Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v3.0

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£1,760VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):80 W

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop Review: Compare 117 technical specifications and 6 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop
7.0/10

Overall score

Score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

40%

6.3

Technical score

25%

8.1

Reviews score

25%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

6.3

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 64% of graphics cards
5.3

Value for money

Value for money
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.0

Overall score

30%

1.2

Price

â–¼Worse than 99%
6.3

Technical score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

4.7

Performance

24%

5.5

Memory

12%

9.0

Power

11%

9.2

Features

5%

8.0

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity

â–¼Worse than 66%
8.1

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

80%

8.1

Average grade

20%

8.3

Popularity

Grades by review (6)
3 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 60%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet

What reviewers say about the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop

Based on 3 · 3

Reviewers unanimously praise its strong gaming performance, with no notable complaints raised.
Praised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop

Based on 206 owners sharing their experience in online comments

59%positive11%mixed30%negative

Owners praise its fast gaming performance, while limited video memory and weaker high-resolution performance cause the biggest frustrations.

What owners dislike

  • Owners say the 8GB of VRAM runs out in some games and mods, causing stutter or lower settings, and worry it limits future headroom at 1440p and higher.7
  • Some owners report frame rates lower than expected in certain games, like Warzone and Apex at low settings, and a few say it barely beat their older cards.5
  • Owners say 4K at maximum settings gives only about 30 to 80 fps in demanding games, so they lower settings or accept 30 fps in some titles.4
  • Some owners report temperatures near 80 to 93 °C under heavy load, usually when fan curves are poor, and fixing fan speeds in software brings them down.4

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop

Technical score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

4.7

Performance

24%

5.5

Memory

12%

9.0

Power

11%

9.2

Features

5%

8.0

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity

6.3
Reviews score
8.1
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.0

Overall score

30%

1.2

Price

5.3
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
10,046 points
This graphics card scores 10,046 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 70.5% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
6,387 points
This graphics card scores 6,387 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 63.6% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
15,527 points
This graphics card scores 15,527 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 74.4% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
6,760 points
This graphics card scores 6,760 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 76% of graphics cards.
FP32 performance
15.97 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 15.97 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is lower than that of 62.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
VRAM
8 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 56.8% of graphics cards and equal to 25.7% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 16.4% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 50.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.5% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
448 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 448 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 41.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 11.8% of graphics cards.
Effective memory speed
12,000 MHz
This graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 12,000 MHz, which is slower than that of 80.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.5% of graphics cards and equal to 50.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 24.1% of graphics cards and equal to 75.9% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.8% of graphics cards and equal to 77.2% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.8% of graphics cards and equal to 79.2% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 2% of graphics cards and equal to 98% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 9% of graphics cards and equal to 88.2% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 90.9% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21.7% of graphics cards and equal to 76% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.3% of graphics cards and equal to 46.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65.3% of graphics cards and equal to 22.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
80 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 80 W, which is lower than that of 90% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.4% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
150 W
This graphics card draws 150 W under peak load, which is lower than 75.9% of graphics cards and equal to 1.4% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
?
Board power limit
140 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 140 W, which is lower than that of 80.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.9% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
80 W
Show more
Size
?
Length
?
Height
?
Slot width
?
Weight
?
Show more

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryFeaturesConnectivityPowerDesign
  • 64 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (256 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    256 bit vs 192 bit
  • 62.8% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (80 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    80 W vs 215 W
  • 12.5% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    80%

    8.1

    Average grade

    20%

    8.3

    Popularity

    Grades by review (6)
    3 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.1 vs 7.2
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • 36.4% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (140 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    140 W vs 220 W
  • 12.5% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    80%

    8.1

    Average grade

    20%

    8.3

    Popularity

    Grades by review (6)
    3 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 2 estimated from the review. 3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.1 vs 7.2
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • 64 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (256 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    256 bit vs 192 bit
  • 62.8% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (80 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    80 W vs 215 W
  • 36.4% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (140 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    140 W vs 220 W
  • 35.3% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,620 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    1,620 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 59.4% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (780 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    780 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (no vs multi frame generation).
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card uses a larger manufacturing process than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a manufacturing process of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 36.8% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (12,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    12,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 34% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (249.6 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    249.6 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 3.38x more expensive
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop is more expensive than the average graphics card (£1,760 vs £520).
    £1,760 vs £520
  • 40.1% worse value for money
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop has worse value for money than the average graphics card (5.29 vs 7.4).
    5.29 vs 7.41
  • 19.2% lower sentiment score
    6.3 vs 7.8
  • 35.3% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,620 MHz vs 2,505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,505 MHz.
    1,620 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 59.4% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (780 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    780 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 34% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (249.6 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    249.6 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 22.6% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (124.8 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 161.3 GPixel/s.
    124.8 GPixel/s vs 161.3 GPixel/s
  • 29.3% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (16 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.6 TFLOPS.
    15.97 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS
  • 31.4% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (15,527 points vs 22,638 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22,638 points.
    15,527 points vs 22,638 points
  • 2 years older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2021 vs 2023).
    January 2021
    2021 vs 2023
  • 32% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (10,046 points vs 14,779 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14,779 points.
    10,046 points vs 14,779 points
  • 24 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (160 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    160 vs 184
  • 30.2% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (6,387 points vs 9,148 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9,148 points.
    6,387 points vs 9,148 points
  • 44% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (6,760 points vs 12,70.5 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12,070.5 points.
    6,760 points vs 12,070.5 points
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 36.8% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (12,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
    12,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 83.3% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    4 MB vs 24 MB
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (no vs multi frame generation).
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card uses a larger manufacturing process than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a manufacturing process of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • 33.3% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (392 mm² vs 294 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 294 mm².
    392 mm² vs 294 mm²
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
    3 vs 3.1
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 2.1a).
    2.1 vs 2.1a
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • More basic codec support
    This graphics card encodes more basic formats than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 62.5% lower DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (8.1 Gbps vs 21.6 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 21.6 Gbps.
    8.1 Gbps vs 21.6 Gbps
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 10 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (105 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    105 °C vs 95 °C
  • 9.6 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (45 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    45 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 8 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (75 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    75 °C vs 67 °C
  • No backplate
    This graphics card does not include a backplate, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Jarrod'sTech
≈ estimated
26/01/2021
Benchmark review · 14 games at 1440p and 1080p
Verdict
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop delivers strong 1440p results in modern games.
Shop video
Brand video
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.5
techspot.com
✓ explicit
04/03/2021
Lab test · Laptop vs desktop
Verdict
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop is a clear step up at 115W, but the 80W version lags well behind the desktop card.
6.0
au.pcmag.com
≈ estimated
28/01/2021
Hands-on test · Laptop GPU power
Verdict
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU is fast, but buyers must check each laptop's wattage, since one name can hide much slower versions.
7.0
computerbase.de
≈ estimated
26/01/2021
Lab test · Gaming laptops
Verdict
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU is faster than last generation's laptop cards, but its power limit and the laptop's cooling decide how fast it runs.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop

  • Excellent 1440p gaming performance with high frame rates in most modern titles
  • Great value-to-performance ratio compared to higher-tier mobile GPUs like the RTX 3080
  • Highly efficient Ampere architecture providing strong performance per watt
  • Support for DLSS technology which significantly boosts frame rates in demanding games
  • Strong capabilities for creative workloads including video editing and 3D rendering
  • Effective thermal management in well-designed laptop chassis (e.g., Lenovo Legion 5 Pro)
  • Significant generational leap over previous-gen mobile GPUs like the RTX 2070

What customers don't like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop

  • Performance varies significantly between laptop models due to different TGP (wattage) limits (80W to 140W+)
  • 8GB of VRAM can be a bottleneck for 4K gaming and some future AAA titles at ultra settings
  • Significantly lower core counts and clock speeds compared to the desktop RTX 3070 version
  • Can run hot in thinner, ultra-portable laptop designs with limited cooling capacity
  • Lack of 'frame generation' features found in newer RTX 40-series cards
  • Some users report noise issues with loud fans under heavy gaming loads in specific models

Verdict

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop is a high-performance mobile GPU built on the 8nm Ampere architecture, featuring 5,120 CUDA cores and 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM on a 256-bit memory bus. It offers versatile power configurations ranging from 80W to 125W (up to 140W+ with Dynamic Boost 2.0), providing core boost clocks between 1,290 MHz and 1,620 MHz. Key pros include excellent 1440p gaming performance, 2nd-gen ray tracing support, and efficiency-boosting technologies like DLSS and Resizable BAR. However, performance varies significantly depending on the laptop's specific TGP (Total Graphics Power) limit, and the 8GB of VRAM can become a bottleneck in some modern titles at ultra settings.

Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found