OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Morepro Fitness Tracker V19 Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£45Battery life:7 daysScreen size:1.14 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:?

Morepro Fitness Tracker V19 Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

7.6

Overall score

Score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 69% of models
Score components

80%

7.5

Technical score

20%

8.0

User score

â–²Better than 69% of fitness-trackers
7.5

Technical score

Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Score components

20%

7.6

Sports & Navigation

20%

5.2

Battery

18%

9.7

Health

18%

6.7

Display

8%

8.5

Smart Features

8%

8.9

App & Wellness

4%

7.8

Connectivity

4%

6.8

Design & Durability

â–²Better than 70% of fitness-trackers
8.0

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

8.8

Number of reviews

Based on 3,941 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 72% of fitness-trackers
  • morepro-fitness-tracker-v19
  • morepro-fitness-tracker-v19
  • morepro-fitness-tracker-v19
  • morepro-fitness-tracker-v19
  • morepro-fitness-tracker-v19
  • morepro-fitness-tracker-v19
  • morepro-fitness-tracker-v19
  • morepro-fitness-tracker-v19
morepro-fitness-tracker-v19
morepro-fitness-tracker-v19
morepro-fitness-tracker-v19
morepro-fitness-tracker-v19
morepro-fitness-tracker-v19
morepro-fitness-tracker-v19
morepro-fitness-tracker-v19
morepro-fitness-tracker-v19

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Morepro Fitness Tracker V19

Technical score
Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Score components:

20%

7.6

Sports & Navigation

20%

5.2

Battery

18%

9.7

Health

18%

6.7

Display

8%

8.5

Smart Features

8%

8.9

App & Wellness

4%

7.8

Connectivity

4%

6.8

Design & Durability

7.5
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

8.8

Number of reviews

Based on 3,941 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.0
Popularity
Popularity
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 76% of models
Popularity:
Morepro Fitness Tracker V19 has a popularity score of 8.8 points, which is higher than 76.1% of fitness trackers.
8.8
Value for money
Value for money
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 68% of models
Score components:

60%

7.6

Overall score

40%

10

Price

8.3
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 40% of models
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
yes
Resting heart rate
yes
â–² Better than 53% of models
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate. 52.6% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
â–² Better than 66% of models
This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts. 65.8% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
High heart rate alert only.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
â–¼ Worse than 12% of models
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
yes
Blood oxygen sensor
yes
â–² Better than 75% of models
This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor. 75.1% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
â–¼ Worse than 12% of models
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
?
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 5% of models
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
â–¼ Worse than 8% of models
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
â–² Better than 28% of models
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
â–² Better than 16% of models
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
Call control
no
â–¼ Worse than 42% of models
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 41.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
â–¼ Worse than 1% of models
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
â–¼ Worse than 20% of models
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
â–² Better than 6% of models
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
â–² Better than 2% of models
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
Achievements
yes
â–² Better than 24% of models
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
â–² Better than 24% of models
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
â–¼ Worse than 34% of models
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
4
Bluetooth version
4
â–¼ Worse than 44% of models
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4 which is newer than in 5.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 51.3% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
no
NFC
no
â–¼ Worse than 13% of models
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
â–¼ Worse than 1% of models
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
7 days
Battery life
7 days
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Market range: <5 days – >180 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 7 days which is shorter than that of 53.5% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 22.8% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
?
Battery capacity
130 mAh
Battery capacity
130 mAh
â–² Better than 57% of models
Market range: <30 mAh – >225 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 130 mAh which is higher than that of 56.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 0.7% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
â–² Better than 24% of models
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
1.14 inch
Screen size
1.14 inch
â–² Better than 61% of models
Market range: <0 inch – >1.6 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.14 inch which is larger than that of 60.8% of fitness trackers.
Display type
?
Screen resolution
135x 240
Screen resolution
135x 240
â–² Better than 77% of models
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 135x240 which is higher than that of 77.3% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
241 ppi
Pixel density
241 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <140 ppi – >330 ppi
This fitness tracker has a pixel density of 241 ppi which is lower than that of 51.9% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
no
Replaceable watch band
no
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band. 74.9% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
18 mm
Show more

Morepro Fitness Tracker V19 vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • Blood oxygen monitoring
    Blood oxygen sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
  • Tracks HRV
    HRV tracking
    yes
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    This fitness tracker supports HRV tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.9% of fitness trackers support HRV tracking.
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Continuous SpOâ‚‚ monitoring
    Continuous SpOâ‚‚ monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    This fitness tracker supports continuous SpOâ‚‚ monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does not. 12.3% of fitness trackers support continuous SpOâ‚‚ monitoring.
    24/7 monitoring.
  • Heart rate alerts
    Fast/slow heart rate alerts
    yes
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 34.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
    High heart rate alert only.
  • Tracks respiration rate
    Respiration rate tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    This fitness tracker supports respiratory rate tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 12.9% of fitness trackers support respiratory rate tracking.
    Sleep only.
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Color display
    Color display
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 37.7% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • Blood oxygen monitoring
    Blood oxygen sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
  • Tracks HRV
    HRV tracking
    yes
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    This fitness tracker supports HRV tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.9% of fitness trackers support HRV tracking.
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Heart rate alerts
    Fast/slow heart rate alerts
    yes
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 34.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
    High heart rate alert only.
  • Continuous SpOâ‚‚ monitoring
    Continuous SpOâ‚‚ monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    This fitness tracker supports continuous SpOâ‚‚ monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does not. 12.3% of fitness trackers support continuous SpOâ‚‚ monitoring.
    24/7 monitoring.
  • Tracks respiration rate
    Respiration rate tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    This fitness tracker supports respiratory rate tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 12.9% of fitness trackers support respiratory rate tracking.
    Sleep only.
  • Built-in temperature sensor
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    This fitness tracker has a temperature sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.8% of fitness trackers have a temperature sensor.
    Skin or ambient temperature sensor.
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Tracks skin temperature
    Skin temperature tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    This fitness tracker supports skin temperature tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 11.3% of fitness trackers support skin temperature tracking.
    Tracks skin temperature trends.
  • Period notifications
    Has period notifications
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This fitness tracker has period notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 31% of fitness trackers have period notifications.
  • ECG support
    ECG technology
    yes
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    This fitness tracker supports ECG, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.7% of fitness trackers support ECG.
  • Fertile window notifications
    Displays fertile window notifications
    yes
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    This fitness tracker displays fertile window notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 24.1% of fitness trackers display fertile window notifications.
  • Ovulation prediction
    Predicts ovulation
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.6% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
  • Cycle start prediction
    Predicts start date
    yes
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42.5% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • ECG lead type
    ECG lead type
    yes
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    This fitness tracker supports advanced ECG leads, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.7% of fitness trackers support advanced ECG leads.
    single-lead ECG.
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitor
    yes
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    This fitness tracker supports blood pressure monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does not. 1.9% of fitness trackers support blood pressure monitoring.
    Optical sensor measurement.
  • Low power mode
    Low power mode
    yes
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    This fitness tracker supports low power mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 24.1% of fitness trackers support low power mode.
  • 18.2% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    130 mAh
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <30 mAh – >225 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (130 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    130 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Color display
    Color display
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 37.7% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • 0.1 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.14 inch
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    Market range: <0 inch – >1.6 inch
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen size than the average fitness tracker (1.1 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    1.14 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Camera remote control
    Camera remote control
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.9% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
  • Gesture control
    Gesture control
    yes
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This fitness tracker supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
  • No account required
    No account required
    yes
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    This fitness tracker works without an account, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.2% of fitness trackers work without an account.
  • No pace measurement
    Measures pace
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support pace measurement, while the average fitness tracker does. 61.7% of fitness trackers support pace measurement.
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    7 days
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <5 days – >180 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • No replaceable watch band
    Replaceable watch band
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band, while the average fitness tracker does. 74.5% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
  • 2 ATM lower water resistance rating
    ATM rating
    3 ATM
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <1 ATM – >5 ATM
    This fitness tracker has a lower ATM rating than the average fitness tracker (3 ATM vs 5 ATM). The average fitness tracker has an ATM rating of 5 ATM.
    3 ATM vs 5 ATM
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    135 x 240
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (135x240 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    135x240 vs 194x368
  • Basic display glass
    Display glass type
    plastic
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This fitness tracker uses less durable display glass than the average fitness tracker (plastic vs glass). The average fitness tracker uses glass display glass.
    plastic vs glass
  • 4.2 mm greater height
    Height
    45 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <10 mm – >50 mm
    This fitness tracker is taller than the average fitness tracker (45 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    45 mm vs 40.8 mm
  • 10 °C higher minimum operating temperature
    Min operating temperature
    -10 °C
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    Market range: <-20 °C – >5 °C
    This fitness tracker has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (-10 °C vs 0 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
    -10 °C vs 0 °C
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    7 days
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <5 days – >180 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    135 x 240
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (135x240 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    135x240 vs 194x368
  • Basic display glass
    Display glass type
    plastic
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This fitness tracker uses less durable display glass than the average fitness tracker (plastic vs glass). The average fitness tracker uses glass display glass.
    plastic vs glass
  • No replaceable watch band
    Replaceable watch band
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band, while the average fitness tracker does. 74.5% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
  • 2 ATM lower water resistance rating
    ATM rating
    3 ATM
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <1 ATM – >5 ATM
    This fitness tracker has a lower ATM rating than the average fitness tracker (3 ATM vs 5 ATM). The average fitness tracker has an ATM rating of 5 ATM.
    3 ATM vs 5 ATM
  • 4.2 mm greater height
    Height
    45 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <10 mm – >50 mm
    This fitness tracker is taller than the average fitness tracker (45 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    45 mm vs 40.8 mm
  • 10 °C higher minimum operating temperature
    Min operating temperature
    -10 °C
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    Market range: <-20 °C – >5 °C
    This fitness tracker has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (-10 °C vs 0 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
    -10 °C vs 0 °C

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
davethekayaker.com
19/04/2019
Summary of the review
Fitness Tracker Review: MorePro Waterproof Health Tracker

Third-party reviews

Based on 3,941 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Morepro Fitness Tracker V19

  • Affordable price point and overall great value for a budget fitness tracker
  • Comprehensive health monitoring including ECG, blood pressure, and blood oxygen levels
  • Lightweight and comfortable design with soft, flexible bands
  • Convenient built-in USB charging that doesn't require extra cables
  • Generally accurate tracking for vitals and EKG readings
  • User-friendly interface and simple initial setup process

What we don't like about Morepro Fitness Tracker V19

  • Inconsistent battery life, often lasting less than the advertised 7 days
  • Occasional connectivity issues and difficulty keeping the device paired with the smartphone app
  • Screen readability can be poor in direct sunlight due to limited brightness adjustments
  • Syncing data between the device and the app can sometimes be slow
  • Durability concerns regarding the band's connection point over the charging port
  • Some users report specific functionality issues with sleep monitoring not working consistently

Verdict

The Morepro Fitness Tracker V19 is a health-focused wearable featuring a 1.14-inch IPS color screen and an IP68 waterproof rating. It distinguishes itself with advanced monitoring capabilities, including 24/7 heart rate and blood pressure tracking, SpO2 blood oxygen levels, and an integrated ECG/EKG sensor with HRV analysis. The device supports over 20 sports modes, scientific sleep tracking, and a cordless USB charging design that provides 5 to 7 days of battery life. Main pros include its affordable price point, comprehensive cardiovascular insights, and senior-friendly interface with adjustable brightness and large fonts. However, common cons include the lack of built-in GPS, limited multi-sport mode switching, and a potential reduction in battery life to approximately 3 days when all continuous monitoring functions are simultaneously enabled.

Compare Morepro Fitness Tracker V19 with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Morepro Fitness Tracker V19 and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found