Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v3.0

ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity OC review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£690VRAM:10 GBMemory bus width:320 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):320 W

ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity OC Review: Compare 117 technical specifications and 13 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity OC
7.7/10

Overall score

Score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

40%

7.5

Technical score

25%

8.6

Reviews score

25%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

7.5

Sentiment score

▲Better than 61% of graphics cards
7.5

Value for money

Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.7

Overall score

30%

6.9

Price

▲Better than 54%
7.5

Technical score

Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

7.0

Performance

24%

6.9

Memory

12%

8.0

Power

11%

9.2

Features

5%

7.3

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity

▲Better than 60%
8.6

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

80%

8.5

Average grade

20%

8.7

Popularity

Grades by review (13)
6 reviews: 5 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. 7 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
★Better than 96%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • zotac-geforce-rtx-3080-trinity-oc
  • zotac-geforce-rtx-3080-trinity-oc
  • zotac-geforce-rtx-3080-trinity-oc
  • zotac-geforce-rtx-3080-trinity-oc
  • zotac-geforce-rtx-3080-trinity-oc
  • zotac-geforce-rtx-3080-trinity-oc
  • zotac-geforce-rtx-3080-trinity-oc
  • zotac-geforce-rtx-3080-trinity-oc
zotac-geforce-rtx-3080-trinity-oc
zotac-geforce-rtx-3080-trinity-oc
zotac-geforce-rtx-3080-trinity-oc
zotac-geforce-rtx-3080-trinity-oc
zotac-geforce-rtx-3080-trinity-oc
zotac-geforce-rtx-3080-trinity-oc
zotac-geforce-rtx-3080-trinity-oc
zotac-geforce-rtx-3080-trinity-oc
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

What reviewers say about the ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity OC

Based on 6 · 7

Reviewers like its design and finish, but are split on fan noise, gaming performance and overclocking, and dislike its power draw.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity OC

Based on 238 owners sharing their experience in online comments

68%positive13%mixed19%negative

Owners praise strong, lasting gaming performance, while limited VRAM, high power use, and heat cause the most frustration.

What owners dislike

  • Several owners say the card runs very hot and heats up small rooms, with some models hitting over 100 C in the VRM or hotspot without new pads or paste.7
  • Owners say 10GB of VRAM runs out in newer games at 1440p and 4K, causing stutters or forcing lower texture settings.4

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity OC

Technical score
Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

7.0

Performance

24%

6.9

Memory

12%

8.0

Power

11%

9.2

Features

5%

7.3

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity

7.5
Reviews score
8.6
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.7

Overall score

30%

6.9

Price

7.5
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
17,418 points
This graphics card scores 17,418 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 58.3% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
12,299 points
This graphics card scores 12,299 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 62.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
23,907 points
This graphics card scores 23,907 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 55.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
15,047 points
This graphics card scores 15,047 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 61.2% of graphics cards.
FP32 performance
30.03 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 30.03 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is higher than that of 60.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
VRAM
10 GB
This graphics card has 10 GB of VRAM, which is less than 55.5% of graphics cards and equal to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 57.1% of graphics cards and equal to 22.4% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
320 bit
This graphics card uses a 320 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 86.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
760.3 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 760.3 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 81.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
Effective memory speed
19,000 MHz
This graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz, which is faster than that of 48.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.5% of graphics cards and equal to 50.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 24.1% of graphics cards and equal to 75.9% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.8% of graphics cards and equal to 77.2% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.8% of graphics cards and equal to 79.2% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 2% of graphics cards and equal to 98% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 9% of graphics cards and equal to 88.2% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 90.9% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21.7% of graphics cards and equal to 76% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.3% of graphics cards and equal to 46.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
32.4 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 32.4 Gbps, which is faster than on 56.6% of graphics cards and equal to 20.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
320 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 320 W, which is higher than that of 79.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 5.6% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
320 W
This graphics card draws 320 W under peak load, which is higher than 76.9% of graphics cards and equal to 5% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 65.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 16.8% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
336 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 336 W, which is higher than that of 81% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
320 W
Show more
What reviewers say
Size
317.8x 120.7x 58 mm
Length
317.8 mm
This graphics card is 317.8 mm long, which is longer than 72.9% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Height
120.7 mm
This graphics card is 120.7 mm tall, which is shorter than 58.4% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.5 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s, which is slimmer than 35.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 14.7% of graphics cards.
Weight
870 g
This graphics card weighs 870 g, which is lighter than 65.7% of Graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of Graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say

ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity OC vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryFeaturesConnectivityPowerDesign
  • 128 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (320 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    320 bit vs 192 bit
  • 69.7% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (760.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    760.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 28 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (68 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    68 vs 40
  • 28 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (68 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    68 vs 40
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 88 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (272 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    272 vs 184
  • 128 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (272 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    272 vs 144
  • 19.4% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    80%

    8.5

    Average grade

    20%

    8.7

    Popularity

    Grades by review (13)
    6 reviews: 5 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. 7 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.6 vs 7.2
  • 19.4% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    80%

    8.5

    Average grade

    20%

    8.7

    Popularity

    Grades by review (13)
    6 reviews: 5 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. 7 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.6 vs 7.2
  • 28 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (68 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    68 vs 40
  • 28 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (68 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    68 vs 40
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 88 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (272 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    272 vs 184
  • 128 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (272 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    272 vs 144
  • 24.1% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (469.2 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    469.2 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 6.77x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (240.2 TFLOPS vs 35.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.48 TFLOPS.
    240.2 TFLOPS vs 35.48 TFLOPS
  • 32.9% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (30 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.6 TFLOPS.
    30.03 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS
  • 128 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (320 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    320 bit vs 192 bit
  • 69.7% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (760.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    760.3 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • Supports LHR limiting
    This graphics card supports an LHR limiter, while the average graphics card does not. 7.5% of Graphics cards support one.
  • 31.1% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,725 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    1,725 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (no vs multi frame generation).
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card uses a larger manufacturing process than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a manufacturing process of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • 25% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,440 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,440 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 48.8% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (320 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    320 W vs 215 W
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • 32.1% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1,188 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    1,188 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 2 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (10 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    10 GB vs 12 GB
  • 32.7% more expensive
    ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity OC is more expensive than the average graphics card (£690 vs £520).
    £690 vs £520
  • 31.1% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,725 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    1,725 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 25% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,440 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,440 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 3 years older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2020 vs 2023).
    September 2020
    2020 vs 2023
  • 32.1% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1,188 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    1,188 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 2 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (10 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    10 GB vs 12 GB
  • 79.2% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (5 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    5 MB vs 24 MB
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (no vs multi frame generation).
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card uses a larger manufacturing process than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a manufacturing process of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • 2.14x larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (628 mm² vs 294 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 294 mm².
    628 mm² vs 294 mm²
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (1 vs 3.1).
    1 vs 3.1
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 2.1a).
    2.1 vs 2.1a
  • More basic codec support
    This graphics card encodes more basic formats than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 48.8% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (320 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    320 W vs 215 W
  • 52.7% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (336 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    336 W vs 220 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 13 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (50 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    50 °C vs 37 °C
  • 2.08x higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (25 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    25 W vs 12 W
  • 6 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (73 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    73 °C vs 67 °C
  • 45.5% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (320 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    320 W vs 220 W
  • 35.6 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (317.8 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
    317.8 mm vs 282.2 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
GGZII
≈ estimated
08/12/2020
User review · gaming, temperatures and fan noise
Verdict
The ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity OC runs 1440p games at 144 fps and is hard to fault at a reasonable price.
9.0
Rorouni Kenra
≈ estimated
24/11/2020
Hands-on test · 10 games at ultrawide 1440p
Verdict
The ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity OC performs well at high settings on ultrawide 1440p, though an older CPU causes some bottlenecking.
8.0
Tech YES City
≈ estimated
20/10/2020
Hands-on review · benchmarks vs ASUS TUF
Verdict
The ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity OC is a solid buy if it's in stock at the right price, though the ASUS TUF comes out ahead.
6.0
eTeknix
≈ estimated
21/09/2020
Hands-on review · benchmarks and comparison with other cards
Verdict
The ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity OC is well built but trails rivals on power and temperatures, and leaves the price question to viewers.
9.0
Tech Critter
≈ estimated
17/09/2020
First impressions · 3DMark and game benchmarks
Verdict
The ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity OC is a big step up from the RTX 2080 Ti and worth buying if the budget allows.
Overview video
Not graded
Not graded
Not graded
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

10
techpowerup.com
✓ explicit
17/09/2020
Review · Low-noise card
Verdict
The Zotac RTX 3080 Trinity is a low-noise card that runs at NVIDIA reference speeds, with fans that stop at idle and decent overclocking room.
10
connect-living.de
✓ explicit
29/09/2020
Benchmark test · High-end card
Verdict
The Zotac RTX 3080 Trinity is a cool, quiet card for 4K gaming, though its 320W draw may call for a stronger power supply.
8.0
overclocking.com
✓ explicit
29/01/2021
Hands-on test · Triple-fan card
Verdict
The Zotac RTX 3080 Trinity is a well-finished triple-fan card whose fans stop below 60°C, though it is heavy at 1340 g.
9.6
geeknetic.es
✓ explicit
17/09/2020
Review · Custom design
Verdict
The Zotac RTX 3080 Trinity is a long, sturdy card whose fans switch off at low temperatures, though its look is plainer than the Founders Edition.
9.0
kotaworld.it
≈ estimated
22/10/2020
Hands-on review · Quiet RGB card
Verdict
The Zotac RTX 3080 Trinity OC is a stable, very quiet card at idle, but it needs strong case airflow and an 800-850W power supply.
10
nexthardware.com
✓ explicit
22/09/2020
Overclock test · 3DMark results
Verdict
The Zotac RTX 3080 Trinity reaches about 1950MHz when overclocked, gaining 4-6% in 3DMark, though results vary from chip to chip.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity OC

  • Competitive pricing, often more affordable than higher-tier AIB competitors like ASUS or MSI.
  • Efficient and quiet IceStorm 2.0 cooling system that maintains stable temperatures under load.
  • Solid 4K gaming performance and excellent real-time ray tracing capabilities.
  • Attractive physical design featuring SPECTRA 2.0 RGB lighting and a metal backplate.
  • Effective 'Freeze Fan Stop' technology that shuts fans down during idle or low-load tasks for silent operation.

What customers don't like about ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity OC

  • Strict power limits that significantly restrict overclocking headroom compared to other brands.
  • The proprietary FireStorm software is frequently reported as buggy, difficult to install, or prone to breaking RGB settings.
  • Performance is slightly lower (roughly 1–2%) than the NVIDIA Founders Edition and other high-end factory-overclocked models.
  • Reports of minor coil whine and occasional fan shroud vibrations at specific high speeds.
  • Concerns regarding build quality consistency, including reported cases of hardware instability or failure.

Verdict

The Zotac GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity OC is a high-performance graphics card built on the NVIDIA Ampere architecture, featuring 8,704 CUDA cores and a factory-overclocked boost clock of 1,725 MHz. It is equipped with 10GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus, offering a memory bandwidth of 760 GB/s and a 19 Gbps memory speed. Key characteristics include the triple-fan IceStorm 2.0 cooling system, SPECTRA 2.0 RGB lighting, and a durable die-cast metal backplate. Main pros include exceptional 4K gaming performance, an excellent 5-year warranty upon registration, and a relatively compact height for a triple-fan card. However, cons include a conservative power limit that restricts significant overclocking and slightly higher operating noise levels compared to some premium competitors.

Compare ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity OC with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity OC and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found