OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6750 XT Ultra Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£330VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):250 W

XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6750 XT Ultra Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6750 XT Ultra
7.1/10

Overall score

Score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 50% of models
Score components

90%

6.9

Technical score

10%

8.9

User score

â–²Better than 50% of graphics cards
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Score components

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

8.8

Price

â–²Better than 70%
6.9

Technical score

Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
Score components

44%

6.2

Performance

24%

6.2

Memory

12%

8.6

Power & Cooling

11%

9.2

Platform & Features

5%

5.7

Design

4%

9.0

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 51%
8.9

User score

User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 81% of models
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

7.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 81%
  • xfx-speedster-qick-319-radeon-rx-6750-xt-ultra
  • xfx-speedster-qick-319-radeon-rx-6750-xt-ultra
  • xfx-speedster-qick-319-radeon-rx-6750-xt-ultra
  • xfx-speedster-qick-319-radeon-rx-6750-xt-ultra
  • xfx-speedster-qick-319-radeon-rx-6750-xt-ultra
  • xfx-speedster-qick-319-radeon-rx-6750-xt-ultra
  • xfx-speedster-qick-319-radeon-rx-6750-xt-ultra
  • xfx-speedster-qick-319-radeon-rx-6750-xt-ultra
  • xfx-speedster-qick-319-radeon-rx-6750-xt-ultra
xfx-speedster-qick-319-radeon-rx-6750-xt-ultra
xfx-speedster-qick-319-radeon-rx-6750-xt-ultra
xfx-speedster-qick-319-radeon-rx-6750-xt-ultra
xfx-speedster-qick-319-radeon-rx-6750-xt-ultra
xfx-speedster-qick-319-radeon-rx-6750-xt-ultra
xfx-speedster-qick-319-radeon-rx-6750-xt-ultra
xfx-speedster-qick-319-radeon-rx-6750-xt-ultra
xfx-speedster-qick-319-radeon-rx-6750-xt-ultra
xfx-speedster-qick-319-radeon-rx-6750-xt-ultra
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6750 XT Ultra

Technical score
Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
Score components:

44%

6.2

Performance

24%

6.2

Memory

12%

8.6

Power & Cooling

11%

9.2

Platform & Features

5%

5.7

Design

4%

9.0

Connectivity & Media

6.9
User score
User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 81% of models
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

7.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.9
Popularity
Popularity
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 72% of models
Popularity:
XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6750 XT Ultra has a popularity score of 7.7 points, which is higher than that of 71.7% of products in this category.
7.7
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Score components:

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

8.8

Price

7.6
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
13,419 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 13,419 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 55.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
8,000 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 8,000 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 58.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.9% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
21,145 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 21,145 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 57.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
7,428 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 7,428 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 74.4% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
13.43 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 13.43 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 66.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
12 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 45.5% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 50.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
432 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 432 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 58.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4, which is older than on 80.6% of graphics cards and equal to 13.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
16.2 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 16.2 Gbps, which is slower than on 58.4% of graphics cards and equal to 2% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
250 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 250 W, which is higher than that of 58.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.2% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
250 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 250 W under peak load, which is higher than 56.8% of graphics cards and equal to 4.8% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
650 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 650 W PSU, which is lower than that of 40.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
253 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 253 W, which is higher than that of 59.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
250 W
Show more
Size
323x 132x 51 mm
Length
323 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 323 mm long, which is longer than 76% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.8% of graphics cards.
Height
132 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 132 mm tall, which is taller than 64.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3 slot/s, which is wider than 69.8% of graphics cards and equal in width to 17.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,860 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1,860 g, which is heavier than 85.4% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6750 XT Ultra vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 4.7% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2623 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,623 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 18.9% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2283 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,283 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 24x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (96 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    96 MB vs 4 MB
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2250 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • 11.3% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6750 XT Ultra
    the average graphics card
    XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6750 XT Ultra has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.90 vs 8.000).
    8.9 vs 8
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 3.33x higher HDMI bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (40 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    40 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • 11.3% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6750 XT Ultra
    the average graphics card
    XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6750 XT Ultra has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.90 vs 8.000).
    8.9 vs 8
  • 4.7% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2623 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,623 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 18.9% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2283 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,283 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 24x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (96 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    96 MB vs 4 MB
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2250 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • 3.33x higher HDMI bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (40 Gbps vs 12 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 12 Gbps.
    40 Gbps vs 12 Gbps
  • 7 °C lower load temperature
    This graphics card has a lower load temperature than the average graphics card (60 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    60 °C vs 67 °C
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 40% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    7 nm vs 5 nm
  • 104 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (40 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    40 vs 144
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (3 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    3.0 vs 8
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 104 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (40 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    40 vs 144
  • 40.5% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (13.4 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    13.43 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 24 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (160 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    160 vs 184
  • 38.5% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (7428 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    7,428 points vs 12,074 points
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 87.5% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (3 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    3 MB vs 24 MB
  • 5.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (18000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    18,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 3.6% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (432 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    432 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 40% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    7 nm vs 5 nm
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (3 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    3.0 vs 8
  • 1 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2022 vs 2023).
    May 2022
    2,022 vs 2,023
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 1.4a).
    1.4 vs 1.4a
  • 16.3% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (250 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    250 W vs 215 W
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 13 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (50 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    50 °C vs 37 °C
  • 6.6 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (42 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    42 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 38 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (323 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    323 mm vs 285 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 7 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (132 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    132 mm vs 125 mm
  • 82.2% heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (1860 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    1,860 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techguided.com
30/05/2026
Summary of the review
XFX Speedster QICK319 Radeon RX 6750XT Review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6750 XT Ultra

  • Excellent value for money, often described as a top contender for price-to-performance.
  • Strong 1080p and capable 1440p gaming performance, with 12GB of VRAM providing good headroom for AAA titles.
  • Effective Ghost Thermal triple-fan cooling system that keeps the card relatively cool under load.
  • Robust build quality with a sleek black aluminum backplate.
  • Runs very quietly for many users, with some reporting no audible coil whine.

What we don't like about XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6750 XT Ultra

  • Large physical footprint at 323mm long, which may not fit in many small form factor (ITX/Micro-ATX) or even some mid-tower cases.
  • Lacks RGB lighting, which may be a drawback for users seeking a more colourful aesthetic.
  • Significant power draw and occasional power spikes, requiring at least a 600W-650W quality power supply.
  • Ray tracing performance is notably weaker than competing Nvidia RTX cards.
  • Some users report issues with audible coil whine or the card running 'warm' in poorly ventilated builds.

Verdict

The XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6750 XT Ultra is a performance-oriented 1440p gaming graphics card based on the AMD RDNA 2 architecture, featuring 2,560 stream processors and 12GB of GDDR6 VRAM on a 192-bit bus. This factory-overclocked 'Ultra' model operates with a base clock of 2,283 MHz, a game clock of 2,533 MHz, and a boost clock reaching up to 2,623 MHz, supported by an 18 Gbps effective memory speed and 96MB of Infinity Cache. Key characteristics include a robust 2.6-slot 'Ghost Thermal' triple-fan cooling system and a sleek all-black aluminum backplate, requiring a 650W minimum PSU via dual 8-pin PCIe connectors. Its primary advantages are its excellent cooling efficiency, high frame rates in 1440p titles, and a solid build quality that excludes distracting RGB lighting; however, its substantial 323mm length may cause fitment issues in smaller cases, and some users report audible fan noise or coil whine under heavy load.

Compare XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6750 XT Ultra with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6750 XT Ultra and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found