Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Goqii Band Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£35Battery life:7 daysScreen size:?Heart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:1.5 m

Goqii Band Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

7.5

Overall score

Score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

7.4

Technical score

20%

7.7

User score

â–²Better than 65% of fitness-trackers
7.4

Technical score

Technical score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

7.9

Sports & Navigation

20%

4.8

Battery

18%

8.4

Health

18%

7.5

Display

8%

8.1

Smart Features

8%

9.6

App & Wellness

4%

7.4

Connectivity

4%

6.7

Design & Durability

â–²Better than 65% of fitness-trackers
7.7

User score

User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.2

User ratings

30%

8.9

Number of reviews

Based on 4,037 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 77% of fitness-trackers
  • goqii-band
  • goqii-band
  • goqii-band
  • goqii-band
  • goqii-band
  • goqii-band
goqii-band
goqii-band
goqii-band
goqii-band
goqii-band
goqii-band

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Goqii Band

Technical score
Technical score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

7.9

Sports & Navigation

20%

4.8

Battery

18%

8.4

Health

18%

7.5

Display

8%

8.1

Smart Features

8%

9.6

App & Wellness

4%

7.4

Connectivity

4%

6.7

Design & Durability

7.4
User score
User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.2

User ratings

30%

8.9

Number of reviews

Based on 4,037 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.7
Popularity
Popularity
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Goqii Band has a popularity score of 8.9 points, which is higher than 77% of fitness trackers.
8.9
Value for money
Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

7.5

Overall score

40%

10

Price

8.2
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
?
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts. 65.8% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
yes
Blood oxygen sensor
yes
This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor. 75.1% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 41.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
?
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
?
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
yes
Coaching
yes
This fitness tracker supports coaching. 66.5% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
4
Bluetooth version
4
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4 which is newer than in 5.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 51.3% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
8 m
Maximum Bluetooth range
8 m
This fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 8 m which is lower than that of 91% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 0.8% of fitness trackers.
NFC
?
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
Show more
Battery life
7 days
Battery life
7 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 7 days which is shorter than that of 53.5% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 22.8% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
?
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
7 h
Battery life in power-saving mode
7 h
This fitness tracker offers a power-saving battery life of 7 h which is shorter than that of 94.4% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 5.6% of fitness trackers.
Battery capacity
?
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
?
Display type
?
Screen resolution
?
Pixel density
?
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
?
Show more

Goqii Band vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • Blood oxygen monitoring
    Blood oxygen sensor
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
  • 2,000x larger internal storage
    Internal storage
    64 GB
    This fitness tracker has a higher internal storage than the average fitness tracker (64 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.032 GB of internal storage.
    64 GB vs 0.032 GB
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Heart rate alerts
    Fast/slow heart rate alerts
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 34.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Coaching features
    Coaching
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports coaching, while the average fitness tracker does not. 33.8% of fitness trackers support coaching.
  • Built-in temperature sensor
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a temperature sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.8% of fitness trackers have a temperature sensor.
  • Built-in gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a gyroscope, while the average fitness tracker does not. 26.5% of fitness trackers have a gyroscope.
  • Blood oxygen monitoring
    Blood oxygen sensor
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
  • Heart rate alerts
    Fast/slow heart rate alerts
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 34.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
  • Built-in temperature sensor
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a temperature sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.8% of fitness trackers have a temperature sensor.
  • ECG support
    ECG technology
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports ECG, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.7% of fitness trackers support ECG.
    single-lead ECG.
  • Ovulation prediction
    Predicts ovulation
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.6% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
  • Cycle start prediction
    Predicts start date
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42.5% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • ECG lead type
    ECG lead type
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports advanced ECG leads, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.7% of fitness trackers support advanced ECG leads.
    single-lead ECG.
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitor
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports blood pressure monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does not. 1.9% of fitness trackers support blood pressure monitoring.
    Requires initial app calibration.
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • 2,000x larger internal storage
    Internal storage
    64 GB
    This fitness tracker has a higher internal storage than the average fitness tracker (64 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.032 GB of internal storage.
    64 GB vs 0.032 GB
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • 1 mm thinner design
    Thickness
    10 mm
    This fitness tracker is thinner than the average fitness tracker (10 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    10 mm vs 11 mm
  • Coaching features
    Coaching
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports coaching, while the average fitness tracker does not. 33.8% of fitness trackers support coaching.
  • Tracks calorie intake
    Calorie intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calorie intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.3% of fitness trackers support calorie intake tracking.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports water intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42% of fitness trackers support water intake tracking.
  • Tracks temperature
    Temperature tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports temperature tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 12.9% of fitness trackers support temperature tracking.
  • Points-based system
    Points-based system
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports a points-based system, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.6% of fitness trackers support a points-based system.
    Uses Karma Points.
  • No automatic activity detection
    Automatic activity detection
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support automatic activity detection, while the average fitness tracker does. 52% of fitness trackers support automatic activity detection.
  • 1 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    2.5 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2.5 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    source range 2-3 h.
    2.5 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    7 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • 5 ATM lower water resistance rating
    ATM rating
    0 ATM
    This fitness tracker has a lower ATM rating than the average fitness tracker (0 ATM vs 5 ATM). The average fitness tracker has an ATM rating of 5 ATM.
    Not waterproof.
    0 ATM vs 5 ATM
  • 48.5 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • 13 h shorter power-saving battery life
    Battery life in power-saving mode
    7 h
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life in power-saving mode than the average fitness tracker (7 h vs 20 h). The average fitness tracker has 20 h of battery life in power-saving mode.
    7 h vs 20 h
  • 3.5% lower user score
    User score
    7.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Goqii Band
    the average fitness tracker
    Goqii Band has a lower user score than the average fitness tracker (7.73 vs 8.000).
    7.73 vs 8
  • 2 m shorter Bluetooth range
    Maximum Bluetooth range
    8 m
    This fitness tracker has a shorter Bluetooth range than the average fitness tracker (8 m vs 10 m). The average fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m.
    8 m vs 10 m
  • 3.5% lower user score
    User score
    7.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Goqii Band
    the average fitness tracker
    Goqii Band has a lower user score than the average fitness tracker (7.73 vs 8.000).
    7.73 vs 8
  • 1 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    2.5 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2.5 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    source range 2-3 h.
    2.5 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    7 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • 13 h shorter power-saving battery life
    Battery life in power-saving mode
    7 h
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life in power-saving mode than the average fitness tracker (7 h vs 20 h). The average fitness tracker has 20 h of battery life in power-saving mode.
    7 h vs 20 h
  • 2 m shorter Bluetooth range
    Maximum Bluetooth range
    8 m
    This fitness tracker has a shorter Bluetooth range than the average fitness tracker (8 m vs 10 m). The average fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m.
    8 m vs 10 m
  • 5 ATM lower water resistance rating
    ATM rating
    0 ATM
    This fitness tracker has a lower ATM rating than the average fitness tracker (0 ATM vs 5 ATM). The average fitness tracker has an ATM rating of 5 ATM.
    Not waterproof.
    0 ATM vs 5 ATM
  • 48.5 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1.5 m vs 50 m

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
the-gadgeteer.com
31/12/2014
Summary of the review
M
m.economictimes.com
17/09/2014
Summary of the review
T
themobileindian.com
14/07/2015
Summary of the review
I
indianexpress.com
31/08/2015
Summary of the review
T
techgoondu.com
14/04/2015
Summary of the review
T
the-gadgeteer.com
31/12/2014
Summary of the review
I
indiatoday.in
03/12/2016
Summary of the review
T
the-gadgeteer.com
31/12/2014
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 4,037 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Goqii Band

  • Integrated personal coaching service provides high motivation and guidance for fitness goals.
  • Excellent battery life, with some models lasting up to 7 days or more on a single charge.
  • Stylish and attractive design with a rugged build that resists scratches.
  • Accurate tracking for core metrics like steps, heart rate, and sleep in most user scenarios.
  • Value-added features like NFC contactless payment and a 'Health Locker' for medical records.
  • Good customer support, with reported instances of quick replacements for faulty parts or lost cables.

What we don't like about Goqii Band

  • Step count accuracy can be inconsistent during specific activities like brisk walking or household chores.
  • The rubber band design can become loose over time due to repeatedly removing the tracker module for charging.
  • Subscription-based model means the core coaching benefit requires ongoing payments.
  • App interface and software experience have been described as cluttered or needing further refinement.
  • Display readability can be difficult in direct sunlight or for quick glances due to its orientation.
  • Initial setup and syncing can be slow or encounter configuration hitches.

Verdict

The GOQii Vital 4.0 is a comprehensive fitness tracker featuring an AMOLED color display with a 120x240 pixel resolution and IP68 water and dust resistance. Key characteristics include 24/7 heart rate monitoring, SpO2 blood oxygen tracking, body temperature sensors, and blood pressure measurement, alongside support for 17 exercise modes. A major pro is its unique health ecosystem which includes a 3-month personal coaching subscription and a built-in USB charger that eliminates the need for extra cables, providing up to 7 days of battery life. However, notable cons include reported inaccuracies in blood pressure and sleep tracking, a lack of built-in GPS for independent route monitoring, and a design that some users find prone to unfastening.

Compare Goqii Band with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Goqii Band and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found