Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Realme Band Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£20Battery life:9 daysScreen size:0.96 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:1.5 m

Realme Band Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

7.1

Overall score

Score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

6.9

Technical score

20%

7.9

User score

â–²Better than 54% of fitness-trackers
6.9

Technical score

Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

8.5

Sports & Navigation

20%

5.0

Battery

18%

7.4

Health

18%

6.0

Display

8%

7.5

Smart Features

8%

8.8

App & Wellness

4%

5.8

Connectivity

4%

6.5

Design & Durability

â–¼Worse than 54% of fitness-trackers
7.9

User score

User score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.4

User ratings

30%

9.0

Number of reviews

Based on 4,856 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 73% of fitness-trackers
  • realme-band
  • realme-band
  • realme-band
  • realme-band
realme-band
realme-band
realme-band
realme-band

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Realme Band

Technical score
Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

8.5

Sports & Navigation

20%

5.0

Battery

18%

7.4

Health

18%

6.0

Display

8%

7.5

Smart Features

8%

8.8

App & Wellness

4%

5.8

Connectivity

4%

6.5

Design & Durability

6.9
User score
User score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.4

User ratings

30%

9.0

Number of reviews

Based on 4,856 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.9
Popularity
Popularity
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Realme Band has a popularity score of 9 points, which is higher than 78.4% of fitness trackers.
9.0
Value for money
Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

7.1

Overall score

40%

10

Price

8.0
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
yes
Resting heart rate
yes
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate. 52.6% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts. 65.8% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
High heart rate alert only.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
yes
Call control
yes
This fitness tracker supports call controls. 58.7% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Reject/mute only.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
no
Achievements
no
This fitness tracker does not support achievements. 76.2% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
4.2
Bluetooth version
4.2
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.2 which is newer than in 59.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 14.2% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
This fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m which is higher than that of 14.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 63.4% of fitness trackers.
NFC
no
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
9 days
Battery life
9 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 9 days which is shorter than that of 50.5% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
?
Battery capacity
90 mAh
Battery capacity
90 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 90 mAh which is lower than that of 66.5% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 4.6% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
0.96 inch
Screen size
0.96 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 0.96 inch which is smaller than that of 53.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 9.1% of fitness trackers.
Display type
TFT LCD
Display type
TFT LCD
This fitness tracker uses TFT LCD display technology which is less advanced than that of 62.1% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 5.6% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
80x 160
Screen resolution
80x 160
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 80x160 which is higher than that of 61.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.3% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
186 ppi
Pixel density
186 ppi
This fitness tracker has a pixel density of 186 ppi which is lower than that of 70.4% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 3.7% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
no
Replaceable watch band
no
This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band. 74.9% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
16 mm
Show more

Realme Band vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Heart rate alerts
    Fast/slow heart rate alerts
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 34.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
    High heart rate alert only.
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Color display
    Color display
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 37.7% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • Call control
    Call control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.5% of fitness trackers support call controls.
    Reject/mute only.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.2
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (4.2 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    4.2 vs 4.0
  • Built-in route tracker
    Has a route tracker
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports route tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.8% of fitness trackers support route tracking.
    Built-in GPS route tracking.
  • 3.5x cheaper
    Realme Band is cheaper than the average fitness tracker (£20 vs £70).
    £20 vs £70
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Heart rate alerts
    Fast/slow heart rate alerts
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 34.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
    High heart rate alert only.
  • Color display
    Color display
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 37.7% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.2
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (4.2 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    4.2 vs 4.0
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Call control
    Call control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.5% of fitness trackers support call controls.
    Reject/mute only.
  • Camera remote control
    Camera remote control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.9% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
  • Gesture control
    Gesture control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
  • 20% lighter
    Thickness
    20 g mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (20 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    20 g vs 25 g
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports water intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42% of fitness trackers support water intake tracking.
    Includes hydration reminders.
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    80 x 160
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (80x160 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    80x160 vs 194x368
  • 0.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    2 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 48.5 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • 87.5% smaller internal storage
    Internal storage
    0.004 GB
    This fitness tracker has a lower internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.032 GB of internal storage.
    0.004 GB vs 0.032 GB
  • Not compatible with iOS
    Compatible with iOS
    no
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with iOS, while the average fitness tracker is. 96.7% of fitness trackers are compatible with iOS.
  • No replaceable watch band
    Replaceable watch band
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band, while the average fitness tracker does. 74.5% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
  • 24.1% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    186 ppi
    This fitness tracker has a lower pixel density than the average fitness tracker (186 ppi vs 245 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 245 ppi.
    186 ppi vs 245 ppi
  • 18.2% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    90 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (90 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    90 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • 0.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    2 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 18.2% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    90 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (90 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    90 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • 1 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    9 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (9 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    9 days vs 10 days
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    80 x 160
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (80x160 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    80x160 vs 194x368
  • 24.1% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    186 ppi
    This fitness tracker has a lower pixel density than the average fitness tracker (186 ppi vs 245 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 245 ppi.
    186 ppi vs 245 ppi
  • Basic display glass
    Display glass type
    plastic
    This fitness tracker uses less durable display glass than the average fitness tracker (plastic vs glass). The average fitness tracker uses glass display glass.
    plastic vs glass
  • 0.08 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    0.96 inch
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (1 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    0.96 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • Not compatible with iOS
    Compatible with iOS
    no
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with iOS, while the average fitness tracker is. 96.7% of fitness trackers are compatible with iOS.
  • 87.5% smaller internal storage
    Internal storage
    0.004 GB
    This fitness tracker has a lower internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.032 GB of internal storage.
    0.004 GB vs 0.032 GB
  • 48.5 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • No replaceable watch band
    Replaceable watch band
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band, while the average fitness tracker does. 74.5% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
  • 0.9 mm thicker design
    Thickness
    11.9 mm
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (11.9 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    11.9 mm vs 11 mm
  • 10 °C higher minimum operating temperature
    Min operating temperature
    10 °C
    This fitness tracker has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (10 °C vs 0 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
    10 °C vs 0 °C
  • No achievements
    Achievements
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support achievements, while the average fitness tracker does. 75.8% of fitness trackers support achievements.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techadvisor.com
11/11/2020
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.net
16/08/2020
Summary of the review
W
wareable.com
07/07/2020
Summary of the review
M
m.economictimes.com
16/05/2020
Summary of the review
U
unbox.ph
30/03/2020
Summary of the review
A
androidauthority.com
02/04/2020
Summary of the review
T
techkrams.de
09/01/2021
Summary of the review
C
chinamobilemag.de
15/07/2020
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.com
14/08/2020
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
03/08/2020
Summary of the review
F
frandroid.com
01/08/2020
Summary of the review
E
elespanol.com
02/07/2020
Summary of the review
E
elespanol.com
15/07/2020
Summary of the review
T
techprincess.it
24/07/2020
Summary of the review
S
smartworld.it
22/07/2020
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.nl
26/08/2020
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 4,856 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Realme Band

  • Integrated USB-A charging connector built into the strap removes the need for extra cables.
  • Very lightweight and slim design (approx. 20g) makes it comfortable for 24/7 wear and sleep tracking.
  • Affordable entry-level price point compared to major competitors like Fitbit or Samsung.
  • Responsive capacitive touch button for simple menu navigation.
  • Includes helpful daily reminders for hydration and sedentary alerts.
  • IP68 water and dust resistance provides protection against rain and hand washing.

What we don't like about Realme Band

  • Display is significantly dim and almost impossible to read in direct sunlight.
  • Fitness tracking metrics, specifically heart rate and calorie burn, are often reported as inaccurate or inconsistent.
  • The Realme Link companion app frequently suffers from pairing and data synchronisation issues.
  • Lacks a gyroscope, limiting the depth of data available for detailed sports analysis.
  • Workout tracking is automatically disabled once the battery falls below 20%.
  • Notification support is limited, with small text that can be difficult to read on the 0.96-inch screen.

Verdict

The Realme Band is a budget-friendly fitness tracker featuring a 0.96-inch color TFT-LCD display with 160x80 resolution and a single capacitive touch button for navigation. Weighing just 20g, it includes a 90mAh battery offering up to 10 days of life, an IP68 water resistance rating, and a PPG optical heart rate sensor for 24/7 monitoring. Its standout characteristic is the integrated USB-A connector hidden within the detachable TPU strap, allowing for cable-free direct charging. Main pros include its lightweight ergonomic design, convenient built-in charging, and a dedicated Cricket Mode among its nine sports tracking options. However, notable cons include poor outdoor screen visibility under direct sunlight, buggy sleep and step tracking accuracy, and a limited notification system that often truncates text.

Compare Realme Band with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Realme Band and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found