OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

Manli GeForce RTX 3090 M3478 N613 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£1,710VRAM:24 GBMemory bus width:384 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):350 W

Manli GeForce RTX 3090 M3478 N613 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

8.0/10

Overall score

Score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 67% of models
Score components

90%

8.0

Technical score

10%

?

User score

▲Better than 67% of graphics cards
6.0

Value for money

Value for money
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

Overall score

30%

1.5

Price

▼Worse than 91%
8.0

Technical score

Technical score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 68% of models
Score components

44%

7.9

Performance

24%

8.1

Memory

12%

7.1

Power & Cooling

11%

9.5

Platform & Features

5%

6.5

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity & Media

▲Better than 68%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Best prices
    N/A~ £1,710
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card Manli GeForce RTX 3090 M3478 N613

Technical score
Technical score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 68% of models
Score components:

44%

7.9

Performance

24%

8.1

Memory

12%

7.1

Power & Cooling

11%

9.5

Platform & Features

5%

6.5

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity & Media

8.0
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Manli GeForce RTX 3090 M3478 N613 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than that of 57.7% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components:

70%

8.0

Overall score

30%

1.5

Price

6.0
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
19,128 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 19,128 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 63% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
12,357 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 12,357 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 61.7% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
30,500 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 30,500 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 71.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
15,197 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 15,197 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 62.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
35.58 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 35.58 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 65.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
24 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 24 GB of VRAM, which is more than 91.1% of graphics cards and equal to 5.6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
GDDR version
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
384 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 384 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 89.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7.3% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
936 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 936 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 87.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
1.4 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 1.4 Gbps, which is slower than on 96.4% of graphics cards and equal to 3.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
350 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 350 W, which is higher than that of 85.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.7% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
350 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 350 W under peak load, which is higher than 83.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.9% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 64.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 17.1% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
417 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 417 W, which is higher than that of 91.4% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
350 W
Show more
Size
317x 115x 60 mm
Length
317 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 317 mm long, which is longer than 71.5% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Height
115 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 115 mm tall, which is shorter than 72.4% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.7% of graphics cards.
Slot width
3 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 3 slot/s, which is wider than 69.8% of graphics cards and equal in width to 17.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
?
Show more

Manli GeForce RTX 3090 M3478 N613 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 42 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (82 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    82 vs 40
  • 12 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (24 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    24 GB vs 12 GB
  • 42 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (82 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    82 vs 40
  • 2.09x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (936 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    936 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 144 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (328 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    328 vs 184
  • 48 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    112 vs 64
  • 184 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (328 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    328 vs 144
  • 128 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (384 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    384 bit vs 256 bit
  • 42 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (82 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    82 vs 40
  • 42 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (82 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    82 vs 40
  • 144 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (328 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    328 vs 184
  • 48 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (112 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    112 vs 64
  • 184 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (328 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    328 vs 144
  • 45.9% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (556 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    556 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 57.6% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (35.6 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    35.58 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 34.6% higher PassMark score
    This graphics card has a higher PassMark score than the average graphics card (30500 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    30,500 points vs 22,653 points
  • 6,144 more FP32 units
    This graphics card has more FP32 units than the average graphics card (10,496 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    10,496 vs 4,352
  • 16.3% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (189.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    189.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 12 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (24 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    24 GB vs 12 GB
  • 2.09x higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (936 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    936 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 128 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (384 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    384 bit vs 256 bit
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • Supports NVLink
    This graphics card supports NVLink, the average graphics card does not.
  • 10 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (115 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    115 mm vs 125 mm
  • 32.3% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1695 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,695 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 95.1% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (936 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    936 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 27.3% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1395 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,395 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • 62.8% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (350 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    350 W vs 215 W
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 3.23x more expensive
    Manli GeForce RTX 3090 M3478 N613 is more expensive than the average graphics card (£1,710 vs £530).
    £1,710 vs £530
  • 19.1% worse value for money
    Manli GeForce RTX 3090 M3478 N613 has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.04 vs 7.2).
    6.04 vs 7.2
  • 4.22x less popular
    Manli GeForce RTX 3090 M3478 N613 is less popular than the average graphics card (1 vs 4.2).
    1 vs 4.22
  • 32.3% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1695 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,695 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 27.3% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1395 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,395 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 95.1% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (936 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    936 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 30.3% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1219 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,219 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 75% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (6 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    6 MB vs 24 MB
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • 3 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2020 vs 2023).
    October 2020
    2,020 vs 2,023
  • 2.13x larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (628 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    628 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (7 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    7 vs 8
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
    3.0 vs 3.1
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 93% lower DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (1.4 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    1.4 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 62.8% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (350 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    350 W vs 215 W
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
  • 85.3% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (417 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    417 W vs 225 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 20 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (87 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    87 °C vs 67 °C
  • 59.1% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (350 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    350 W vs 220 W
  • 7 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (44 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    44 °C vs 37 °C
  • 33.3% higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (16 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    16 W vs 12 W
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • 32 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (317 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    317 mm vs 285 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    3 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

H
hardwareluxx.de
18/06/2021
Summary of the review
3x 24 GB Grafikspeicher: Drei Modelle der GeForce RTX 3090 im Test
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Manli GeForce RTX 3090 M3478 N613

  • Exceptional 4K and potential 8K gaming performance
  • Massive 24GB GDDR6X VRAM is ideal for professional 3D rendering and AI workloads
  • Solid build quality featuring an aluminium backplate
  • Effective cooling solution that maintains stable load temperatures (around 65-70°C)
  • Relatively quiet fan operation compared to other high-end models
  • Shared hardware lineage with more mainstream brands like Zotac and Inno3D

What we don't like about Manli GeForce RTX 3090 M3478 N613

  • Extremely high power consumption, requiring a beefy 750W+ PSU
  • Massive physical size (triple-slot) that may not fit in standard PC cases
  • Diminishing returns for average gamers compared to the much cheaper RTX 3080
  • Potential warranty and support delays for users outside of its primary Asian market
  • Brand is less familiar in Western markets, which may impact resale value or trust
  • High initial MSRP makes it a niche purchase for most consumers

Verdict

The Manli GeForce RTX 3090 (M3478+N613) is a high-end enthusiast graphics card built on NVIDIA's 8nm Ampere architecture, featuring 10,496 CUDA cores, 328 Tensor cores, and 82 RT cores. It is equipped with a massive 24GB of GDDR6X VRAM on a 384-bit bus, providing 936 GB/s bandwidth and supporting base/boost clock speeds of 1395/1695 MHz. Main pros include its titan-class performance for 8K HDR gaming and heavy professional workloads like AI training or 3D rendering, a robust triple-slot cooling design with copper heat pipes, and high-speed HDMI 2.1 support. However, it has significant drawbacks including a high 350W power draw (recommending a 750W+ PSU), a large triple-slot physical footprint that may not fit all cases, and its high initial cost compared to lower-tier models.

Compare Manli GeForce RTX 3090 M3478 N613 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Manli GeForce RTX 3090 M3478 N613 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found