Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£480VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):220 W

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
6.9/10

Overall score

Score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

6.7

Technical score

10%

8.6

User score

▼Worse than 54% of graphics cards
7.2

Value for money

Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

8.0

Price

▼Worse than 52%
6.7

Technical score

Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

5.7

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

8.1

Power & Cooling

11%

9.5

Platform & Features

5%

9.7

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity & Media

▼Worse than 56%
8.6

User score

User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 74%
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-3070
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-3070
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-3070
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-3070
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-3070
nvidia-geforce-rtx-3070
nvidia-geforce-rtx-3070
nvidia-geforce-rtx-3070
nvidia-geforce-rtx-3070
nvidia-geforce-rtx-3070
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Technical score
Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

5.7

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

8.1

Power & Cooling

11%

9.5

Platform & Features

5%

9.7

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity & Media

6.7
User score
User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.6
Popularity
Popularity
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 has a popularity score of 7.7 points, which is higher than that of 71.7% of products in this category.
7.7
Value for money
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

8.0

Price

7.2
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
13,000 points
This graphics card scores 13,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 58% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
8,300 points
This graphics card scores 8,300 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 56% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
22,157 points
This graphics card scores 22,157 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 54.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
11,103 points
This graphics card scores 11,103 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 56.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
20.31 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 20.31 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 57.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
448 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 448 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 41.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 11% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
32.4 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 32.4 Gbps, which is faster than on 57.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
220 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 220 W, which is higher than that of 50.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.2% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
220 W
This graphics card draws 220 W under peak load, which is lower than 48.5% of graphics cards and equal to 3.4% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
650 W
This graphics card recommends a 650 W PSU, which is lower than that of 40.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
240 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 240 W, which is higher than that of 52% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
220 W
Show more
Size
242x 112x 2 mm
Length
242 mm
This graphics card is 242 mm long, which is shorter than 73.1% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.7% of graphics cards.
Height
39 mm
This graphics card is 39 mm tall, which is shorter than 99.2% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,038 g
This graphics card weighs 1,038 g, which is heavier than 50.7% of graphics cards.
Show more

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 86 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (39 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    39 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 43 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (242 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    242 mm vs 285 mm
  • Includes LHR limiter
    This graphics card includes an LHR limiter, the average graphics card does not.
  • 7.5% higher user score
    User score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
    the average graphics card
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.60 vs 8.000).
    8.6 vs 8
  • 6 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (46 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    46 vs 40
  • 40 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (184 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    184 vs 144
  • 7.5% higher user score
    User score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
    the average graphics card
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.60 vs 8.000).
    8.6 vs 8
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 40 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (184 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    184 vs 144
  • 6 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (46 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    46 vs 40
  • Includes LHR limiter
    This graphics card includes an LHR limiter, the average graphics card does not.
  • 7 °C lower idle temperature
    This graphics card has a lower idle temperature than the average graphics card (30 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    30 °C vs 37 °C
  • 86 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (39 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    39 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 43 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (242 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    242 mm vs 285 mm
  • 31.1% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1725 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,725 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • 21.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1500 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,500 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • 16.7% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (317.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    317.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 31.1% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1725 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,725 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 21.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1500 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,500 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 16.7% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (317.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    317.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 10.1% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (20.3 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    20.3 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 83.3% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    4 MB vs 24 MB
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • 3 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2020 vs 2023).
    October 2020
    2,020 vs 2,023
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (7 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    7 vs 8
  • 32.9% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (392 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    392 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No 3D output
    This graphics card does not support 3D output, the average graphics card does.
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 3.5 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (38.9 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    38.9 dB vs 35.4 dB

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
pk.ign.com
27/10/2020
Summary of the review
P
pcper.com
27/10/2020
Summary of the review
K
kitguru.net
27/10/2020
Summary of the review
T
techspot.com
27/10/2020
Summary of the review
I
itpro.com
23/03/2021
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
10/01/2021
Summary of the review
G
gamingnexus.com
27/10/2020
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
27/10/2020
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
27/10/2020
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
25/07/2022
Summary of the review
I
ign.com
08/11/2022
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
27/10/2020
Summary of the review
S
slashgear.com
27/10/2020
Summary of the review
O
overclock3d.net
27/10/2020
Summary of the review
M
mmorpg.com
27/10/2020
Summary of the review
D
digitalfoundry.net
23/11/2020
Summary of the review
W
windowscentral.com
09/11/2020
Summary of the review
S
sea.ign.com
27/10/2020
Summary of the review
P
pcworld.com
27/10/2020
Summary of the review
S
smartworld.it
30/11/2020
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

  • Exceptional value-to-performance, matching the previous generation's flagship (RTX 2080 Ti) at less than half the launch price.
  • Outstanding performance for 1440p gaming, often hitting 100+ FPS in modern titles with high settings.
  • High energy efficiency, delivering more performance per watt than previous generations and even its larger sibling, the RTX 3080.
  • Compact physical design (Founders Edition) that fits easily into smaller PC cases or ITX builds.
  • Supports modern features like DLSS 2.0 and improved Ray Tracing, which significantly boost smoothness and visual quality.
  • Relatively quiet and cool operation, with temperatures typically staying under 75°C during heavy load.

What we don't like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

  • Limited VRAM (8GB), which can lead to performance bottlenecks at 4K resolution or in newer, high-texture-demanding games.
  • The proprietary 12-pin power connector (Founders Edition) requires an adapter that many users find aesthetically unappealing.
  • Not quite powerful enough for uncompromised 4K gaming; users often need to lower settings or rely heavily on DLSS for 60 FPS.
  • Poor availability and widespread scalping at launch made the card difficult to obtain at its intended MSRP.
  • Limited overclocking headroom compared to previous generations, with small gains for the extra power consumed.
  • Founders Edition lacks RGB lighting, which may be a drawback for users who prioritize PC aesthetics.

Verdict

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 is a high-performance graphics card built on the 8nm Ampere architecture, featuring 5,888 CUDA cores, a 1.50 GHz base clock (1.73 GHz boost), and 8GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448 GB/s bandwidth. It is widely praised for delivering performance comparable to the previous generation's flagship, the RTX 2080 Ti, at a significantly lower launch price, making it an exceptional value for 1440p gaming and entry-level 4K. Main pros include its impressive power efficiency with a 220W TDP, support for 2nd-gen Ray Tracing and 3rd-gen Tensor cores for DLSS, and a relatively compact dual-slot design suitable for many cases. However, its primary cons are the limited 8GB VRAM capacity, which can become a bottleneck in memory-intensive 4K titles or modern high-resolution textures, and its use of standard GDDR6 instead of the faster GDDR6X found in higher-tier models.

Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found