Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£560VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):250 W

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
7.2/10

Overall score

Score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

7.0

Technical score

10%

8.7

User score

â–²Better than 51% of graphics cards
7.3

Value for money

Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

7.6

Price

â–²Better than 53%
7.0

Technical score

Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

6.1

Performance

24%

6.2

Memory

12%

8.6

Power & Cooling

11%

9.2

Platform & Features

5%

8.9

Design

4%

9.1

Connectivity & Media

â–²Better than 50%
8.7

User score

User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.7

User ratings

30%

8.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 76%
  • amd-radeon-rx-6750-xt
amd-radeon-rx-6750-xt
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Technical score
Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

6.1

Performance

24%

6.2

Memory

12%

8.6

Power & Cooling

11%

9.2

Platform & Features

5%

8.9

Design

4%

9.1

Connectivity & Media

7.0
User score
User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.7

User ratings

30%

8.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.7
Popularity
Popularity
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has a popularity score of 8.7 points, which is higher than that of 81.1% of products in this category.
8.7
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

7.6

Price

7.3
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
13,419 points
This graphics card scores 13,419 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 55.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
6,747 points
This graphics card scores 6,747 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 62.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
20,689 points
This graphics card scores 20,689 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 59.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
11,065 points
This graphics card scores 11,065 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 56.7% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
13.31 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 13.31 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 68.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
12 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 45.5% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 50.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
432 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 432 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 58.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.3
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.3, which is older than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 15.7% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
250 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 250 W, which is higher than that of 58.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.2% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
250 W
This graphics card draws 250 W under peak load, which is higher than 56.8% of graphics cards and equal to 4.8% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
650 W
This graphics card recommends a 650 W PSU, which is lower than that of 40.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
250 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 250 W, which is higher than that of 55.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.4% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
250 W
Show more
Size
267x 110x 40 mm
Length
267 mm
This graphics card is 267 mm long, which is shorter than 59.7% of graphics cards and equal in length to 3.5% of graphics cards.
Height
110 mm
This graphics card is 110 mm tall, which is shorter than 88.7% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
890 g
This graphics card weighs 890 g, which is lighter than 64.9% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Show more

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 3.8% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2600 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,600 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 24x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (96 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    96 MB vs 4 MB
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2250 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 15 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (110 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    110 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 12% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2150 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,150 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 8.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
    the average graphics card
    AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.69 vs 8.000).
    8.69 vs 8
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 8.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
    the average graphics card
    AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.69 vs 8.000).
    8.69 vs 8
  • 2.07x more popular
    AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is more popular than the average graphics card (8.74 vs 4.2).
    8.74 vs 4.22
  • 3.8% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2600 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,600 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 12% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2150 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,150 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 24x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (96 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    96 MB vs 4 MB
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2250 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 50% lower idle power draw
    This graphics card has a lower idle power draw than the average graphics card (6 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    6 W vs 12 W
  • 15 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (110 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    110 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 40% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    7 nm vs 5 nm
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (2 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    2.0 vs 8
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 41% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (13.3 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    13.31 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 24 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (160 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    160 vs 184
  • 26.4% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (6747 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    6,747 points vs 9,166 points
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 87.5% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (3 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    3 MB vs 24 MB
  • 5.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (18000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    18,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 3.6% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (432 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    432 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 40% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    7 nm vs 5 nm
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (2 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    2.0 vs 8
  • Older Vulkan version
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
    1.3 vs 1.4
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 3).
    2.2 vs 3.0
  • 1 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2022 vs 2023).
    May 2022
    2,022 vs 2,023
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.7 vs 6.8).
    6.7 vs 6.8
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • 16.3% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (250 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    250 W vs 215 W
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 8 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (75 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    75 °C vs 67 °C
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

U
uk.pcmag.com
01/06/2022
Summary of the review
T
tweaktown.com
12/05/2022
Summary of the review
O
overclockers.com
10/05/2022
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
10/05/2022
Summary of the review
C
custompc.com
04/10/2023
Summary of the review
C
cgmagonline.com
08/11/2023
Summary of the review
P
pcgamer.com
24/06/2022
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
01/06/2022
Summary of the review
P
pcgamer.com
10/06/2022
Summary of the review
H
hothardware.com
16/05/2022
Summary of the review
T
techspot.com
16/05/2022
Summary of the review
E
eurogamer.net
10/05/2022
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
10/05/2022
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
25/05/2022
Summary of the review
W
wepc.com
06/09/2024
Summary of the review
T
tech4gamers.com
25/12/2023
Summary of the review
P
pcper.com
10/05/2022
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
10/05/2022
Summary of the review
H
hardzone.es
08/09/2022
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
10/05/2022
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

  • Excellent performance for 1440p gaming across most modern titles
  • Strong value-to-performance ratio compared to NVIDIA's RTX 3060 Ti and 3070
  • Generous 12GB of VRAM helps future-proof for memory-intensive games
  • Advanced driver features like AMD Adrenaline offer robust hardware monitoring and overclocking
  • Many aftermarket models (e.g., MSI Gaming X Trio, Sapphire Nitro+) run cool and quiet
  • Native support for AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR) improves frame rates in supported games

What we don't like about AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

  • Significantly weaker ray tracing performance compared to NVIDIA's equivalent GPUs
  • Higher power consumption than its predecessor, the RX 6700 XT
  • Marginal performance gains over the RX 6700 XT (often single-digit percentage)
  • Reported issues with hardware acceleration, particularly during video playback in browsers like Firefox
  • Potential for coil whine and high idle power draw reported by some users
  • Lacks support for NVIDIA-exclusive features like DLSS, though RSR/FSR are available alternatives

Verdict

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is a high-end RDNA 2-based graphics card featuring 40 compute units, 2560 stream processors, and 12GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus. It operates with a game clock of 2495 MHz and a boost clock of up to 2600 MHz, utilizing 96MB of Infinity Cache to deliver an effective memory bandwidth of 1326 GB/s. Main pros include its exceptional 1440p gaming performance, a generous VRAM capacity for its class, and strong thermal efficiency in many partner models. However, its main cons are a high power draw of 250W compared to the RX 6700 XT it refreshes, and relatively weak ray tracing performance compared to its NVIDIA competitors.

Compare AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found