Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5700 XT Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£430VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):225 W

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5700 XT Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5700 XT
6.1/10

Overall score

Score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.9

Technical score

10%

8.4

User score

â–¼Worse than 74% of graphics cards
6.8

Value for money

Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.1

Overall score

30%

8.3

Price

â–¼Worse than 68%
5.9

Technical score

Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

4.3

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

7.9

Power & Cooling

11%

8.5

Platform & Features

5%

7.7

Design

4%

8.6

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 75%
8.4

User score

User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

8.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 70%
  • sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-5700-xt
  • sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-5700-xt
  • sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-5700-xt
  • sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-5700-xt
  • sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-5700-xt
  • sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-5700-xt
sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-5700-xt
sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-5700-xt
sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-5700-xt
sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-5700-xt
sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-5700-xt
sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-5700-xt
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5700 XT

Technical score
Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

4.3

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

7.9

Power & Cooling

11%

8.5

Platform & Features

5%

7.7

Design

4%

8.6

Connectivity & Media

5.9
User score
User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

8.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.4
Popularity
Popularity
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5700 XT has a popularity score of 8.7 points, which is higher than that of 81.1% of products in this category.
8.7
Value for money
Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.1

Overall score

30%

8.3

Price

6.8
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
9,611 points
This graphics card scores 9,611 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 72.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
8,800 points
This graphics card scores 8,800 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 51.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
16,168 points
This graphics card scores 16,168 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 72.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
7,592 points
This graphics card scores 7,592 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 73% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
9.86 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 9.86 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 75% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
448 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 448 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 41.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 11% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12
This graphics card supports DirectX 12, which is older than on 81.8% of graphics cards and equal to 16.9% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4, which is older than on 80.6% of graphics cards and equal to 13.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
225 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 225 W, which is higher than that of 54.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.1% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
250 W
This graphics card draws 250 W under peak load, which is higher than 56.8% of graphics cards and equal to 4.8% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
650 W
This graphics card recommends a 650 W PSU, which is lower than that of 40.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
225 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W, which is lower than that of 49.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
241 W
Show more
Size
254x 135x 46.5 mm
Length
254 mm
This graphics card is 254 mm long, which is shorter than 66.7% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Height
135 mm
This graphics card is 135 mm tall, which is taller than 69.9% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.6% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.3 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.3 slot/s, which is slimmer than 51.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
925 g
This graphics card weighs 925 g, which is lighter than 61.5% of graphics cards.
Show more

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5700 XT vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 31 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (254 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    254 mm vs 285 mm
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 5.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5700 XT
    the average graphics card
    Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5700 XT has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.45 vs 8.000).
    8.45 vs 8
  • 4x larger L1 cache
    This graphics card has more L1 cache than the average graphics card (512 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    512 vs 128
  • 2.05x more popular
    Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5700 XT is more popular than the average graphics card (8.66 vs 4.2).
    8.66 vs 4.22
  • 5.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5700 XT
    the average graphics card
    Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5700 XT has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.45 vs 8.000).
    8.45 vs 8
  • 2.05x more popular
    Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5700 XT is more popular than the average graphics card (8.66 vs 4.2).
    8.66 vs 4.22
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 4x larger L1 cache
    This graphics card has more L1 cache than the average graphics card (512 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    512 vs 128
  • 31 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (254 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    254 mm vs 285 mm
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 23.2% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1925 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,925 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 6.5% worse value for money
    Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5700 XT has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.75 vs 7.2).
    6.75 vs 7.2
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 23.2% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1925 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,925 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 56.8% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (9.8 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    9.75 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 20% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (304.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    304.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 24.5% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (123.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    123.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 13% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1670 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,670 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 28.6% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (16168 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    16,168 points vs 22,653 points
  • 34.5% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (9611 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    9,611 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 24 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (160 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    160 vs 184
  • 37.1% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (7592 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    7,592 points vs 12,074 points
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 83.3% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    4 MB vs 24 MB
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • 40% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    7 nm vs 5 nm
  • No mesh shaders
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
  • 4 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2019 vs 2023).
    August 2019
    2,019 vs 2,023
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
    12 vs 12 Ultimate
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2.0 vs 3.0
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (7 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    7 vs 8
  • 55% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (10300 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    10,300 million vs 22,900 million
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Older DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 1.4a).
    1.4 vs 1.4a
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
    2.0b vs 2.1
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 8 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (75 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    75 °C vs 67 °C
  • 8 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (45 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    45 °C vs 37 °C
  • 4.7% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (225 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    225 W vs 215 W
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 10 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (135 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    135 mm vs 125 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
tomshardware.com
21/11/2019
Summary of the review
I
igorslab.de
04/09/2019
Summary of the review
B
bit-tech.net
12/08/2019
Summary of the review
P
pcper.com
12/08/2019
Summary of the review
G
gamersnexus.net
12/08/2019
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
12/08/2019
Summary of the review
T
tektick.com
08/05/2020
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
07/07/2019
Summary of the review
I
igorslab.de
04/09/2019
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
06/10/2019
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
07/07/2019
Summary of the review
H
hardware.info
12/08/2019
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5700 XT

  • Excellent value for money, often cited as one of the best AIB versions of the RX 5700 XT for the price.
  • Significantly cooler and quieter operation compared to the AMD reference blower design.
  • Dual-BIOS support allows users to switch between performance and silent modes.
  • Quick-connect fans make maintenance, cleaning, or replacement much easier.
  • Strong 1440p gaming performance, maintaining high frame rates in most titles.
  • Features 'TriXX Boost' which can improve performance through intelligent resolution downscaling.

What we don't like about Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5700 XT

  • Software drivers and overclocking stability have been noted as inconsistent or 'fraught with oddities' by some users.
  • Does not feature hardware-accelerated ray tracing, unlike its NVIDIA contemporaries.
  • The physical design is relatively plain compared to higher-end 'Nitro+' or enthusiast-tier models.
  • Fans can produce an audible whine or oscillation sound once speeds exceed 1600 RPM.
  • Consumes slightly more power than the reference model due to factory overclocking.

Verdict

The Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5700 XT is a high-performance graphics card built on AMD's 7nm RDNA architecture, featuring 2,560 stream processors, 8GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit interface, and a factory-overclocked boost clock of up to 1,925 MHz. Key characteristics include the Dual-X cooling system with 95mm dual-ball bearing fans, a dual BIOS switch for performance or silent modes, and the TriXX Boost software for performance optimization. Its main pros are significantly improved thermal performance and lower noise levels compared to the AMD reference design, along with user-replaceable Quick Connect fans and a sturdy aluminum backplate. However, its notable cons include a higher power draw than the reference model, limited head room for manual overclocking, and a lack of dedicated hardware for real-time ray tracing.

Compare Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5700 XT with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5700 XT and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found