OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Drawing tablets Methodology v1.0
Drawing tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Drawing tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Drawing tablets Methodology v1.0

GAOMON PD1610 Review | 66 Data compared

Avg. price:~£440Type:pen displayActive drawing area:74318 mm²Resolution:2560x1600Pen pressure levels:8192Report rate:220 RPS

GAOMON PD1610 Review: Compare 66 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Drawing tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

7.6

Overall score

Score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the drawing tablet's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best drawing tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 79% of models
Score components

90%

7.6

Technical score

10%

7.6

User score

â–²Better than 79% of drawing-tablets
7.6

Technical score

Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Drawing tablets category across these key areas: Form Factor, Display & Color, Pen & Input, Connectivity, Controls & Extras.
When it matters
When you want to compare drawing tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 79% of models
Score components

50%

8.1

Pen & Input

40%

7.0

Display & Color

4%

7.7

Form Factor

3%

7.5

Connectivity

3%

6.8

Controls & Extras

â–²Better than 79% of drawing-tablets
7.6

User score

User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the drawing tablet.
When it matters
When you want to know how a drawing tablet performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

2.0

Number of reviews

Based on 4 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 88% of drawing-tablets
  • gaomon-pd1610
  • gaomon-pd1610
  • gaomon-pd1610
  • gaomon-pd1610
gaomon-pd1610
gaomon-pd1610
gaomon-pd1610
gaomon-pd1610

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of drawing tablet GAOMON PD1610

Technical score
Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Drawing tablets category across these key areas: Form Factor, Display & Color, Pen & Input, Connectivity, Controls & Extras.
When it matters
When you want to compare drawing tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 79% of models
Score components:

50%

8.1

Pen & Input

40%

7.0

Display & Color

4%

7.7

Form Factor

3%

7.5

Connectivity

3%

6.8

Controls & Extras

7.6
User score
User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the drawing tablet.
When it matters
When you want to know how a drawing tablet performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

2.0

Number of reviews

Based on 4 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.6
Popularity
Popularity
2.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the drawing tablet.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Popularity:
GAOMON PD1610 has a popularity score of 2 points, which is lower than 62.9% of drawing tablets.
2.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the drawing tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a drawing tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Score components:

60%

7.6

Overall score

40%

8.2

Price

7.8
Type
pen display
Display
yes
Display
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This drawing tablet has a display. This feature is present on 47.9% of drawing tablets.
2.5K display.
Compatibility
Windows / macOS / Linux / ChromeOS / Android
Wireless capability
no
Wireless capability
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This drawing tablet does not support wireless use. 18.6% of drawing tablets support wireless use.
Weight
1,500 g
Weight
1,500 g
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <250 g – >5.5k g
This drawing tablet weighs 1,500 g, heavier than 74.5% of drawing tablets and equal to 0.5% of drawing tablets.
Tablet only; separate stand excluded.
Show more
Active drawing area
74,318 mm²
Active drawing area
74,318 mm²
â–² Better than 80% of models
Market range: <15.5k mm² – >127.8k mm²
This drawing tablet offers an active drawing area of 74,318 mm², larger than that of 79.9% of drawing tablets.
344.83 x 215.52 mm.
Screen size
16 inch
Screen size
16 inch
â–² Better than 60% of models
Market range: <11.6 inch – >23.8 inch
This drawing tablet has a screen size of 16 inch, larger than that of 60.2% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 2.2% of drawing tablets.
Resolution
2560x1600
Resolution
2560x1600
â–² Better than 88% of models
This drawing tablet has a display resolution of 2560x1600, higher than that of 87.6% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 1.6% of drawing tablets.
Pixel density
189 ppi
Pixel density
189 ppi
â–² Better than 71% of models
Market range: <102 ppi – >239 ppi
This drawing tablet has a pixel density of 189 ppi, higher than that of 71% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 2.2% of drawing tablets.
Typical brightness
220 nits
Typical brightness
220 nits
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Market range: <220 nits – >310 nits
This drawing tablet has a typical brightness of 220 nits, lower than that of 57.1% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 34.1% of drawing tablets.
Show more
Stylus included
yes
Stylus included
yes
Category Benchmark
This drawing tablet comes with a stylus. This feature is present on 100% of drawing tablets.
Pen technology
EMR (battery-free)
Pen technology
EMR (battery-free)
â–² Better than 5% of models
This drawing tablet uses EMR (battery-free) pen technology, more advanced than that of 4.6% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 95.4% of drawing tablets.
Pen pressure levels
8,192
Pen pressure levels
8,192
â–¼ Worse than 15% of models
Market range: <8.2k – >16.4k
This drawing tablet supports 8,192 pen pressure levels, more than 9.3% of drawing tablets and equal to 75.8% of drawing tablets.
Pen resolution
5,080 LPI
Pen resolution
5,080 LPI
â–² Better than 6% of models
Market range: <5.1k LPI – >5.1k LPI
This drawing tablet supports a pen resolution of 5,080 LPI, higher than that of 5.7% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 94.3% of drawing tablets.
Report rate
220 RPS
Report rate
220 RPS
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
Market range: <200 RPS – >290 RPS
This drawing tablet has a report rate of 220 RPS, lower than that of 56% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 20.9% of drawing tablets.
Show more
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 13% of models
This drawing tablet does not support Bluetooth. 13.1% of drawing tablets support Bluetooth.
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C) ports
?
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C) ports
2
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C) ports
2
★ Better than 90% of models
Market range: <0 – >2
This drawing tablet has 2 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C) ports, more than 90.2% of drawing tablets and equal to 9.8% of drawing tablets.
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A) ports
0
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A) ports
0
â–¼ Worse than 1% of models
Market range: <0 – >0
This drawing tablet has 0 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A) ports, fewer than 1.1% of drawing tablets and equal to 99% of drawing tablets.
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A) ports
0
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A) ports
0
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
Market range: <0 – >0
This drawing tablet has 0 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A) ports, fewer than 1.6% of drawing tablets and equal to 98.4% of drawing tablets.
Show more
N. of express keys
8
N. of express keys
8
â–² Better than 58% of models
Market range: <0 – >10
This drawing tablet has 8 express keys, more than 58.4% of drawing tablets and equal to 26.3% of drawing tablets.
N. of dials
0
N. of dials
0
â–¼ Worse than 22% of models
Market range: <0 – >1
This drawing tablet has 0 dials, fewer than 21.6% of drawing tablets and equal to 78.4% of drawing tablets.
Stand included
yes
Stand included
yes
â–² Better than 71% of models
This drawing tablet comes with a stand. This feature is present on 29.5% of drawing tablets.
Fold-out legs
no
Fold-out legs
no
â–¼ Worse than 7% of models
This drawing tablet does not have fold-out legs. 7.3% of drawing tablets have fold-out legs.
Pen stand included
yes
Pen stand included
yes
â–² Better than 41% of models
This drawing tablet comes with a pen stand. This feature is present on 58.9% of drawing tablets.
Show more

GAOMON PD1610 vs the average drawing tablet

246810TotalForm FactorDisplay & ColorPen & InputConnectivityControls & Extras
  • 2 bit higher color depth
    Bit depth
    10 bit
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <8 bit – >10 bit
    This drawing tablet has a higher color depth than the average drawing tablet (10 bit vs 8 bit). The average drawing tablet has a color depth of 8 bit.
    10-bit via 8-bit + FRC.
    10 bit vs 8 bit
  • Fully laminated display
    Full lamination
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This drawing tablet has full lamination, while the average drawing tablet does not. 39% of drawing tablets have full lamination.
  • 33,554 mm² larger work area
    Active drawing area
    74,318 mm²
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <15.5k mm² – >127.8k mm²
    This drawing tablet has a larger active drawing area than the average drawing tablet (74318 mm² vs 40764 mm²). The average drawing tablet offers an active drawing area of 40764 mm².
    344.83 x 215.52 mm.
    74,318 mm² vs 40,764 mm²
  • Anti-reflection coating
    Anti-reflection coating
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This drawing tablet has an anti-reflection coating, while the average drawing tablet does not. 47.7% of drawing tablets have an anti-reflection coating.
    Etched anti-glare glass.
  • Integrated display
    Display
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This drawing tablet has a display, while the average drawing tablet does not. 48.2% of drawing tablets have a display.
    2.5K display.
  • 13.9% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    189 ppi
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    Market range: <102 ppi – >239 ppi
    This drawing tablet has a higher pixel density than the average drawing tablet (189 ppi vs 166 ppi). The average drawing tablet has a pixel density of 166 ppi.
    189 ppi vs 166 ppi
  • 1 more HDMI ports
    HDMI ports
    1
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <0 – >1
    This drawing tablet has more HDMI ports than the average drawing tablet (1 vs 0). The average drawing tablet has 0 HDMI ports.
    1 vs 0
  • Stand included
    Stand included
    yes
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    This drawing tablet comes with a stand, while the average drawing tablet does not. 29.8% of drawing tablets come with a stand.
  • Integrated display
    Display
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This drawing tablet has a display, while the average drawing tablet does not. 48.2% of drawing tablets have a display.
    2.5K display.
  • 2 bit higher color depth
    Bit depth
    10 bit
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <8 bit – >10 bit
    This drawing tablet has a higher color depth than the average drawing tablet (10 bit vs 8 bit). The average drawing tablet has a color depth of 8 bit.
    10-bit via 8-bit + FRC.
    10 bit vs 8 bit
  • Fully laminated display
    Full lamination
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This drawing tablet has full lamination, while the average drawing tablet does not. 39% of drawing tablets have full lamination.
  • 33,554 mm² larger work area
    Active drawing area
    74,318 mm²
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <15.5k mm² – >127.8k mm²
    This drawing tablet has a larger active drawing area than the average drawing tablet (74318 mm² vs 40764 mm²). The average drawing tablet offers an active drawing area of 40764 mm².
    344.83 x 215.52 mm.
    74,318 mm² vs 40,764 mm²
  • Anti-reflection coating
    Anti-reflection coating
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This drawing tablet has an anti-reflection coating, while the average drawing tablet does not. 47.7% of drawing tablets have an anti-reflection coating.
    Etched anti-glare glass.
  • 13.9% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    189 ppi
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    Market range: <102 ppi – >239 ppi
    This drawing tablet has a higher pixel density than the average drawing tablet (189 ppi vs 166 ppi). The average drawing tablet has a pixel density of 166 ppi.
    189 ppi vs 166 ppi
  • 0.4 inch larger display
    Screen size
    16 inch
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    Market range: <11.6 inch – >23.8 inch
    This drawing tablet has a larger screen than the average drawing tablet (16 inch vs 15.6 inch). The average drawing tablet has a screen size of 15.6 inch.
    16 inch vs 15.6 inch
  • 1 more HDMI ports
    HDMI ports
    1
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <0 – >1
    This drawing tablet has more HDMI ports than the average drawing tablet (1 vs 0). The average drawing tablet has 0 HDMI ports.
    1 vs 0
  • Includes 3.5 mm jack
    3.5 mm audio jack
    yes
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    This drawing tablet includes a 3.5 mm audio jack, while the average drawing tablet does not. 11.5% of drawing tablets include a 3.5 mm audio jack.
  • 1 more USB-C 3.2 Gen 1 ports
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C) ports
    2
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <0 – >2
    This drawing tablet has more USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C) ports than the average drawing tablet (2 vs 1). The average drawing tablet has 1 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C) ports.
    2 vs 1
  • Stand included
    Stand included
    yes
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    This drawing tablet comes with a stand, while the average drawing tablet does not. 29.8% of drawing tablets come with a stand.
  • 2 more express keys
    N. of express keys
    8
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    Market range: <0 – >10
    This drawing tablet has more express keys than the average drawing tablet (8 vs 6). The average drawing tablet has 6 express keys.
    8 vs 6
  • 2 fewer nibs included
    N. of nibs included
    8
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <6 – >20
    This drawing tablet includes fewer replacement nibs than the average drawing tablet (8 vs 10). The average drawing tablet includes 10 replacement nibs.
    8 vs 10
  • 12 ms slower response
    Response time
    26 ms
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <8 ms – >25 ms
    This drawing tablet has a slower response time than the average drawing tablet (26 ms vs 14 ms). The average drawing tablet has a response time of 14 ms.
    26 ms vs 14 ms
  • 30 nits dimmer display
    Typical brightness
    220 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <220 nits – >310 nits
    This drawing tablet has lower typical brightness than the average drawing tablet (220 nits vs 250 nits). The average drawing tablet has a typical brightness of 250 nits.
    220 nits vs 250 nits
  • 6 % narrower Adobe RGB coverage
    Adobe RGB coverage
    86 %
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <72 % – >99 %
    This drawing tablet covers less Adobe RGB than the average drawing tablet (86 % vs 92 %). The average drawing tablet covers 92 % of Adobe RGB.
    86 % vs 92 %
  • 4 % narrower DCI-P3 coverage
    DCI-P3 coverage
    90 %
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <88 % – >99 %
    This drawing tablet covers less DCI-P3 than the average drawing tablet (90 % vs 94 %). The average drawing tablet covers 94 % of DCI-P3.
    90 % vs 94 %
  • 5.6% lower report rate
    Report rate
    220 RPS
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    Market range: <200 RPS – >290 RPS
    This drawing tablet has a lower report rate than the average drawing tablet (220 RPS vs 233 RPS). The average drawing tablet has a report rate of 233 RPS.
    220 RPS vs 233 RPS
  • 6.1% heavier pen
    Pen weight
    14 g
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    Market range: <10 g – >16 g
    This drawing tablet includes a heavier pen than the average drawing tablet (14 g vs 13.2 g). The average drawing tablet pen weighs 13.2 g.
    14 g vs 13.2 g
  • 2.03x heavier design
    Weight
    1,500 g
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <250 g – >5.5k g
    This drawing tablet is heavier than the average drawing tablet (1500 g vs 740 g). The average drawing tablet weighs 740 g.
    Tablet only; separate stand excluded.
    1,500 g vs 740 g
  • 2.75x more expensive
    GAOMON PD1610 is more expensive than the average drawing tablet (£440 vs £160).
    £440 vs £160
  • 5.1% lower user score
    User score
    7.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the drawing tablet.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a drawing tablet performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    GAOMON PD1610
    the average drawing tablet
    GAOMON PD1610 has a lower user score than the average drawing tablet (7.62 vs 8.000).
    7.62 vs 8
  • 2.03x heavier design
    Weight
    1,500 g
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <250 g – >5.5k g
    This drawing tablet is heavier than the average drawing tablet (1500 g vs 740 g). The average drawing tablet weighs 740 g.
    Tablet only; separate stand excluded.
    1,500 g vs 740 g
  • 73 mm bulkier body
    Width
    429.8 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <211 mm – >567 mm
    This drawing tablet is wider than the average drawing tablet (429.8 mm vs 356.8 mm). The average drawing tablet is 356.8 mm wide.
    429.8 mm vs 356.8 mm
  • 46.8 mm taller body
    Height
    269.8 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <139.2 mm – >359 mm
    This drawing tablet is taller than the average drawing tablet (269.8 mm vs 223 mm). The average drawing tablet is 223 mm tall.
    269.8 mm vs 223 mm
  • 12 ms slower response
    Response time
    26 ms
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <8 ms – >25 ms
    This drawing tablet has a slower response time than the average drawing tablet (26 ms vs 14 ms). The average drawing tablet has a response time of 14 ms.
    26 ms vs 14 ms
  • 30 nits dimmer display
    Typical brightness
    220 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <220 nits – >310 nits
    This drawing tablet has lower typical brightness than the average drawing tablet (220 nits vs 250 nits). The average drawing tablet has a typical brightness of 250 nits.
    220 nits vs 250 nits
  • 6 % narrower Adobe RGB coverage
    Adobe RGB coverage
    86 %
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <72 % – >99 %
    This drawing tablet covers less Adobe RGB than the average drawing tablet (86 % vs 92 %). The average drawing tablet covers 92 % of Adobe RGB.
    86 % vs 92 %
  • 4 % narrower DCI-P3 coverage
    DCI-P3 coverage
    90 %
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <88 % – >99 %
    This drawing tablet covers less DCI-P3 than the average drawing tablet (90 % vs 94 %). The average drawing tablet covers 94 % of DCI-P3.
    90 % vs 94 %
  • 2 fewer nibs included
    N. of nibs included
    8
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <6 – >20
    This drawing tablet includes fewer replacement nibs than the average drawing tablet (8 vs 10). The average drawing tablet includes 10 replacement nibs.
    8 vs 10
  • 5.6% lower report rate
    Report rate
    220 RPS
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    Market range: <200 RPS – >290 RPS
    This drawing tablet has a lower report rate than the average drawing tablet (220 RPS vs 233 RPS). The average drawing tablet has a report rate of 233 RPS.
    220 RPS vs 233 RPS
  • 6.1% heavier pen
    Pen weight
    14 g
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    Market range: <10 g – >16 g
    This drawing tablet includes a heavier pen than the average drawing tablet (14 g vs 13.2 g). The average drawing tablet pen weighs 13.2 g.
    14 g vs 13.2 g
  • 0.5 m shorter cable
    Cable length
    1 m
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <1.5 m – >1.8 m
    This drawing tablet has a shorter cable than the average drawing tablet (1 m vs 1.5 m). The average drawing tablet has a cable length of 1.5 m.
    1 m vs 1.5 m

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
the-gadgeteer.com
25/04/2024
Summary of the review
Gaomon PD1610Go to product viewer dialogue for this item. Pen Display review – an excellent 16 in. drawing display
T
the-gadgeteer.com
25/04/2024
Summary of the review
Gaomon PD1610 Pen Display review – an excellent 16-inch drawing display
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 4 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about GAOMON PD1610

  • High-resolution 2.5K QHD display provides excellent clarity and sharp image quality.
  • The 16:10 aspect ratio offers more vertical screen space compared to standard 16:9 displays.
  • Fully laminated screen minimizes parallax, making the pen-to-screen contact feel more direct.
  • Matte anti-glare glass provides a natural 'paper-like' texture for drawing.
  • Battery-free pen (AP51) supports 8192 levels of pressure sensitivity and 60-degree tilt.
  • Single-cable connection via USB-C simplifies setup on compatible computers.
  • Build quality is solid with an aluminum alloy back and sleek, touch-sensitive express keys.
  • Highly competitive pricing for the features provided compared to larger brands.

What we don't like about GAOMON PD1610

  • Mac users may experience UI scaling issues, leading to fuzzy icons or text at native resolution.
  • Brightness levels are considered dim by some users, making it harder to use in very bright rooms.
  • The display sometimes fails to remember custom brightness settings after being turned off.
  • Touch-sensitive express keys can be accidentally activated due to a lack of tactile feedback.
  • The included stand is limited to a few fixed angles and cannot prop the display very high.
  • Slight diagonal line jitter may be present when drawing very slowly.

Verdict

The Gaomon PD1610 is a 16-inch pen display featuring a 2.5K QHD+ resolution (2560 x 1600) with a unique 16:10 aspect ratio that provides 11% more vertical workspace than standard 16:9 screens. It boasts a fully laminated, anti-glare etched glass surface with a 120% sRGB color gamut and 1.07 billion colors, paired with the battery-free AP51 stylus offering 8,192 levels of pressure sensitivity and ±60° tilt support. Key advantages include its high pixel density (188 PPI), eight customizable touch-sensitive express keys, and versatile connectivity via dual USB-C ports and mini HDMI. However, notable drawbacks include potential UI scaling and fuzziness issues on macOS, touch keys that are prone to accidental activation due to a lack of tactile feedback, and relatively low peak brightness at approximately 220 nits.

Compare GAOMON PD1610 with other products in the Drawing tablets category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of GAOMON PD1610 and other products in the Drawing tablets category

No results found