Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Sony SLT-A35 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£130Sensor size:APS-CWeight:415 gBattery life (CIPA):440 shots

Sony SLT-A35 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

5.9

Overall score

Score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.9

Technical score

10%

?

User score

▲Better than 69% of cameras
5.9

Technical score

Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

6.4

Sensor & Image

25%

6.4

Photo Features

18%

5.3

Video & Audio

14%

6.2

Display & Design

8%

6.1

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

▲Better than 70% of cameras
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £130
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Sony SLT-A35

Technical score
Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

6.4

Sensor & Image

25%

6.4

Photo Features

18%

5.3

Video & Audio

14%

6.2

Display & Design

8%

6.1

Battery & Power

7%

2.6

Connectivity & Storage

5.9
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Sony SLT-A35 has a popularity score of 1, which is lower than 51.3% of cameras.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.9

Overall score

40%

9.8

Price

7.1
Sensor size
APS-C
Sensor size
APS-C
This camera uses a sensor classified as APS-C; it is larger than the sensor in 57.4% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 25.7% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
16.2 MP
Main camera megapixels
16.2 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP, which is higher than that of 46.8% of cameras and equal to that of 4.2% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
4.76 µm
Main camera pixel size
4.76 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 4.76 µm, which are larger than those in 76.9% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 12800 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 12,800
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 12,800, which is higher than that of 54.4% of cameras and equal to that of 18.8% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Sony A
Built-in focus motor
yes
Built-in focus motor
yes
This camera has a built-in focus motor. 10.9% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
15
N. of focus points
15
This camera has 15 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 57.5% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 2.8% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.3% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
17 Mbps
Video bitrate
17 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 17 Mbps which is lower than that of 77.1% of cameras and equal to that of 3.6% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
slt
Weight
415 g
Weight
415 g
This camera weighs 415 g which is heavier than 52.8% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.1% of cameras.
Width
124.4 mm
Width
124.4 mm
This camera has a width of 124.4 mm which is wider than 61.1% of cameras and equal to that of 0.3% of cameras.
Height
92 mm
Height
92 mm
This camera has a height of 92 mm which is taller than 69.5% of cameras and equal to that of 0.4% of cameras.
Thickness
84.7 mm
Thickness
84.7 mm
This camera has a thickness of 84.7 mm which is thicker than 84.4% of cameras and equal to that of 0.4% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
440 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
440 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 440 shots, which is longer than that of 73.9% of cameras and equal to that of 2.1% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,080 mAh
Battery capacity
1,080 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,080 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 52.9% of cameras and equal to those in 1.9% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Sony SLT-A35 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    electronic
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (electronic vs none).
    electronic vs none
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Sensor-shift dust reduction.
  • 1.42 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.76 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.8 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.76 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Phase-detect AF in video
    Phase-detection autofocus (video)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus in video, the average camera does not.
  • Supports live streaming
    Live streaming (first-party)
    yes
    This camera supports live streaming, the average camera does not.
    Imaging Edge Webcam.
  • 13.8% better value for money
    Sony SLT-A35 has a better value-for-money score than the average camera (7.05 vs 6.2).
    7.05 vs 6.2
  • 2.23x cheaper
    Sony SLT-A35 is cheaper than the average camera (£130 vs £290).
    £130 vs £290
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    electronic
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (electronic vs none).
    electronic vs none
  • 0.32 x more viewfinder magnification
    Viewfinder magnification
    1.1 x
    This camera has a higher viewfinder magnification than the average camera (1.1 x vs 0.78 x). The average camera has a viewfinder magnification of 0.78 x.
    1.1 x vs 0.78 x
  • 1 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    1
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (1 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • Sensor cleaning system
    Sensor cleaning system
    yes
    This camera includes a sensor cleaning system, the average camera does not.
    Sensor-shift dust reduction.
  • 1.42 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.76 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.8 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.76 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 6,400 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    12,800 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (12800 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    12,800 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 0.3 points higher DxOMark Landscape score
    DxOMark landscape score
    12.7 points
    This camera has a higher DxOMark landscape score than the average camera (12.7 points vs 12.4 points). The average camera scores 12.4 points.
    12.7 points vs 12.4 points
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • Built-in AF motor
    Built-in focus motor
    yes
    This camera has a built-in focus motor, the average camera does not.
  • In-camera panorama mode
    In-camera panorama mode
    yes
    This camera includes an in-camera panorama mode, the average camera does not.
    Sweep Panorama
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
  • Phase-detect AF in video
    Phase-detection autofocus (video)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus in video, the average camera does not.
  • Supports live streaming
    Live streaming (first-party)
    yes
    This camera supports live streaming, the average camera does not.
    Imaging Edge Webcam.
  • 110 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    440 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (440 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    440 shots vs 330 shots
  • More versatile card slots
    Memory card slot types
    Memory Stick Duo + SD
    This camera uses more versatile card slots than the average camera (Memory Stick Duo + SD vs SD). The average camera supports SD memory card slot types.
    Memory Stick Duo + SD vs SD
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -1
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-1 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -1 vs -4
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • 920000 dots lower EVF resolution
    EVF resolution
    1,440,000 dots
    This camera has a lower EVF resolution than the average camera (1440000 dots vs 2360000 dots). The average camera has an EVF resolution of 2360000 dots.
    1440000 dots vs 2360000 dots
  • 13 Mbps lower video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    17 Mbps
    This camera has a lower video bitrate than the average camera (17 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    17 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • 38.7 mm thicker
    Thickness
    84.7 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (84.7 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    84.7 mm vs 46 mm
  • 2 older
    Release date
    2011
    This camera is older than the average camera (2011 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    August 2011
    2,011 vs 2,013
  • 93% less popular
    Sony SLT-A35 is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • Older HDMI version
    HDMI version
    1.3
    This camera uses HDMI 1.3, while the average camera uses HDMI 1.4.
    1.3 vs 1.4
  • 93% less popular
    Sony SLT-A35 is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 920000 dots lower EVF resolution
    EVF resolution
    1,440,000 dots
    This camera has a lower EVF resolution than the average camera (1440000 dots vs 2360000 dots). The average camera has an EVF resolution of 2360000 dots.
    1440000 dots vs 2360000 dots
  • 38.7 mm thicker
    Thickness
    84.7 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (84.7 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    84.7 mm vs 46 mm
  • 18.1 mm taller body
    Height
    92 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (92 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    92 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 4.5 mm wider
    Width
    124.4 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (124.4 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    124.4 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • 2 older
    Release date
    2011
    This camera is older than the average camera (2011 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    August 2011
    2,011 vs 2,013
  • 80 points lower DxOMark Sports score
    DxOMark sports score
    763 points
    This camera has a lower DxOMark sports score than the average camera (763 points vs 843 points). The average camera has a DxOMark sports score of 843 points.
    763 points vs 843 points
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -1
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-1 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -1 vs -4
  • 8 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    15
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (15 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    15 vs 23
  • 13 Mbps lower video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    17 Mbps
    This camera has a lower video bitrate than the average camera (17 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    17 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • Older HDMI version
    HDMI version
    1.3
    This camera uses HDMI 1.3, while the average camera uses HDMI 1.4.
    1.3 vs 1.4

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
20/09/2011
Summary of the review
E
ephotozine.com
05/10/2011
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
19/08/2011
Summary of the review
D
dpreview.com
08/06/2011
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
16/08/2011
Summary of the review
P
pocket-lint.com
16/04/2013
Summary of the review
W
whatdigitalcamera.com
13/09/2011
Summary of the review
S
sonyalphalab.com
22/09/2011
Summary of the review
D
digital-photography-school.com
25/09/2011
Summary of the review
T
theregister.com
07/11/2011
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
11/09/2011
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
10/09/2011
Summary of the review
C
connect-living.de
05/09/2011
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
05/08/2011
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
15/06/2011
Summary of the review
C
community.sony.de
15/06/2011
Summary of the review
F
focus.de
03/08/2012
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
16/06/2011
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
20/09/2011
Summary of the review
D
dday.it
07/06/2011
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Sony SLT-A35

  • Compact and lightweight, making it easy to carry around
  • Excellent image quality with low noise and great colour reproduction
  • Ultra-fast and responsive autofocus system
  • High-quality Full HD video recording with continuous focus
  • Good compatibility with the wide range of Sony Alpha A-mount lenses
  • High-resolution LCD panel with 100% frame coverage Electronic Viewfinder (EVF)

What we don't like about Sony SLT-A35

  • Fixed, non-tilting LCD screen limits low/high angle shooting
  • The Electronic Viewfinder (EVF) can look flat or noisy in certain conditions
  • Some softness at the extreme corners of the image, especially with the kit lens
  • Continuous burst shooting speeds are modest compared to other models in the lineup

Verdict

The Sony SLT-A35 is an entry-level interchangeable lens camera featuring a unique fixed translucent mirror design and a 16.2-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor. Key specifications include a 15-point phase-detection autofocus system, 1080i HD video recording at 17Mbps, and a native ISO range of 100-12800. Its primary advantages are the fast full-time autofocus during both stills and video, a compact and lightweight 415g body, and a high continuous shooting speed of 5.5 fps (or 7 fps in a cropped tele-zoom mode). However, notable drawbacks include a non-articulating 3-inch LCD screen, an electronic viewfinder that can suffer from motion lag and lower contrast compared to optical versions, and relatively short battery life rated at approximately 440 shots.

Compare Sony SLT-A35 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Sony SLT-A35 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found