OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

Amazfit Band 5 Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£35Battery life:15 daysScreen size:1.1 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:50 m

Amazfit Band 5 Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

8.1

▲Better than 84% of fitness-trackers

7.9

▲Better than 82% of fitness-trackers

8.9

▲Better than 89% of fitness-trackers

7.2
Swimming
Swimming
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for swimming performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this fitness-trackers meets your specific swimming needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
28.0%
10
ATM rating
24.0%
4.0
Open-water swim mode
18.0%
10
Waterproof depth rating
15.0%
4.0
GPS
15.0%
7.0
Battery life
8.0
Kids
Kids
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for kids performance.
When it matters
When selecting a durable, safe, and family-friendly fitness-trackers suitable for learning and young children.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
30.0%
7.0
Battery life
25.0%
7.7
Weight
20.0%
10
ATM rating
15.0%
6.2
Screen size
10.0%
10
Price

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Amazfit Band 5

8.1

Show more

Hide

Health

8.6

Show more

Hide

Heart rate monitor

Resting heart rate

Fast/slow heart rate alerts

Irregular heart rate alerts

Blood oxygen sensor

Show more

Sports & Navigation

8.0

Show more

Hide

GPS

Satellite systems supported

GNSS bands supported

Galileo support

Acquires GPS faster

Show more

Smart Features

8.5

Show more

Hide

Notifications

Vibrating alerts

Call control

Call answering

Calendar sync

Show more

App & Wellness

9.0

Show more

Hide

Activity reports

Goal setting

Achievements

Inactivity alerts

Coaching

Show more

Connectivity

7.7

Show more

Hide

Bluetooth version

Maximum Bluetooth range

?

NFC

Wi-Fi connectivity

Wi-Fi version

Show more

Battery

6.9

Show more

Hide

Battery life

Battery life with GPS on

N/A

Battery life in training mode

?

Battery life in power-saving mode

Battery capacity

Show more

Display

7.2

Show more

Hide

Display

Screen size

Display type

Screen resolution

Pixel density

Show more

Design & Durability

8.1

Show more

Hide

Form factor

wristband

Hybrid design

Designed for kids

Replaceable watch band

Band width

15.55 mm

Show more

Amazfit Band 5 vs the average fitness tracker

Why is Amazfit Band 5 better than the average fitness tracker?

Show more

Hide

Blood oxygen monitoring
Blood oxygen sensor
yes
▲ Better than 75% of models
This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
5 days longer battery life
Battery life
15 days
▲ Better than 75% of models
Market range: <5 days – >180 days
This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (15 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
Longer in saver mode
15 days vs 10 days
Lower resting heart rate
Resting heart rate
yes
▲ Better than 53% of models
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Touchscreen
Touchscreen
yes
▲ Better than 56% of models
This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
Swim stroke counter
Swim stroke counter
yes
▲ Better than 78% of models
This fitness tracker supports swim stroke counting, while the average fitness tracker does not. 22% of fitness trackers support swim stroke counting.
Auto pause
Auto pause
yes
▲ Better than 77% of models
This fitness tracker supports auto pause, while the average fitness tracker does not. 23.2% of fitness trackers support auto pause.
Heart rate alerts
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
▲ Better than 66% of models
This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 34.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
High and low resting heart rate alerts.
Tracks respiration rate
Respiration rate tracking
yes
▲ Better than 88% of models
This fitness tracker supports respiratory rate tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 12.9% of fitness trackers support respiratory rate tracking.
Sleep only.

11.1% higher user score
User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Amazfit Band 5
the average fitness tracker
Amazfit Band 5 has a higher user score than the average fitness tracker (8.89 vs 8.000).
8.89 vs 8
97.4% more popular
Amazfit Band 5 has a higher popularity than the average fitness tracker (10 vs 5.1).
10 vs 5.07
9.2% better value for money
Amazfit Band 5 has a higher value-for-money score than the average fitness tracker (8.64 vs 7.9).
8.64 vs 7.92

Blood oxygen monitoring
Blood oxygen sensor
yes
▲ Better than 75% of models
This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Lower resting heart rate
Resting heart rate
yes
▲ Better than 53% of models
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Heart rate alerts
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
▲ Better than 66% of models
This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 34.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
High and low resting heart rate alerts.
Tracks respiration rate
Respiration rate tracking
yes
▲ Better than 88% of models
This fitness tracker supports respiratory rate tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 12.9% of fitness trackers support respiratory rate tracking.
Sleep only.
Tracks menstrual cycle
Menstrual cycle tracking
yes
▲ Better than 59% of models
This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
Period notifications
Has period notifications
yes
▲ Better than 69% of models
This fitness tracker has period notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 31% of fitness trackers have period notifications.
Fertile window notifications
Displays fertile window notifications
yes
▲ Better than 76% of models
This fitness tracker displays fertile window notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 24.1% of fitness trackers display fertile window notifications.
Ovulation prediction
Predicts ovulation
yes
▲ Better than 59% of models
This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.6% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
Cycle start prediction
Predicts start date
yes
▲ Better than 58% of models
This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42.5% of fitness trackers predict the start date.

Swim stroke counter
Swim stroke counter
yes
▲ Better than 78% of models
This fitness tracker supports swim stroke counting, while the average fitness tracker does not. 22% of fitness trackers support swim stroke counting.
Auto pause
Auto pause
yes
▲ Better than 77% of models
This fitness tracker supports auto pause, while the average fitness tracker does not. 23.2% of fitness trackers support auto pause.
Tracks elevation
Elevation tracking
yes
▲ Better than 73% of models
This fitness tracker supports elevation tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 27.4% of fitness trackers support elevation tracking.
Recovery time advisor
Recovery time advisor
yes
▲ Better than 88% of models
This fitness tracker supports recovery time guidance, while the average fitness tracker does not. 12.2% of fitness trackers support recovery time guidance.
0-96 hours based on workout intensity.
Built-in gyroscope
Gyroscope
yes
▲ Better than 74% of models
This fitness tracker has a gyroscope, while the average fitness tracker does not. 26.5% of fitness trackers have a gyroscope.
Built-in route tracker
Has a route tracker
yes
▲ Better than 50% of models
This fitness tracker supports route tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.8% of fitness trackers support route tracking.
Uses connected phone GPS for route maps.
Auto lap
Auto lap
yes
▲ Better than 81% of models
This fitness tracker supports auto lap, while the average fitness tracker does not. 19.4% of fitness trackers support auto lap.
Distance-based.

5 days longer battery life
Battery life
15 days
▲ Better than 75% of models
Market range: <5 days – >180 days
This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (15 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
Longer in saver mode
15 days vs 10 days
Low power mode
Low power mode
yes
▲ Better than 76% of models
This fitness tracker supports low power mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 24.1% of fitness trackers support low power mode.
5 h longer power-saving battery life
Battery life in power-saving mode
25 h
▲ Better than 83% of models
Market range: <6 h – >36 h
This fitness tracker has a higher battery life in power-saving mode than the average fitness tracker (25 h vs 20 h). The average fitness tracker has 20 h of battery life in power-saving mode.
25 h vs 20 h

Touchscreen
Touchscreen
yes
▲ Better than 56% of models
This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
Color display
Color display
yes
▲ Better than 63% of models
This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 37.7% of fitness trackers have a color display.
19.6% higher pixel density
Pixel density
293 ppi
▲ Better than 81% of models
Market range: <140 ppi – >330 ppi
This fitness tracker has a higher pixel density than the average fitness tracker (293 ppi vs 245 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 245 ppi.
293 ppi vs 245 ppi
Durable display glass
Display glass type
tempered glass
▲ Better than 64% of models
This fitness tracker uses more durable display glass than the average fitness tracker (tempered glass vs glass). The average fitness tracker uses glass display glass.
Anti-fingerprint coating.
tempered glass vs glass

Modern Bluetooth version
Bluetooth version
5.0
▲ Better than 75% of models
This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (5 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
5.0 vs 4.0

Phone finder support
Find my phone
yes
▲ Better than 51% of models
This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
Passcode protection
Passcode protection
yes
▲ Better than 83% of models
This fitness tracker supports passcode protection, while the average fitness tracker does not. 17.6% of fitness trackers support passcode protection.
Uses a band lock feature.
Call control
Call control
yes
▲ Better than 59% of models
This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.5% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Reject/mute only.
High voice commands
Voice commands
yes
★ Better than 95% of models
This fitness tracker supports voice commands, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.4% of fitness trackers support voice commands.
Supports Amazon Alexa.
Voice assistant support
Voice assistant support
yes
★ Better than 94% of models
This fitness tracker supports voice assistants, while the average fitness tracker does not. 6.9% of fitness trackers support voice assistants.
Supports Amazon Alexa.
Calendar sync
Calendar sync
yes
▲ Better than 80% of models
This fitness tracker supports calendar sync, while the average fitness tracker does not. 20.2% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Camera remote control
Camera remote control
yes
▲ Better than 61% of models
This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.9% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
Requires Zepp app pairing.
Gesture control
Gesture control
yes
▲ Better than 60% of models
This fitness tracker supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.

Tracks calorie intake
Calorie intake tracking
yes
▲ Better than 61% of models
This fitness tracker supports calorie intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.3% of fitness trackers support calorie intake tracking.
Points-based system
Points-based system
yes
▲ Better than 62% of models
This fitness tracker supports a points-based system, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.6% of fitness trackers support a points-based system.
Uses PAI.

Why is Amazfit Band 5 worse than the average fitness tracker?

Show more

Hide

No automatic activity detection
Automatic activity detection
no
▼ Worse than 52% of models
This fitness tracker does not support automatic activity detection, while the average fitness tracker does. 52% of fitness trackers support automatic activity detection.
No exercise tagging
Exercise tagging
no
▼ Worse than 59% of models
This fitness tracker does not support exercise tagging, while the average fitness tracker does. 58.4% of fitness trackers support exercise tagging.
0.5 hours longer charging time
Charging time
2 hours
▼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <0 hours – >5 hours
This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
2 hours vs 1.5 hours
Lower screen resolution
Screen resolution
126 x 294
▲ Better than 78% of models
This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (126x294 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
126x294 vs 194x368
1.4 mm thicker design
Thickness
12.4 mm
▼ Worse than 72% of models
Market range: <8 mm – >13 mm
This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (12.4 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
12.4 mm vs 11 mm
6.4 mm greater height
Height
47.2 mm
▼ Worse than 86% of models
Market range: <10 mm – >50 mm
This fitness tracker is taller than the average fitness tracker (47.2 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
47.2 mm vs 40.8 mm

0.5 hours longer charging time
Charging time
2 hours
▼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <0 hours – >5 hours
This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
2 hours vs 1.5 hours

Lower screen resolution
Screen resolution
126 x 294
▲ Better than 78% of models
This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (126x294 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
126x294 vs 194x368

1.4 mm thicker design
Thickness
12.4 mm
▼ Worse than 72% of models
Market range: <8 mm – >13 mm
This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (12.4 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
12.4 mm vs 11 mm
6.4 mm greater height
Height
47.2 mm
▼ Worse than 86% of models
Market range: <10 mm – >50 mm
This fitness tracker is taller than the average fitness tracker (47.2 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
47.2 mm vs 40.8 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

consumerreports.org

No Date Provided

Summary of the review

Amazfit Band 5 Smartwatches & Fitness Tracker Review Would you like a comparison of these reviews to see which specific fitness features performed bes...

The Amazfit Band 5 is a user-friendly and durable budget fitness tracker that excels in ease of use, featuring simple smartphone pairing and reliable water resistance. It offers high utility with a 1.1-inch AMOLED display and a variety of health metrics, including SpO2, sleep, and stress tracking. However, the device falls short in accuracy, with heart-rate monitoring rated only "fair," making its cardiovascular data less precise. Additionally, enabling advanced features like Amazon Alexa and continuous tracking may reduce the manufacturer's claimed 15-day battery life.

en.xiaomitoday.it

29/10/2020

Summary of the review

AMAZFIT Band 5 Review - Alexa and SpO2 as an Investment for the Future

The Amazfit Band 5 is identified as a superior, feature-packed alternative to the Mi Band 5, boasting key upgrades like Amazon Alexa integration and SpO2 blood oxygen monitoring. Pros include a vibrant 1.1-inch AMOLED display, 24/7 heart rate tracking via the BioTracker sensor, and 15-day battery life, making it a strong, low-cost wearable for health tracking. However, the device lacks a built-in speaker, limiting Alexa interactions to text, and does not feature onboard GPS or NFC for payments. Additionally, heavy utilization of advanced metrics can significantly reduce the promised battery life. YouTube ·

sypnotix.com

14/12/2020

Summary of the review

Amazfit Band 5 Review: Amazing Value - Sypnotix

The Amazfit Band 5 review on The Sypnotix highlights it as a feature-packed and affordable budget smartwatch priced at $49.99. Tested over a one-month period, the device excels in health tracking, offering accurate heart rate and blood-oxygen saturation monitoring, though calibration can be slow. It provides diverse capabilities such as women’s health tracking, sleep quality analysis, stress monitoring, breathing exercises, and 11 sports modes. Its lightweight design features a vibrant 1.1-inch AMOLED touchscreen that remains highly visible in broad daylight, and it integrates seamlessly with the Zepp app on a Google Pixel 5 to display detailed health scores and data insights. Additionally, it supports Amazon Alexa commands, offers over 45 customizable watch faces, is 5 ATM water-resistant, and boasts an exceptional 15-day battery life that extends to 25 days in power-saving mode. However, the reviewer notes a few prominent drawbacks regarding the device's physical design and software integration. Visually, the smartwatch lacks a sleek, premium aesthetic and is described as a tracker that "won't necessarily turn heads". The midnight black TPU band presents sizing challenges, as the reviewer found their...

techadvisor.com

20/10/2020

Summary of the review

Amazfit Band 5 Review - Tech Advisor

The Amazfit Band 5 is an exceptionally budget-friendly fitness tracker reviewed by Tech Advisor that packs surprisingly high-end health features into a compact, 24g lightweight polycarbonate body with an identical design to the Xiaomi Mi Band 5. Priced at a modest $49.99 / £44.90, the device stands out by offering premium capabilities like blood oxygen (SpO2) monitoring—a feature heavily marketed by luxury competitors—alongside built-in Amazon Alexa integration for voice commands, alarms, and quick reminders. Its 1.1-inch AMOLED touchscreen interface remains highly responsive, backed by a stellar 12-day battery life from a 125mAh cell, which can nearly double if advanced tracking settings are disabled. Fitness enthusiasts can leverage its 5ATM waterproofing and the detailed PAI scoring metrics housed inside the companion Zepp app, which also handles general lifestyle notifications, music playback adjustments, and even a unique smartphone camera remote shutter. Despite its remarkable value, Tech Advisor's hands-on testing highlights critical limitations, most notably the complete absence of on-board GPS tracking, meaning it must rely entirely on a connected smartphone to map outdoor workout routes. The review explicitly outlines the device's pros...

wareable.com

30/10/2020

Summary of the review

Amazfit Band 5 review: A budget fitness tracker with an Alexa bonus

The Wareable review highlights the Amazfit Band 5 as a high-value, budget-friendly fitness tracker featuring reliable Amazon Alexa integration, a high-quality display, and comprehensive tracking metrics similar to the Xiaomi Mi Band 5. While praised for its features, the device's sports tracking performance is considered a mixed bag, and the reviewer notes the nearly identical Mi Band 5 is a better alternative for those uninterested in Alexa functionality. Wareable

notebookcheck.com

29/04/2021

Summary of the review

Review of Huami's Amazfit Band 5 Fitness Tracker - Notebookcheck

The Amazfit Band 5 is a feature-rich, budget-friendly fitness tracker manufactured by Huami that closely mirrors the hardware design of the Xiaomi Mi Smart Band 5 but introduces several notable upgrades. It features a 1.1-inch AMOLED touchscreen display, lacks integrated GPS, and boasts a water resistance rating of 5 ATM. In terms of performance, the tracker provides a solid battery life, lasting approximately 10 days in real-world testing with continuous health monitoring active compared to its 15-day maximum estimate. Key advantages (pros) highlighted in the review include its built-in Amazon Alexa voice assistant integration via an on-board microphone, manual blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) monitoring, and precise tracking metrics specifically designed for counting strokes during rowing and swimming workouts. However, the device falls short in several areas that buyers should consider. The primary drawbacks (cons) of the Amazfit Band 5 include a limited selection of sport profiles—offering just 11 tracking modes, which is significantly outpaced by competitors like the Xiaomi Mi Band 6 with 30 modes and the Huawei Band 6 with nearly 100 modes. Additionally, the device exhibits inaccurate and...

china-gadgets.de

29/09/2022

Summary of the review

Amazfit Band 5: Mi Band 5 with Alexa & Blood Oxygen Saturation - China-Gadgets

The Amazfit Band 5 is a budget-friendly fitness tracker manufactured by Huami (the same company behind Xiaomi's popular Mi Band series) that strongly resembles the Xiaomi Mi Band 5 in design and core specifications. It features a 1.1-inch color AMOLED touchscreen display, Bluetooth 5.0 connectivity, 5 ATM water resistance, and a 125 mAh battery that delivers a strong battery life of up to 15 days. While it utilizes the Zepp companion app instead of the Mi Fit app, its physical footprint, overall software layout, and standard features—such as step tracking, sleep monitoring, heart rate measurement, and sports tracking—are virtually identical to its Xiaomi counterpart. Pros and Cons Pros: Highly affordable price point (spotted as low as €15 to €25), inclusion of Amazon Alexa voice control, blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) monitoring, and a slightly longer 15-day battery life compared to the Mi Band 5. Cons: Lack of NFC for contactless mobile payments, lack of built-in standalone GPS, localized language or server stability issues with Alexa at launch, and the inability to automatically track SpO2 continuously throughout the day without manual activation.

heise.de

07/12/2020

Summary of the review

Amazfit Band 5 Review: Versatile Fitness Tracker - Heise

The Heise Online review describes the Amazfit Band 5 as a versatile, budget-friendly fitness tracker featuring exceptional two-week battery life, quick magnetic charging, and comprehensive sleep tracking that monitors REM cycles and breathing quality. Conversely, the review identifies significant drawbacks, including a cumbersome, overly long wristband, and a challenging initial setup process that involved navigating foreign language menus. heise online

stylistme.com

05/09/2020

Summary of the review

Amazfit Band 5: The best competitor to the Xiaomi Mi Band 5

The StylistMe review positions the Amazfit Band 5 as a highly competitive and superior alternative to the popular Xiaomi Mi Band 5. Retailing at a budget-friendly price of 24.90 €, this lightweight 12g tracker features a vibrant 1.1-inch AMOLED colour display and a 5 ATM waterproof rating, making it perfectly suited for swimming. Key strengths highlighted in the review include its robust healthcare monitoring suit—such as continuous heart rate tracking, stress level analysis, and a specialized SpO2 sensor for measuring blood oxygen saturation—alongside a standout 15-day battery life. Furthermore, the seamless integration of Amazon Alexa via a built-in microphone allows users to effortlessly manage smart home devices, check the weather, and set timers right from their wrist. Despite earning an impressive overall score of 9/10, the reviewer identifies a few notable drawbacks to consider. On the hardware front, the device relies on a less convenient "Pogo" pin contact charging dock rather than the magnetic charging cradles utilized by newer competitors. There is also some minor operational ambiguity regarding whether the device features an integrated speaker, which means users might have...

notebookcheck.biz

05/05/2021

Summary of the review

Huami Amazfit Band 5 review: between the Xiaomi Mi Smart Band 5 and the Band 6

The Notebookcheck review establishes the Huami Amazfit Band 5 as a highly capable fitness tracker positioned as an enhanced version of the Xiaomi Mi Smart Band 5. A major pro of the device is the inclusion of blood-oxygen saturation (SpO2) measurements and built-in Amazon Alexa voice assistant integration via a dedicated microphone. Additionally, it features a crisp 1.1-inch AMOLED display with larger menu fonts than Xiaomi, a longer strap suitable for larger wrists, and reliable step counting via its proprietary PPG optical bio-tracking sensor. The tracker offers 11 distinct sports modes, customisable vibration models, and convenient remote smartphone camera/music playback controls through the Zepp app. Conversely, the review highlights several cons, notably the total absence of standalone GPS, meaning it relies entirely on a paired smartphone to map exercise routes. Health monitoring accuracy is another drawback; the review reveals inconsistencies in sleep tracking—failing to capture brief awakenings—and notes that manual blood-oxygen readings rarely match the precision of certified medical pulse oximeters. Furthermore, notifications on the small display are hindered by placeholder boxes replacing standard emojis. Finally, while its 125 mAh...

lesalexiens.fr

02/11/2020

Summary of the review

Amazfit Band 5 Review: The Fitness Tracker That Cuts Corners

The Amazfit Band 5 review from Les Alexiens gives a mixed verdict, highlighting its low-cost SpO2, stress, and heart rate monitoring, along with 11 sports modes and built-in Alexa support, all packed into a light, 1.1-inch AMOLED display design. While offering impressive features for the price, the tracker boasts decent one-to-two-week battery life. However, the review severely criticizes the device's accuracy and performance, noting unreliable sensors during exercise and the lack of integrated GPS. Furthermore, the Alexa voice integration is described as poorly implemented, featuring only text responses and experiencing frequent microphone recognition issues.

esbellsa.com

13 de noviembre de 2023

Summary of the review

AMAZFIT Band 5 Review

The Amazfit Band 5 is reviewed as an affordable yet comprehensive smartband that closely resembles the Xiaomi Mi Band 5 in design but stands out by introducing blood oxygen (SpO2) monitoring and Amazon Alexa integration. Geared toward fitness enthusiasts on a budget, it supports 11 sports modes, sleep tracking (including naps longer than 20 minutes), stress monitoring, and menstrual cycle tracking. The device synchronizes quickly with smartphone notifications through the Zepp App rather than MiFit, and boasts a reliable battery life that lasts roughly 15 days under normal usage, which can drop to 7 or 8 days with intensive activity. However, the review highlights several distinct drawbacks despite its strong value proposition. On the positive side, its major pros include its highly affordable pricing, built-in Alexa voice assistant, and the addition of blood oxygen tracking. Conversely, its notable cons involve the lack of built-in GPS—requiring users to carry a tethered smartphone to track outdoor routes—and an integrated Alexa system that does not yet support the Spanish language. Additionally, the screen suffers from poor visibility and inadequate illumination in bright outdoor...

elespanol.com

23/10/2020

Summary of the review

Amazfit Band 5 Review: A Smart Band with Voice Assistant", "Amazfit Band 5 Review: A Fitness Tracker with Voice Assistant

The El Androide Libre review concludes that the Amazfit Band 5 is a highly competitive, budget-friendly smartband that packs extensive tracking capabilities into a design heavily resembling the Xiaomi Mi Band series. The reviewer notes several key pros, including its impressive value for money, comprehensive health metrics such as blood oxygen saturation (SpO2), heart rate, and sleep monitoring, and an excellent battery life that stretches for two weeks or more without a charge. Its standout feature is the built-in integration of Amazon Alexa, allowing users to issue voice commands directly from their wrist, which acts as a major differentiator in the low-cost market. However, the review points out clear cons regarding its aesthetic originality and immediate software limitations. Structurally, it lacks a unique identity since it borrows heavily from alternative market designs. Furthermore, at the time of the review, the Alexa voice assistant features were restricted because the software only supported English commands. The reviewer advises that while the activity features are solid, full recommendation based on the voice assistant relies on the manufacturer rolling out the promised Spanish language...

tuttoandroid.net

08/12/2020

Summary of the review

Xiaomi Mi Band 5 vs Amazfit Band 5: differences and which one to buy

This review highlights that the Amazfit Band 5 serves as an enhanced version of the Xiaomi Mi Band 5 Global, sharing the same 1.1-inch AMOLED display, 125 mAh battery, 50-meter water resistance, and general software features. The main pros of the Amazfit Band 5 include the inclusion of an accurate SpO2 blood oxygen saturation sensor and integration with the Zepp companion app, which provides cleaner, more intuitive data graphics than Xiaomi’s Mi Fit app. However, its cons involve a slightly higher price tag (€44.99 vs €34.99) and severe connectivity and language issues with its built-in Amazon Alexa assistant, rendering the voice feature mostly useless. Additionally, its NFC functionality is restricted exclusively to AliPay in China, making it unavailable for global payments. In comparison, the Xiaomi Mi Band 5 wins on affordability, costing €10 less, and offers slightly better battery longevity (13–14 days) because it does not experience the battery drain caused by Alexa queries. Its obvious con is the total omission of the SpO2 sensor and microphone, which are locked to its Chinese variant. Structurally, the reviewer notes a minor...

tecnologici.net

10/12/2020

Summary of the review

AMAZFIT Band 5: The REVIEW and comparison with Xiaomi Mi Band 5

The Amazfit Band 5 is a highly capable, low-cost smart band designed as an upgraded counter to the Xiaomi Mi Band 5, featuring a nearly identical physical design, an identical 1.1” AMOLED display, and a 125 mAh battery that lasts up to 15 days in standby or around 10 days under normal usage. While the physical hardware, 11 sports modes, and sleep tracking functionalities remain identical to its competitor, the Amazfit version differentiates itself by utilizing the Zepp management software instead of Mi Fit. Priced slightly higher at around €45 compared to the €35 Mi Band 5, it offers an unbeatable quality-to-price ratio for users seeking enhanced tracking utilities. The primary pros of the Amazfit Band 5 include the integration of Amazon Alexa for voice commands via a built-in microphone and the addition of an SpO2 sensor for blood oxygen saturation monitoring. However, the SpO2 sensor is not diagnostic-grade and can deliver inaccurate readings if the strap is too loose. Major cons of the device include a higher retail price than standard Xiaomi bands, a steep drop in battery life...

robadainformatici.it

28/10/2025

Summary of the review

Amazfit Band 5 - Full review - Tech Stuff

The Amazfit Band 5 is a highly capable and budget-friendly fitness tracker featuring a lightweight design, weighing just 24 grams with its hypoallergenic TPU strap. It sports a bright 1.1-inch AMOLED touch display with a fingerprint-resistant coating, and provides a stable connection via Bluetooth 5.0 to pair with the comprehensive Zepp companion app. Health monitoring features include continuous heart rate tracking, sleep and menstrual cycle tracking, the PAI health assessment system, and a built-in SpO2 sensor for blood oxygen measurement. Fitness enthusiasts can track multiple sports like running, cycling, swimming, and jump rope, backed by a 5 ATM waterproof rating. Additionally, it offers smartphone notifications, weather forecasts, and smart home integration via built-in Amazon Alexa.

notebookcheck.nl

05/05/2021

Summary of the review

Review of the Huami Amazfit Band 5 fitness tracker", "Huami Amazfit Band 5 fitness tracker review

Overview and Key Features The Amazfit Band 5 serves as an upgraded alternative to the Xiaomi Mi Smart Band 5, maintaining a nearly identical design and hardware profile but distinguishing itself by adding a blood oxygen (SpO2) saturation sensor and integration with Amazon Alexa. Operating via the Zepp app on iOS and Android devices, the tracker features a 1.1-inch AMOLED display with slightly enlarged menu fonts, lacks standalone GPS, and provides a slightly longer 16mm wrist strap compared to Xiaomi's version. It tracks 11 distinct sports modes and provides standard smartwatch utilities, delivering roughly 10 days of real-world battery life under active monitoring settings despite a 15-day manufacturer rating. Pros and Cons Pros: High-utility feature additions including blood oxygen monitoring and functional Alexa voice commands via an integrated microphone. Excellent price-to-performance ratio, costing roughly the same as the Xiaomi Mi Band 5 while offering superior features. Highly reliable daily step counter and a physical band that is 16mm longer to comfortably fit broader wrists. Cons: Lacks integrated GPS, relying strictly on a connected smartphone to track movement routes. Notification system...

Third-party reviews

Based on 30,799 buyer reviews from online shops.

Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Amazfit Band 5

High affordability, offering significant value for the price
Lightweight and compact design that remains comfortable even during sleep
Vibrant 1.1-inch AMOLED color display with good viewing angles indoors
Built-in Amazon Alexa support for voice commands, alarms, and lists
Strong battery life lasting between 12 to 15 days on a single charge
Includes SpO2 (blood oxygen) monitoring, which is rare for its price bracket
5ATM water resistance, making it suitable for swimming and showering

What we don't like about Amazfit Band 5

Poor screen visibility when used outdoors in direct sunlight
Lack of an 'always-on' display option
Step and sleep tracking accuracy can be inconsistent or lower than high-end models
Heart rate monitoring may struggle to track rapid changes during high-intensity workouts
Small font sizes on submenus can make reading notifications difficult for some users
The companion Zepp app is sometimes described as cluttered or confusing
Proprietary magnetic charging cable is easy to misplace and difficult to replace

Verdict

The Amazfit Band 5 is a lightweight 24g fitness tracker featuring a 1.1-inch color AMOLED display (126x294 resolution) and a 125mAh battery that offers up to 15 days of life. Key characteristics include 5 ATM water resistance, built-in Amazon Alexa support, and comprehensive health monitoring through a BioTracker 2 PPG sensor for 24/7 heart rate and SpO2 blood oxygen measurement. Its main pros are the affordable price point, accurate sleep and stress tracking with PAI health assessment, and 11 distinct sports modes. However, notable cons include the lack of built-in GPS, difficulty reading small text on the narrow screen, and poor display visibility in direct sunlight even at maximum brightness.

Best alternatives

Xiaomi Smart Band 9

Fitness trackers

Xiaomi Smart Band 8

Fitness trackers

Samsung Galaxy FIT3

Fitness trackers

Fitness trackers

Xiaomi Smart Band 7

Fitness trackers

Xiaomi Smart Band 7 Pro

Fitness trackers

Fitness trackers

Xiaomi Redmi Smart Band Pro

Fitness trackers

Xiaomi Mi Smart Band 6

Fitness trackers

Xiaomi Mi Band 5

Fitness trackers

Xiaomi Mi Band 4

Fitness trackers

Samsung Galaxy Fit

Fitness trackers

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare Amazfit Band 5 with other products in the Fitness trackers category

Graphic comparison of Amazfit Band 5 and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found