Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming X Trio Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£390VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):240 W

MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming X Trio Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming X Trio
6.7/10

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

6.4

Technical score

10%

9.4

User score

▼Worse than 61% of graphics cards
7.2

Value for money

Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

▼Worse than 52%
6.4

Technical score

Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

5.1

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

8.9

Power & Cooling

11%

9.5

Platform & Features

5%

5.7

Design

4%

9.1

Connectivity & Media

▼Worse than 64%
9.4

User score

User score
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
★Better than 93%
  • msi-geforce-rtx-3060-ti-gaming-x-trio
  • msi-geforce-rtx-3060-ti-gaming-x-trio
  • msi-geforce-rtx-3060-ti-gaming-x-trio
  • msi-geforce-rtx-3060-ti-gaming-x-trio
msi-geforce-rtx-3060-ti-gaming-x-trio
msi-geforce-rtx-3060-ti-gaming-x-trio
msi-geforce-rtx-3060-ti-gaming-x-trio
msi-geforce-rtx-3060-ti-gaming-x-trio
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming X Trio

Technical score
Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

5.1

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

8.9

Power & Cooling

11%

9.5

Platform & Features

5%

5.7

Design

4%

9.1

Connectivity & Media

6.4
User score
User score
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.4
Popularity
Popularity
10/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming X Trio has a popularity score of 10 points, which is higher than that of 91.9% of products in this category.
10
Value for money
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

7.2
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
12,000 points
This graphics card scores 12,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 61.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
7,400 points
This graphics card scores 7,400 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 61.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
20,310 points
This graphics card scores 20,310 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 60.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
12,137 points
This graphics card scores 12,137 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 50.8% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
17.8 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 17.8 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 60.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
448 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 448 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 41.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 11% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
240 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 240 W, which is higher than that of 56.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.3% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
240 W
This graphics card draws 240 W under peak load, which is higher than 54.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
600 W
This graphics card recommends a 600 W PSU, which is lower than that of 54.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
250 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 250 W, which is higher than that of 55.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.4% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
240 W
Show more
Size
323x 140x 56 mm
This graphics card measures 323x140x 56 mm, which is larger than 65% of graphics cards and equal in size to 1.1% of graphics cards.
Length
323 mm
This graphics card is 323 mm long, which is longer than 76% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.8% of graphics cards.
Height
140 mm
This graphics card is 140 mm tall, which is taller than 79.3% of graphics cards and equal in height to 5.5% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3 slot/s, which is wider than 69.8% of graphics cards and equal in width to 17.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,452 g
This graphics card weighs 1,452 g, which is heavier than 71.8% of graphics cards.
Show more

MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming X Trio vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • 17.1% higher user score
    User score
    9.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming X Trio
    the average graphics card
    MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming X Trio has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.37 vs 8.000).
    9.37 vs 8
  • Includes LHR limiter
    This graphics card includes an LHR limiter, the average graphics card does not.
  • 2.37x more popular
    MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming X Trio is more popular than the average graphics card (10 vs 4.2).
    10 vs 4.22
  • 3.65x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (129.6 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.5 TFLOPS.
    129.6 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS
  • 6.4 dB quieter under load
    This graphics card has a lower load noise level than the average graphics card (29 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    29 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 7.7% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (600 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    600 W vs 650 W
  • 17.1% higher user score
    User score
    9.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming X Trio
    the average graphics card
    MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming X Trio has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.37 vs 8.000).
    9.37 vs 8
  • 2.37x more popular
    MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming X Trio is more popular than the average graphics card (10 vs 4.2).
    10 vs 4.22
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • 3.65x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (129.6 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.5 TFLOPS.
    129.6 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS
  • Includes LHR limiter
    This graphics card includes an LHR limiter, the average graphics card does not.
  • 7.7% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (600 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    600 W vs 650 W
  • 6.4 dB quieter under load
    This graphics card has a lower load noise level than the average graphics card (29 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    29 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 26.9% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1830 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,830 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • 26.6% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1410 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,410 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 27% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (278.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    278.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 15 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (140 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    140 mm vs 125 mm
  • 26.9% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1830 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,830 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 26.6% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1410 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,410 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 27% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (278.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    278.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 32 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (152 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    152 vs 184
  • 18.4% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (133.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    133.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 21.1% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (17.8 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    17.8 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 10.3% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (20310 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    20,310 points vs 22,653 points
  • 18.2% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (12000 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    12,000 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 19.3% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (7400 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    7,400 points vs 9,166 points
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 83.3% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    4 MB vs 24 MB
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • 3 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2020 vs 2023).
    December 2020
    2,020 vs 2,023
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (7 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    7 vs 8
  • 32.9% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (392 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    392 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
    3.0 vs 3.1
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 11.6% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (240 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    240 W vs 215 W
  • 6 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (43 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    43 °C vs 37 °C
  • 15 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (140 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    140 mm vs 125 mm
  • 38 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (323 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    323 mm vs 285 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 42.2% heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (1452 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    1,452 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

H
hardwarezone.com.sg
03/12/2020
Summary of the review
P
pcgamer.com
15/12/2020
Summary of the review
T
thefpsreview.com
16/12/2020
Summary of the review
I
ign.com
16/07/2021
Summary of the review
T
tweaktown.com
03/12/2020
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
01/12/2020
Summary of the review
H
hwcooling.net
26/03/2021
Summary of the review
T
tech-critter.com
01/01/2021
Summary of the review
O
overclockers.com
01/12/2020
Summary of the review
E
eteknix.com
02/12/2020
Summary of the review
O
overclockersclub.com
01/12/2020
Summary of the review
H
hexus.net
18/12/2020
Summary of the review
T
thefpsreview.com
16/12/2020
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
01/12/2020
Summary of the review
O
overclock3d.net
01/12/2020
Summary of the review
M
m.hexus.net
18/12/2020
Summary of the review
C
computerbase.de
05/12/2020
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
01/12/2020
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming X Trio

  • Excellent cooling performance with temperatures often staying below 60-70°C under load
  • Whisper-quiet operation, with some reviewers noting it as the quietest 3060 Ti model
  • High build quality and premium aesthetics, featuring robust RGB lighting and a graphene backplate
  • Strong out-of-the-box overclock with a higher boost clock compared to the reference design
  • Solid 1440p gaming performance, outperforming previous-gen cards like the RTX 2080 Super

What we don't like about MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming X Trio

  • Large physical footprint (323mm length) may not fit in smaller PC cases
  • Requires significant power with two 8-pin connectors and a higher TDP than the Founders Edition
  • RGB software (MSI Center/Dragon Center) can be cumbersome or forced for customization
  • High price premium over the MSRP of base RTX 3060 Ti models
  • Visible hotspots on some of the top-edge RGB LED clusters

Verdict

The MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming X Trio is a high-performance custom graphics card based on the NVIDIA Ampere architecture, featuring 4,864 CUDA cores and 8GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus. It offers a significant factory overclock with a boost clock of 1,830 MHz and a total graphics power (TGP) of 240W, requiring two 8-pin power connectors. Main pros include its premium Tri Frozr 2 cooling system with three TORX 4.0 fans, which ensures exceptionally quiet operation and low load temperatures (around 66°C), as well as robust build quality with a graphene composite backplate. However, its massive physical footprint at 323mm long and nearly three slots thick can pose compatibility issues for smaller cases, and it carries a price premium compared to entry-level 3060 Ti models.

Compare MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming X Trio with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming X Trio and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found