Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£380VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):225 W

XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II
6.0/10

Overall score

Score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.7

Technical score

10%

8.2

User score

▼Worse than 76% of graphics cards
6.7

Value for money

Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

▼Worse than 74%
5.7

Technical score

Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

4.2

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

8.1

Power & Cooling

11%

8.2

Platform & Features

5%

6.7

Design

4%

8.7

Connectivity & Media

▼Worse than 76%
8.2

User score

User score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

8.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 64%
  • xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-ii
  • xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-ii
  • xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-ii
  • xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-ii
  • xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-ii
  • xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-ii
  • xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-ii
  • xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-ii
  • xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-ii
xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-ii
xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-ii
xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-ii
xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-ii
xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-ii
xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-ii
xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-ii
xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-ii
xfx-radeon-rx-5700-xt-thicc-ii
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II

Technical score
Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

4.2

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

8.1

Power & Cooling

11%

8.2

Platform & Features

5%

6.7

Design

4%

8.7

Connectivity & Media

5.7
User score
User score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

8.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.2
Popularity
Popularity
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II has a popularity score of 8.2 points, which is higher than that of 76.3% of products in this category.
8.2
Value for money
Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

6.7
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
9,386 points
This graphics card scores 9,386 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 73.6% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
0 points
This graphics card scores 0 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 83.2% of graphics cards and equal to 16.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
16,167 points
This graphics card scores 16,167 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 73% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
7,588 points
This graphics card scores 7,588 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 73.3% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
9.75 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 9.75 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 75.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
448 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 448 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 41.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 11% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12
This graphics card supports DirectX 12, which is older than on 81.8% of graphics cards and equal to 16.9% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
6
This graphics card supports up to 6 displays, which is more than 98.7% of graphics cards and equal to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
225 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 225 W, which is higher than that of 54.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.1% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
300 W
This graphics card draws 300 W under peak load, which is higher than 69.8% of graphics cards and equal to 4.4% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
600 W
This graphics card recommends a 600 W PSU, which is lower than that of 54.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
225 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W, which is lower than that of 49.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
225 W
Show more
Size
293x 130x 55 mm
Length
293 mm
This graphics card is 293 mm long, which is longer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Height
130 mm
This graphics card is 130 mm tall, which is taller than 58.6% of graphics cards and equal in height to 2.9% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.7 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.7 slot/s, which is wider than 65% of graphics cards and equal in width to 2.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,000 g
This graphics card weighs 1,000 g, which is lighter than 51.5% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 3.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 2 more displays supported
    This graphics card supports more displays than the average graphics card (6 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
    6 vs 4
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 4x larger L1 cache
    This graphics card has more L1 cache than the average graphics card (512 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    512 vs 128
  • 7.7% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (600 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    600 W vs 650 W
  • 2.4% higher user score
    User score
    8.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II
    the average graphics card
    XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.19 vs 8.000).
    8.19 vs 8
  • 2.4% higher user score
    User score
    8.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II
    the average graphics card
    XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.19 vs 8.000).
    8.19 vs 8
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 4x larger L1 cache
    This graphics card has more L1 cache than the average graphics card (512 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    512 vs 128
  • 2 more displays supported
    This graphics card supports more displays than the average graphics card (6 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
    6 vs 4
  • 7.7% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (600 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    600 W vs 650 W
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 24% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1905 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,905 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 6.6% worse value for money
    XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.75 vs 7.2).
    6.75 vs 7.2
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 24% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1905 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,905 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 56.8% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (9.8 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    9.75 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 16.4% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1605 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,605 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 25.3% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (121.9 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    121.9 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 20% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (304.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    304.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 28.6% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (16167 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    16,167 points vs 22,653 points
  • 36.1% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (9386 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    9,386 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 24 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (160 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    160 vs 184
  • 37.2% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (7588 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    7,588 points vs 12,074 points
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 83.3% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    4 MB vs 24 MB
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • 40% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    7 nm vs 5 nm
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (2 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    2.0 vs 8
  • No mesh shaders
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 4 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2019 vs 2023).
    September 2019
    2,019 vs 2,023
  • No DirectStorage support
    This graphics card does not support DirectStorage, the average graphics card does.
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Lower VRS tier
    This graphics card supports a lower VRS tier than the average graphics card (Tier 1 vs Tier 2).
    Tier 1 vs Tier 2
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
    12 vs 12 Ultimate
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2.0 vs 3.0
  • No sampler feedback
    This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 55% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (10300 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    10,300 million vs 22,900 million
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
    2.0b vs 2.1
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 9 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (76 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    76 °C vs 67 °C
  • 11 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (48 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    48 °C vs 37 °C
  • 4.7% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (225 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    225 W vs 215 W
  • 36.4% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (300 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    300 W vs 220 W
  • 3.6 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (39 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    39 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 5 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (130 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    130 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.2 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (2.7 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2.7 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

L
lanoc.org
18/10/2019
Summary of the review
M
mmorpg.com
20/09/2019
Summary of the review
R
reviewcentralme.com
07/01/2021
Summary of the review
T
tweaktown.com
08/11/2019
Summary of the review
L
lanoc.org
18/10/2019
Summary of the review
T
thefpsreview.com
30/09/2019
Summary of the review
G
gamersnexus.net
25/09/2019
Summary of the review
P
pcworld.com
13/09/2019
Summary of the review
O
overclockersclub.com
10/09/2019
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
09/09/2019
Summary of the review
P
pcper.com
09/09/2019
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
09/09/2019
Summary of the review
V
vortez.net
10/09/2019
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II

  • Aesthetic design often described as a 'classic muscle car' or 'clean' and 'business-like'.
  • Strong gaming performance at 1440p, capable of holding its own against more expensive competitors.
  • Noticeable improvement in noise and core temperatures compared to the AMD reference blower design.
  • Dual BIOS switch allows users to toggle between performance and silent modes.
  • Zero RPM fan feature ensures silent operation during low-load desktop use.
  • Solid build quality featuring a metal backplate and a 3-year warranty.

What we don't like about XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II

  • Mediocre VRAM cooling; memory temperatures can approach 100°C due to poor thermal pad contact or plate design.
  • High power consumption, especially on the 'Ultra' model, which can exceed the draw of an RTX 2080 Ti.
  • Early units suffered from a bugged fan profile in the Performance BIOS, though later fixed via a mandatory update.
  • Louder operation than rival custom cards (like Sapphire Pulse/Nitro+) due to an aggressive fan curve required to manage heat.
  • Large physical footprint (2.5-slot design) may not fit in many smaller or compact PC cases.
  • Plastic shroud components can feel 'creaky' or less premium than the visual appearance suggests.

Verdict

The XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II is a high-performance graphics card built on the 7nm RDNA architecture, specifically designed for smooth 1440p gaming with 8GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit interface. It features a custom 2.7-slot cooling solution with two 100mm fans, a base clock of 1605 MHz, a game clock of 1755 MHz, and a boost clock of up to 1905 MHz, while supporting PCIe 4.0 for increased bandwidth. Main characteristics include a premium retro car-inspired aesthetic with a chrome-finished grill, a full metal backplate for structural support, and a Dual BIOS switch for toggling between performance and quiet modes. Pros of the card include its impressive out-of-the-box performance, 'Zero DB' fan technology that stops fans under light loads for silent operation, and solid build quality with a three-year warranty. However, notable cons include its bulky triple-slot physical footprint, high power consumption requiring at least a 600W PSU, and early reports of thermal inefficiency where the card ran significantly hotter and louder than competing custom models.

Compare XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found