Scored using Headphones Methodology v1.0
Headphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Headphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Headphones Methodology v1.0

Beyerdynamic Aventho 200 Review | 93 Data compared

Avg. price:~£200Form factor:on-earConnectivity:wirelessBattery life:63 hoursActive noise cancellation (ANC):yes

Beyerdynamic Aventho 200 Review: Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Headphones category and whether it is worth buying.

8.1

Overall score

Score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

8.5

Technical score

20%

6.5

User score

★Better than 92% of headphones
8.5

Technical score

Technical score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

52%

9.0

Sound

20%

7.7

Features

10%

6.5

Design

8%

8.4

Connectivity

6%

9.4

Battery

4%

9.2

Calls & Controls

★Better than 97% of headphones
6.5

User score

User score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.8

User ratings

30%

3.6

Number of reviews

Based on 24 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 92% of headphones
  • beyerdynamic-aventho-200
  • beyerdynamic-aventho-200
  • beyerdynamic-aventho-200
  • beyerdynamic-aventho-200
  • beyerdynamic-aventho-200
  • beyerdynamic-aventho-200
  • beyerdynamic-aventho-200
  • beyerdynamic-aventho-200
  • beyerdynamic-aventho-200
  • beyerdynamic-aventho-200
beyerdynamic-aventho-200
beyerdynamic-aventho-200
beyerdynamic-aventho-200
beyerdynamic-aventho-200
beyerdynamic-aventho-200
beyerdynamic-aventho-200
beyerdynamic-aventho-200
beyerdynamic-aventho-200
beyerdynamic-aventho-200
beyerdynamic-aventho-200

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of pair of headphones Beyerdynamic Aventho 200

Technical score
Technical score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

52%

9.0

Sound

20%

7.7

Features

10%

6.5

Design

8%

8.4

Connectivity

6%

9.4

Battery

4%

9.2

Calls & Controls

8.5
User score
User score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.8

User ratings

30%

3.6

Number of reviews

Based on 24 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
6.5
Popularity
Popularity
3.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Beyerdynamic Aventho 200 has a popularity score of 3.6 points, which is lower than that of 67.8% of products in this category.
3.6
Value for money
Value for money
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

8.1

Overall score

40%

9.5

Price

8.5
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
yes
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
yes
This pair of headphones supports active noise cancellation. 72.6% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
dynamic
Driver size
45 mm
Driver size
45 mm
This pair of headphones uses a driver size of 45 mm, larger driver size than 83.7% of headphones and equal to 2.4% of headphones.
Number of drivers
1
Number of drivers
1
This pair of headphones uses 1 drivers, fewer drivers than 4% of headphones and equal to 96% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
10 Hz
Lowest frequency
10 Hz
This pair of headphones reaches a lowest frequency of 10 Hz, lower lowest frequency than 67.2% of headphones and equal to 12.6% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
yes
Noise-canceling microphone
yes
This pair of headphones supports a noise-canceling microphone. 61.1% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
yes
Can be used as a headset
yes
This pair of headphones is headset-ready, 84.8% is not. 15.2% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
6
Number of microphones
6
This pair of headphones has 6 microphones, more microphones than 96% of headphones and equal to 2.4% of headphones.
Boom microphone
no
Boom microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not include a boom microphone. 13.5% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
?
Show more
Connectivity
wireless
Connectivity
wireless
This pair of headphones supports wireless connectivity, more flexible connectivity than 50.8% of headphones and equal to 49.2% of headphones.
Bluetooth version
5.4
Bluetooth version
5.4
This pair of headphones uses Bluetooth version 5.4, newer Bluetooth version than 95.2% of headphones and equal to 4.1% of headphones.
Maximum Bluetooth range
15 m
Maximum Bluetooth range
15 m
This pair of headphones offers a Bluetooth range of 15 m, higher Bluetooth range than 84.9% of headphones and equal to 6.2% of headphones.
Audio latency
60 ms
Audio latency
60 ms
This pair of headphones has audio latency of 60 ms, lower audio latency than 65.5% of headphones and equal to 6.2% of headphones.
Multipoint support
yes
Multipoint support
yes
This pair of headphones supports multipoint. 69.4% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
yes
Ambient sound mode
yes
This pair of headphones supports ambient sound mode. 75.2% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
EQ support
yes
EQ support
yes
This pair of headphones supports EQ customization. 76.8% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
yes
Companion app
yes
This pair of headphones works with a companion app. 78.4% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
N/A
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
This pair of headphones supports voice assistants. 39.2% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
63 hours
Battery life
63 hours
This pair of headphones offers battery life of 63 hours, higher battery life than 85.4% of headphones.
Battery life with ANC
40 hours
Battery life with ANC
40 hours
This pair of headphones offers battery life with ANC of 40 hours, higher battery life with ANC than 61.5% of headphones and equal to 11% of headphones.
Charging time
1.5 hours
Charging time
1.5 hours
This pair of headphones needs 1.5 hours to charge, lower charging time than 87.2% of headphones and equal to 7.6% of headphones.
Quick charge
yes
Quick charge
yes
This pair of headphones supports quick charge. 67% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
1,050 mAh
Battery capacity
1,050 mAh
This pair of headphones has a battery capacity of 1,050 mAh, higher battery capacity than 91.3% of headphones and equal to 1.2% of headphones.
Show more
Brand name
Beyerdynamic
Form factor
on-ear
Weight
293 g
Weight
293 g
This pair of headphones weighs 293 g, heavier than 79.3% of headphones and equal to 0.3% of headphones.
Acoustic design
closed-back
Clamp force
?
Show more

Beyerdynamic Aventho 200 vs the average pair of headphones

246810TotalDesignSoundBatteryConnectivityCalls & ControlsFeatures
  • Active noise cancellation
    Active noise cancellation (ANC)
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports active noise cancellation, the average pair of headphones does not. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
  • Spatial audio support
    Spatial audio
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports spatial audio, the average pair of headphones does not. 15.9% of headphones support spatial audio.
  • Ambient sound mode
    Ambient sound mode
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports ambient sound mode, the average pair of headphones does not. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
  • EQ customization
    EQ support
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports EQ customization, the average pair of headphones does not. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
  • Companion app support
    Companion app
    yes
    This pair of headphones works with a companion app, the average pair of headphones does not. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
  • 5 mm larger driver size
    Driver size
    45 mm
    This pair of headphones uses a larger driver size than the average pair of headphones (45 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
    45 mm vs 40 mm
  • Multipoint support
    Multipoint support
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports multipoint, the average pair of headphones does not. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
  • Wear detection
    In/on-ear detection
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports wear detection, the average pair of headphones does not. 8.6% of headphones support in/on-ear detection.
  • 17% better value for money
    Beyerdynamic Aventho 200 has better value for money than the average pair of headphones (8.51 vs 7.3).
    8.51 vs 7.27
  • Foldable design
    Foldable
    yes
    This pair of headphones has a foldable design, the average pair of headphones does not. 48.3% of headphones are foldable.
  • Water resistance
    Water resistance
    yes
    This pair of headphones is water resistant, the average pair of headphones is not. 20.2% of headphones are water resistant.
  • Better IP rating
    IP rating
    IP53
    This pair of headphones has a better IP rating than the average pair of headphones (IP53 vs none). The average headphones have an IP rating of none.
    IP53 vs none
  • Active noise cancellation
    Active noise cancellation (ANC)
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports active noise cancellation, the average pair of headphones does not. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
  • Spatial audio support
    Spatial audio
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports spatial audio, the average pair of headphones does not. 15.9% of headphones support spatial audio.
  • 5 mm larger driver size
    Driver size
    45 mm
    This pair of headphones uses a larger driver size than the average pair of headphones (45 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
    45 mm vs 40 mm
  • 8 Hz lower bass extension
    Lowest frequency
    10 Hz
    This pair of headphones has a lower lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (10 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    10 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 3 dB/mW higher sensitivity
    Sensitivity
    105 dB/mW
    This pair of headphones has a higher sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (105 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    105 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • 2,000 Hz higher treble extension
    Highest frequency
    22,000 Hz
    This pair of headphones has a higher highest frequency than the average pair of headphones (22000 Hz vs 20000 Hz). The average headphones reach a highest frequency of 20000 Hz.
    22,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • 33 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    63 hours
    This pair of headphones has a higher battery life than the average pair of headphones (63 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life of 30 hours.
    63 hours vs 30 hours
  • Quick charge support
    Quick charge
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports quick charge, the average pair of headphones does not. 33% of headphones support quick charge.
  • 0.5 hours shorter charging time
    Charging time
    1.5 hours
    This pair of headphones has a lower charging time than the average pair of headphones (1.5 hours vs 2 hours). The average headphones need 2 hours to charge.
    1.5 hours vs 2 hours
  • 81% higher battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,050 mAh
    This pair of headphones has a higher battery capacity than the average pair of headphones (1050 mAh vs 580 mAh). The average headphones have a battery capacity of 580 mAh.
    1,050 mAh vs 580 mAh
  • 10 hours longer ANC battery life
    Battery life with ANC
    40 hours
    This pair of headphones has a higher battery life with ANC than the average pair of headphones (40 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life with ANC of 30 hours.
    40 hours vs 30 hours
  • USB-C charging
    USB Type-C
    yes
    This pair of headphones uses USB-C charging, the average pair of headphones does not. 29.5% of headphones use USB Type-C.
  • Play while charging
    Play while charging
    yes
    This pair of headphones can play while charging, the average pair of headphones cannot. 29.1% of headphones support play while charging.
  • Removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    This pair of headphones has a removable battery, the average pair of headphones does not. 7.8% of headphones have a removable battery.
  • Rechargeable battery
    Has a rechargeable battery
    yes
    This pair of headphones has a rechargeable battery, the average pair of headphones does not. 47.9% of headphones have a rechargeable battery.
  • Multipoint support
    Multipoint support
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports multipoint, the average pair of headphones does not. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
  • More flexible connectivity
    Connectivity
    wireless
    This pair of headphones offers more flexible connectivity than the average pair of headphones (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    wireless vs wired
  • AptX Adaptive support
    aptX Adaptive
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports aptX Adaptive, the average pair of headphones does not. 6.7% of headphones support aptX Adaptive.
  • LE Audio support
    Bluetooth LE Audio
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports LE Audio, the average pair of headphones does not. 11.6% of headphones support Bluetooth LE Audio.
  • AptX HD support
    aptX HD
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports aptX HD, the average pair of headphones does not. 7.6% of headphones support aptX HD.
  • AptX Lossless support
    aptX Lossless
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports aptX Lossless, the average pair of headphones does not. 4.8% of headphones support aptX Lossless.
  • 90 ms lower audio latency
    Audio latency
    60 ms
    This pair of headphones has a lower audio latency than the average pair of headphones (60 ms vs 150 ms). The average headphones have audio latency of 150 ms.
    60 ms vs 150 ms
  • 5 m longer Bluetooth range
    Maximum Bluetooth range
    15 m
    This pair of headphones has a higher Bluetooth range than the average pair of headphones (15 m vs 10 m). The average headphones offer a Bluetooth range of 10 m.
    15 m vs 10 m
  • AAC codec support
    AAC
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports AAC, the average pair of headphones does not. 32.2% of headphones support AAC.
  • AptX support
    aptX
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports aptX, the average pair of headphones does not. 18.4% of headphones support aptX.
  • Fast pairing support
    Fast pairing
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports fast pairing, the average pair of headphones does not. 14% of headphones support fast pairing.
  • Multipoint connections
    Multipoint connections
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports multipoint connections, while the average pair of headphones does not. 30.2% of headphones support multipoint connections.
    supports multipoint for up to 2 devices.
  • Low-latency game mode
    Low-latency game mode
    yes
    This pair of headphones includes a low-latency game mode, the average pair of headphones does not. 21.2% of headphones support low-latency game mode.
  • Clear call microphone
    Noise-canceling microphone
    yes
    This pair of headphones offers a clear call microphone, while the average pair of headphones does not. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
  • On-device controls
    On-device controls
    yes
    This pair of headphones includes on-device controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
  • In-line controls
    In-line controls
    yes
    This pair of headphones includes in-line controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 36.6% of headphones support in-line controls.
  • 5 more microphones
    Number of microphones
    6
    This pair of headphones has more microphones than the average pair of headphones (6 vs 1). The average headphones have 1 microphones.
    6 vs 1
  • Sidetone support
    Sidetone
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports sidetone, the average pair of headphones does not. 25.3% of headphones support sidetone.
  • Ambient sound mode
    Ambient sound mode
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports ambient sound mode, the average pair of headphones does not. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
  • EQ customization
    EQ support
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports EQ customization, the average pair of headphones does not. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
  • Companion app support
    Companion app
    yes
    This pair of headphones works with a companion app, the average pair of headphones does not. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
  • Wear detection
    In/on-ear detection
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports wear detection, the average pair of headphones does not. 8.6% of headphones support in/on-ear detection.
  • Find-my-headphones feature
    Find my headphones
    yes
    This pair of headphones supports find-my-headphones features, the average pair of headphones does not. 8.7% of headphones support Find My Headphones.
  • 9 newer release date
    Release date
    2025
    This pair of headphones was released more recently than the average pair of headphones (2025 vs 2016). The average headphones were released in 2016.
    September 2025
    2025 vs 2016
  • 34.4% higher weight
    Weight
    293 g
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (293 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    293 g vs 218 g
  • 22.2% lower user score
    User score
    6.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Beyerdynamic Aventho 200
    the average pair of headphones
    Beyerdynamic Aventho 200 has a lower user score than the average pair of headphones (6.55 vs 8.000).
    6.55 vs 8
  • 2.22x more expensive
    Beyerdynamic Aventho 200 is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (£200 vs £90).
    £200 vs £90
  • 61.8% less popular
    Beyerdynamic Aventho 200 is less popular than the average pair of headphones (3.63 vs 5.9).
    3.63 vs 5.87
  • 22.2% lower user score
    User score
    6.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Beyerdynamic Aventho 200
    the average pair of headphones
    Beyerdynamic Aventho 200 has a lower user score than the average pair of headphones (6.55 vs 8.000).
    6.55 vs 8
  • 2.22x more expensive
    Beyerdynamic Aventho 200 is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (£200 vs £90).
    £200 vs £90
  • 61.8% less popular
    Beyerdynamic Aventho 200 is less popular than the average pair of headphones (3.63 vs 5.9).
    3.63 vs 5.87
  • 34.4% higher weight
    Weight
    293 g
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (293 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    293 g vs 218 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

S
soundgale.com
23/12/2025
Summary of the review
S
stadt-bremerhaven.de
14/03/2026
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
23/03/2026
Summary of the review
A
areadvd.de
04/02/2026
Summary of the review
K
kopfhoerer.de
05/04/2026
Summary of the review
H
hifitest.de
28/11/2025
Summary of the review
I
inthegame.nl
12/02/2026
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 24 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Beyerdynamic Aventho 200

  • Excellent battery life of up to 63 hours (40 hours with ANC on).
  • Rich, balanced, and natural sound quality with support for aptX Lossless and Adaptive codecs.
  • Highly comfortable over-ear design featuring memory foam and a fontanelle-friendly headband cutout.
  • Replaceable battery and ear pads, significantly extending the product's long-term value.
  • Efficient modern connectivity features including Bluetooth 5.4, Multipoint, and Google Fast Pair.
  • Fast-charging capability provides up to 16 hours of playback from just a 15-minute charge.
  • Solid build quality using premium materials like aluminum and high-grade plastics.

What we don't like about Beyerdynamic Aventho 200

  • Active Noise Cancellation (ANC) is effective but trails behind top-tier competitors like Sony or Bose.
  • Capacitive touch controls can be fiddly and may require a learning curve for some users.
  • Transparency mode can occasionally sound muffled or struggle with specific high frequencies.
  • Lack of LDAC support might limit high-res wireless audio options for certain Android devices.
  • At approximately 293g, they are slightly heavier than some travel-focused rival models.
  • Voice notifications have been described by some users as sounding overly robotic.
  • The included charging cable is USB-C to USB-A rather than the more modern USB-C to USB-C.

Verdict

The Beyerdynamic Aventho 200 is a wireless over-ear headphone featuring 45mm dynamic drivers, Bluetooth 5.4 with Multipoint, and support for high-resolution codecs like aptX Lossless and aptX Adaptive. Key characteristics include active noise cancellation (ANC), transparency mode, and a notable frequency response of 10 Hz to 22,000 Hz. Main pros are its industry-leading battery life of up to 63 hours (40 with ANC), a fast-charging capability of 16 hours from just 15 minutes, and a durable design with a user-replaceable battery and ear pads. Potential cons include a slightly higher weight of 293g compared to travel rivals, the lack of LDAC support, and a learning curve for its intuitive touch controls.

Compare Beyerdynamic Aventho 200 with other products in the Headphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Beyerdynamic Aventho 200 and other products in the Headphones category

No results found