Scored using Headphones Methodology v1.0
Headphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Headphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Headphones Methodology v1.0

Master & Dynamic MW50 Review | 93 Data compared

Avg. price:~ÂŁ400Form factor:on-ear/over-earConnectivity:wirelessBattery life:16 hoursActive noise cancellation (ANC):no

Master & Dynamic MW50 Review: Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Headphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.7/10

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
âś•
What it is
An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

6.7

Technical score

20%

?

User score

â–˛Better than 69% of headphones
7.2

Value for money

Value for money
7.2/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

â–ĽWorse than 59%
6.7

Technical score

Technical score
6.7/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

52%

7.1

Sound

20%

5.1

Features

10%

6.8

Design

8%

7.1

Connectivity

6%

7.0

Battery

4%

8.6

Calls & Controls

â–˛Better than 72%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ ÂŁ400
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of pair of headphones Master & Dynamic MW50

Technical score
Technical score
6.7/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

52%

7.1

Sound

20%

5.1

Features

10%

6.8

Design

8%

7.1

Connectivity

6%

7.0

Battery

4%

8.6

Calls & Controls

6.7
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Master & Dynamic MW50 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than that of 73.4% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.2/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

7.2
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
no
This pair of headphones does not support active noise cancellation. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
dynamic
Driver size
40 mm
This pair of headphones uses a driver size of 40 mm, larger driver size than 28.6% of headphones and equal to 53.3% of headphones.
Number of drivers
1
This pair of headphones uses 1 drivers, fewer drivers than 4% of headphones and equal to 96% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
5 Hz
This pair of headphones reaches a lowest frequency of 5 Hz, lower lowest frequency than 86.3% of headphones and equal to 10.8% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
yes
This pair of headphones supports a noise-canceling microphone. 61.1% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
yes
This pair of headphones is headset-ready, 84.8% is not. 15.2% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
2
This pair of headphones has 2 microphones, more microphones than 77.9% of headphones and equal to 8.9% of headphones.
Boom microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not include a boom microphone. 13.5% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
?
Show more
Connectivity
wireless
This pair of headphones supports wireless connectivity, more flexible connectivity than 50.8% of headphones and equal to 49.2% of headphones.
Bluetooth version
4.1
This pair of headphones uses Bluetooth version 4.1, newer Bluetooth version than 62.3% of headphones and equal to 5.4% of headphones.
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
Audio latency
35 ms
This pair of headphones has audio latency of 35 ms, lower audio latency than 93.8% of headphones and equal to 0.2% of headphones.
Multipoint support
yes
This pair of headphones supports multipoint. 69.4% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
no
This pair of headphones does not offer ambient sound mode. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
EQ support
?
Companion app
no
This pair of headphones does not work with a companion app. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
N/A
Voice assistant support
yes
This pair of headphones supports voice assistants. 39.2% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
16 hours
This pair of headphones offers battery life of 16 hours, lower battery life than 77% of headphones and equal to 2.3% of headphones.
Battery life with ANC
N/A
Charging time
2 hours
This pair of headphones needs 2 hours to charge, lower charging time than 47.8% of headphones and equal to 39% of headphones.
Quick charge
yes
This pair of headphones supports quick charge. 67% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
?
Show more
Brand name
Master & Dynamic
Form factor
on-ear/over-ear
Weight
240 g
This pair of headphones weighs 240 g, heavier than 57.6% of headphones and equal to 1.5% of headphones.
Acoustic design
closed-back
Clamp force
4.4
This pair of headphones has a clamp force of 4.4, higher clamp force than 50.9% of headphones and equal to 4.2% of headphones.
Show more

Master & Dynamic MW50 vs the average pair of headphones

246810TotalDesignSoundBatteryConnectivityCalls & ControlsFeatures
  • Hi-Res Audio certification
    This pair of headphones has Hi-Res Audio certification, the average pair of headphones does not. 23.1% of headphones are Hi-Res Audio certified.
  • 13 Hz lower bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a lower lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (5 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    5 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 115 ms lower audio latency
    This pair of headphones has a lower audio latency than the average pair of headphones (35 ms vs 150 ms). The average headphones have audio latency of 150 ms.
    35 ms vs 150 ms
  • Multipoint support
    This pair of headphones supports multipoint, the average pair of headphones does not. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
  • More flexible connectivity
    This pair of headphones offers more flexible connectivity than the average pair of headphones (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    wireless vs wired
  • Clear call microphone
    This pair of headphones offers a clear call microphone, while the average pair of headphones does not. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
  • Quick charge support
    This pair of headphones supports quick charge, the average pair of headphones does not. 33% of headphones support quick charge.
  • On-device controls
    This pair of headphones includes on-device controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
  • Hi-Res Audio certification
    This pair of headphones has Hi-Res Audio certification, the average pair of headphones does not. 23.1% of headphones are Hi-Res Audio certified.
  • 13 Hz lower bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a lower lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (5 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    5 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 10,000 Hz higher treble extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher highest frequency than the average pair of headphones (30,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz). The average headphones reach a highest frequency of 20,000 Hz.
    30,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • 0.2 % lower distortion
    This pair of headphones has a lower total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (0.1 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    0.1 % vs 0.3 %
  • 4 dB/mW higher sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a higher sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (106 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    106 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • Quick charge support
    This pair of headphones supports quick charge, the average pair of headphones does not. 33% of headphones support quick charge.
  • USB-C charging
    This pair of headphones uses USB-C charging, the average pair of headphones does not. 29.5% of headphones use USB Type-C.
  • Removable battery
    This pair of headphones has a removable battery, the average pair of headphones does not. 7.8% of headphones have a removable battery.
  • Rechargeable battery
    This pair of headphones has a rechargeable battery, the average pair of headphones does not. 47.9% of headphones have a rechargeable battery.
  • 115 ms lower audio latency
    This pair of headphones has a lower audio latency than the average pair of headphones (35 ms vs 150 ms). The average headphones have audio latency of 150 ms.
    35 ms vs 150 ms
  • Multipoint support
    This pair of headphones supports multipoint, the average pair of headphones does not. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
  • More flexible connectivity
    This pair of headphones offers more flexible connectivity than the average pair of headphones (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    wireless vs wired
  • AAC codec support
    This pair of headphones supports AAC, the average pair of headphones does not. 32.2% of headphones support AAC.
  • AptX support
    This pair of headphones supports aptX, the average pair of headphones does not. 18.4% of headphones support aptX.
  • Multipoint connections
    This pair of headphones supports multipoint connections, while the average pair of headphones does not. 30.2% of headphones support multipoint connections.
    supports multipoint for up to 2 devices.
  • Clear call microphone
    This pair of headphones offers a clear call microphone, while the average pair of headphones does not. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
  • On-device controls
    This pair of headphones includes on-device controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
  • 1 more microphones
    This pair of headphones has more microphones than the average pair of headphones (2 vs 1). The average headphones have 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • Wind noise reduction
    This pair of headphones reduces wind noise, the average pair of headphones does not. 34.3% of headphones support wind noise reduction.
  • 14 hours shorter battery life
    This pair of headphones has a lower battery life than the average pair of headphones (16 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life of 30 hours.
    16 hours vs 30 hours
  • 4.44x more expensive
    Master & Dynamic MW50 is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (ÂŁ400 vs ÂŁ90).
    ÂŁ400 vs ÂŁ90
  • 5.87x less popular
    Master & Dynamic MW50 is less popular than the average pair of headphones (1 vs 5.9).
    1 vs 5.87
  • 10.1% higher weight
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (240 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    240 g vs 218 g
  • Tangle-prone cable
    This pair of headphones uses a tangle-prone cable, while the average pair of headphones is easier to manage. 64.2% of headphones use a tangle-free cable.
  • 4.44x more expensive
    Master & Dynamic MW50 is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (ÂŁ400 vs ÂŁ90).
    ÂŁ400 vs ÂŁ90
  • 5.87x less popular
    Master & Dynamic MW50 is less popular than the average pair of headphones (1 vs 5.9).
    1 vs 5.87
  • 10.1% higher weight
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (240 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    240 g vs 218 g
  • Tangle-prone cable
    This pair of headphones uses a tangle-prone cable, while the average pair of headphones is easier to manage. 64.2% of headphones use a tangle-free cable.
  • 14 hours shorter battery life
    This pair of headphones has a lower battery life than the average pair of headphones (16 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life of 30 hours.
    16 hours vs 30 hours

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
pcmag.com
22/12/2016
Summary of the review
W
wired.com
14/12/2016
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
17/04/2017
Summary of the review
T
theaudiophileman.com
19/04/2017
Summary of the review
T
techaeris.com
23/06/2017
Summary of the review
H
headphonereview.com
10/11/2017
Summary of the review
W
whathifi.com
05/02/2018
Summary of the review
S
soundguys.com
19/04/2018
Summary of the review
T
themasterswitch.com
04/07/2018
Summary of the review
D
digitaltrends.com
23/08/2019
Summary of the review
T
the-gadgeteer.com
20/07/2017
Summary of the review
N
n-tv.de
09/09/2018
Summary of the review
M
major-tech.de
17/06/2019
Summary of the review
K
kopfhoerer.de
29/05/2019
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
09/03/2017
Summary of the review
O
on-mag.fr
26/02/2019
Summary of the review
O
on-mag.fr
28/12/2016
Summary of the review
A
afdigitale.it
05/02/2018
Summary of the review
G
gqitalia.it
06/11/2018
Summary of the review
N
nerdmovieproductions.it
04/10/2018
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Master & Dynamic MW50

  • Premium build quality featuring authentic cowhide and lambskin leather
  • Extremely comfortable memory foam ear cushions for long listening sessions
  • Detailed, rich, and warm sound signature with excellent vocal clarity
  • Strong and reliable Bluetooth wireless signal range
  • Modular magnetic design allows easy swapping between on-ear and over-ear pads
  • Beautiful and stylish aesthetics made from aluminum and stainless steel
  • High-quality braided cables and luxurious accessories included in the packaging

What customers don't like about Master & Dynamic MW50

  • Very expensive retail price compared to other consumer headphones
  • Earcups do not fold flat into a compact form factor for easy travel
  • Onboard physical control buttons are small and difficult to use
  • Average battery life of 16 hours falls below competitor standards
  • Noticeable sound leakage and poor passive noise isolation
  • Over-ear cups can feel somewhat cramped or small for users with larger ears
  • Microphone struggles with background noise and wind rejection during calls

Verdict

The Master & Dynamic MW50 is a premium wireless headphone featuring 40mm high-performance beryllium drivers that deliver a rich, warm sound signature across a broad frequency range of 5Hz – 30,000Hz. Crafted from luxury materials including heavy-grain cowhide leather, lambskin-wrapped memory foam ear pads, and machined aluminium, the MW50 weighs approximately 240g and utilizes Bluetooth 4.1 with aptX for high-quality audio streaming. Key pros include its exceptional build quality, an innovative external aluminium antenna for extended signal range, and a 16-hour battery life with rapid USB-C charging. However, notable cons include its high price point, the lack of active noise cancellation (ANC), and a non-folding design that may limit portability for some users.

Compare Master & Dynamic MW50 with other products in the Headphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Master & Dynamic MW50 and other products in the Headphones category

No results found