Scored using Headphones Methodology v1.0
Headphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Headphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Headphones Methodology v1.0

Skullcandy Crusher Wireless Review | 93 Data compared

Avg. price:~£70Form factor:over-earConnectivity:wirelessBattery life:40 hoursActive noise cancellation (ANC):no

Skullcandy Crusher Wireless Review: Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Headphones category and whether it is worth buying.

Skullcandy Crusher Wireless
6.6/10

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

5.9

Technical score

20%

9.4

User score

â–²Better than 67% of headphones
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–²Better than 66%
5.9

Technical score

Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

52%

5.7

Sound

20%

5.4

Features

10%

6.6

Design

8%

5.7

Connectivity

6%

7.7

Battery

4%

8.2

Calls & Controls

â–²Better than 53%
9.4

User score

User score
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
★Better than 99%
  • skullcandy-crusher-wireless
  • skullcandy-crusher-wireless
  • skullcandy-crusher-wireless
  • skullcandy-crusher-wireless
  • skullcandy-crusher-wireless
  • skullcandy-crusher-wireless
  • skullcandy-crusher-wireless
  • skullcandy-crusher-wireless
  • skullcandy-crusher-wireless
  • skullcandy-crusher-wireless
skullcandy-crusher-wireless
skullcandy-crusher-wireless
skullcandy-crusher-wireless
skullcandy-crusher-wireless
skullcandy-crusher-wireless
skullcandy-crusher-wireless
skullcandy-crusher-wireless
skullcandy-crusher-wireless
skullcandy-crusher-wireless
skullcandy-crusher-wireless
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of pair of headphones Skullcandy Crusher Wireless

Technical score
Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

52%

5.7

Sound

20%

5.4

Features

10%

6.6

Design

8%

5.7

Connectivity

6%

7.7

Battery

4%

8.2

Calls & Controls

5.9
User score
User score
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.4
Popularity
Popularity
10/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Skullcandy Crusher Wireless has a popularity score of 10 points, which is higher than that of 91.9% of products in this category.
10
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

10

Price

7.6
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
no
This pair of headphones does not support active noise cancellation. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
dynamic
Driver size
40 mm
This pair of headphones uses a driver size of 40 mm, larger driver size than 28.6% of headphones and equal to 53.3% of headphones.
Number of drivers
2
This pair of headphones uses 2 drivers, more drivers than 96% of headphones and equal to 2.5% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
20 Hz
This pair of headphones reaches a lowest frequency of 20 Hz, higher lowest frequency than 50.8% of headphones and equal to 47.3% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
yes
This pair of headphones supports a noise-canceling microphone. 61.1% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
yes
This pair of headphones is headset-ready, 84.8% is not. 15.2% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
1
This pair of headphones has 1 microphones, more microphones than 26.9% of headphones and equal to 50.9% of headphones.
Boom microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not include a boom microphone. 13.5% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
?
Show more
Connectivity
wireless
This pair of headphones supports wireless connectivity, more flexible connectivity than 50.8% of headphones and equal to 49.2% of headphones.
Bluetooth version
4.1
This pair of headphones uses Bluetooth version 4.1, newer Bluetooth version than 62.3% of headphones and equal to 5.4% of headphones.
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
This pair of headphones offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m, higher Bluetooth range than 2.7% of headphones and equal to 80.6% of headphones.
Audio latency
162 ms
This pair of headphones has audio latency of 162 ms, higher audio latency than 57.3% of headphones and equal to 0.3% of headphones.
Multipoint support
?
Show more
Ambient sound mode
no
This pair of headphones does not offer ambient sound mode. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
EQ support
yes
This pair of headphones supports EQ customization. 76.8% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
no
This pair of headphones does not work with a companion app. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
N/A
Voice assistant support
yes
This pair of headphones supports voice assistants. 39.2% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
40 hours
This pair of headphones offers battery life of 40 hours, higher battery life than 62.7% of headphones and equal to 4.8% of headphones.
Battery life with ANC
N/A
Charging time
2.5 hours
This pair of headphones needs 2.5 hours to charge, higher charging time than 53% of headphones and equal to 13% of headphones.
Quick charge
yes
This pair of headphones supports quick charge. 67% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
1,200 mAh
This pair of headphones has a battery capacity of 1,200 mAh, higher battery capacity than 94.6% of headphones and equal to 2.8% of headphones.
Show more
Brand name
Skullcandy
Form factor
over-ear
Weight
275 g
This pair of headphones weighs 275 g, heavier than 72% of headphones and equal to 0.5% of headphones.
Acoustic design
closed-back
Clamp force
5.3
This pair of headphones has a clamp force of 5.3, higher clamp force than 72.3% of headphones and equal to 6.5% of headphones.
Show more

Skullcandy Crusher Wireless vs the average pair of headphones

246810TotalDesignSoundBatteryConnectivityCalls & ControlsFeatures
  • EQ customization
    This pair of headphones supports EQ customization, the average pair of headphones does not. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
  • More flexible connectivity
    This pair of headphones offers more flexible connectivity than the average pair of headphones (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    wireless vs wired
  • Clear call microphone
    This pair of headphones offers a clear call microphone, while the average pair of headphones does not. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
  • Quick charge support
    This pair of headphones supports quick charge, the average pair of headphones does not. 33% of headphones support quick charge.
  • AptX Lossless support
    This pair of headphones supports aptX Lossless, the average pair of headphones does not. 4.8% of headphones support aptX Lossless.
  • On-device controls
    This pair of headphones includes on-device controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
  • 1 more drivers
    This pair of headphones uses more drivers than the average pair of headphones (2 vs 1). The average headphones use 1 drivers.
    2 vs 1
  • 2.07x higher battery capacity
    This pair of headphones has a higher battery capacity than the average pair of headphones (1,200 mAh vs 580 mAh). The average headphones have a battery capacity of 580 mAh.
    1,200 mAh vs 580 mAh
  • 17.5% higher user score
    User score
    9.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Skullcandy Crusher Wireless
    the average pair of headphones
    Skullcandy Crusher Wireless has a higher user score than the average pair of headphones (9.4 vs 8).
    9.4 vs 8
  • 70.4% more popular
    Skullcandy Crusher Wireless is more popular than the average pair of headphones (10 vs 5.9).
    10 vs 5.87
  • 26 mm more spacious earcup width
    This pair of headphones offers more spacious earcup width than the average pair of headphones (70 mm vs 44 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup width of 44 mm.
    70 mm vs 44 mm
  • Foldable design
    This pair of headphones has a foldable design, the average pair of headphones does not. 48.3% of headphones are foldable.
  • 1 more drivers
    This pair of headphones uses more drivers than the average pair of headphones (2 vs 1). The average headphones use 1 drivers.
    2 vs 1
  • Quick charge support
    This pair of headphones supports quick charge, the average pair of headphones does not. 33% of headphones support quick charge.
  • 2.07x higher battery capacity
    This pair of headphones has a higher battery capacity than the average pair of headphones (1,200 mAh vs 580 mAh). The average headphones have a battery capacity of 580 mAh.
    1,200 mAh vs 580 mAh
  • 10 hours longer battery life
    This pair of headphones has a higher battery life than the average pair of headphones (40 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life of 30 hours.
    40 hours vs 30 hours
  • Play while charging
    This pair of headphones can play while charging, the average pair of headphones cannot. 29.1% of headphones support play while charging.
  • Rechargeable battery
    This pair of headphones has a rechargeable battery, the average pair of headphones does not. 47.9% of headphones have a rechargeable battery.
  • More flexible connectivity
    This pair of headphones offers more flexible connectivity than the average pair of headphones (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    wireless vs wired
  • AptX Lossless support
    This pair of headphones supports aptX Lossless, the average pair of headphones does not. 4.8% of headphones support aptX Lossless.
  • Clear call microphone
    This pair of headphones offers a clear call microphone, while the average pair of headphones does not. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
  • On-device controls
    This pair of headphones includes on-device controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
  • Wind noise reduction
    This pair of headphones reduces wind noise, the average pair of headphones does not. 34.3% of headphones support wind noise reduction.
  • EQ customization
    This pair of headphones supports EQ customization, the average pair of headphones does not. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
  • 2.7 % higher distortion
    This pair of headphones has a higher total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (3 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    3 % vs 0.3 %
  • 11.61 dB/mW lower sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a lower sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (90.4 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    90.39 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • 26.1% higher weight
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (275 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    275 g vs 218 g
  • 0.5 hours longer charging time
    This pair of headphones has a higher charging time than the average pair of headphones (2.5 hours vs 2 hours). The average headphones need 2 hours to charge.
    2.5 hours vs 2 hours
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    20 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 1 higher clamp force
    This pair of headphones has a higher clamp force than the average pair of headphones (5.3 vs 4.3). The average headphones have a clamp force of 4.3.
    5.3 vs 4.3
  • 5 mm tighter earcup height
    This pair of headphones has tighter earcup height than the average pair of headphones (55 mm vs 60 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup height of 60 mm.
    55 mm vs 60 mm
  • 20 dB lower max SPL
    This pair of headphones has a lower max SPL than the average pair of headphones (90 dB vs 110 dB). The average headphones reach a max SPL of 110 dB.
    90 dB vs 110 dB
  • 26.1% higher weight
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (275 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    275 g vs 218 g
  • 1 higher clamp force
    This pair of headphones has a higher clamp force than the average pair of headphones (5.3 vs 4.3). The average headphones have a clamp force of 4.3.
    5.3 vs 4.3
  • 5 mm tighter earcup height
    This pair of headphones has tighter earcup height than the average pair of headphones (55 mm vs 60 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup height of 60 mm.
    55 mm vs 60 mm
  • 2.7 % higher distortion
    This pair of headphones has a higher total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (3 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    3 % vs 0.3 %
  • 11.61 dB/mW lower sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a lower sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (90.4 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    90.39 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    20 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 20 dB lower max SPL
    This pair of headphones has a lower max SPL than the average pair of headphones (90 dB vs 110 dB). The average headphones reach a max SPL of 110 dB.
    90 dB vs 110 dB
  • 12.61 dB SPL lower sound pressure level
    This pair of headphones has a lower sound pressure level than the average pair of headphones (90.4 dB SPL vs 103 dB SPL). The average headphones reach a sound pressure level of 103 dB SPL.
    90.39 dB SPL vs 103 dB SPL
  • 0.5 hours longer charging time
    This pair of headphones has a higher charging time than the average pair of headphones (2.5 hours vs 2 hours). The average headphones need 2 hours to charge.
    2.5 hours vs 2 hours
  • 12 ms higher audio latency
    This pair of headphones has a higher audio latency than the average pair of headphones (162 ms vs 150 ms). The average headphones have audio latency of 150 ms.
    162 ms vs 150 ms

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Prashanth Sai Sankar
≈ estimated
06/01/2021
Long-term review · about a year of regular use
Verdict
Skullcandy Crusher Wireless is a solid pair with long battery life, but its vibrating bass slider feels gimmicky.
9.0
Fit Man Style
≈ estimated
02/05/2019
Long-term test · two months of gym use
Verdict
Skullcandy Crusher Wireless is recommended: good value for the money, durable and stays in place, though it has minor drawbacks.
9.0
TechteamGB
✓ explicit
19/03/2018
Hands-on review · sound, battery and features
Verdict
Skullcandy Crusher Wireless is a solid all-round pick with decent build and sound, not the best available but far from bad.
4.0
GYMCADDY
≈ estimated
01/09/2017
Hands-on review · two weeks of use, comfort and sound
Verdict
Skullcandy Crusher Wireless has excellent build quality, but comfort, sound and controls hold it back, so it is not recommended right now.
9.0
Flossy Carter
≈ estimated
04/01/2017
Hands-on review · bass, battery and build tests
Verdict
Skullcandy Crusher Wireless is a strong buy for bass lovers, even though the build does not feel premium.
9.0
Nick Capaccio
≈ estimated
19/11/2016
Hands-on review · sound, Bluetooth and battery tests
Verdict
Skullcandy Crusher Wireless is strongly recommended for bass fans, with great build, long battery life and a few small quirks.
7.0
Inspire2Rise
≈ estimated
22/03/2017
Hands-on review · build and haptic bass
Verdict
Skullcandy Crusher Wireless is only recommended for bass lovers who want extra punch, not for most listeners.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

S
soundguys.com
04/08/2022
Summary of the review
R
rtings.com
24/08/2018
Summary of the review
H
headphonereview.com
15/08/2017
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
02/12/2016
Summary of the review
A
au.pcmag.com
03/12/2016
Summary of the review
X
xander51.medium.com
08/11/2016
Summary of the review
T
techgearlab.com
07/01/2018
Summary of the review
K
kopfhoerer.de
10/05/2017
Summary of the review
N
netzwelt.de
02/11/2016
Summary of the review
S
spiegel.de
10/04/2017
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
22/12/2016
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
01/02/2017
Summary of the review
C
clubic.com
09/12/2019
Summary of the review
F
freelastica.com
2017 (Updated date not specified)
Summary of the review
R
rush.nl
20/05/2017
Summary of the review
N
nwtv.nl
17/11/2017
Summary of the review
C
coolesuggesties.nl
16/05/2020
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Skullcandy Crusher Wireless

  • Adjustable haptic bass slider allows for intense, physically-felt bass levels
  • Exceptional battery life, often cited around 40 hours of playback
  • Fast charging capabilities, providing several hours of use from a 10-minute charge
  • Solid, durable build quality featuring metal reinforcement and aluminum rails
  • Easy-to-use physical controls for volume and music playback
  • Good wireless Bluetooth range and stability

What customers don't like about Skullcandy Crusher Wireless

  • High clamping force can feel overly tight and cause discomfort during long sessions
  • Bass can become muddy, distorted, or overwhelming when the slider is maxed out
  • Poor breathability leads to ear cups getting warm quickly
  • Sub-par noise isolation that fails to block out loud environments or engine rumbles
  • Reports of durability issues with plastic joints and headbands over long-term use
  • Notable audio latency makes them less suitable for wireless gaming and movies

Verdict

The Skullcandy Crusher Wireless is an over-ear Bluetooth headset renowned for its patented Sensory Haptic Bass technology, which utilizes dual 40mm drivers and a dedicated slider to deliver adjustable, bone-rattling low-end vibrations. Key specifications include a massive 40-hour battery life with rapid charge capabilities (10 minutes for 3 hours of play), a frequency response of 20Hz–20kHz, and an impedance of 33 Ohms. Its primary strengths are its exceptional battery longevity, durable collapsible design, and a fun, immersive bass experience ideal for EDM and movies. However, notable drawbacks include a tight clamping force that can cause discomfort during long sessions, significant sound leakage at higher volumes, and a lack of active noise cancellation (ANC), resulting in subpar isolation in noisy environments.

Compare Skullcandy Crusher Wireless with other products in the Headphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Skullcandy Crusher Wireless and other products in the Headphones category

No results found