Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£540VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):160 W

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
6.4/10

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

6.2

Technical score

10%

7.6

User score

â–¼Worse than 68% of graphics cards
6.8

Value for money

Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

7.7

Price

â–¼Worse than 68%
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

5.5

Performance

24%

3.8

Memory

12%

8.7

Power & Cooling

11%

9.1

Platform & Features

5%

10

Design

4%

9.1

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 67%
7.6

User score

User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

6.1

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 91%
  • amd-radeon-rx-6600-xt
  • amd-radeon-rx-6600-xt
  • amd-radeon-rx-6600-xt
  • amd-radeon-rx-6600-xt
  • amd-radeon-rx-6600-xt
  • amd-radeon-rx-6600-xt
amd-radeon-rx-6600-xt
amd-radeon-rx-6600-xt
amd-radeon-rx-6600-xt
amd-radeon-rx-6600-xt
amd-radeon-rx-6600-xt
amd-radeon-rx-6600-xt
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

5.5

Performance

24%

3.8

Memory

12%

8.7

Power & Cooling

11%

9.1

Platform & Features

5%

10

Design

4%

9.1

Connectivity & Media

6.2
User score
User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

6.1

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.6
Popularity
Popularity
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT has a popularity score of 6.1 points, which is higher than that of 59.7% of products in this category.
6.1
Value for money
Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

7.7

Price

6.8
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
9,700 points
This graphics card scores 9,700 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 72.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
4,420 points
This graphics card scores 4,420 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 74.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
16,448 points
This graphics card scores 16,448 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 72.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
7,460 points
This graphics card scores 7,460 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 74.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
10.6 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 10.6 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 74.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
128 bit
This graphics card uses a 128 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 69.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 26% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
256 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 256 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 80.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x8
This graphics card uses x8 PCIe lanes, which is fewer than 76.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.2% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
160 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 160 W, which is lower than that of 68% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.8% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
160 W
This graphics card draws 160 W under peak load, which is lower than 71.2% of graphics cards and equal to 3.8% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
500 W
This graphics card recommends a 500 W PSU, which is lower than that of 75.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 8.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
160 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 160 W, which is lower than that of 71.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
160 W
Show more
Size
190x 110x 40 mm
Length
190 mm
This graphics card is 190 mm long, which is shorter than 92.2% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Height
110 mm
This graphics card is 110 mm tall, which is shorter than 88.7% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
886 g
This graphics card weighs 886 g, which is lighter than 65.4% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 3.4% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2589 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,589 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 95 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (190 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    190 mm vs 285 mm
  • 23.1% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    500 W vs 650 W
  • 15 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (110 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    110 mm vs 125 mm
  • 25.6% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (160 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    160 W vs 215 W
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 14.3% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2000 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 28.9% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (160 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    160 W vs 225 W
  • 3.4% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2589 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,589 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 14.3% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2000 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 8x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (32 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    32 MB vs 4 MB
  • 23.1% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    500 W vs 650 W
  • 25.6% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (160 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    160 W vs 215 W
  • 28.9% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (160 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    160 W vs 225 W
  • 66.7% lower idle power draw
    This graphics card has a lower idle power draw than the average graphics card (4 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    4 W vs 12 W
  • 95 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (190 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    190 mm vs 285 mm
  • 15 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (110 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    110 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 42.9% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (256 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    256 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • 5.7% lower user score
    User score
    7.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
    the average graphics card
    AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.57 vs 8.000).
    7.57 vs 8
  • 6.5% worse value for money
    AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.76 vs 7.2).
    6.76 vs 7.2
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 56 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (128 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    128 vs 184
  • 8 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (32 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    32 vs 40
  • 8 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (32 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    32 vs 40
  • 53% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (10.6 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    10.6 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 13.1% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (331.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    331.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 27.4% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (16448 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    16,448 points vs 22,653 points
  • 51.8% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (4420 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    4,420 points vs 9,166 points
  • 33.9% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (9700 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    9,700 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 38.2% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (7460 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    7,460 points vs 12,074 points
  • 2,304 fewer FP32 units
    This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (2048 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    2,048 vs 4,352
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 42.9% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (256 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    256 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 91.7% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (2 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    2 MB vs 24 MB
  • 15.8% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (16000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    16,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • 40% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    7 nm vs 5 nm
  • 2 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2021 vs 2023).
    August 2021
    2,021 vs 2,023
  • 51.5% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (11100 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    11,100 million vs 22,900 million
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
    3.0 vs 3.1
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 5 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (42 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    42 °C vs 37 °C

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techspot.com
08/05/2022
Summary of the review
T
techspot.com
13/09/2021
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
29/08/2021
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
25/08/2021
Summary of the review
T
techspot.com
10/08/2021
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
10/08/2021
Summary of the review
F
futurefive.co.nz
06/09/2021
Summary of the review
S
sea.ign.com
10/08/2021
Summary of the review
R
reviewed.com
16/08/2021
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
10/08/2021
Summary of the review
I
ign.com
10/08/2021
Summary of the review
C
custompc.com
04/10/2023
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
11/08/2021
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
11/08/2021
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
10/08/2021
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
10/08/2021
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
10/08/2021
Summary of the review
P
pcworld.com
10/08/2021
Summary of the review
G
gamereactor.es
04/09/2021
Summary of the review
P
profesionalreview.com
20/09/2021
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

  • Excellent high-refresh 1080p gaming performance, often exceeding the RTX 3060 in rasterization.
  • Remarkable power efficiency with low TDP (160W), making it ideal for systems with smaller power supplies.
  • Runs cool and quiet across most partner models like the ASUS Dual or Gigabyte Gaming OC.
  • Supports modern features like AMD Smart Access Memory (SAM) and FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR).
  • Strong value on the current used market, frequently found under $200.

What we don't like about AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

  • Performance drops off significantly at 1440p and 4K due to the limited 128-bit memory bus and 32MB Infinity Cache.
  • Ray tracing performance lags noticeably behind Nvidia's competition.
  • Lacks a hardware-based equivalent to Nvidia's DLSS (relying instead on spatial upscaling like FSR).
  • Uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which can cause performance bottlenecks on older PCIe 3.0 systems.
  • Launch price (MSRP) was widely criticized as being too high for a card focused primarily on 1080p.

Verdict

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is a mid-range graphics card built on the 7nm RDNA 2 architecture, featuring 2,048 stream processors, 32 compute units, and 32 Ray Accelerators. It is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, a 32 MB Infinity Cache, and operates with a 160W TDP, requiring a single 8-pin power connector. Its main strengths include exceptional power efficiency and high frame-rate performance for 1080p gaming, often surpassing the RTX 3060 in rasterization. However, it is limited by a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface that can bottleneck performance on older PCIe 3.0 systems, possesses relatively weak ray tracing capabilities compared to its competition, and struggles at resolutions higher than 1080p due to its narrow memory bandwidth.

Compare AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found