OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Amazfit Band 7 Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£45Battery life:18 daysScreen size:1.47 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:50 m

Amazfit Band 7 Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

8.8

Overall score

Score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components

80%

8.9

Technical score

20%

8.4

User score

★Better than 96% of fitness-trackers
8.9

Technical score

Technical score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 97% of models
Score components

20%

9.0

Sports & Navigation

20%

8.3

Battery

18%

9.5

Health

18%

8.6

Display

8%

9.5

Smart Features

8%

9.2

App & Wellness

4%

7.9

Connectivity

4%

8.0

Design & Durability

★Better than 97% of fitness-trackers
8.4

User score

User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 77% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

8.5

Number of reviews

Based on 2,651 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▲Better than 77% of fitness-trackers
  • amazfit-band-7
  • amazfit-band-7
  • amazfit-band-7
  • amazfit-band-7
  • amazfit-band-7
  • amazfit-band-7
  • amazfit-band-7
  • amazfit-band-7
amazfit-band-7
amazfit-band-7
amazfit-band-7
amazfit-band-7
amazfit-band-7
amazfit-band-7
amazfit-band-7
amazfit-band-7

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Amazfit Band 7

Technical score
Technical score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 97% of models
Score components:

20%

9.0

Sports & Navigation

20%

8.3

Battery

18%

9.5

Health

18%

8.6

Display

8%

9.5

Smart Features

8%

9.2

App & Wellness

4%

7.9

Connectivity

4%

8.0

Design & Durability

8.9
User score
User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 77% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

8.5

Number of reviews

Based on 2,651 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.4
Popularity
Popularity
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 73% of models
Popularity:
Amazfit Band 7 has a popularity score of 8.5 points, which is higher than 72.8% of fitness trackers.
8.5
Value for money
Value for money
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 95% of models
Score components:

60%

8.8

Overall score

40%

10

Price

9.1
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
▲ Better than 40% of models
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
yes
Resting heart rate
yes
▲ Better than 53% of models
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate. 52.6% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
▲ Better than 66% of models
This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts. 65.8% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
High and low resting heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
▼ Worse than 12% of models
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
yes
Blood oxygen sensor
yes
▲ Better than 75% of models
This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor. 75.1% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
▼ Worse than 11% of models
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
▼ Worse than 12% of models
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
?
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
▼ Worse than 5% of models
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
▼ Worse than 8% of models
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
▲ Better than 28% of models
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
▲ Better than 16% of models
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
yes
Call control
yes
▲ Better than 59% of models
This fitness tracker supports call controls. 58.7% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Reject/mute only.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
▼ Worse than 1% of models
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
yes
Calendar sync
yes
▲ Better than 80% of models
This fitness tracker supports calendar sync. 80.2% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
▲ Better than 6% of models
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
via Zepp app
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
▲ Better than 2% of models
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
Achievements
yes
▲ Better than 24% of models
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
▲ Better than 24% of models
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
▼ Worse than 34% of models
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
5.2
Bluetooth version
5.2
★ Better than 94% of models
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 5.2 which is newer than in 94.4% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 1.5% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
no
NFC
no
▼ Worse than 13% of models
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
▼ Worse than 2% of models
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi connectivity.
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
▼ Worse than 1% of models
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
18 days
Battery life
18 days
▲ Better than 77% of models
Market range: <5 days – >180 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 18 days which is longer than that of 76.7% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 1% of fitness trackers.
Longer in saver mode
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
28 h
Battery life in power-saving mode
28 h
▲ Better than 89% of models
Market range: <6 h – >36 h
This fitness tracker offers a power-saving battery life of 28 h which is longer than that of 88.9% of fitness trackers.
Battery capacity
232 mAh
Battery capacity
232 mAh
★ Better than 94% of models
Market range: <30 mAh – >225 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 232 mAh which is higher than that of 94.1% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
▲ Better than 24% of models
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
1.47 inch
Screen size
1.47 inch
▲ Better than 76% of models
Market range: <0 inch – >1.6 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.47 inch which is larger than that of 75.5% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 9.1% of fitness trackers.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
▲ Better than 75% of models
This fitness tracker uses AMOLED display technology which is more advanced than that of 74.9% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 25.1% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
198x 368
Screen resolution
198x 368
★ Better than 91% of models
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 198x368 which is higher than that of 91.5% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
282 ppi
Pixel density
282 ppi
▲ Better than 56% of models
Market range: <140 ppi – >330 ppi
This fitness tracker has a pixel density of 282 ppi which is higher than that of 56.5% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 15.7% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
▼ Worse than 2% of models
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
▼ Worse than 2% of models
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
▲ Better than 26% of models
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
16 mm
Show more

Amazfit Band 7 vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • 8 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    18 days
    ▲ Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <5 days – >180 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (18 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    Longer in saver mode
    18 days vs 10 days
  • 2.11x larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    232 mAh
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <30 mAh – >225 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (232 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    232 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Blood oxygen monitoring
    Blood oxygen sensor
    yes
    ▲ Better than 75% of models
    This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
  • Always-on display
    Always-on display
    yes
    ▲ Better than 75% of models
    This fitness tracker has an always-on display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.6% of fitness trackers have an always-on display.
  • Tracks HRV
    HRV tracking
    yes
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    This fitness tracker supports HRV tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.9% of fitness trackers support HRV tracking.
    Sleep only.
  • Measures VO2 max
    VO2 max
    yes
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    This fitness tracker supports VO2 max tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 21.8% of fitness trackers support VO2 max tracking.
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    ▲ Better than 53% of models
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    ▲ Better than 56% of models
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • 15.4% better value for money
    Amazfit Band 7 has a higher value-for-money score than the average fitness tracker (9.14 vs 7.9).
    9.14 vs 7.92
  • 5.3% higher user score
    User score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Amazfit Band 7
    the average fitness tracker
    Amazfit Band 7 has a higher user score than the average fitness tracker (8.42 vs 8.000).
    8.42 vs 8
  • Blood oxygen monitoring
    Blood oxygen sensor
    yes
    ▲ Better than 75% of models
    This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
  • Tracks HRV
    HRV tracking
    yes
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    This fitness tracker supports HRV tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.9% of fitness trackers support HRV tracking.
    Sleep only.
  • Measures VO2 max
    VO2 max
    yes
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    This fitness tracker supports VO2 max tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 21.8% of fitness trackers support VO2 max tracking.
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    ▲ Better than 53% of models
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Heart rate alerts
    Fast/slow heart rate alerts
    yes
    ▲ Better than 66% of models
    This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 34.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
    High and low resting heart rate alerts.
  • Continuous SpO₂ monitoring
    Continuous SpO₂ monitoring
    yes
    ▲ Better than 88% of models
    This fitness tracker supports continuous SpO₂ monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does not. 12.3% of fitness trackers support continuous SpO₂ monitoring.
    24/7 monitoring.
  • Tracks respiration rate
    Respiration rate tracking
    yes
    ▲ Better than 88% of models
    This fitness tracker supports respiratory rate tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 12.9% of fitness trackers support respiratory rate tracking.
    Sleep only.
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    ▲ Better than 59% of models
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Period notifications
    Has period notifications
    yes
    ▲ Better than 69% of models
    This fitness tracker has period notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 31% of fitness trackers have period notifications.
  • Fertile window notifications
    Displays fertile window notifications
    yes
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    This fitness tracker displays fertile window notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 24.1% of fitness trackers display fertile window notifications.
  • Ovulation prediction
    Predicts ovulation
    yes
    ▲ Better than 59% of models
    This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.6% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
  • Cycle start prediction
    Predicts start date
    yes
    ▲ Better than 58% of models
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42.5% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • 8 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    18 days
    ▲ Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <5 days – >180 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (18 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    Longer in saver mode
    18 days vs 10 days
  • 2.11x larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    232 mAh
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <30 mAh – >225 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (232 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    232 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Low power mode
    Low power mode
    yes
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    This fitness tracker supports low power mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 24.1% of fitness trackers support low power mode.
  • 8 h longer power-saving battery life
    Battery life in power-saving mode
    28 h
    ▲ Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <6 h – >36 h
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life in power-saving mode than the average fitness tracker (28 h vs 20 h). The average fitness tracker has 20 h of battery life in power-saving mode.
    28 h vs 20 h
  • Always-on display
    Always-on display
    yes
    ▲ Better than 75% of models
    This fitness tracker has an always-on display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.6% of fitness trackers have an always-on display.
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    ▲ Better than 56% of models
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • 11.1% higher screen brightness
    Screen brightness
    500 nits
    ▲ Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <390 nits – >600 nits
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen brightness than the average fitness tracker (500 nits vs 450 nits). The average fitness tracker has screen brightness of 450 nits.
    500 nits vs 450 nits
  • 0.43 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.47 inch
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <0 inch – >1.6 inch
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen size than the average fitness tracker (1.5 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    1.47 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • Color display
    Color display
    yes
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 37.7% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • 15.1% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    282 ppi
    ▲ Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <140 ppi – >330 ppi
    This fitness tracker has a higher pixel density than the average fitness tracker (282 ppi vs 245 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 245 ppi.
    282 ppi vs 245 ppi
  • Durable display glass
    Display glass type
    tempered glass
    ▲ Better than 64% of models
    This fitness tracker uses more durable display glass than the average fitness tracker (tempered glass vs glass). The average fitness tracker uses glass display glass.
    Anti-fingerprint coating.
    tempered glass vs glass
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.2
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (5.2 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    5.2 vs 4.0
  • Smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    yes
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    This fitness tracker supports a smart alarm, while the average fitness tracker does not. 27.3% of fitness trackers support a smart alarm.
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    ▲ Better than 51% of models
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Passcode protection
    Passcode protection
    yes
    ▲ Better than 83% of models
    This fitness tracker supports passcode protection, while the average fitness tracker does not. 17.6% of fitness trackers support passcode protection.
    Uses an off-wrist numerical password lock.
  • 4x larger internal storage
    Internal storage
    0.128 GB
    ▲ Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >0.5 GB
    This fitness tracker has a higher internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0.1 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.032 GB of internal storage.
    0.128 GB vs 0.032 GB
  • Call control
    Call control
    yes
    ▲ Better than 59% of models
    This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.5% of fitness trackers support call controls.
    Reject/mute only.
  • High voice commands
    Voice commands
    yes
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    This fitness tracker supports voice commands, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.4% of fitness trackers support voice commands.
  • Voice assistant support
    Voice assistant support
    yes
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    This fitness tracker supports voice assistants, while the average fitness tracker does not. 6.9% of fitness trackers support voice assistants.
    Supports Amazon Alexa.
  • Calendar sync
    Calendar sync
    yes
    ▲ Better than 80% of models
    This fitness tracker supports calendar sync, while the average fitness tracker does not. 20.2% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
  • Camera remote control
    Camera remote control
    yes
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.9% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
    Enable it in Zepp Lab.
  • Gesture control
    Gesture control
    yes
    ▲ Better than 60% of models
    This fitness tracker supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
  • 6 newer release date
    Release date
    2022
    ▲ Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This fitness tracker was released more recently than the average fitness tracker (2022 vs 2016). The average fitness tracker was released in 2016.
    July 2022
    2022 vs 2016
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    This fitness tracker supports third-party apps, while the average fitness tracker does not. 3.3% of fitness trackers support third-party apps.
    Supports mini-apps via Zepp App Store.
  • Tracks calorie intake
    Calorie intake tracking
    yes
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    This fitness tracker supports calorie intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.3% of fitness trackers support calorie intake tracking.
  • Tracks temperature
    Temperature tracking
    yes
    ▲ Better than 88% of models
    This fitness tracker supports temperature tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 12.9% of fitness trackers support temperature tracking.
  • Points-based system
    Points-based system
    yes
    ▲ Better than 62% of models
    This fitness tracker supports a points-based system, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.6% of fitness trackers support a points-based system.
    Uses PAI.
  • 0.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    2 hours
    ▼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <0 hours – >5 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 12% heavier
    Thickness
    28 g mm
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <8 mm – >13 mm
    This fitness tracker is heavier than the average fitness tracker (28 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    28 g vs 25 g
  • 1.2 mm thicker design
    Thickness
    12.2 mm
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <8 mm – >13 mm
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (12.2 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    12.2 mm vs 11 mm
  • 0.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    2 hours
    ▼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <0 hours – >5 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 12% heavier
    Thickness
    28 g mm
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <8 mm – >13 mm
    This fitness tracker is heavier than the average fitness tracker (28 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    28 g vs 25 g
  • 1.2 mm thicker design
    Thickness
    12.2 mm
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <8 mm – >13 mm
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (12.2 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    12.2 mm vs 11 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
consumerreports.org
01/08/2022
Summary of the review
Amazfit Band 7 Smartwatches & Fitness Tracker Review
P
popsci.com
17/04/2023
Summary of the review
Amazfit Band 7 fitness & health tracker review: Back to basics
A
androidcentral.com
23/10/2022
Summary of the review
Amazfit Band 7 review: The ideal budget fitness tracker for ...
T
techgearlab.com
13/08/2025
Summary of the review
Amazfit Band 7 Review | Tested & Rated - TechGearLab
T
techadvisor.com
09/06/2023
Summary of the review
Amazfit Band 7 Review: Terrific Tracker - Tech Advisor
T
tomsguide.com
06/09/2024
Summary of the review
Amazfit Band 7 fitness tracker review - Tom's Guide
T
theverge.com
25/03/2023
Summary of the review
Amazfit Band 7 review: where did all the budget trackers go?
P
pcwelt.de
27/06/2023
Summary of the review
Amazfit Band 7 Review: Budget-Friendly Activity Tracker
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.com
27/03/2023
Summary of the review
Amazfit Band 7 Smartwatch Review - Affordable Fitness Tracker with Alexa and Accuracy Issues
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
02/11/2024
Summary of the review
This fitness tracker offers the best value for money in our comparison
(Translated)Show original
P
protegez-vous.ca
Date non spécifiée
Summary of the review
AMAZFIT Band 7 | Protect Yourself
(Translated)Show original
T
test-achats.be
Date non spécifiée
Summary of the review
Amazfit Band 7 review", "Amazfit Band 7 test
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.biz
28/03/2023
Summary of the review
Amazfit Band 7 review: affordable fitness tracker with Alexa and accuracy gaps", "Amazfit Band 7 review: an affordable fitness tracker with Alexa and...
(Translated)Show original
T
techgearlab.com
13/08/2025
Summary of the review
Amazfit Band 7 Review | Tested and Rated
(Translated)Show original
G
gizlogic.com
08/11/2022
Summary of the review
Amazfit Band 7 review: testing the new affordable wearable from Amazfit
(Translated)Show original
O
ocu.org
23/10/2026
Summary of the review
AMAZFIT BAND 7 fitness tracker, activity tracker, smartwatch
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.nl
28/03/2023
Summary of the review
Amazfit Band 7 smartwatch review - Affordable fitness tracker with Alexa and accuracy gaps
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 2,651 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Amazfit Band 7

  • Exceptional battery life, often lasting 12–18 days on a single charge
  • Large, vibrant 1.47-inch AMOLED display that is easy to read
  • Highly affordable price point, offering great value for money
  • Lightweight and comfortable design suitable for all-day wear and sleep
  • Comprehensive health tracking features including 24/7 heart rate and SpO2 monitoring
  • Supports over 120 sports modes with auto-detection for popular activities
  • User-friendly Zepp app for detailed data analysis and device customization

What we don't like about Amazfit Band 7

  • Lack of built-in GPS, requiring a tethered phone connection for distance tracking
  • Insecure strap clasp that can easily catch on objects and come undone
  • Inconsistent sensor accuracy for heart rate and sleep tracking reported by some users
  • Touchscreen can be finicky or overly responsive, leading to accidental menu activations
  • Limited Bluetooth range can occasionally affect notification reliability
  • Missing advanced features like NFC for contactless payments and a built-in speaker

Verdict

The Amazfit Band 7 is a budget-friendly fitness tracker featuring a vibrant 1.47-inch AMOLED always-on display with a 198x368 resolution and 282 PPI. It excels in endurance, offering up to 18 days of battery life from its 232 mAh cell, and supports 120 sports modes alongside 24-hour heart rate, SpO2, and stress monitoring. Notable pros include its lightweight 28g design, 5 ATM water resistance, and built-in Amazon Alexa for voice commands. However, main cons include the lack of built-in GPS, requiring a tethered smartphone for route tracking, and reported accuracy issues with sensors during high-intensity workouts or sleep tracking.

Compare Amazfit Band 7 with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Amazfit Band 7 and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found