OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

MSI Radeon RX 6750 XT Mech 2X Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£430VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):250 W

MSI Radeon RX 6750 XT Mech 2X Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

MSI Radeon RX 6750 XT Mech 2X
6.9/10

Overall score

Score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
Score components

90%

6.8

Technical score

10%

7.1

User score

â–¼Worse than 56% of graphics cards
7.3

Value for money

Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 53% of models
Score components

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

8.3

Price

â–²Better than 53%
6.8

Technical score

Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Score components

44%

6.1

Performance

24%

6.2

Memory

12%

7.5

Power & Cooling

11%

9.2

Platform & Features

5%

7.6

Design

4%

9.1

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 53%
7.1

User score

User score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

4.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 96%
  • msi-radeon-rx-6750-xt-mech-2x
  • msi-radeon-rx-6750-xt-mech-2x
  • msi-radeon-rx-6750-xt-mech-2x
  • msi-radeon-rx-6750-xt-mech-2x
  • msi-radeon-rx-6750-xt-mech-2x
  • msi-radeon-rx-6750-xt-mech-2x
msi-radeon-rx-6750-xt-mech-2x
msi-radeon-rx-6750-xt-mech-2x
msi-radeon-rx-6750-xt-mech-2x
msi-radeon-rx-6750-xt-mech-2x
msi-radeon-rx-6750-xt-mech-2x
msi-radeon-rx-6750-xt-mech-2x
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card MSI Radeon RX 6750 XT Mech 2X

Technical score
Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Score components:

44%

6.1

Performance

24%

6.2

Memory

12%

7.5

Power & Cooling

11%

9.2

Platform & Features

5%

7.6

Design

4%

9.1

Connectivity & Media

6.8
User score
User score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

4.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.1
Popularity
Popularity
4.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 51% of models
Popularity:
MSI Radeon RX 6750 XT Mech 2X has a popularity score of 4.4 points, which is higher than that of 50.8% of products in this category.
4.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 53% of models
Score components:

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

8.3

Price

7.3
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
12,800 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 12,800 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 59.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
6,500 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 6,500 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 63% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
21,624 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 21,624 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 55.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
15,000 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 15,000 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 60.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
13.4 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 13.4 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 67.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
12 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 45.5% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 50.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
432 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 432 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 58.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
250 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 250 W, which is higher than that of 58.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.2% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
250 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 250 W under peak load, which is higher than 56.8% of graphics cards and equal to 4.8% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
650 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 650 W PSU, which is lower than that of 40.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
287 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 287 W, which is higher than that of 66.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
250 W
Show more
Size
249x 132x 52 mm
Length
249 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 249 mm long, which is shorter than 69.8% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Height
132 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 132 mm tall, which is taller than 64.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.5 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s, which is slimmer than 36.3% of graphics cards and equal in width to 14.7% of graphics cards.
Weight
932 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 932 g, which is lighter than 61.1% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

MSI Radeon RX 6750 XT Mech 2X vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 4.5% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2618 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,618 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 24x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (96 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    96 MB vs 4 MB
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2250 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 12% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2150 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,150 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 36 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (249 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    249 mm vs 285 mm
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 4.5% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2618 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,618 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 12% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2150 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,150 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 24x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (96 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    96 MB vs 4 MB
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2250 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 36 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (249 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    249 mm vs 285 mm
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 40% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    7 nm vs 5 nm
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 13.2% lower user score
    User score
    7.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    MSI Radeon RX 6750 XT Mech 2X
    the average graphics card
    MSI Radeon RX 6750 XT Mech 2X has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.06 vs 8.000).
    7.06 vs 8
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 41% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (13.3 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    13.31 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 24 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (160 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    160 vs 184
  • 29.1% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (6500 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    6,500 points vs 9,166 points
  • 12.8% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (12800 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    12,800 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 87.5% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (3 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    3 MB vs 24 MB
  • 5.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (18000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    18,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 3.6% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (432 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    432 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 40% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    7 nm vs 5 nm
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (3 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    3.0 vs 8
  • 1 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2022 vs 2023).
    May 2022
    2,022 vs 2,023
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.7 vs 6.8).
    6.7 vs 6.8
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 16.3% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (250 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    250 W vs 215 W
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 27.6% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (287 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    287 W vs 225 W
  • 8 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (75 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    75 °C vs 67 °C
  • 5.6 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (41 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    41 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 7 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (132 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    132 mm vs 125 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

H
hothardware.com
16/05/2022
Summary of the review
Radeon RX 6750 XTGo to product viewer dialogue for this item. Review With MSI: Strong 1440p PC Gaming

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about MSI Radeon RX 6750 XT Mech 2X

  • Excellent value for money, often priced lower than competitors
  • Strong performance for 1080p and solid 1440p gaming
  • Compact dual-fan design fits easily in smaller PC cases
  • Features 'Zero Frozr' technology where fans stop under low load for silent operation
  • Comes with a factory overclock for a small performance boost out of the box

What we don't like about MSI Radeon RX 6750 XT Mech 2X

  • Build quality uses cheaper materials, including a plastic backplate instead of metal
  • Lacks any RGB or LED lighting, which some users expect at this price point
  • Can run hot and loud compared to higher-end triple-fan models like the Gaming X Trio
  • Ray tracing performance is generally weaker than NVIDIA equivalents
  • Power plugs are oriented 'upside down' compared to reference cards, which may complicate cable management

Verdict

The MSI Radeon RX 6750 XT Mech 2X is a mid-range graphics card based on the RDNA 2 architecture, featuring 2,560 stream processors, a 2,600 MHz boost clock, and 12GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit interface with 18 Gbps speeds. Key characteristics include its industrial dual-fan design with TORX Fan 3.0, a reinforced brushed-finish backplate, and a 250W TDP requiring dual 8-pin power connectors. Its main pros are excellent 1440p gaming performance, a compact form factor suitable for smaller builds, and reliable cooling efficiency at its price point. However, some users note cons such as high noise levels under heavy load and temperatures that can run warm if frame rates are not capped.

Compare MSI Radeon RX 6750 XT Mech 2X with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of MSI Radeon RX 6750 XT Mech 2X and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found