OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£250VRAM:11 GBMemory bus width:352 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):250 W

MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio
6.1/10

Overall score

Score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 74% of models
Score components

90%

5.8

Technical score

10%

9.0

User score

▼Worse than 74% of graphics cards
7.0

Value for money

Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

70%

6.1

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

▼Worse than 62%
5.8

Technical score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components

44%

4.3

Performance

24%

6.1

Memory

12%

8.6

Power & Cooling

11%

7.3

Platform & Features

5%

5.7

Design

4%

7.6

Connectivity & Media

▼Worse than 76%
9.0

User score

User score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 85% of models
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

8.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 85%
  • msi-gtx-1080-ti-gaming-x-trio
  • msi-gtx-1080-ti-gaming-x-trio
  • msi-gtx-1080-ti-gaming-x-trio
  • msi-gtx-1080-ti-gaming-x-trio
  • msi-gtx-1080-ti-gaming-x-trio
  • msi-gtx-1080-ti-gaming-x-trio
  • msi-gtx-1080-ti-gaming-x-trio
msi-gtx-1080-ti-gaming-x-trio
msi-gtx-1080-ti-gaming-x-trio
msi-gtx-1080-ti-gaming-x-trio
msi-gtx-1080-ti-gaming-x-trio
msi-gtx-1080-ti-gaming-x-trio
msi-gtx-1080-ti-gaming-x-trio
msi-gtx-1080-ti-gaming-x-trio
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio

Technical score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components:

44%

4.3

Performance

24%

6.1

Memory

12%

8.6

Power & Cooling

11%

7.3

Platform & Features

5%

5.7

Design

4%

7.6

Connectivity & Media

5.8
User score
User score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 85% of models
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

8.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.0
Popularity
Popularity
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 81% of models
Popularity:
MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio has a popularity score of 8.7 points, which is higher than that of 81.1% of products in this category.
8.7
Value for money
Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components:

70%

6.1

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

7.0
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
10,000 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 10,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 70.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.9% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
2,711 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 2,711 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 79.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
13,470 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 13,470 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 77.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
12,226 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 12,226 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 51% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
12.06 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 12.06 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 72.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
11 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 11 GB of VRAM, which is less than 54.6% of graphics cards and equal to 1.5% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR5X
GDDR version
GDDR5X
This graphics card uses GDDR5X memory, which is older than on 84.2% of graphics cards and equal to 1.6% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
352 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 352 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 87.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.5% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
484 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 484 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 52.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3
This graphics card supports PCIe 3, which is older than on 77.7% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12
This graphics card supports DirectX 12, which is older than on 81.8% of graphics cards and equal to 16.9% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 2 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 79.1% of graphics cards and equal to 9.5% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4, which is older than on 80.6% of graphics cards and equal to 13.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
32.4 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 32.4 Gbps, which is faster than on 57.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
250 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 250 W, which is higher than that of 58.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.2% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
300 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 300 W under peak load, which is higher than 69.8% of graphics cards and equal to 4.4% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
600 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 600 W PSU, which is lower than that of 54.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
330 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 330 W, which is higher than that of 79% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
250 W
Show more
Size
325x 140x 48 mm
This graphics card measures 325x140x 48 mm, which is larger than 58.3% of graphics cards.
Length
325 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 325 mm long, which is longer than 77.2% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.1% of graphics cards.
Height
140 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 140 mm tall, which is taller than 79.3% of graphics cards and equal in height to 5.5% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3 slot/s, which is wider than 69.8% of graphics cards and equal in width to 17.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,484 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1,484 g, which is heavier than 72.7% of graphics cards.
Show more

MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 96 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (352 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    352 bit vs 256 bit
  • 24 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (88 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    88 vs 64
  • 40 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (224 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    224 vs 184
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 13% higher user score
    User score
    9.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio
    the average graphics card
    MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.04 vs 8.000).
    9.04 vs 8
  • Supports NVLink
    This graphics card supports NVLink, the average graphics card does not.
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • 13% higher user score
    User score
    9.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio
    the average graphics card
    MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.04 vs 8.000).
    9.04 vs 8
  • 2.12x cheaper
    MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio is cheaper than the average graphics card (£250 vs £530).
    £250 vs £530
  • 2.07x more popular
    MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio is more popular than the average graphics card (8.74 vs 4.2).
    8.74 vs 4.22
  • 24 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (88 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    88 vs 64
  • 40 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (224 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    224 vs 184
  • 96 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (352 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    352 bit vs 256 bit
  • 8% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (484 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    484 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • Supports NVLink
    This graphics card supports NVLink, the average graphics card does not.
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 7.7% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (600 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    600 W vs 650 W
  • 32.8% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1683 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,683 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 3.2x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (16 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    16 nm vs 5 nm
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • 12 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (28 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    28 vs 40
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 32.8% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1683 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,683 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 12 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (28 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    28 vs 40
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 22.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1480 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,480 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 49% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (11.5 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    11.5 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 40.5% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (13470 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    13,470 points vs 22,653 points
  • 70.4% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (2711 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    2,711 points vs 9,166 points
  • 31.9% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (10000 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    10,000 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 99.4% lower FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (0.2 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    0.18 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 10.7% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (145.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    145.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 42% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (11016 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    11,016 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 91.7% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (2 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    2 MB vs 24 MB
  • 1 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (11 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    11 GB vs 12 GB
  • 21.4% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1376 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,376 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 62.5% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (48 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    48 vs 128
  • 3.2x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (16 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    16 nm vs 5 nm
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
    3.0 vs 4.0
  • No AI upscalers
    This graphics card does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
  • 6 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2017 vs 2023).
    October 2017
    2,017 vs 2,023
  • No mesh shaders
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (4 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    4 vs 8
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
    12 vs 12 Ultimate
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (1.2 vs 3).
    1.2 vs 3.0
  • No sampler feedback
    This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 59.7% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (471 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    471 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • 47.6% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (12000 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    12,000 million vs 22,900 million
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
    3.0 vs 3.1
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 1 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    2 vs 3
  • No DSC support
    This graphics card does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
  • Older DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 1.4a).
    1.4 vs 1.4a
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
    2.0b vs 2.1
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (4 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    4 vs 6
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 46.7% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (330 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    330 W vs 225 W
  • 16.3% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (250 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    250 W vs 215 W
  • 18 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (55 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    55 °C vs 37 °C
  • 36.4% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (300 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    300 W vs 220 W
  • 15 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (140 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    140 mm vs 125 mm
  • 40 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (325 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    325 mm vs 285 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 45.3% heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (1484 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    1,484 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

O
ocinside.de
01/10/2017
Summary of the review
MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio Review YouTube·OC3D TV
O
overclockersclub.com
01/12/2017
Summary of the review
MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio Review
O
overclock3d.net
19/10/2017
Summary of the review
MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio Review
T
tech-critter.com
02/03/2018
Summary of the review
Review - MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio TechPowerUp
B
bit-tech.net
14/12/2017
Summary of the review
MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio Review
H
hexus.net
10/11/2017
Summary of the review
Review: MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio(vortez.net) | 28 November 2017 | MSI GTX 1080 Ti GAMING X TRIO Review
K
kitguru.net
27/10/2017
Summary of the review
MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio Review
T
techpowerup.com
19/10/2017
Summary of the review
MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio 11 GB Review(overclock3d.net) | 19 October 2017 | MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio Review
G
guru3d.com
16/10/2017
Summary of the review
MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio Review
O
ocinside.de
19/10/2017
Summary of the review
MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio Review
O
ocinside.de
02/12/2017
Summary of the review
MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio Test - OCinside.de
(Translated)Show original
G
gamestar.de
13/10/2017
Summary of the review
MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio im Test - GameStar
(Translated)Show original
C
comptoir-hardware.com
01/02/2018
Summary of the review
Test • MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio - Le Comptoir du Hardware
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
17/11/2017
Summary of the review
MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio review door Foritain
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
21/10/2017
Summary of the review
MSI GTX 1080 Ti Trio Review - Van twee naar drie ventilators
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio

  • Excellent cooling performance with typical load temperatures ranging from 63°C to 71°C
  • Exceptionally quiet operation, often cited as one of the quietest 1080 Ti models
  • Strong out-of-the-box factory overclock performance, capable of reaching near 2,000 MHz in OC mode
  • High-quality build with a substantial metal backplate and triple-fan Tri Frozr design
  • Includes a dedicated GPU support bracket to help prevent PCB sag
  • Good display connectivity including dual HDMI ports, which is beneficial for VR users

What we don't like about MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio

  • Massive physical size (325mm length, 2.5 to 3-slot width) makes it incompatible with some smaller cases
  • Heavy weight (approx. 1.5kg) can cause significant GPU sag despite the included bracket
  • Inconsistent lighting design; features red-only LEDs around the fans that cannot be changed to other colours, potentially clashing with themed builds
  • The included support bracket is reported by some users as fiddly to install and not entirely effective
  • Priced at a premium compared to many other custom GTX 1080 Ti variants
  • Manual overclocking headroom can be limited by NVIDIA's voltage restrictions

Verdict

The MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio is a high-performance graphics card built on NVIDIA's Pascal architecture, featuring 3,584 CUDA cores and 11GB of GDDR5X memory on a 352-bit bus. It distinguishes itself with a massive Tri-Frozr cooling system utilizing three TORX 2.0 fans, which allows for factory-overclocked boost speeds of up to 1,683 MHz in OC mode while maintaining remarkably low noise levels. Main characteristics include Mystic Light RGB customisation and dual 8-pin power requirements. Its primary pros are its exceptional thermal performance and quiet operation, outperforming many competitors in both temperature and acoustics. However, its massive 325mm length and 2.5-slot width can make it difficult to fit in smaller cases, and the card's significant weight often necessitates the use of its included support bracket to prevent GPU sag.

Compare MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X Trio and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found