OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

PowerColor Hellhound Radeon RX 7600 XT Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£320VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):190 W

PowerColor Hellhound Radeon RX 7600 XT Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

PowerColor Hellhound Radeon RX 7600 XT
6.9/10

Overall score

Score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Score components

90%

6.8

Technical score

10%

7.9

User score

â–¼Worse than 55% of graphics cards
7.5

Value for money

Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Score components

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

8.8

Price

â–²Better than 64%
6.8

Technical score

Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components

44%

5.8

Performance

24%

5.8

Memory

12%

8.2

Power & Cooling

11%

9.2

Platform & Features

5%

9.1

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 54%
7.9

User score

User score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

5.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 85%
  • powercolor-hellhound-radeon-rx-7600-xt
  • powercolor-hellhound-radeon-rx-7600-xt
  • powercolor-hellhound-radeon-rx-7600-xt
  • powercolor-hellhound-radeon-rx-7600-xt
  • powercolor-hellhound-radeon-rx-7600-xt
  • powercolor-hellhound-radeon-rx-7600-xt
  • powercolor-hellhound-radeon-rx-7600-xt
  • powercolor-hellhound-radeon-rx-7600-xt
powercolor-hellhound-radeon-rx-7600-xt
powercolor-hellhound-radeon-rx-7600-xt
powercolor-hellhound-radeon-rx-7600-xt
powercolor-hellhound-radeon-rx-7600-xt
powercolor-hellhound-radeon-rx-7600-xt
powercolor-hellhound-radeon-rx-7600-xt
powercolor-hellhound-radeon-rx-7600-xt
powercolor-hellhound-radeon-rx-7600-xt
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card PowerColor Hellhound Radeon RX 7600 XT

Technical score
Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components:

44%

5.8

Performance

24%

5.8

Memory

12%

8.2

Power & Cooling

11%

9.2

Platform & Features

5%

9.1

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

6.8
User score
User score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

5.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.9
Popularity
Popularity
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 54% of models
Popularity:
PowerColor Hellhound Radeon RX 7600 XT has a popularity score of 5.2 points, which is higher than that of 54.5% of products in this category.
5.2
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Score components:

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

8.8

Price

7.5
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
10,985 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 10,985 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 66.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
5,913 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 5,913 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 68.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
17,537 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 17,537 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 66.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
8,966 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 8,966 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 65.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
23.02 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 23.02 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 50.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
16 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to 28.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
128 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 128 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 69.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 26% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
288 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 288 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 69.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.8% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x8
This graphics card uses x8 PCIe lanes, which is fewer than 76.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.2% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1, which is more advanced than on 67.5% of graphics cards and equal to 8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
13.5 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 13.5 Gbps, which is slower than on 60.9% of graphics cards and equal to 1.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
190 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 190 W, which is lower than that of 55.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.8% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
190 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 190 W under peak load, which is lower than 58.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.8% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
650 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 650 W PSU, which is lower than that of 40.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
190 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 190 W, which is lower than that of 59% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
190 W
Show more
Size
220x 133x 45 mm
Length
220 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 220 mm long, which is shorter than 86% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Height
133 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 133 mm tall, which is taller than 66.1% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
809 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 809 g, which is lighter than 70.5% of graphics cards.
Show more

PowerColor Hellhound Radeon RX 7600 XT vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 12.2% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2810 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,810 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2250 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 65 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (220 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    220 mm vs 285 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 1.4a).
    2.1 vs 1.4a
  • 5.7% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2029 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,029 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 8x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (32 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    32 MB vs 4 MB
  • 12.2% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2810 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,810 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 5.7% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2029 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,029 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 10.2% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (179.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    179.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2250 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 8x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (32 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    32 MB vs 4 MB
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 1.4a).
    2.1 vs 1.4a
  • 7.1 dB quieter under load
    This graphics card has a lower load noise level than the average graphics card (28.3 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    28.3 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 50% lower idle power draw
    This graphics card has a lower idle power draw than the average graphics card (6 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    6 W vs 12 W
  • 65 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (220 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    220 mm vs 285 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • 56 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (128 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    128 vs 184
  • 8 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (32 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    32 vs 40
  • 35.7% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 1.7% lower user score
    User score
    7.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    PowerColor Hellhound Radeon RX 7600 XT
    the average graphics card
    PowerColor Hellhound Radeon RX 7600 XT has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.86 vs 8.000).
    7.86 vs 8
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 56 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (128 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    128 vs 184
  • 8 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (32 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    32 vs 40
  • 80 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (64 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    64 vs 144
  • 8 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (32 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    32 vs 40
  • 22.6% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (17537 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    17,537 points vs 22,653 points
  • 35.5% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (5913 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    5,913 points vs 9,166 points
  • 25.2% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (10985 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    10,985 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 2,304 fewer FP32 units
    This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (2048 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    2,048 vs 4,352
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 35.7% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 91.7% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (2 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    2 MB vs 24 MB
  • 5.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (18000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    18,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • 20% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (6 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    6 nm vs 5 nm
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (3 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    3 vs 8
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 3).
    2.2 vs 3.0
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 8 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (133 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    133 mm vs 125 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
digitalreg.net
26/03/2024
Summary of the review
PowerColor HellHound RX 7600 XT Review
H
hothardware.com
24/01/2024
Summary of the review
AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT Review: 1080p PC Gaming With PowerColor And XFX
O
overclock3d.net
24/01/2024
Summary of the review
AMD Radeon RX 7600 XTGo to product viewer dialog for this item. with XFX, Sapphire and PowerColor
1
1side0.net
04/02/2024
Summary of the review
PowerColor Hellhound AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT Review
T
tweaktown.com
25/01/2024
Summary of the review
PowerColor HELLHOUND AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT Review
H
hwupgrade.it
24/01/2024
Summary of the review
AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT recensione: una Radeon RX 7600 con il doppio della VRAM
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about PowerColor Hellhound Radeon RX 7600 XT

  • Generous 16GB VRAM provides future-proofing for VRAM-intensive games and content creation workloads.
  • Efficient and quiet cooling system that maintains low temperatures even under load.
  • Compact dual-slot design (approx. 220mm length) makes it a great fit for smaller PC cases.
  • Solid 1080p performance with respectable entry-level 1440p capabilities.
  • Useful physical features including a dual BIOS (OC/Silent) switch and a toggle for the ice blue/amethyst purple LED lighting.
  • Improved 1% low framerate performance in some titles compared to 8GB models.

What we don't like about PowerColor Hellhound Radeon RX 7600 XT

  • Modest performance gains over the standard RX 7600 despite the $60 price premium.
  • Limited 128-bit memory bus can bottle-neck the 16GB of VRAM in certain high-resolution scenarios.
  • Higher power consumption (TDP increased to 190W) requiring 8+6 pin power connectors.
  • Disappointing ray tracing performance compared to competitors like the NVIDIA RTX 4060.
  • Poor overall value proposition when compared to older discounted cards like the RX 6700 XT.
  • Occasional reports of slight coil whine under heavy load.

Verdict

The PowerColor Hellhound Radeon RX 7600 XT is a mid-range graphics card featuring 16GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, built on AMD's RDNA 3 architecture with 2048 stream processors and 32 Ray Accelerators. This specific model offers a boost clock of up to 2810 MHz in OC mode and 2755 MHz in silent mode, supported by a 7+2 phase VRM and a dual 100mm fan cooling system with four nickel-plated heat pipes. Its main pros include the generous 16GB VRAM for high-texture 1080p and 1440p gaming, dual BIOS functionality for noise control, and a compact two-slot design with a physical LED toggle. However, its primary cons are the limited memory bandwidth caused by the narrow 128-bit bus, higher power consumption (190W TDP) compared to competitors, and a relatively high price point that offers only marginal performance gains over the standard RX 7600 in most scenarios.

Compare PowerColor Hellhound Radeon RX 7600 XT with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of PowerColor Hellhound Radeon RX 7600 XT and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found