging time
    Charging time
    1.5 hours
    This pair of headphones has a lower charging time than the average pair of headphones (1.5 hours vs 2 hours). The average headphones need 2 hours to charge.
    1.5 hours vs 2 hours
  • USB-C charging
    USB Type-C
    yes
    This pair of headphones uses USB-C charging, the average pair of headphones does not. 29.5% of headphones use USB Type-C.
  • Rechargeable battery
    Has a rechargeable battery
    yes
    This pair of headphones has a rechargeable battery, the average pair of headphones does not. 47.9% of headphones have a rechargeable battery.
  • 6 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    36 hours
    This pair of headphones has a higher battery life than the average pair of headphones (36 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life of 30 hours.
    36 hours vs 30 hours
  • More flexible connectivity
    Connectivity
    wireless
    This pair of headphones offers more flexible connectivity than the average pair of headphones (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    wireless vs wired
  • 104 ms lower audio latency
    Audio latency
    46 ms
    This pair of headphones has a lower audio latency than the average pair of headphones (46 ms vs 150 ms). The average headphones have audio latency of 150 ms.
    46 ms vs 150 ms
  • On-device controls
    On-device controls
    yes
    This pair of headphones includes on-device controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
  • Wind noise reduction
    Wind noise reduction
    yes
    This pair of headphones reduces wind noise, the average pair of headphones does not. 34.3% of headphones support wind noise reduction.
  • Sidetone support
    Sidetone
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports sidetone, the average pair of headphones does not. 25.3% of headphones support sidetone.
  • Quick mic mute
    Mute function
    yes
    This pair of headphones includes a quick mic mute, the average pair of headphones does not. 29.3% of headphones support a mute function.
  • EQ customization
    EQ support
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports EQ customization, the average pair of headphones does not. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
  • Find-my-headphones feature
    Find my headphones
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports find-my-headphones features, the average pair of headphones does not. 8.7% of headphones support Find My Headphones.
  • 2.7 % higher distortion
    THD (Total Harmonic Distortion)
    3 %
    This pair of headphones has a higher total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (3 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    3 % vs 0.3 %
  • 10.7 dB/mW lower sensitivity
    Sensitivity
    91.3 dB/mW
    This pair of headphones has a lower sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (91.3 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    91.3 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    Lowest frequency
    20 Hz
    This pair of headphones has a higher lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    20 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 9 mm tighter earcup width
    Earcup inner width
    35 mm
    This pair of headphones has tighter earcup width than the average pair of headphones (35 mm vs 44 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup width of 44 mm.
    35 mm vs 44 mm
  • No travel bag
    Travel bag included
    no
    This pair of headphones does not include a travel bag, the average pair of headphones does. 65.4% of headphones include a travel bag.
  • 18.7 dB lower max SPL
    Max SPL
    91.3 dB
    This pair of headphones has a lower max SPL than the average pair of headphones (91.3 dB vs 110 dB). The average headphones reach a max SPL of 110 dB.
    91.3 dB vs 110 dB
  • 11.7 dB SPL lower sound pressure level
    Sound pressure level
    91.3 dB SPL
    This pair of headphones has a lower sound pressure level than the average pair of headphones (91.3 dB SPL vs 103 dB SPL). The average headphones reach a sound pressure level of 103 dB SPL.
    91.3 dB SPL vs 103 dB SPL
  • 9 mm tighter earcup width
    Earcup inner width
    35 mm
    This pair of headphones has tighter earcup width than the average pair of headphones (35 mm vs 44 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup width of 44 mm.
    35 mm vs 44 mm
  • No travel bag
    Travel bag included
    no
    This pair of headphones does not include a travel bag, the average pair of headphones does. 65.4% of headphones include a travel bag.
  • 2.7 % higher distortion
    THD (Total Harmonic Distortion)
    3 %
    This pair of headphones has a higher total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (3 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    3 % vs 0.3 %
  • 10.7 dB/mW lower sensitivity
    Sensitivity
    91.3 dB/mW
    This pair of headphones has a lower sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (91.3 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    91.3 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    Lowest frequency
    20 Hz
    This pair of headphones has a higher lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    20 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 18.7 dB lower max SPL
    Max SPL
    91.3 dB
    This pair of headphones has a lower max SPL than the average pair of headphones (91.3 dB vs 110 dB). The average headphones reach a max SPL of 110 dB.
    91.3 dB vs 110 dB
  • 11.7 dB SPL lower sound pressure level
    Sound pressure level
    91.3 dB SPL
    This pair of headphones has a lower sound pressure level than the average pair of headphones (91.3 dB SPL vs 103 dB SPL). The average headphones reach a sound pressure level of 103 dB SPL.
    91.3 dB SPL vs 103 dB SPL

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
thereviewsmiths.com
09/07/2024
Summary of the review
H
hanscox.substack.com
07/08/2023
Summary of the review
T
techhive.com
24/10/2022
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
18/08/2021
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
18/08/2021
Summary of the review
R
rtings.com
29/01/2021
Summary of the review
Z
zock-around-the-clock.com
01/04/2023
Summary of the review
H
hanscox.substack.com
07/08/2023
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 16,898 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Skullcandy Hesh Evo Wireless

  • Impressive 36-44 hour battery life with rapid charge (10 mins for 3 hours)
  • Lightweight and ergonomic design suitable for long listening sessions
  • Rich, bass-forward 'V-shaped' sound profile that highlights vocals
  • Built-in Tile finding technology for easy tracking
  • Simple, intuitive controls and easy Bluetooth pairing
  • Collapsible design that folds flat for better portability
  • Solid value for money compared to higher-end competitors

What we don't like about Skullcandy Hesh Evo Wireless

  • No Active Noise Cancellation (ANC); only passive noise isolation
  • High volume leakage can be distracting to others nearby
  • Lack of custom EQ settings or app-based sound adjustment
  • Wired mode can significantly reduce sound volume and quality
  • Plastic build feels somewhat flimsy and non-premium
  • Included charging cable is very short (3-4 inches)
  • No storage case included in newer retail packaging

Verdict

The Skullcandy Hesh Evo Wireless is a lightweight, over-ear headphone weighing approximately 213 grams and featuring powerful 40mm dynamic drivers that deliver a v-shaped sound profile with a frequency range of 20Hz to 20kHz. Its primary characteristics include exceptional 36-hour battery life with a rapid-charge feature—offering 3 hours of playback from just a 10-minute charge—alongside built-in Tile™ finding technology and a collapsible, flat-folding design for portability. Main pros include a highly comfortable memory foam fit, easy-to-use tactile buttons for call and track management, and a low 32 Ohm impedance that makes it easy to drive from mobile devices. However, its notable cons are a total lack of active noise cancellation (ANC), no app-based EQ customization, and a primarily plastic construction that some users find less premium than metal-reinforced alternatives.

Compare Skullcandy Hesh Evo Wireless with other products in the Headphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Skullcandy Hesh Evo Wireless and other products in the Headphones category

No results found