Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Master Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£810VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):290 W

GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Master Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Master
7.0/10

Overall score

Score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

6.8

Technical score

10%

8.5

User score

â–¼Worse than 52% of graphics cards
6.8

Value for money

Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.0

Overall score

30%

6.2

Price

â–¼Worse than 68%
6.8

Technical score

Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

6.1

Performance

24%

6.4

Memory

12%

8.0

Power & Cooling

11%

9.5

Platform & Features

5%

5.0

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 53%
8.5

User score

User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

8.1

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 70%
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-master
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-master
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-master
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-master
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-master
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-master
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-master
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-master
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-master
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-master
  • gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-master
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-master
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-master
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-master
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-master
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-master
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-master
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-master
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-master
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-master
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-master
gigabyte-aorus-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-master
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Master

Technical score
Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

6.1

Performance

24%

6.4

Memory

12%

8.0

Power & Cooling

11%

9.5

Platform & Features

5%

5.0

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity & Media

6.8
User score
User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

8.1

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.5
Popularity
Popularity
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Master has a popularity score of 8.1 points, which is higher than that of 75.5% of products in this category.
8.1
Value for money
Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.0

Overall score

30%

6.2

Price

6.8
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
14,600 points
This graphics card scores 14,600 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 50.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
11,650 points
This graphics card scores 11,650 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 59.9% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
23,795 points
This graphics card scores 23,795 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 54.5% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
12,710 points
This graphics card scores 12,710 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 51.4% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
23.04 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 23.04 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 50.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
GDDR version
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
608 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 608 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 63.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
vendor-name or prompt-tail contamination removed; Vulkan version unresolved.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
32.4 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 32.4 Gbps, which is faster than on 57.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
290 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 290 W, which is higher than that of 70.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.6% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
310 W
This graphics card draws 310 W under peak load, which is higher than 75.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
850 W
This graphics card recommends a 850 W PSU, which is higher than that of 83.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 12.2% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
310 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 310 W, which is higher than that of 74% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.4% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
290 W
Show more
Size
324x 142x 70 mm
Length
324 mm
This graphics card is 324 mm long, which is longer than 76.8% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Height
142 mm
This graphics card is 142 mm tall, which is taller than 87.1% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.8% of graphics cards.
Slot width
4 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 4 slot/s, which is wider than 97.6% of graphics cards and equal in width to 2.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,780 g
This graphics card weighs 1,780 g, which is heavier than 82.9% of graphics cards.
Show more

GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Master vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 35.7% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (608 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    608 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 8 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (48 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    48 vs 40
  • 8 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (48 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    48 vs 40
  • 48 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (192 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    192 vs 144
  • Includes LHR limiter
    This graphics card includes an LHR limiter, the average graphics card does not.
  • 5.8% higher user score
    User score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Master
    the average graphics card
    GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Master has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.46 vs 8.000).
    8.46 vs 8
  • 7 °C lower idle temperature
    This graphics card has a lower idle temperature than the average graphics card (30 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    30 °C vs 37 °C
  • 5.8% higher user score
    User score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Master
    the average graphics card
    GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Master has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.46 vs 8.000).
    8.46 vs 8
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 8 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (48 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    48 vs 40
  • 8 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (48 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    48 vs 40
  • 48 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (192 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    192 vs 144
  • 10.3% higher pixel rate
    This graphics card has a higher pixel rate than the average graphics card (180 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    180 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 35.7% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (608 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    608 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • Includes LHR limiter
    This graphics card includes an LHR limiter, the average graphics card does not.
  • 7 °C lower idle temperature
    This graphics card has a lower idle temperature than the average graphics card (30 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    30 °C vs 37 °C
  • 25.1% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1875 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,875 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 30.8% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (850 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    850 W vs 650 W
  • 18% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1575 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,575 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 1.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (4 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    4 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 34.9% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (290 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    290 W vs 215 W
  • 52.8% more expensive
    GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Master is more expensive than the average graphics card (£810 vs £530).
    £810 vs £530
  • 6.2% worse value for money
    GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Master has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.78 vs 7.2).
    6.78 vs 7.2
  • 25.1% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1875 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,875 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 18% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1575 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,575 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 83.3% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    4 MB vs 24 MB
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • 2 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2021 vs 2023).
    May 2021
    2,021 vs 2,023
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (7 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    7 vs 8
  • 32.9% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (392 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    392 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
    3.0 vs 3.1
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 30.8% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (850 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    850 W vs 650 W
  • 34.9% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (290 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    290 W vs 215 W
  • 37.8% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (310 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    310 W vs 225 W
  • 40.9% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (310 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    310 W vs 220 W
  • 3.8 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (39.2 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    39.2 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 1.5 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (4 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    4 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 17 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (142 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    142 mm vs 125 mm
  • 39 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (324 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    324 mm vs 285 mm
  • 74.3% heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (1780 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    1,780 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
pcgamer.com
05/07/2021
Summary of the review
E
eteknix.com
09/06/2021
Summary of the review
P
pressreader.com
12/07/2021
Summary of the review
E
eteknix.com
09/06/2021
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Master

  • Outstanding performance at 1440p and solid 4K gaming with DLSS
  • Exceptional thermal performance with low operating temperatures under load
  • Customizable LCD 'Edge View' screen for displaying stats, images, or GIFs
  • Impressive aesthetics and high-quality build materials
  • Dual BIOS switch providing choices between OC and Silent modes
  • Generous connectivity with six video outputs (3x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort)

What we don't like about GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Master

  • RGB Fusion 2.0 software is frequently reported as buggy and difficult to use
  • Massive physical size (4-slot design) requiring significant case clearance
  • Higher price point compared to other 3070 Ti variants, often nearing 3080 costs
  • 8GB of VRAM can be limiting for high-resolution textures in future titles
  • High power requirements, needing three separate power cables and a beefy PSU
  • Prone to significant GPU sag due to its weight, often necessitating a support bracket

Verdict

The Gigabyte Aorus GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Master is a flagship-tier graphics card powered by the NVIDIA Ampere architecture, featuring 6,144 CUDA cores and a factory-overclocked boost clock of 1,875 MHz. It is equipped with 8GB of high-speed GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit interface, delivering a massive 608 GB/s bandwidth to support high-performance 1440p and 4K gaming. Its main characteristics include the massive 'MAX-Covered' triple-fan cooling system, a customizable 'LCD Edge View' for real-time stats or GIFs, and an extensive array of six video outputs (3x DisplayPort 1.4a and 3x HDMI). Key pros include its exceptional thermal management, premium build quality, and superior out-of-the-box clock speeds compared to reference models. However, notable cons include its enormous quad-slot physical size that may not fit in smaller cases, significant 290W power draw requiring at least an 850W PSU, and potential software conflicts with the RGB Fusion control application.

Compare GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Master with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Master and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found